Author

admin

Browsing

Mark Skousen of Forecasts & Strategies shares his outlook for gold, silver and the US economy.

‘We’ve entered an era of what I call permanent inflation,’ he explained.

‘After World War II, inflation became permanent — higher and higher prices every year. The inflation rate may ebb and accelerate, but it’s always positive year after year.’

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Questcorp Mining Inc. (CSE: QQQ,OTC:QQCMF) (OTCQB: QQCMF) (FSE: D910) (the ‘Company’ or ‘Questcorp’) is pleased to announce that Sorbie Bornholm LP (‘Sorbie’), a UK Investment Fund, has undertaken an initial investment in Questcorp Mining Inc. (CSE: QQQ,OTC:QQCMF) (OTCQB: QQCMF) (FSE: D910) (‘Questcorp’ or the ‘Company’). The gross amount of the investment is CAD$2,000,000. The funds will go toward advancing Questcorp’s ongoing exploration and development programs at its flagship La Union Gold and Silver Project in Sonora, Mexico, and its North Island Copper Property on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, and for general working capital purposes.

Reflecting on the new partnership, President & CEO, Saf Dhillon, commented:

‘We are incredibly pleased to have secured this strategic investment from Sorbie Bornholm, a respected international institutional investor. This financing provides us with the flexibility to accelerate exploration across our key assets in Mexico and British Columbia. We view Sorbie’s participation as a strong vote of confidence in Questcorp’s team, vision, and long-term potential to deliver value through discovery and development.’

Whitney Kofford, Managing Director of Sorbie Bornholm LP, added:

‘We are delighted to welcome Questcorp Mining Inc. as a new partner and portfolio company. Our decision to invest reflects our enormous confidence in Questcorp’s leadership. And in turn, by entering into a Sharing Agreement, Questcorp’s leadership signals strong conviction in their ability to execute and grow value for all stakeholders. Sorbie’s Sharing Agreement is designed to align interests towards growth and provide companies with consistent capital that rewards operational success and share price appreciation. We trust Questcorp will use the capital support to systematically unlock long-term value for all shareholders, and we look forward to sharing in their great upside potential.’

About Sorbie Bornholm

Sorbie Bornholm LP is a global investment firm that provides funding for ongoing business objectives to listed micro, small and mid-cap growth companies. We focus on public equity investments in companies that are looking to expand and on management teams with a clear growth strategy. Our extensive experience allows us to invest in most industries in order to provide supportive, longer-term capital that rewards company growth.

Since 2000, Sorbie Bornholm LP founder Greg Kofford has perfected the ‘Sorbie-Strategy’, utilizing a sharing agreement that supports management and rewards growth. This unique approach has now been used in over 50 investments – with many of those resulting in the companies receiving more cash than the original offering proceeds – without having to issue any additional shares.

Sorbie Bornholm’s core values drive who we are and how we invest. We are committed to developing long-term relationships with select listed public companies and their brokers & advisers. We focus on providing supportive, longer-term capital that rewards growth. We invest to make a difference, to become a valued partner and to be a shareholder of choice. It’s important to us that we succeed together.

To see if the Sorbie-Strategy is right for your company, please contact Sorbie Bornholm:

Whitney Kofford, Managing Director
+1-801-554-5889
whitney@sorbiebornholm.com https://sorbiebornholm.co.uk/

About Questcorp Mining Inc.

Questcorp Mining Inc. is engaged in the business of the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in North America, with the objective of locating and developing economic precious and base metals properties of merit. The Company holds an option to acquire an undivided 100% interest in and to mineral claims totaling 1,168.09 hectares comprising the North Island Copper Property, on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, subject to a royalty obligation. The Company also holds an option to acquire an undivided 100% interest in and to mineral claims totaling 2,520.2 hectares comprising the La Union Project located in Sonora, Mexico, subject to a royalty obligation.

Contact Information

Questcorp Mining Corp.

Saf Dhillon, President & CEO

Email: saf@questcorpmining.ca
Telephone: (604) 484-3031

This news release includes certain ‘forward-looking statements’ under applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the intended use of proceeds from the Offering. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: the ability of Riverside to secure geophysical contractors to undertake orientation surveys and follow up detailed survey to confirm and enhance the drill targets as contemplated or at all, general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties, uncertain capital markets; and delay or failure to receive board or regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that the geophysical surveys will be completed as contemplated or at all and that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/273793

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

  • Disney CEO Bob Iger appeared on the ‘ManningCast’ during a ‘Monday Night Football’ game.
  • Iger was not directly asked about the ongoing ESPN and ABC blackout on YouTube TV.
  • The carriage dispute between Disney and YouTube TV has now lasted for two football weekends.

For those who thought Disney CEO Bob Iger’s ‘ManningCast’ appearance during the ‘Monday Night Football’ contest between the Green Bay Packers and Philadelphia Eagles would be a chance for the boss to make a public statement about the ESPN (and overall Disney) blackout on YouTube TV amid a corporate dispute, they were wrong.

An avowed Packers supporter, Iger – who was in attendance at the game in Wisconsin – was not explicitly asked by either of the Manning brothers about the carriage dispute that has now lasted two full football weekends and deprived YouTube TV subscribers from watching all sports that air on ESPN or ABC. He arrived for the final play of the first quarter and was gone with 12:30 until halftime.

Eli Manning did welcome Iger to the show with a question about watching sports on TV and said ‘so how we doing?’ But Iger didn’t take the half-baked bait. The rest of the conversation focused on how Iger fell in love with the Packers as a boy and some discussion of the controversial ‘tush push’ play.

YouTube, owned by Google, claims Disney, the parent company of ESPN, is charging too much in its licensing agreement with the cord-cutting service. Their previous agreement ended Oct. 31 at midnight.

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter. Check out the latest edition: Best and worst of unpredictable Week 10.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The good news for fantasy football managers? Only two teams are on bye in Week 11. The bad news? One of them is the Indianapolis Colts.

The Colts have been one of the best offenses in the NFL this season, and Jonathan Taylor has been the clear-cut No. 1 fantasy running back. Without him and other contributors like Daniel Jones, Michael Pittman Jr., Tyler Warren and Alec Pierce, fantasy managers will face some difficult start ’em, sit ’em decisions.

This week, the crop of streamers to pick from is a little better. That’s because three of the NFL’s most porous defenses – the Cincinnati Bengals, Dallas Cowboys and Tennessee Titans – are all set to return from bye.

But will these streamers end up being better options than some of the higher-end fantasy assets in tough matchups? Those will be the decisions fantasy footballers grapple with as the push to the playoffs reaches its peak.

Who can you start and sit in fantasy football for Week 11 of the NFL season? USA TODAY Sports outlines eight players to start and eight to sit.

Fantasy football players to start in Week 11

Quarterbacks

  • Tua Tagovailoa, Miami Dolphins (vs. Washington Commanders)

The Commanders have allowed at least 250 passing yards and three passing touchdowns in each of their last four games. The team has also lost starting cornerbacks Marshon Lattimore (torn ACL) and Trey Amos (broken fibula) in back-to-back weeks and may struggle to contain Jaylen Waddle. Tagovailoa has accounted for multiple touchdowns in six of his last nine starts, so he has a solid floor and a high ceiling in this matchup.

  • Aaron Rodgers, Pittsburgh Steelers (vs. Cincinnati Bengals)

Is Rodgers going to throw four touchdowns against the Bengals again? Maybe not, but Cincinnati is one of five teams to have surrendered at least 20 passing touchdowns to quarterbacks this season. The Bengals also figure to be without Trey Hendrickson (hip) for this game, so they won’t be able to generate consistent pressure against Rodgers. That should allow the 41-year-old veteran to put together a solid performance, especially if the game turns into another shootout.

Running backs

  • Woody Marks, Houston Texans (at Tennessee Titans)

Marks has had an up-and-down rookie season, but he has averaged 73 scrimmage yards per game over his last two outings. He should have a chance to do some damage against a Titans defense that has allowed 12 rushing touchdowns to running backs this season – tied for the most in the NFL – and the second-most fantasy points per game (FPPG) to the position.

  • Sean Tucker, Tampa Bay Buccaneers (at Buffalo Bills)

Could Tucker end up taking on the lead role in Tampa Bay’s backfield? He was more efficient than Rachaad White against the Patriots, becoming the first running back to total more than 53 rushing yards against New England (he had 53 on nine carries). Bucky Irving still hasn’t practiced since suffering a shoulder injury in Week 4 against the Eagles, so that could line Tucker up for a solid workload against a Bills defense that has surrendered 12 rushing touchdowns to running backs this season.

Wide receivers

  • Marvin Harrison Jr., Arizona Cardinals (vs. San Francisco 49ers)

The Cardinals have made a concerted effort to get Harrison Jr. the ball coming out of their bye. Over the last two weeks, the second-year wide-out has averaged 11 targets per game and has posted 10 catches for 129 yards and two touchdowns. Now, he faces a 49ers team that has allowed 126 receptions to wide receivers this season, fifth-most in the NFL, making him a quality PPR threat.

  • Tyler Lockett, Las Vegas Raiders (vs. Dallas Cowboys)

Lockett has only been with the Raiders for a couple of weeks, but the Jakobi Meyers trade allowed him to step into a larger role. The 33-year-old veteran had a team-high six targets against the Broncos and turned them into five catches for 44 yards in a tough matchup. The Cowboys are considerably weaker, having allowed a league-high 16 touchdowns to receivers this season, so Lockett’s long-term chemistry with Geno Smith could make him a viable flex in this spot.

Tight end

  • Pat Freiermuth, Pittsburgh Steelers (vs. Cincinnati Bengals)

The Bengals have allowed far and away the most receiving touchdowns to tight ends this season at 12. No other team has allowed more than seven. Last time they played the Steelers, Freiermuth, Jonnu Smith and Darnell Washington all scored. All could be viable again, but Freiermuth has the highest ceiling of the bunch.

