Author

admin

Browsing

(TheNewswire)

TORONTO, ON TheNewswire – May 20, 2025 Silver Crown Royalties Inc. ( Cboe: SCRI, OTCQX: SLCRF, BF: QS0 ) ( ‘Silver Crown’ ‘SCRi’ the ‘Corporation’ or the ‘Company’ ) is pleased to announce a non-brokered offering (the ‘ Offering ‘) for gross proceeds of up to C$2,000,000.

The Company intends to issue up to 307,692 units (‘ Units ‘) of the Company at a price of C$6.50 per Unit pursuant to the Offering. Each Unit will consist of one common share in the capital of the Company (‘ Common Share ‘) and one Common Share purchase warrant (‘ Warrant ‘). Each Warrant will be exercisable to acquire one (1) additional Common Share at an exercise price of C$13.00 for a period of three years from the date of the closing of the Offering (the ‘ Expiry Date ‘). Closing of the Offering will be subject to customary conditions precedent, including the prior approval of Cboe Canada Inc.

Peter Bures, Silver Crown’s Chief Executive Officer, commented, ‘In the current market environment, this financing paves the way to free cash flow in Q4 of this year by facilitating the completion of the second tranche of our silver royalty on PPX Mining Corp.’s Igor 4 project and other growth initiatives.’

ABOUT Silver Crown Royalties INC.

Founded by industry veterans, Silver Crown Royalties ( Cboe: SCRI | OTCQX: SLCRF | BF: QS0 ) is a publicly traded, silver royalty company. Silver Crown (SCRi) currently has four silver royalties of which three are revenue-generating. Its business model presents investors with precious metals exposure that allows for a natural hedge against currency devaluation while minimizing the negative impact of cost inflation associated with production. SCRi endeavors to minimize the economic impact on mining projects while maximizing returns for shareholders. For further information, please contact:

Silver Crown Royalties Inc.

Peter Bures, Chairman and CEO

Telephone: (416) 481-1744

Email: pbures@silvercrownroyalties.com

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This release contains certain ‘forward looking statements’ and certain ‘forward-looking information’ as defined under applicable Canadian and U.S. securities laws. Forward-looking statements and information can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘should’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘estimate’, ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘continue’, ‘plans’ or similar terminology. The forward-looking information contained herein is provided for the purpose of assisting readers in understanding management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Forward-looking statements and information include, but are not limited to, In the current market environment, this financing paves the way to free cash flow in Q4 of this year by facilitating the completion of the second tranche of our silver royalty on PPX Mining Corp.’s Igor 4 project and other growth initiatives’ . Forward-looking statements and information are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions that, while believed by management to be reasonable, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual actions, events or results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including but not limited to: the impact of general business and economic conditions; the absence of control over mining operations from which SCRi will purchase gold and other metals or from which it will receive royalty payments and risks related to those mining operations, including risks related to international operations, government and environmental regulation, delays in mine construction and operations, actual results of mining and current exploration activities, conclusions of economic evaluations and changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents, equipment breakdowns, title matters, labor disputes or other unanticipated difficulties or interruptions in operations; SCRi’s ability to enter into definitive agreements and close proposed royalty transactions; the inherent uncertainties related to the valuations ascribed by SCRi to its royalty interests; problems inherent to the marketability of gold and other metals; the inherent uncertainty of production and cost estimates and the potential for unexpected costs and expenses; industry conditions, including fluctuations in the price of the primary commodities mined at such operations, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and fluctuations in interest rates; government entities interpreting existing tax legislation or enacting new tax legislation in a way which adversely affects SCRi; stock market volatility; regulatory restrictions; liability, competition, the potential impact of epidemics, pandemics or other public health crises on SCRi’s business, operations and financial condition, loss of key employees. SCRi has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers are advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. SCRi undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information except as required by applicable law. Such forward-looking information represents management’s best judgment based on information currently available.

This document does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, securities of the Company in Canada, the United States or any other jurisdiction. Any such offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy the securities described herein will be made only pursuant to subscription documentation between the Company and prospective purchasers. Any such offering will be made in reliance upon exemptions from the prospectus and registration requirements under applicable securities laws, pursuant to a subscription agreement to be entered into by the Company and prospective investors. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

CBOE CANADA DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS NEWS RELEASE.

Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Investorideas.com, a global investor news source covering mining and metals stocks releases a new episode of the Exploring Mining Podcast . Host Cali Van Zant talks with Andrew Bowering, Chairman of Apollo Silver Corp. (TSXV: APGO) (OTCQB: APGOF) (FSE: 6ZF0). Apollo Silver Corp. has assembled an experienced and technically strong leadership team who have joined to advance world class precious metals projects in tier-one jurisdictions.


Andrew Bowering, Chairman of Apollo Silver Corp

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/6292/252535_43ae76a504493a60_001full.jpg

Andy shares his background, his passion for the mining sector, how he defines success and his vision for Apollo Silver Corp. and its key projects.

Key takeaways from interview:

    Listen to the podcast:

    https://www.spreaker.com/episode/this-fully-funded-silver-stock-holds-america-s-biggest-undeveloped-silver-mine–66126199

    Watch on YouTube:

    Listen to Exploring Mining on Spotify

    Listen to Exploring Mining podcast on iTunes Apple podcasts

    Podcast Overview
    Andrew Bowering, Chairman of Apollo Silver Corp shares his extensive background in the mining industry, which spans 35 years. Andy explains how he founded Apollo Silver at the request of investors, raising significant funds and acquiring assets from mid-tier to major companies in the silver space.

    The conversation then shifts to the recent appointment of Ross McElroy as CEO of Apollo Silver. Andy highlights Ross’ extensive experience in the industry, including his recent sale of Fission Uranium for $1.1 billion, and expresses enthusiasm about having Ross now lead the Apollo team. (Related news release)

    California Mining Landscape and Calico Project
    Andy discusses the mining landscape in California, highlighting the state’s complex history with mining and environmental concerns. He explains that while California has been less popular for mining in recent years due to environmental regulations and water scarcity, there are still areas like San Bernardino County where mining operations are active. Andrew then describes Apollo’s project, situated primarily on private land designated for mining, emphasizing its favorable location and historical significance. He also mentions the project’s geological advantages, including a 1:1 strip ratio and a straightforward geological formation.

    Calico Project
    Andrew discusses the Calico project, which consists of three deposits: two silver (Waterloo and Langtry) and an historical gold deposit, The Burcham Mine. The project contains approximately 160 million ounces of silver and 70,000 ounces of gold. Andrew also mentions the presence of barite, a critical mineral, which could be valuable for negotiations with the government. For the upcoming year, the company plans to announce a compliant barite resource, conduct a drill program to determine the size of the gold resource, and perform an economic study on the silver resource.

    Cinco De Mayo Mining Project
    Andrew discusses their large mining project called Cinco de Mayo, located northwest of Chihuahua City in North Mexico. He explains that the project, potentially the largest CRD (Carbonate Replacement Deposit) in North America, lost its social license in 2012 when local surface owners banned mining. Andrew’s company, Apollo, has been given a five-year option to resolve community issues and resume drilling. He draws parallels to his previous success with Prime Mining in Sinaloa, Mexico, where he restored community support and unlocked significant value. Andrew believes his team’s local connections and experience will help them resolve the social license issues at Cinco de Mayo, potentially turning it into a highly valuable project.

    Mining in Northern Mexico’s Economy
    Andrew shares the importance of mining in Northern Mexico’s economy and the recent changes in government policy. He explains that the previous government tried to restrict mining, but the new Sheinbaum government is now opening up the sector for foreign investment. Andrew emphasizes the positive impact of mineral exploration and mine development on local communities in Mexico. He mentions that officials from Chihuahua’s Ministry of Mines visited their office, expressing excitement about the potential reopening of the Cinco de Mayo project, which could bring significant economic benefits to the area.

    Mining Industry Success
    Andrew talks about the key elements for success in the mining industry, emphasizing the importance of good assets, a strong management team, and a solid shareholder base with a good capital structure. He stresses the value of teamwork and hiring smart, hardworking individuals. Andrew explains his role in raising money and promotion, while also highlighting his hands-on experience and personal financial commitment to Apollo. He says he believes that demonstrating leadership through personal investment attracts good supporters, which in turn brings more supporters and provides the patience needed for long-term projects.

    About Apollo Silver Corp.

    Apollo has assembled an experienced and technically strong leadership team who have joined to advance quality precious metals projects in sought after jurisdictions. The Company is focused on advancing its portfolio of two prospective silver exploration and resource development projects, the Calico Project, in San Bernardino County, California and the Cinco de Mayo Project, in Chihuahua, Mexico.

    Please visit www.apollosilver.com for further information.