Defense/special teams

  • Los Angeles Chargers (at Jacksonville Jaguars)

The Chargers are coming off a strong defensive effort against the Steelers, limiting Pittsburgh to 10 total points and forcing Rodgers into two interceptions. The Jaguars are thin at receiver thanks to injuries to Brian Thomas Jr. and Travis Hunter, so they could have trouble moving the ball against Jesse Minter’s stingy defense.

Fantasy football players to sit in Week 11

Quarterbacks

  • Bo Nix, Denver Broncos (vs. Kansas City Chiefs)

The Chiefs are coming off a bye and are one of just six NFL teams to allow fewer than 10 passing touchdowns to opposing quarterbacks this season. Nix could still do some damage against a Kansas City defense that has allowed a league-high five rushing touchdowns to quarterbacks this season, but it’s hard to recommend trusting the second-year starter after his Week 10 struggles against a weaker Raiders defense.

  • Sam Darnold, Seattle Seahawks (vs. Los Angeles Rams)

The Rams have surrendered the eighth-fewest FPPG to quarterbacks this season. More importantly, the team ranks ninth in the NFL in pressures, per the NFL’s Next Gen Stats. Darnold’s passer rating drops from 128.6 when kept clean to 83.8 when under pressure, per Pro Football Focus, so this could end up being a tougher matchup for him.

Running backs

  • Tyrone Tracy Jr., New York Giants (vs. Green Bay Packers)

Tracy should continue to get a high volume of touches as he splits the Giants’ workload with Devin Singletary, but the Packers have been good against the run this season. Add in the possibility of Russell Wilson starting for an injured Jaxson Dart (concussion) and Tracy doesn’t seem likely to find many running lanes.

  • Kenneth Walker, Seattle Seahawks (vs. Los Angeles Rams)

Walker has not scored a touchdown since his team’s Week 3 game against the Saints. That doesn’t seem likely to change against a Rams team that has allowed a league-low one rushing touchdown to running backs this season.

Wide receivers

  • Xavier Worthy, Kansas City Chiefs (at Denver Broncos)

The Broncos have allowed the fewest FPPG to wide receivers this season. Rashee Rice can still be trusted against them, but Worthy – who has averaged just 3.7 catches and 37 receiving yards per game since Rice’s return with no touchdowns – is too risky to start.

  • Courtland Sutton, Denver Broncos (vs. Kansas City Chiefs)

It’s also going to be hard to trust the Broncos receivers against a Chiefs defense that has allowed a league-low 955 receiving yards to wide-outs this season. Sutton has cooled after a strong start to the season, averaging just three catches for 45 yards over his last five games with just one touchdown. Nix seems more comfortable throwing to his former college teammate Troy Franklin, so it may be time to fade Sutton.

Tight end

  • Cade Otton, Tampa Bay Buccaneers (at Buffalo Bills)

Otton has seen an uptick in production over his last five games, but he has a tough matchup against the Bills in Week 11. Buffalo has allowed the fewest receptions (23) and receiving yards (242) to tight ends this season, so Otton has a low floor in this matchup.

Defense/special teams

  • Seattle Seahawks (at Los Angeles Rams)

The Seahawks have been stellar defensively this season, but Matthew Stafford has thrown a whopping 13 touchdowns over his last three games. Maybe Seattle will put the MVP front-runner’s hot streak to an end, but there is potential for disappointment from the Seahawks stop unit this week.

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 2025-26 NBA season isn’t even a month in, but there has already been sharp movement in the league’s balance of power.

Several squads, such as the Detroit Pistons, are exceeding early expectations. Others, however, like the Los Angeles Clippers, are underwhelming and starting to show deep flaws that may signal an eventual crash out.

The constant has been the defending champion Oklahoma City Thunder, who did pick up their first defeat last week, but who nonetheless continue to march on to dominance, even without their second best player in Jalen Williams.

Here are USA TODAY Sports’ NBA power rankings after Week 3 of the 2025-26 regular season:

USA TODAY Sports NBA power rankings

Note: Records through Nov. 9. Parentheses show movement from last week’s rankings

NBA Week 3 rankings: Top 5

  • 1. Oklahoma City Thunder, 10-1 (—)
  • 2. Denver Nuggets, 7-2 (+4)
  • 3. Detroit Pistons, 8-2 (+8)
  • 4. San Antonio Spurs, 7-2 (-1)
  • 5. Cleveland Cavaliers, 7-3 (+2)

The Thunder finally dropped their first game, but Detroit has surged behind the play of Cade Cunningham (25.6 points and 9.8 assists per game) and Jalen Duren (19.4 points and 11.8 rebounds per game). Shooting is a concern for the Pistons, while the Spurs just got point guard De’Aaron Fox back and picked up a massive, 11-point win over the Rockets.

NBA Week 3 rankings: No. 6-10

  • 6. Los Angeles Lakers, 7-3 (-4)
  • 7. New York Knicks, 6-3 (+1)
  • 8. Houston Rockets, 6-3 (-4)
  • 9. Minnesota Timberwolves, 6-4 (+3)
  • 10. Milwaukee Bucks, 6-4 (+3)

JJ Redick has leveraged huge performances from role players like Jake LaRavia, Rui Hachimura and Deandre Ayton, and LeBron James’ return is nearing. The Timberwolves only have one victory against a team with a winning record (Trail Blazers), and Giannis Antetokounmpo is firmly in the MVP race and is keeping the Bucks afloat.

NBA Week 3 rankings: No. 11-15

  • 11. Chicago Bulls, 6-3 (-6)
  • 12. Golden State Warriors, 6-5 (-3)
  • 13. Miami Heat, 6-4 (+1)
  • 14. Philadelphia 76ers, 6-4 (-4)
  • 15. Portland Trail Blazers, 5-4 (+4)

The Sixers have lost four of their last six and have a third quarter problem, having been outscored nine times in the period through their first 10 games. The Bulls have lost three of their last four, and point guard Josh Giddey (ankle) may miss some time. The Heat are winning games, surprisingly without Tyler Herro and now Bam Adebayo, with their hyper-quick pace (106.95, leading the NBA).

NBA Week 3 rankings: No. 16-20

  • 16. Boston Celtics, 5-6 (—)
  • 17. Toronto Raptors, 5-5 (+1)
  • 18. Phoenix Suns, 5-5 (+5)
  • 19. Atlanta Hawks, 5-5 (-2)
  • 20. Los Angeles Clippers, 3-6 (-5)

The Clippers are old, slow, turn the ball over and can’t defend; and rumors about Tyronn Lue’s future are swirling. The Raptors are sneakily competitive, with recent wins over the Cavaliers, Bucks and Hawks. And the Hawks could slide as Trae Young (MCL sprain) misses time.

NBA Week 3 rankings: No. 21-25

  • 21. Memphis Grizzlies, 4-7 (+1)
  • 22. Orlando Magic, 4-6(-2)
  • 23. Utah Jazz, 3-6 (-2)
  • 24. Charlotte Hornets, 3-6 (+2)
  • 25. Sacramento Kings, 3-7 (+2)

Desmond Bane simply hasn’t panned out for the Magic, averaging just 10.8 points per game over his last five. LaMelo Ball (ankle) has missed four games, with more possible, and there seems to be no resolution to the Ja Morant situation in Memphis. Morant is shooting an abysmal 27.6% over his last five games.

NBA Week 3 rankings: No. 26-30

  • 26. Dallas Mavericks, 2-7 (-1)
  • 27. New Orleans Pelicans, 2-7 (+2)
  • 28. Indiana Pacers, 1-9 (-4)
  • 29. Washington Wizards, 1-9 (-1)
  • 30. Brooklyn Nets, 1-9 (—)

The Mavericks are doing Cooper Flagg a disservice playing him at point guard, the Pacers still can’t get healthy and the Wizards have the worst net rating (-16.3) in basketball.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

If there were one word to describe the Philadelphia Eagles’ 10-7 win over the Green Bay Packers on ‘Monday Night Football’ to close Week 10, it would be bizarre.

Over the final two-and-a-half minutes, Packers coach Matt LaFleur and Eagles coach Nick Sirianni took turns making baffling coaching decisions.

It started, in earnest, when Sirianni called back-to-back pass plays after the Packers called their first timeout of the second half with 2:34 left in regulation. Many believed the Eagles – who were facing a second-and-8 – would run it at least once more to force Green Bay to use another timeout.

Instead, Jalen Hurts threw two incompletions, and the Eagles had to punt the ball back to the Packers, giving Green Bay a chance to mount a game-tying or game-winning drive with 2:18 left in regulation.

But the Packers couldn’t capitalize on that opportunity. They got near midfield only to see LaFleur and Co. dial up a shotgun run on fourth-and-1 during which Josh Jacobs was stuffed behind the line and fumbled, ending the drive.

LaFleur’s questionable call was quickly outdone by Sirianni. The Eagles were facing a fourth-and-6 with 33 seconds left in regulation when the fourth-year coach decided to go for it. The play call? Hurts took a downfield shot to A.J. Brown, who couldn’t reel it in, and gifted the ball back to the Packers at their own 35-yard line with 27 seconds left in regulation.

The Packers nearly took advantage of Sirianni’s decision, getting the ball just across midfield with five seconds left in regulation. At that point, LaFleur opted to attempt a 65-yard field goal with Brandon McManus, who has dealt with a quad injury for most of the season, in 28-degree weather.

McManus got a chance to attempt a practice kick, as the officials did not step in front of the ball in time after the Eagles called a timeout to ice the veteran kicker. His kick was short, but LaFleur still decided to attempt it.

The kick sailed well wide to the right, ending the game and the lamentable stretch of decisions that characterized Monday’s finish.

USA TODAY Sports provided live updates, highlights and more from the ‘Monday Night Football’ matchup in Week 10 below.