    Apollo on X @corp_apollo

    May 2025 Presentation

    Hear other episodes of the Exploring Mining Podcast , rated as one of the top 30 mining podcasts to listen to in 2025,

    The Investorideas.com podcasts are also available on Apple Podcasts, Audible, Spotify, Tunein, Stitcher, Spreaker.com, iHeartRadio, Google Podcasts and most audio platforms available.

    Visit the Podcast page at Investorideas.com:

    https://www.investorideas.com/Audio/

    Research mining stocks at Investorideas.com with our free mining stocks directory at Investorideas.com

    About Investorideas.com – Big Investing Ideas

    Investorideas.com Named as one of 100 Best Investment Blogs and Websites in 2025 (8th)

    Investorideas.com is the go-to platform for big investing ideas. From breaking stock news to top-rated investing podcasts, we cover it all. Our original branded content includes podcasts such as Exploring Mining, Cleantech, Crypto Corner, Cannabis News, and the AI Eye. We also create free investor stock directories for sectors including mining, crypto, renewable energy, gaming, biotech, tech, sports and more. Public companies within the sectors we cover can use our news publishing and content creation services to help tell their story to interested investors. Paid content is always disclosed.

    Disclaimer/Disclosure: This podcast and article featuring Apollo Silver are paid for content at Investorideas.com, part of a monthly marketing mining stock showcase (payment disclosure). Our site does not make recommendations for purchases or sale of stocks, services or products. Nothing on our sites should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell products or securities. All investing involves risk and possible losses. This site is currently compensated for news publication and distribution, social media and marketing, content creation and more. Disclosure is posted for each compensated news release, content published /created if required but otherwise the news was not compensated for and was published for the sole interest of our readers and followers. Contact management and IR of each company directly regarding specific questions.

    More disclaimer info: https://www.investorideas.com/About/Disclaimer.asp Learn more about publishing your news release and our other news services on the Investorideas.com newswire https://www.investorideas.com/News-Upload/ Global investors must adhere to regulations of each country. Please read Investorideas.com privacy policy: https://www.investorideas.com/About/Private_Policy.asp

    Follow us on X @investorideas @Exploringmining

    Follow us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/Investorideas

    Follow us on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/Investorideas

    Contact Investorideas.com to be a guest or sponsor this podcast
    800-665-0411

    To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/252535

    News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Apollo Silver Corp. (‘Apollo’ or the ‘Company’) (TSX.V: APGO, OTCQB: APGOF, Frankfurt: 6ZF0) is pleased to announce it has acquired 2,215 hectares (‘ha’) of highly prospective claims contiguous to its Waterloo property at its Calico Silver Project (‘Calico’ or ‘Calico Project’). The newly acquired claims herein referred to as the Mule claims comprise 415 lode mining claims, and have been acquired from LAC Exploration LLC (‘LAC’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lithium Americas Corp. (TSX: LAC; NYSE: LAC), who were the previous operators of the property. Preliminary mapping and sampling conducted by the prior operator of the Mule claims identified several high-grade silver targets, which will be evaluated as part of Apollo’s future exploration planning.

    In addition, a mapping and sampling program was recently completed at the Burcham gold prospect area in the southwest region of the Waterloo property (see news release dated February 12, 2025). This program confirmed the importance of the Calico fault system with respect to controls on the silver (‘Ag)’ and gold (‘Au’) mineralization in the area and has identified the potential for copper (‘Cu’), zinc (‘Zn’) and lead (‘Pb’) mineralization associated with stratabound and mantos lenses.

    Highlights:

    • Mule claims expand the Calico Project land package by over 285%, from 1,194 ha to 3,409 ha of contiguous claims.
      • Mule claims trend along the mineralized Calico Fault System responsible for mineralization seen at Calico.
      • Reports from the prior operator indicate that there are several strongly anomalous silver values on the property, which Apollo will attempt to ground-truth in the coming exploration programs.
      • Sampling done across the Mule claims by previous operator has   identified a large Ag anomaly associated with the same suite of host rocks at the Waterloo property.
    • Exploration at the Burcham prospect at Waterloo included assays from 27 surface samples:
      • Assay peaks up to 14.10 g/t Au, 20.70 g/t Ag, 0.17% Cu, 22.80% Zn and 5.74 % Pb from various samples (see Table 1).
      • Identification of strata-bound lenses and mantos that show strong potential for Cu, Zn and Pb mineralization.