Packers vs. Eagles MNF takeaways

  • The Eagles offense goes as Saquon Barkley goes: Barkley had trouble gaining consistent yardage over the first three quarters of Monday’s game. The Eagles scored just three points while the Packers largely bottled up Barkley. Then, in the fourth quarter, Barkley ripped off a 41-yard gain on a third down, the Eagles’ longest play of the day. One play later, Jalen Hurts found DeVonta Smith for the team’s lone touchdown. Barkley performing well clearly makes life easier for Hurts, so Nick Sirianni and Kevin Patullo should continue to emphasize running the ball.
  • A.J. Brown is an afterthought in the Eagles’ offense: Philadelphia got Brown two targets quickly coming off its Week 9 bye, making it seem like the veteran receiver would be a big part of the team’s offensive game plan against the Packers. However, Brown wasn’t targeted again until the Eagles’ final offensive snap of the game. Hurts simply seems more comfortable targeting Dallas Goedert and Smith over Brown right now, so it will be interesting to see if Brown shows any vexation with his role.
  • The Packers have a receiver problem:. Jordan Love had a tough day against the Eagles defense, but he didn’t have much help. His leading receiver was Christian Watson, who racked up 45 yards on just two catches, while the team’s top wide out from 2025 – Romeo Doubs – suffered a chest injury during the contest. There remains upside in Green Bay’s receiver room, especially regarding first-round rookie Matthew Golden, but do the Packers have enough talent at the position to make a deep postseason run? That remains to be seen.
  • Philadelphia’s pass rush is significantly better after the Jaelan Phillips trade: The Eagles struggled to generate consistent pressure to open the 2025 NFL season after losing Josh Sweat and Milton Williams in free agency. General manager Howie Roseman remedied that weakness by trading for Phillips, who was active during his first game with the Eagles and forced a fumble on a Josh Jacobs fourth-and-1 carry late in the fourth quarter. Add in the returns of Nolan Smith (from injury) and Brandon Graham (from retirement), and the Eagles’ edge rush rotation is looking a lot better as they gear up to defend their Super Bowl title.

A.J. Brown stats vs. Packers

  • 2 receptions (3 targets)
  • 13 receiving yards
  • 0 touchdowns

Jalen Hurts stats vs. Packers

  • 15-of-26 (57.6% completion rate)
  • 183 passing yards
  • 1 passing touchdown
  • 0 interceptions
  • 92.3 passer rating
  • 5 rushing attempts
  • 27 rushing yards
  • 0 rushing touchdowns

Jordan Love stats vs. Eagles

  • 20-of-36 (55.5% completion rate)
  • 176 passing yards
  • 0 passing touchdowns
  • 0 interceptions
  • 68.8 passer rating
  • 5 rushing attempts
  • 28 rushing yards
  • 0 rushing touchdowns

Josh Jacobs stats vs. Eagles

  • 21 rush attempts
  • 74 rushing yards
  • 1 rushing touchdown
  • 5 receptions (6 targets)
  • 33 receiving yards
  • 0 receiving touchdowns

Saquon Barkley stats vs. Packers

  • 22 rush attempts
  • 60 rushing yards
  • 0 rushing touchdowns
  • 3 receptions (3 targets)
  • 41 receiving yards
  • 0 receiving touchdowns

DeVonta Smith stats vs. Packers

  • 4 receptions (7 targets)
  • 43 receiving yards
  • 1 receiving touchdown

Packers vs. Eagles highlights

Packers vs. Eagles final score: Eagles 10, Packers 7

Brandon McManus misses 65-yard field goal attempt as time expires

The Packers got close enough to try a 65-yard game-tying field goal at the end of regulation, but McManus’ kick went wide right after a shaky snap. The Eagles win the game 10-7.

Eagles go for it on fourth-and-6, fail to convert

Jalen Hurts tried to hit A.J. Brown on a downfield pass on fourth-and-6 but the two couldn’t connect. As a result, the Packers will have one more chance to get into field goal range, with 27 seconds and no timeouts remaining.

Eagles force Josh Jacobs fumble on fourth-and-1 to get ball back

The Packers got the ball near midfield but were facing a fourth-and-1 when Matt LaFleur dialed up a Jacobs run. The Eagles were ready for it, stuffing him behind the line and forcing the veteran back to fumble.

Philadelphia now has the ball back with 1:26 remaining in regulation. Green Bay still has two timeouts remaining, so the Eagles need a first down to go full victory formation.

Packers force Eagles punt, will have 2:18 to tie game

The Packers managed to get the Eagles to stall out after the Eagles inexplicably passed twice and threw two incompletions while needing just one first down to potentially run the clock out on Green Bay.

Braden Mann’s punt was fair caught on the 10-yard line, but the Packers will have 2:18 and two timeouts to get into field goal range or mount a potential game-winning touchdown drive.

Eagles trying to run clock out on Packers

The Eagles nearly went three-and-out following the Packers’ touchdown, but Jalen Hurts found DeVonta Smith for a completion on third-and-12 to keep Philadelphia’s offense on the field. Since then, Saquon Barkley has been running the ball well against the Packers and gained another first down.

Matt LaFleur has started to take his timeouts. If the Eagles can get one more first down, they can push the Packers to the brink and potentially run out the clock.

Packers vs. Eagles score: Josh Jacobs powers in Packers’ first score to cut Eagles’ lead to three

The Packers didn’t fold after the Eagles’ touchdown drive. Instead, Green Bay mounted its best drive of the day, marching 75 yards over 11 plays before Jacobs managed to bulldoze his way into the end-zone for six.

Brandon McManus made the extra point and the Eagles are now leading 10-7 with 5:49 left in regulation.

Eagles 10, Packers 7

Romeo Doubs injury update

Doubs, who has been the Packers’ most consistent receiver in 2025, is dealing with a chest injury. He is questionable to return to Monday’s game because of the injury.

The Packers are already thin at receiver thanks to an injury to Matthew Golden. Without Doubs, Christian Watson and Dontavyion Wicks will be relied upon to help Green Bay’s comeback efforts.

Packers vs. Eagles score: DeVonta Smith catches 36-yard TD one play after Saquon Barkley 41-yard gain

The Eagles finally created an explosive play when Barkley took a third-down dump-off pass 41 yards. Immediately after, Jalen Hurts found Smith down the field for a 36-yard score during which the team’s top wide-out jumped over the Packers defense to get the score.

Jake Elliott makes the extra point and the Eagles are now leading 10-0 with 10:35 left in regulation.

Eagles 10, Packers 0

Packers punt after Christian Watson gain wiped out by penalty

The Packers appeared to end up in the red-zone after a downfield completion from Jordan Love to Watson. Instead, an illegal formation penalty backed up Green Bay, and the Packers couldn’t gain another yard before being forced to punt.

Bo Melton nearly made a terrific play to pin the Eagles inside their own 5-yard line, but he stepped on the goal-line before batting the ball back into play. That resulted in a touchback, and the Eagles will get the ball on their own 20-yard line, leading 3-0 with 12:46 left in regulation.

Eagles take 3-0 lead into third quarter, but Packers developing offensive rhythm

The Packers haven’t yet gotten on the board, but they have crossed midfield on each of their two second-half drives thus far. Their latest drive is still ongoing, and Green Bay will open the fourth quarter with a third-and-4 from Philadelphia’s 43-yard line.

Neither Jordan Love (83 yards) nor Jalen Hurts (90 yards) has yet topped 100 yards passing in the defensive slugfest. Both Saquon Barkley and Josh Jacobs have also been limited, with Barkley racking up 40 yards on 12 carries and Jacobs getting 58 yards on 16 totes.

Is Saquon Barkley hurt?

Barkley was listed on the Eagles’ injury report ahead of their Week 10 game with a groin problem. However, Barkley was a full participant at each of Philadelphia’s three practices and did not carry an injury designation into the game.

The Eagles have given Will Shipley and Tank Bigsby more work than usual during Monday’s game, but Barkley has still been the backfield leader throughout the contest.

Eagles go three-and-out following Packers turnover on downs

Green Bay’s defense came up with a big stop after Bo Melton’s drop. Devonte Wyatt blew up a second-down Saquon Barkley run for a 6-yard loss, forcing the Eagles to throw a dump-off to Will Shipley on third-and-long to end the drive.

Braden Mann’s punt was powerful but bounced through the end-zone. The Packers will start from their own 20-yard line, still looking for their first points with 2:32 left in the third quarter.

Bo Melton drops fourth-and-9 pass from Jordan Love

The Packers ended up in no man’s land on their first drive of the second half, so Matt LaFleur opted to go for it on fourth-and-9 rather than punt or attempt a 59-yard field goal.

Love had plenty of time in the pocket and eventually found Bo Melton open beyond the sticks. However, the converted cornerback wasn’t able to reel in the pass, dropping it and creating a turnover on downs.

The ESPN broadcast showed LaFleur irate on the sidelines as the Eagles, leading 3-0, prepared to get the ball back at their own 41-yard line.

Elgton Jenkins injury update

Jenkins, the Packers’ starting center, suffered an ankle injury at the end of the first half. He has now been ruled out for the game, per the team.

Sean Rhyan replaced Jenkins at center and figures to see the rest of the snaps there.

Packers vs. Eagles score: Jake Elliott makes 39-yard field goal to open scoring

It took until the 8:58 mark in the third quarter, but we finally have a score on ‘Monday Night Football.’ It comes via an Elliott 39-yarder that capped off a 10-play, 50-yard drive to open the second half.

The Eagles moved the ball consistently against the Packers’ defense, but a tackle for loss by Quay Walker, followed by a delay of game penalty, put Philadelphia in a third-and-10 situation. Nick Sirianni opted to run the ball to set up the field goal, evidently placing importance on finally breaking the scoreless draw, which the Eagles now lead 3-0.

Eagles 3, Packers 0

How many Super Bowls have the Philadelphia Eagles won?

The Eagles have won two Super Bowls. The first came in Super Bowl 52, a victory over the New England Patriots that concluded the 2017 NFL postseason, while the second came in Super Bowl 59 against the Kansas City Chiefs, which ended the 2024 NFL playoffs.

Eagles and Packers scoreless at halftime in defensive battle

The Eagles and Packers played the NFL’s first scoreless first half since the 2023 season on ‘Monday Night Football.’ The teams combined to punt seven times with two drives ending on lost fumbles in the defensive slog.

Philadelphia’s offense got off to a stronger start and outgained Green Bay 125-83 over the first 30 minutes. Jalen Hurts has completed 7 of 14 passes for 48 yards while adding 21 yards on four carries, while Saquon Barkley (nine carries, 33 yards) is also off to a modest start.

The Packers have posted similar numbers, with Jordan Love going 6 of 10 passing for 39 yards and Josh Jacobs adding 38 yards on the ground.

Jordan Love loses fumble, ending Packers’ scoring opportunity

For the second time in the game, a quarterback has fumbled a ball with his team in field-goal range. 

This time, it was Love who lost the ball. The Packers quarterback was under pressure and looked to throw out of it, but lost control of the ball. Philadelphia was able to hop on the ball, giving Jalen Hurts just 23 seconds left to mount a scoring drive to end the first half.

Lane Johnson injury update

Eagles get first down, but penalties derail drive

The good news: the Eagles got a first down by virtue of an Evan Williams pass interference penalty. The bad news? Philadelphia struggled with penalties of its own following that call, backing the team up and eventually forcing them to punt after Jalen Hurts scrambled on a third-and-long.

Braden Mann’s punt was originally a good one, landing on the 8-yard line. However, the Eagles were called for another penalty, holding, which forced a re-kick. 

This time, Mann’s kick was fielded just beyond the 20 and was taken back out to the Packers 32-yard line. As such, the penalty netted the Packers 24 yards in field position.

Lane Johnson injury update: Eagles OT limps off after leg rolled up

Johnson – the Eagles’ long-time starter at right tackle – was injured early on Philadelphia’s latest drive. He had his right leg rolled up during a Saquon Barkley run and required medical attention on the field.

Johnson was able to walk off the field under his own power but did so gingerly. He went to the blue medical tent for further evaluation.

Daniel Whelan uncorks fourth punt as Packers third-down struggles continue

There have now been three punts in the last two minutes of ‘Monday Night Football’ game time. This time, Jordan Love had a third-down pass batted down, making the Packers 0 for 5 on third-down attempts thus far in tonight’s game.

Xavier Gipson returned Whelan’s punt 13 yards to the Eagles’ 26-yard line as both teams remain scoreless with 6:37 left in the second quarter.

Eagles go three-and-out on second consecutive drive

The defensive slugfest continues! Jalen Hurts completed an 8-yard pass to Dallas Goedert on first down, sparking hope the Eagles might be able to put a drive together. After two consecutive incompletions, Braden Mann came on to punt the ball away.

This time, Mann’s punt was shanked off the side of his foot. It traveled just 31 yards, giving Green Bay the ball back on its 41-yard line.

Packers punt after bluffing fourth-down attempt

The Packers lined up to go for it on fourth-and-2, but Jordan Love was just trying to draw the Eagles offside. Green Bay’s efforts were unsuccessful, so Daniel Whelan was once again called on to punt.

This time, Whelan’s punt sailed into the end-zone for a touchback. The Eagles will get the ball back with 8:28 left in the second quarter, looking to open the ‘Monday Night Football’ scoring.

Eagles go three-and-out after Jordan Mailata, Saquon Barkley slip

On first down, the Eagles tried to run the ball with Barkley, but Mailata fell, blocking the running back’s path and forcing him to go sideways before being tackled. On second down, Barkley had a slip of his own, catching a screen pass but losing his footing as he tried to turn up the field. That put Philadelphia behind the chains and eventually forced the Eagles to punt.

Braden Mann’s kick was a good one, traveling 66 yards before Romeo Doubs could field it. Doubs’ return of 12 yards gives Green Bay the ball on its own 22-yard line.

Packers punt again after fourth-down false start

The Packers lined up to go for it on a fourth-and-1 to open the second quarter. However, before the ball was snapped, left guard Aaron Banks jumped, backing Green Bay up an extra five yards.

Daniel Whelan’s punt was caught at Philadelphia’s 4-yard line, but Xavier Gipson brought it back 17 yards to give the Eagles offense some breathing room.

Packers and Eagles scoreless after first quarter

The first quarter of the Week 10 edition of ‘Monday Night Football’ moved rapidly. The Packers and Eagles both had long first drives that ended without points, as a Jordan Love sack caused Green Bay to fall behind the chains and punt while Jalen Hurts fumbled in the red-zone to end Philadelphia’s scoring chances.

The Eagles’ offense was the more efficient of the two units, outgaining the Packers 82-24 over the first 15 minutes. Nick Sirianni’s squad seems content to run the ball often with Saquon Barkley (six carries, 28 yards) and Hurts (two carries, 13 yards) while A.J. Brown (two catches, 13 yards) is currently the team’s leading receiver.

Jalen Hurts loses fumble to cap scoreless, 15-play Eagles drive

The Eagles followed the Packers’ near-6-minute drive with an 8-minute drive of their own. Like Green Bay’s drive, Philadelphia’s ended without points, as Edgerrin Cooper punched the ball out of Hurts’ hands on an 11-yard quarterback draw.

Keisean Nixon scooped up the loose ball and returned it 22 yards, giving the Packers the ball at their own 36-yard line.

Packers stall out on first drive after Jalyx Hunt sacks Jordan Love for 14-yard loss

The Packers built a good rhythm early in the game, running the ball with Josh Jacobs. However, Love took a massive loss on his second dropback, as Hunt was able to chase him down for a 14-yard loss. That forced the Packers into a third-and-long, where Quinyon Mitchell broke up a pass intended for Christian Watson.

Daniel Whelan came on to punt and pinned the Eagles at their 9-yard line. That’s where Philadelphia will start its first possession from.

Packers hold moments of silence before kickoff

Before kickoff, the Packers held a moment of silence for former league commissioner Paul Tagliabue, who passed away early Sunday Nov. 9, and for Cowboys defensive end Marshawn Kneeland, who died on Thursday, Nov. 6.

What channel is Packers vs. Eagles on Monday Night Football tonight?

  • TV channel: ESPN | ESPN2

The main Cowboys-Cardinals broadcast will air on ESPN, featuring Joe Buck and Troy Aikman on commentary with Lisa Salters providing sideline reports.

ESPN2 will air the ‘Manningcast,’ the alternate broadcast featuring Peyton and Eli Manning.

What time is Monday Night Football tonight?

  • Start time: 8:15 p.m. ET | 7:15 p.m. CT | 6:15 p.m. MT

The Packers-Eagles ‘Monday Night Football’ matchup will air at 8:15 p.m. ET, the customary start time for ‘MNF.’

Packers vs. Eagles live stream

  • Live stream:Fubo | ESPN Unlimited | ESPN Select

Cord-cutters looking to stream the Week 10 ‘MNF’ game have a few options. Viewers can tune to ESPN’s streaming services, Select and Unlimited, for the matchup.

Viewers can also sign up for Fubo. Fubo carries the ESPN family of networks, as well as CBS, NBC, Fox, ABC and the NFL Network, meaning you’ll be able to catch NFL action all season long. Fubo also offers a free trial.

Watch 2025 NFL action with Fubo (free trial)

Packers vs. Eagles prediction

Tucker Kraft’s season-ending injury is tough to overcome; He was leading the team in receiving yards and touchdowns when he went down, and while Green Bay has weapons, it also has inconsistency and injuries among its receivers. The matchup of the night is in the trenches when Eagles RT Lane Johnson lines up across from Parsons. Johnson hasn’t allowed a sack or even a QB hit this season. Kryptonite?

The Eagles’ offense was red-hot before the bye; they’ll find a way to win in a physical battle. Maybe even a pair of two-point conversions via the ‘tush push’ to prove a point. Adding to the drama: the Packers were the team that proposed a rule to ban the ‘tush push’ play in the offseason, a fact that Philadelphia probably didn’t forget.

Prediction: Eagles 25, Packers 20

Packers vs. Eagles live betting odds, moneyline, O/U

How to watch Monday Night Football without YouTube TV

Fubo

Fubo, which offers a free trial for new members, carries all Disney-owned sports networks – including ESPN and ABC – as well as other channels that carry NFL games: NFL Network, CBS and Fox.

Catch NFL action all season long with Fubo

Sling TV

NFL fans can watch ‘Monday Night Football’ on ESPN with the streaming service.

Watch ‘Monday Night Football’ with Sling TV

ESPN Unlimited

NFL fans can tune in to Week 10’s ‘Monday Night Football’ game with an ESPN Unlimited subscription.

Watch all ESPN content with ESPN Unlimited

Antenna

NFL fans with an antenna installed at home can tune in to their local ABC affiliate to watch ‘Monday Night Football’ on Nov. 10.

Is there a ManningCast for Packers vs. Eagles game?

Yes, there will be a ManningCast in Week 10. The Manning brothers will be on the alt-cast for the ‘Monday Night Football’ game between the Eagles and Packers, marking the third of six consecutive weeks with a ManningCast.

Eagles inactives vs. Packers

Packers inactives vs. Eagles

  • WR Matthew Golden
  • CB Nate Hobbs
  • K Lucas Havrisik
  • OL Jacob Monk
  • OL Donovan Jennings
  • DL Lukas Van Ness

NFC East standings

The Eagles enter ‘Monday Night Football’ in first place in the NFC East. Here’s how the division stacks up:

  1. Philadelphia Eagles (6-2)
  2. Dallas Cowboys (3-5-1)
  3. Washington Commanders (3-7)
  4. New York Giants (2-8)

NFC North standings

The Packers enter ‘Monday Night Football’ in first place in the NFC North. Here’s how the division stacks up:

  1. Green Bay Packers (5-2-1)
  2. Detroit Lions (6-3)
  3. Chicago Bears (6-3)
  4. Minnesota Vikings (4-5)

Packers vs. Eagles weather update: How cold is it in Green Bay?

The weather forecast for ‘Monday Night Football’ in Green Bay is partly cloudy skies. Winds will be 10-15 mph, with gusts up to 20 mph. Temperatures will be in the upper 20s per AccuWeather. The temperature at kickoff is expected to be 30 degrees with temperatures dropping into the 20s as the game progresses.

Micah Parsons trade details

Below are the full terms of the Micah Parsons trade:

Packers get:

  • EDGE Micah Parsons

Cowboys get

  • 2027 first-round pick
  • DL Kenny Clark
  • 2026 first-round pick

Micah Parsons contract details

Parsons signed a four-year extension with the Packers upon being traded. Below is a look at the full details of that contract, per Spotrac.com.