    Ross McElroy, President and CEO of Apollo, commented , ‘The addition of the Mule claims substantially enhances the Calico Project. Calico already hosts 3 discrete drill delineated zones with resource estimates along a 4km long trend, along the Calico fault zone. The Mule claims increase the overall land area of the Calico project by more than 2.5x. The new claims are strategically located to the east along the very prolific Calico mineralized corridor and represent a great opportunity for further discoveries. Apollo is committed to continuing to unlock value in California for our shareholders.’

    Mule Claims Acquisition

    The Mule claims are composed of 415 lode mining claims administered by the Bureau of Land Management. Mapping and sampling conducted by the previous operators across the Mule claims has identified a continuation of the mineralized Calico Fault System. The sedimentary rocks of the Barstow formation which hosts the Waterloo silver deposit, as well as the volcanic Pickhandle formation are pronounced all over the acquired claims. The contact between the Barstow and Pickhandle formation has demonstrated potential for gold mineralization as is seen at Waterloo. Sampling across the Mule claims has identified several strong Ag and Au anomalies. Apollo plans to conduct its own follow up exploration program on the Mule claims to better develop its own exploration targets and delineate where this highly prospective contact is exposed.

    Details of the Transaction

    The Mule claims were acquired by Apollo’s wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, Stronghold Silver USA Corp. (‘Stronghold’), from LAC. As consideration for the acquisition, Apollo paid US$250,000 in cash, and LAC retains a 2.0% net smelter return royalty (the ‘Royalty’) on the Mule claims.

    Apollo, through Stronghold, retains the right to buy back 1.0% of the Royalty at any time on or before the date that is thirty (30) days from the date of commencement of commercial production, for a payment of US$1,000,000.

    Figure 1: Map of Calico Project in San Bernardino, California

    2025 Burcham Exploration Program

    The Company has completed its previously announced surface exploration work at its Burcham prospect (see news release dated February 12, 2025). The work completed consisted of detailed mapping, sample collection and target generation, with the aim to follow up with future drilling.

    The exploration team has completed some of the most detailed mapping to date at the Calico Project, including previous programs at Langtry and Waterloo. Structures dominating at Burcham are similar to those at Waterloo with the system being dominated by the Calico Fault, a sinuous moderately plunging reverse fault that dips steeply to the north. Potential for Au mineralization is strong along the contact of the Burcham and Pickhandle formations. Previously unrecognised, stratiform mantos and lenses occupying fold flexures show strong potential for Cu mineralization. This type of mantos have been historically mined on the north side of the Waterloo deposit, and occur near the contact between the Pickhandle Formation and the overlying Barstow Formation. Historic mining on the North side of Waterloo Deposit targeted a manto about 1.5 m thick. Copper mineralization is associated with strong hydrothermal alteration which is seen to diminish as you move eastward along the property. Assays of the sample results are presented in Table 1.

    Figure 2: Summary Map of Burcham Exploration Program

    Table 1: Location and Assay Results of Samples Collected

    Site ID Sample ID Easting Northing Elevation
    (m)
    Au
    (g/t)
    Ag
    (g/t)
    Cu
    (%)
    Zn
    (%)
    Pb
    (%)
    A F278051 511181 3867493 707 0.13 2.73 0.01 0.55 0.12
    B F278052 511185 3867503 712 0.53 9.17 0.04 0.25 0.61
    C F278053 511181 3867516 714 0.01 3.56 0.00 0.30 0.09
    D F278054 511182 3867536 719 0.05 2.95 0.00 0.40 0.06
    E F278055 511209 3867614 736 0.08 3.18 0.00 0.18 0.02
    F F278056 511229 3867640 743 0.12 2.79 0.00 0.27 0.03
    G F278057 511270 3867668 775 14.10 9.08 0.06 0.40 0.51
    H F278058 511238 3867486 728 0.32 3.87 0.03 0.07 0.21
    I F278059 511591 3867483 738 0.05 0.36 0.17 0.89 0.01
    J F278060 511452 3867566 787 0.42 20.70 0.06 0.05 0.49
    K F278061 511378 3867622 792 0.25 7.83 0.02 0.06 0.17
    L F278062 511343 3867613 789 0.25 4.64 0.01 0.01 0.21
    M F278063 511595 3867636 812 0.15 2.50 0.02 0.16 0.25
    N F278064 511617 3867601 796 0.01 0.58 0.01 0.08 0.09
    O F278065 511125 3867728 796 0.03 6.90 0.00 0.09 0.17
    P F278066 511159 3867925 865 0.04 2.96 0.14 0.14 0.24
    Q F278067 511179 3867932 864 0.03 0.61 0.02 0.19 0.03
    R F278068 511016 3867837 857 0.00 17.30 0.00 0.07 0.01
    S F278069 511283 3867661 777 12.45 15.95 0.08 0.29 0.74
    T F278070 511302 3867680 794 4.58 9.02 0.15 0.37 5.74
    U F278071 511363 3867570 781 1.13 12.65 0.02 0.06 0.32
    V F278072 511478 3867509 772 0.72 10.25 0.03 0.04 0.59
    W F278073 511519 3867501 764 0.16 2.73 0.04 0.08 0.17
    X F278074 511485 3867458 753 0.05 2.56 0.01 14.75 0.10
    Y F278075 511440 3867459 751 0.18 1.58 0.00 22.80 0.07
    Z F278076 511377 3867520 748 1.52 5.90 0.02 0.09 0.21
    AA F278077 511314 3867501 734 1.71 3.28 0.01 0.05 0.19