  • Term: Four years
  • Total value: $186 million
  • Average annual value (AAV): $46.5 million
  • Guaranteed money: $136 million

Parsons had one year left on his contract when the Packers acquired him. He is due to have just a $1.17 million base salary, but because he received the entirety of his $44 million signing bonus. – Jacob Camenker

Highest-paid NFL defenders: Where Micah Parsons ranks

Parsons is the highest-paid NFL defender in both AAV and total contract value. Here’s a look at the top 10 defenders in each category:

AAV

  1. Micah Parsons, edge, Packers: $46.5million
  2. T.J. Watt, edge, Steelers: $41 million
  3. Myles Garrett, edge, Browns: $40 million
  4. Danielle Hunter, edge, Texans: $35.6 million
  5. Maxx Crosby, edge, Raiders: $35.5 million
  6. Nick Bosa, edge, 49ers: $34 million
  7. Chris Jones, DL, Chiefs: $31.75 million
  8. Sauce Gardner, CB, Jets: $30.1 million
  9. Derek Stingley Jr., CB, Texans: $30 million
  10. Nik Bonitto, edge, Broncos: $26.5 million

Total contract value

  1. Micah Parsons, edge, Packers: $186 million
  2. Nick Bosa, edge, 49ers: $170 million
  3. Myles Garrett, edge, Browns: $160 million
  4. Chris Jones, DL, Chiefs: $158.75 million
  5. T.J. Watt, edge, Steelers: $123 million
  6. Sauce Gardner, CB, Jets: $120.4 million
  7. Maxx Crosby, edge, Raiders: $106.5 million
  8. Nik Bonitto, edge, Broncos: $106 million
  9. Milton Williams, DL, Patriots: $104 million
  10. Zach Allen, DL, Broncos: $102 million

While Parsons tops defensive players in AAV and total contract value, he ranks just 12th and 15th across the two categories league-wide, behind a plethora of high-paid quarterbacks.

Eagles 2025 schedule

Packers 2025 schedule

Packers vs. Eagles injury report

‘Monday Night Football’ will take place at Lambeau Field

Is AJ Brown playing tonight vs. Packers?

Brown had no injury designation on the Eagles’ Week 10 injury report after he was a full participant in practice all week.

He appears to be a full-go for ‘Monday Night Football’ at Lambeau Field against the Packers.

Who is Jeff Hafley?

Hafley spent the first decade of his coaching career at the college level with stops at Worcester Polytechnic, Albany, Pittsburgh and Rutgers. Though he played wide receiver in college for the Siena Saints, Hafley’s spent the majority of his coaching career on defense. He was either a defensive assistant or defensive backs coach in that first decade.

He followed former Rutgers coach Greg Schiano to the NFL in 2012 with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. He coached defensive backs for the franchise in 2012 and 2013.

When Schiano was fired after the 2013 season, Hafley went to Cleveland for two seasons before a three-year stint in San Francisco. His year with Ohio State in 2019 led to his hiring at Boston College in 2020, where he spent four season and went 22-26 with one Bowl game victory.

Green Bay hired Hafley in 2024 and saw immediate improvement by both standard and advanced statistics. Green Bay went from one of the four worst run defenses in 2023 to a top-10 unit in 2024. By expected points added (EPA) per play, the Packers went from 23rd in 2023 to fifth in 2024, according to SumerSports.

Like Macdonald’s success with Baltimore in 2023, Hafley will likely get head coaching interest for the 2026 hiring cycle.

4th & Monday: Our NFL newsletter always brings the blitz 

Do you like football? Then you’ll enjoy receiving our NFL newsletter in your inbox.   

Get the latest news, expert analysis, game insights and the must-see moments from the NFL conveniently delivered to your email inbox. Sign up now! 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

It’s been a minute since we have seen Caitlin Clark play. Fans will get a chance on Wednesday, Nov. 12 albeit on the golf course and not the basketball court. The Indiana Fever All-Star will play in the The Annika Pro-Am for the second consecutive year.

‘She added so much excitement to the tournament,’ Annika Sorenstam told NBC Sports. ‘We had a lot of people come out, they were standing on the first tee at 7 am. waiting for her to see that first shot.

‘She loves the game of golf, and I’m so glad that she wanted to come back because, you know, it brings more people to the game, brings more people to the tournament, and that’s really what we’re looking for.’

Clark played in 13 games in her second season in the WNBA due to a series of soft tissue injuries. She last played on July 15, right before the All-Star break, injuring her right groin. She was on the bench as the Fever advanced to the WNBA semifinals. The league is in the midst of negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement.

Indiana Fever teammates Sophie Cunningham and Lexie Hull will caddy for Clark at Pelican Golf Club in Belleair, Florida. Clark will play with Nelly Korda, as she did last year, for the first nine holes on Wednesday and with sponsor invite Lauryn Nguyen for the second nine.

‘We just didn’t really know what to expect last year, and I think the response was very positive,’ Sorenstam said. ‘Now we’re trying to make sure that everybody gets a piece of it and also that (Clark) can enjoy it and feel like she’s having a good time.

‘We have so many young girls out there on that Wednesday just wanting to sign, you know, an autograph where they brought you, basketball or a hat or something. It was just nice to see a new demographic enter the golf course.’

“Golf Today” will have live action, highlights and an interview with Clark during its Wednesday coverage, which begins at 11 a.m. ET.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The following is a list of Upcoming Meeting Dates for Reporting Issuers in Canada. The data is supplied by Issuing Companies through the service of CDS Clearing and Depository Services Inc.

Company Name Record Date Meeting Date Type
 ATLANTIS SUBMARINES INTL HLDS November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 S
 Anonymous Intelligence Company* October 21, 2025 December 19, 2025 A
 Arcus Development Group Inc November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 AG
 BLUE LAGOON RESOURCES INC. November 19, 2025 December 30, 2025 A
 Big Ridge Gold Corp. November 6, 2025 December 16, 2025 AGS
 BrandPilot AI Inc. % September 29, 2025 November 13, 2025 AGS
 BrandPilot AI Inc. November 28, 2025 January 15, 2025 AGS
 CLEAN SEED CAPITAL GROUP LTD % October 2, 2025 November 20, 2025 A
 Deveron Corp. November 28, 2025 December 30, 2025 S
 EV Nickel, Inc. November 7, 2025 December 17, 2025 A
 FAB-FORM INDUSTRIES LTD November 7, 2025 December 12, 2025 AG
 Gabriel Resources Ltd November 17, 2025 December 18, 2025 AS
 Gabriel Resources Ltd % October 31, 2025 December 4, 2025 AS
 Glenstar Minerals Inc. November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 A
 Gold Strike Resources Inc. November 18, 2025 December 23, 2025 AGS
 Golden Harp Resources Inc November 4, 2025 December 9, 2025 AS
 Grafton Resources Inc. November 25, 2025 January 2, 2025 AS
 Grit Metals Corp. November 14, 2025 December 19, 2025 A
 Grosvenor Cpc I Inc. December 1, 2025 January 6, 2025 AS
 Helium Minerals Limited November 14, 2025 December 19, 2025 AG
 J2 Metals Inc. * October 8, 2025 December 3, 2025 S
 LOMIKO METALS INC * November 5, 2025 December 18, 2025 AS
 Makenita Resources Inc November 26, 2025 January 12, 2025 AG
 Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc. November 25, 2025 December 30, 2025 A
 Muzhu Mining Ltd. November 7, 2025 December 19, 2025 AS
 New Media Capital 2.0 Inc. * October 21, 2025 December 10, 2025 AGS
 New Zealand Energy Corp. November 19, 2025 December 19, 2025 AGS
 POCML 7 Inc. November 17, 2025 December 18, 2025 AS
 Pacific Geoinfo Corp. November 25, 2025 December 30, 2025 AG
 Pinnacle Silver and Gold Corp November 7, 2025 December 17, 2025 AG
 Pioneer AI Foundry Inc. November 13, 2025 December 18, 2025 A
 Pure Energy Minerals Limited * November 4, 2025 December 19, 2025 A
 QUADRO RESOURCES LTD November 28, 2025 December 30, 2025 AS
 Queen’s Road Capital Inv Ltd. November 28, 2025 January 9, 2025 AG
 Railtown AI Technologies Inc. November 10, 2025 December 17, 2025 A
 Robex Resources Inc. November 3, 2025 December 15, 2025 S
 Rev Exploration Corp. * October 27, 2025 December 19, 2025 AGS
 Route 109 Resources Inc. November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 AG
 Silver Bear Resources Plc November 25, 2025 December 30, 2025 AGS
 Sky Gold Corp November 6, 2025 December 17, 2025 AG
 Stockworks Gold Inc. * October 27, 2025 December 11, 2025 AGS
 SuperQ Quantum Computing Inc. November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 AS
 Teryl Resources Corp. November 13, 2025 December 22, 2025 AG
 Troy Minerals Inc. November 19, 2025 December 30, 2025 A

 

Legend:

* = Change in Previously Reported Information
% = Cancelled Meeting
@ = Adjourned Meeting

Type of Meeting

A = Annual Meeting
S = Special Meeting
G = General Meeting
X = Extra Meeting
E = Extraordinary Meeting

For more information, please visit https://www.cds.ca/

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/273462

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Steve Penny, founder of SilverChartist.com, explains why he currently has a bullish outlook for gold, silver and platinum, as well as uranium.

“The reaction to the next deflationary impulse is what I believe ultimately sends silver up towards triple digits, gold up towards north of US$10,000 (per ounce),” he explained.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

(TheNewswire)

Vancouver, British Columbia TheNewswire – November 10, 2025 Juggernaut Exploration Ltd (JUGR.V) (OTCPK: JUGRF) (FSE: 4JE) ( the ‘Company’ or ‘Juggernaut’) is excited to announce that detailed mapping and sampling have confirmed that the gold-rich Big Mac Zone, Whopper Zone and Gold Dome Zone all form part of the 22 Km 2 district-scale Eldorado System that remains wide open where grab samples assayed up to 263.70 gt AuEq or 8.48 ozt AuEq and channel cuts assayed up to 4.89 gt AuEq over 5.21 m from >400 mineralized veins that are up to 10 m wide hosted in shear zones up to 50 m wide, and are exposed on surface for >1 km with >1 km of vertical relief, remains open and is drill ready on the Big One property (the ‘Property’), Golden Triangle, British Columbia. In addition, based on excellent assay results, the Company has acquired additional claims and expanded the Gold Swarm discovery area of strong gold potential from 1 km 2 to 3 km 2 and 700 m of vertical relief and remains open, effectively tripling this area of strong gold potential, where grab samples assayed up to 231.81 gt AuEq or 7.45 ozt AuEq and channel cuts assayed up to 4.51 gt AuEq over 4.36 m that remains open and is drill ready. The Big One discovery is located in an area of recent glacial and snowpack abatement adjacent to the Tier 1 gold-rich porphyry systems, the likes of Galore Creek. The 100% controlled Big One property covers 39,271 hectares of geological terrane with tremendous additional discovery potential.

Link to map with samples > 1 g/t AuEq

Big One Gold Rich District Scale System Highlights:

  • The district-scale Eldorado System covers an area ~half the size of the Island of Manhattan (22 km ) that remains wide open where grab samples assayed up to 263.70 g/t AuEq or 8.48 oz/t AuEq and channel cuts assayed up to 4.89 g/t AuEq over 5.21 m from 400 mineralized veins that remain open and are up to 10 m wide, the equivalent to ~3-story building, hosted in shear zones up to 50 m wide, comparable to a 15-story building, and are exposed on surface for 500 m, or 5 football fields, with 1 km of vertical relief, the height of 2.5 Empire State Buildings.

Link to Gold Dome Figure

Link to Whopper Zone Figure

  • The Gold Swarm Area of strong gold potential has been expanded from 1 km to 3 km , equivalent to more than the downtown core of Vancouver B.C, with 700 m of vertical relief and remains wide open, with 100 veins up to 4.5 m wide, the equivalent of a 1.5-story building, and exposed on surface for 200 m equivalent to 2 football fields and remain open containing grab samples that assayed up to 231.81 g/t AuEq or 7.45 oz/t AuEq a nd channel cuts that assayed up to 4.51 g/t AuEq over 4.36 m. The Gold Swarm Area is drill ready.

Link to Goldswarm Figure

  • 41% (219 samples out of 527) collected within the Eldorado System in 2024 and 2025 assayed 1 g/t AuEq; 65% (28 samples out of 43) collected withing the Gold Swarm Zone in 2024 and 2025 assayed 1 g/t AuEq.

Grade (AuEq)

>1 g/t

>3 g/t

>5 g/t

>10 g/t

>15 g/t

>20 g/t

>30 g/t

>60 g/t

>90 g/t

Samples

219

129

95

66

51

40

23

8

5

  • Gold samples up to 256.60 g/t or 8.25 oz/t, silver samples up 2810 g/t or 90.34 oz/t, and copper samples up to 14.40 % were collected on Big One.

  • Detailed mapping has confirmed common orientations as well as similar geochemical signatures and textures of the gold-mineralized veins along the 15 km Highway of Gold corridor surrounding the snowcap of Deeker Glacier, strongly indicating that the gold-rich mineralization found throughout is all part of one huge district-scale gold system that remains wide open.

  • The polymetallic veins, alteration signature, geochemical pathfinder element signature, and geophysical anomalies strongly indicate the presence of a large common buried gold-silver-copper rich porphyry feeder source or similar magmatic source or sources at depth responsible for the extensive high-grade veining confirmed on surface over 22 km

  • The company recently received a 5-year property-wide advanced exploration drill permit.

  • Detailed geological and structural mapping has been completed on the reported drill targets in order to define the full geometry of these high-grade gold-bearing shears and veins and will be instrumental in designing the drill plan for the upcoming maiden drill program.

  • A high-resolution UAV photogrammetry survey was completed over an area of 52 km2 on the Eldorado System and Gold Swarm Zone encompassing all of the maiden drill targets. The data will be used to support modelling and define targeting the high-grade gold mineralization recently discovered.

  • A property wide LiDAR survey covering an area of 385 km has been conducted and will be used to augment information obtained from the mapping as well as plan the upcoming inaugural drill campaign.

  • Multiple drill-ready targets have been confirmed and are planned to be tested in the fully funded inaugural drill program and include but are not limited to: the 22 km Eldorado System hosting the Gold Dome Zone where grab samples assayed up to 263.70 g/t AuEq or 8.48 oz/t AuEq; the Big Mac Zone where grab samples assayed up to 113.92 g/t AuEq or 3.66 oz/t AuEq; the Whopper Zone where grab samples assayed up to 43.94 g/t AuEq or 1.41 oz/t AuEq; and the Gold Swarm Area where grab samples assayed up to 231.81 g/t AuEq or 7.45 oz/t AuEq.

  • Juggernaut is working in consultation with the Tahltan First Nation and the local community and is committed to maintaining respectful and collaborative relationships. As we advance exploration on our project, we will continue working closely with the Tahltan First Nation and all the local stakeholders and regulatory agencies to ensure our activities create long-term value and reflect community priorities.

Dan Stuart, President and CEO of Juggernaut Exploration states: ‘With a district-scale discovery of this magnitude host to so many large gold-rich veins and shears exposed on surface that rise above the valley floor for >1 km we are likely only seeing the tip of the iceberg on this mountain of gold. We look forward to the fully funded maiden drill program on this remarkable gold discovery with much anticipation. The best is yet to come!’

Manuele Lazzarotto, PhD, Chief Geologist of Juggernaut Exploration, states: ‘With the advanced exploration permit in hand, we look forward to unlocking the full potential of the Big One gold discovery in the third dimension during the inaugural drill program. Once we receive, compile, and interpret all the deliverables from the detailed and regional mapping, UAV orthophotos survey, and LiDAR survey, the same team responsible for the Tier 1 Surebet gold discovery will design and execute the maiden drill program. Obvious opportunities with the scale and grades seen on Big One are extremely rare, and we have clearly barely begun to scratch the surface. The team looks forward to testing this remarkable discovery at depth.’

Table 1: Samples from 2024-2025 with assays >1 g/t AuEq

Sample ID

Year

Sample Type

Au (g/t)

Ag (g/t)

Cu (%)

Pb (%)

Zn (%)

AuEq (g/t)

M224886

2025

Float

256.60

546.00

0.43

0.41

0.01

263.70

M217656

2025

Float

226.94

335.00

0.00

4.99

0.01

231.81

D751423

2025

Grab

138.70

29.96

0.08

0.02

0.02

139.14

M220659

2025

Grab

111.35

159.00

0.02

3.88

0.01

113.92

M224956

2025

Grab

95.04

49.60

0.02

0.02

0.01

95.67

D751282

2024

Grab

79.01

58.90

0.13

0.43

0.80

80.08

D751407

2025

Grab

68.57

115.00

0.35

1.25

6.53

72.02

D751424

2025

Grab

60.08

9.57

0.01

0.00

0.01

60.21

D751966

2024

Grab

56.54

23.30

0.03

0.02

0.03

56.84

M220561

2025

Grab

55.50

38.62

0.09

2.02

0.44

56.47

M217807

2025

Channel

47.18

156.00

0.01

9.28

0.07

50.57

D750642

2025

Grab

43.99

102.00

0.00

9.19

0.44

46.79

M217601

2025

Channel

39.84

333.00

0.02

0.07

0.06

43.94

M217579

2025

Channel

34.96

415.00

0.02

21.13

0.06

43.38

D751216

2024

Grab

37.98

75.50

0.24

5.72

3.93

41.46

D751191

2024

Channel

12.12

2810.00

0.02

8.04

0.00

37.20

D751156

2024

Grab

33.72

177.00

0.27

2.71

0.27

36.11

D751357

2025

Grab

18.06

333.00

12.05

0.00

0.14

32.65

M217613

2025

Channel

31.68

9.40

0.16

0.00

0.10

31.96

M224961

2025

Grab

31.25

13.98

0.39

0.00

0.00

31.77

D750638

2025

Grab

14.46

621.00

0.11

54.39

0.44

30.79

D751375

2025

Grab

28.47

70.39

0.15

2.43

0.40

29.94

D751402

2025

Grab

29.23

11.44

0.17

0.01

0.00

29.52

D751373

2025

Grab

21.44

172.00

0.07

15.92

6.21

27.59

D751964

2024

Talus

23.47

110.00

1.37

0.01

0.00

26.07

D750389

2024

Grab

8.10

1420.00

1.11

0.15

2.70

26.01

D751163

2024

Float

23.97

116.00

0.02

2.16

0.13

24.53

D750639

2025

Grab

18.12

174.00

3.36

2.91

0.03

23.63

M217567

2025

Channel

17.00

461.00

0.04

0.87

0.31

22.86

D750624

2025

Grab

21.62

45.06

0.00

2.33

0.16

22.58

M217705

2025

Channel

20.78

48.45

0.62

2.37

1.05

22.53

M224905

2025

Talus

9.48

646.00

5.48

0.05

0.05

22.15

M224982

2025

Chip

21.17

20.30

0.02

0.92

0.03

21.58

M217655

2025

Grab

19.64

15.34

0.00

1.37

2.93

20.74

M224983

2025

Grab

14.06

191.00

0.15

17.27

4.50

20.31

D751365

2025

Grab

9.35

566.00

0.01

25.22

0.06

20.24

M217657

2025

Grab

18.11

88.95

0.00

2.08

0.01

19.53

D750621

2025

Grab

3.76

223.00

14.45

0.00

0.11

19.09

D750644

2025

Grab

18.47

12.54

0.00

0.89

0.01

18.77

D750625

2025

Grab

18.32

6.19

0.01

0.01

0.55

18.54

D751374

2025

Talus

16.60

66.43

0.38

1.82

0.60

18.17

D750641

2025

Grab

15.52

55.65

0.63

1.85

0.08

17.06

M224959

2025

Grab

15.94

16.54

0.00

0.01

0.01

16.15

D750394

2024

Grab

13.12

163.00

0.51

1.65

0.42

16.04

M217852

2025

Channel

15.39

20.95

0.04

1.02

0.37

15.93

M217649

2025

Channel

14.96

22.24

0.41

0.64

0.95

15.92

D751285

2024

Grab

3.74

91.20

7.96

0.01

0.01

13.18

D751975

2024

Grab

10.62

198.00

0.00

0.77

0.01

13.10

D750192

2024

Grab

3.44

220.00

6.61

0.00

0.01

12.91

M224932

2025

Grab

0.00

755.00

0.63

6.07

7.28

12.43

D750852

2025

Subcrop

1.07

860.00

0.01

2.12

1.32

12.20

M220602

2025

Grab

11.92

2.04

0.01

0.00

0.04

11.96

M224883

2025

Grab

11.07

20.98

0.03

0.01

0.00

11.36

D751943

2024

Grab

4.00

128.00

0.30

15.35

8.35

11.32

D750198

2024

Float

6.01

34.10

0.14

0.04

15.30

11.21

M217784

2025

Channel

10.83

1.88

0.00

0.00

0.04

10.87

D750704

2025

Grab

2.59

325.00

0.35

22.97

1.56

10.83

D750608

2024

Grab

10.62

3.20

0.00

0.01

0.01

10.67

M217785

2025

Channel

10.17

1.97

0.00

0.00

0.01

10.20

M224957

2025

Grab

9.65

15.14

0.03

0.18

0.48

10.00

D751154

2024

Grab

5.72

218.00

0.22

1.81

1.34

9.20

D751969

2024

Float

5.59

185.00

0.40

1.91

0.98

8.82

D751284

2024

Float

6.34

47.70

0.03

6.78

0.59

8.66

D751151

2024

Float

2.79

474.00

0.01

20.00

1.22

8.59

D751192

2024

Channel

3.39

366.00

0.01

0.11

0.00

7.68

D751372

2025

Grab

7.44

16.56

0.00

0.17

0.01

7.67

D751104

2024

Float

3.79

204.00

0.30

4.60

1.12

7.54

D750395

2024

Grab

6.01

105.00

0.01

0.06

0.09

7.42

D750643

2025

Grab

7.36

2.04

0.00

0.03

0.02

7.40

M217571

2025

Channel

6.06

89.91

0.04

0.01

0.67

7.35

M220559

2025

Grab

1.55

262.00

0.01

13.83

0.08

6.94

M220601

2025

Grab

6.77

5.19

0.08

0.00

0.01

6.91

M224865

2025

Grab

0.05

213.00

4.32

0.07

0.48

6.53

M217589

2025

Channel

5.81

19.08

0.35

0.37

0.28

6.48

D751403

2025

Float

6.13

14.47

0.00

0.02

0.01

6.31

D751368

2025

Talus

6.09

6.80

0.01

0.25

0.04

6.24

D751433

2025

Grab

0.03

139.00

2.99

4.42

4.65

6.13

D751369

2025

Grab

4.97

71.63

0.02

1.44

0.07

6.10

D751939

2024

Channel

5.06

96.30

0.00

0.05

0.03

6.10

M217566

2025

Channel

4.40

118.00

0.02

0.13

0.22

5.93

D751107

2024

Float

4.09

71.80

0.22

1.20

0.95

5.71

D751112

2024

Float

4.94

59.50

0.00

0.31

0.02

5.70

M217702

2025

Channel

4.30

38.77

0.58

2.16

0.10

5.64

M224981

2025

Grab

5.31

13.36

0.01

0.69

0.04

5.60

D751435

2025

Grab

5.19

10.98

0.00

0.54

0.20

5.46

D751158

2024

Grab

4.60

30.70

0.04

1.36

0.02

5.31

M220673

2025

Grab

0.00

345.00

0.03

0.45

4.17

5.29

M217648

2025

Channel

4.69

7.08

0.26

0.44

0.43

5.17

M217788

2025

Channel

5.15

1.29

0.01

0.01

0.00

5.17

D750657

2024

Grab

3.71

40.80

0.76

0.01

0.02

4.98

M220603

2025

Grab

0.39

313.00

0.26

1.50

1.07

4.92

D751215

2024

Grab

2.96

102.00

0.04

0.04

2.15

4.84

D750094

2024

Grab

0.02

108.00

1.01

0.06

8.60

4.83

D750632

2025

Float

4.44

20.01

0.02

0.74

0.01

4.83

D750656

2024

Grab

1.56

97.60

0.06

7.88

0.25

4.53

M217573

2025

Channel

4.27

16.46

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.48

M217643

2025

Channel

4.35

3.99

0.01

0.01

0.04

4.42

M217608

2025

Channel

4.35

1.50

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

D751406

2025

Grab

4.07

12.47

0.00

0.02

0.05

4.24

M224868

2025

Grab

0.38

68.48

3.42

0.01

0.15

4.23

M217805

2025

Channel

4.18

2.82

0.00

0.03

0.01

4.22

D750088

2024

Grab

0.16

143.00

0.04

7.63

1.50

4.18

M224938

2025

Grab

0.00

89.59

3.15

0.01

1.15

4.11

D751417

2025

Grab

3.38

46.67

0.00

0.41

0.00

4.02

M217637

2025

Channel

3.63

10.25

0.03

0.53

0.59

4.00

D750664

2024

Float

0.46

292.00

0.02

4.51

0.08

3.99

D750854

2025

Grab

0.00

186.00

0.07

7.28

1.99

3.95

M224935

2025

Grab

0.00

271.00

0.23

1.45

0.78

3.91

M224866

2025

Grab

0.20

146.00

1.78

0.04

1.31

3.85

M224851

2025

Chip

2.61

38.00

0.13

1.99

0.85

3.70

D751697

2024

Grab

0.09

105.00

2.35

0.01

0.07

3.65

M220553

2025

Grab

0.59

200.00

0.01

3.58

0.06

3.61

D751283

2024

Float

0.26

12.60

3.02

0.00

0.00

3.57

D751946

2024

Grab

0.02

136.00

0.72

0.18

4.35

3.54

D751699

2024

Grab

2.15

68.90

0.01

2.63

0.06

3.51

D750751

2025

Grab

1.16

82.41

0.03

4.01

2.80

3.48

M224904

2025

Grab

1.04

187.00

0.00

0.43

0.17

3.43

D751195

2024

Channel

1.61

38.20

0.82

1.27

0.71

3.37

D751398

2025

Grab

0.09

65.28

2.01

2.59

1.34

3.36

D751436

2025

Grab

0.14

80.25

0.09

13.18

0.20

3.32

D751394

2025

Grab

0.24

187.00

0.16

1.40

1.42

3.22

D750554

2024

Channel

0.05

81.50

0.35

1.05

5.34

3.17

D750199

2024

Grab

0.15

108.00

0.01

7.73

0.05

3.13

D751836

2024

Chip

0.22

114.00

0.00

5.21

1.59

2.95

D751845

2024

Chip

2.63

24.80

0.00

0.01

0.00

2.95

D751972

2024

Channel

1.42

47.30

0.03

3.43

0.68

2.90

D751846

2024

Grab

2.59

24.70

0.01

0.00

0.00

2.87

D751207

2024

Grab

0.04

256.00

0.01

12.65

0.01

2.85

M224963

2025

Grab

2.63

9.40

0.09

0.08

0.01

2.84

M224855

2025

Grab

2.23

30.34

0.03

0.95

0.20

2.83

M217727

2025

Channel

2.73

2.04

0.01

0.03

0.01

2.77

D751109

2024

Grab

1.65

89.50

0.10

0.01

0.03

2.73

D751962

2024

Grab

0.55

95.20

0.26

1.17

1.98

2.65

D751404

2025

Grab

2.61

1.26

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.63

M220555

2025

Grab

0.09

83.19

0.04

8.00

0.64

2.55

D751968

2024

Grab

1.49

53.50

0.01

1.68

0.13

2.55

D751153

2024

Grab

0.83

86.60

0.38

0.08

1.16

2.52

M220674

2025

Grab

0.00

175.00

0.01

0.62

0.74

2.42

D751213

2024

Float

1.65

51.40

0.02

0.31

0.02

2.41

M224927

2025

Grab

0.70

40.80

0.13

6.73

0.02

2.37

M217782

2025

Channel

0.02

88.40

0.84

0.78

1.59

2.32

M224902

2025

Subcrop

2.02

10.72

0.01

0.90

0.02

2.31

M220677

2025

Talus

0.00

29.29

0.29

0.29

6.78

2.26

D751992

2024

Grab

0.33

102.00

0.03

3.27

0.06

2.21

D750448

2024

Grab

0.42

71.70

0.03

4.57

0.09

2.20

D751391

2025

Grab

1.89

14.34

0.10

0.24

0.01

2.19

D751947

2024

Grab

0.01

74.70

0.48

0.09

2.81

2.16

D750086

2024

Channel

0.17

17.30

0.12

1.11

4.70

2.16

D751371

2025

Grab

1.56

39.69

0.00

0.20

0.00

2.08

M224852

2025

Grab

1.08

50.66

0.16

0.93

0.29

2.05

D750555

2024

Channel

0.05

73.10

0.17

1.03

2.65

2.03

M217618

2025

Channel

1.94

6.23

0.00

0.00

0.01

2.02

D750629

2025

Grab

1.23

39.89

0.15

0.00

0.58

1.99

D751165

2024

Grab

1.95

6.80

0.00

0.01

0.01

1.99

M217592

2025

Channel

1.69

10.63

0.17

0.02

0.01

1.97

D750393

2024

Grab

1.01

41.30

0.02

1.79

0.37

1.97

D750449

2024

Grab

0.24

32.60

0.01

6.38

0.02

1.96

D751426

2025

Grab

1.91

1.49

0.00

0.00

0.01

1.94

D751352

2025

Chip

0.22

41.10

1.34

0.01

0.07

1.91

D751422

2025

Grab

0.01

41.14

1.55

0.01

0.02

1.86

M217853

2025

Channel

1.75

2.88

0.00

0.02

0.06

1.81

M217665

2025

Channel

0.80

43.76

0.53

0.00

0.01

1.80

M224912

2025

Grab

1.00

64.20

0.00

0.01

0.00

1.78

D751194

2024

Grab

0.44

130.00

0.01

0.08

0.09

1.74

D750725

2025

Grab

0.00

62.49

0.07

4.77

0.60

1.71

M224903

2025

Grab

0.47

39.05

0.86

0.01

0.01

1.70

M217721

2025

Channel

0.03

53.49

0.88

0.46

0.76

1.70

M220604

2025

Grab

0.50

29.35

0.89

0.30

0.03

1.69

D751429

2025

Grab

0.06

73.61

0.02

2.36

1.37

1.67

M224901

2025

Grab

1.46

12.66

0.02

0.22

0.01

1.66

D750197

2024

Grab

0.10

95.80

0.02

1.43

0.53

1.66

D750195

2024

Grab

0.33

15.30

0.07

2.21

1.77

1.60

D750083

2024

Channel

0.81

32.70

0.01

1.63

0.12

1.57

M217565

2025

Channel

0.47

12.27

0.61

0.04

1.67

1.56

M217724

2025

Channel

1.50

2.88

0.01

0.06

0.01

1.55

D750616

2025

Grab

0.11

64.83

0.52

0.35

0.56

1.54

D751251

2024

Grab

1.27

11.10

0.11

0.02

0.02

1.53

M217636

2025

Channel

1.33

12.99

0.01

0.07

0.01

1.52

D750552

2024

Channel

0.02

33.00

0.24

0.04

2.82

1.51

D751948

2024

Grab

0.11

53.10

0.01

3.48

0.07

1.49

D751993

2024

Grab

1.20

11.90

0.03

0.35

0.17

1.48

M224885

2025

Grab

0.48

14.86

0.90

0.00

0.01

1.45

D751116

2024

Grab

1.27

13.20

0.00

0.01

0.01

1.44

D750553

2024

Channel

0.02

25.10

0.22

0.06

2.82

1.42

D751115

2024

Grab

0.05

45.10

0.02

0.95

2.03

1.40

D751397

2025

Grab

0.01

26.13

0.65

0.05

2.10

1.40

M224914

2025

Grab

0.02

49.81

0.32

1.61

0.85

1.36

D750607

2024

Grab

0.68

43.40

0.00

0.75

0.03

1.36

D751941

2024

Grab

0.35

26.00

0.06

0.64

1.54

1.34

D750095

2024

Channel

0.06

52.40

0.07

1.56

0.93

1.32

D750093

2024

Channel

0.02

43.70

0.15

0.65

1.65

1.31

D751159

2024

Grab

0.54

29.00

0.03

1.93

0.03

1.31

M217707

2025

Channel

0.03

35.15

0.46

1.41

0.94

1.30

M217591

2025

Channel

1.17

3.78

0.06

0.04

0.03

1.28

D751599

2024

Float

0.05

67.20

0.02

1.54

0.23

1.27

M217625

2025

Channel

0.35

20.84

0.55

0.02

0.61

1.22

M217673

2025

Channel

0.07

48.23

0.03

1.41

1.35

1.22

M217626

2025

Channel

0.84

17.58

0.18

0.00

0.02

1.22

M224854

2025

Grab

0.95

20.56

0.05

0.91

0.24

1.21

D750706

2025

Float

0.03

86.21

0.09

0.10

0.05

1.18

D750091

2024

Channel

0.02

56.00

0.13

0.07

1.40

1.18

D751193

2024

Grab

0.44

20.60

0.48

0.01

0.01

1.17

D750087

2024

Channel

0.14

37.00

0.00

1.49

0.91

1.15

D751945

2024

Grab

0.02

27.30

0.08

1.53

1.17

1.13

M217704

2025

Channel

1.07

1.61

0.02

0.01

0.02

1.11

M224856

2025

Grab

0.01

18.03

0.66

0.02

1.22

1.10

D750727

2025

Grab

0.00

28.20

0.83

0.00

0.02

1.07

D751835

2024

Chip

0.12

25.20

0.05

1.76

0.75

1.05

M224919

2025

Grab

0.86

8.94

0.03

0.17

0.01

1.03

M217602

2025

Channel

0.55

25.19

0.16

0.03

0.05

1.02

The Big One property is situated in a region that is well known for hosting Tier 1 precious metal and porphyry deposits, several of which occur near the property including the multiple porphyry systems at Galore Creek (12,159 million pounds of copper, 9.438 million ounces of gold, 174.086 million ounces of silver), the world’s largest known gold reserve at KSM (47.3 million ounces of gold, 160 million ounces of silver, 7.32 billion pounds of copper) and the polymetallic copper project at Shaft Creek (5 billion pounds of copper, 3.7 million ounces of gold, 16.4 million ounces of silver), as well as the Brucejack high-grade epithermal gold deposit (14 million ounces of gold, 91.8 million ounces of silver), and the structurally controlled high-grade hydrothermal gold-silver zones at Trophy and Sphal Creek. The property geology is favorable to host these types of deposits as confirmed by the presence of extensive areas of propylitic alteration, untested geophysical anomalies, strong silt, soil and rock geochemistry including path finder elements directly related to porphyry systems, key structures and textures, porphyry-style mineralization, and high-grade polymetallic veins, that have been discovered within the Big One claims.

The Big One property can be accessed year-round via helicopter from the Glenora/Telegraph Creek Road at the Barrington Mine (33 km to the north-northeast) as well as the Galore Creek Road (15 km to the southeast). The Canadian government committed $20 M to extend/improve the Galore Creek Road to within 15 km of the Big One property. The property is 2 km west of the Scud River airstrip used in the early days of Galore Creek.

The Big One property exploration qualifies for the Critical Mineral Exploration Tax Credit (CMETC).

The Company would like to extend a special thanks to the Tahltan First Nation, the local community, and service providers for supporting our efforts and contributing to the success of this year’s program. We look forward to continuing to work with the Tahltan First Nation and all local stakeholders and businesses while we move forward to unlocking the full potential of this amazing new discovery. WORKING TOGETHER WE SUCCEED!

About Juggernaut Exploration Ltd.

Juggernaut Exploration Ltd. is an explorer and generator of precious metals projects in the prolific Golden Triangle of northwestern British Columbia. Its projects are in world-class geological settings and geopolitical safe jurisdictions amenable to Tier 1 mining in Canada. Juggernaut is a member and active supporter of CASERM, an organization representing a collaborative venture between the Colorado School of Mines and Virginia Tech. Juggernaut’s key strategic cornerstone shareholder is Crescat Capital.

For more information, please contact:

Juggernaut Exploration Ltd.

Dan Stuart

President and Chief Executive Officer

Tel: (604)-559-8028

www.juggernautexploration.com

Follow us on LinkedIn: Click Here
Follow us on Facebook:
Click Here
Follow us on X / Twitter:
Click Here
Follow us on YouTube:
Click Here

Qualified Person

Rein Turna, P. Geo, is the qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, for Juggernaut Exploration projects, and supervised the preparation of, and has reviewed and approved, the technical information in this release.

Other

The reader is cautioned that grab samples are spot samples which are typically, but not exclusively, constrained to mineralization. Grab samples are selective in nature and collected to determine the presence or absence of mineralization and are not intended to be representative of the material sampled.

Grab, channels, chip and talus samples were collected by foot with helicopter assistance. Prospective areas included, but were not limited to, proximity to MINFile locations, placer creek occurrences, regional soil anomalies, and potential gossans based on high-resolution satellite imagery. The rock grab and chip samples were extracted using a rock hammer, or hammer and chisel to expose fresh surfaces and to liberate a sample of anywhere between 0.5 to 5.0 kilograms. All sample sites were flagged with biodegradable flagging tape and marked with the sample number. All sample sites were recorded using hand-held GPS units (accuracy 3-10 meters) and sample ID, easting, northing, elevation, type of sample (outcrop, subcrop, float, talus, chip, grab, etc.) and a description of the rock were recorded on all-weather paper. Samples are then inserted in a clean plastic bag with a sample tag for transport and shipping to the geochemistry lab. QA/QC samples including blanks, certified reference materials, and duplicate samples are inserted regularly into the sample sequence at a rate of 10%.

All samples are transported in rice bags sealed with numbered security tags. The rice bags are transported from the core shacks to the MSALABS facilities in Terrace, BC. MSALABS is certified with both AC89-IAS and ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2017. The core samples undergo preparation via drying, crushing to ~70% of the material passing a 2 mm sieve and riffle splitting. The sample splits are weighed and transferred into three plastic jars, each containing between 300 g and 500 g of crushed sample material. A 250 g split is pulverized to ensure at least 85% of the material passes through a 75 µm sieve. The crushed samples are transported to the MSALABS PhotonAssayTM facility in Prince George, where gold concentrations are quantified via photon assay analysis (method CPA-Au1). Samples that result in gold concentrations ≥5 ppm are analyzed to extinction. Photon assay uses high-energy X-rays (photons) to excite atomic nuclei within the jarred samples, inducing the emission of secondary gamma rays, which are measured to quantify gold concentrations. The assays from all jars are combined on a weight-averaged basis. Multielement analyses are carried at the MSALABS facilities in Surrey, BC, where 250 g of pulverized splits are analyzed via ICF6xx and IMS-230 methods. The IMS-230 method uses 4-acid digestion (a combination of hydrochloric, nitric, perchloric and hydrofluoric acids) followed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry to quantify concentrations of 48 elements. Samples with over-limit results for Ag, Cu, Pb and Zn undergo ore-grade analysis via the ICF-6xx method (where ‘xx’ denotes the target metal). This method employs 4-acid digestion followed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT

Certain disclosures in this release may constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties relating to Juggernaut’s operations that may cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements, including its ability to complete the contemplated private placement. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements.

NOT FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES OR TO U.S. PERSONS OR FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES. THIS PRESS RELEASE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR AN INVITATION TO PURCHASE ANY SECURITIES DESCRIBED IN it.

NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.

Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com