    Sampling and Quality Assurance/Quality Control

    Grab samples were collected in the field and a 2 kg representative sample was sent for analysis. Rock samples are catalogued and securely stored in a warehouse facility in Barstow, California until they are ready for secure shipment to ALS Global Geochemistry in Reno, Nevada (‘ALS Reno’) for sample preparation and gold analysis. After preparation, splits of prepared pulps are securely shipped to ALS Vancouver, British Columbia for analysis.

    Samples were prepared at ALS Reno (Prep-31 package) with each sample crushed to better than 70% passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, U.S. Std. No. 10) screen. A split of 250 g is taken and pulverized to better than 85% passing a 75-micron (Tyler 200 mesh, U.S Std. No 200) screen. Surface samples were analyzed using complete characterization via the CCP-PK05 methods, which include whole rock analysis (ME-ICP06), ME-MS61, single element trace method using aqua regia digestion and ICP-MS (ME-MS42) and rare earth elements using the method ME-ME81, which consists of lithium borate fusion followed by ICP-MS. All surface samples were submitted for gold analysis by fire assay (Au-AA23). Over-range samples analyzed for copper, lead and zinc were re-submitted for analysis using a four-acid digestion and ICP-AES finish (method OG62) with a range of 0.001-50% for copper, 0.001-20% for lead, and 0.001-30% for zinc. Gold was analyzed by fire assay with atomic absorption finish (method Au-AA25) with a reportable range of 0.01-100 ppm Au. All analyses were completed at ALS Vancouver except for gold by fire assay, which was completed at ALS Reno.

    Apollo’s QA/QC program includes ongoing auditing of all results from the laboratories. The Company’s Qualified Person is of the opinion that the sample preparation, analytical, and security procedures followed are sufficient and reliable. The Company is not aware of any sampling issues or other factors that could materially affect the accuracy or reliability of the data reported herein.

    2025 Marketing Initiatives

    The Company also announces that it has engaged Creative Direct Marketing Group, Inc. (‘CDMG’), an arm’s-length service provider, to provide creative services in accordance with the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange (‘TSXV’) and applicable securities laws. Based in Nashville, Tennessee, CDMG specializes in marketing, advertising, and public awareness across various sectors, including mining and metals.

    Pursuant to a work order dated May 16, 2025 (the ‘Agreement’), the Company has retained CDMG’s for a one-time fee of approximately US$129,800. The Agreement represents a creative budget for marketing and advertising services (the ‘Services’), enabling CDMG to begin preparing content that may be used in future campaigns. No specific marketing campaign has been prepared, approved, or scheduled at this time. The engagement is subject to the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange.

    Qualified Person

    The scientific and technical data contained in this news release was reviewed and approved by Isabelle Lépine, M.Sc., P.Geo., Apollo’s Director, Mineral Resources. Ms. Lépine is a registered professional geologist in British Columbia and a QP as defined by NI 43-101 and is not an independent of the Company.

    About Apollo Silver

    Apollo Silver has assembled an experienced and technically strong leadership team who have joined to advance quality precious metals projects in sought after jurisdictions. The Company is focused on advancing its portfolio of two prospective silver exploration and resource development projects, the Calico Project, in San Bernardino County, California and the Cinco de Mayo Project, in Chihuahua, Mexico.

    Please visit www.apollosilver.com for further information.

    ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

    Ross McElroy, President and CEO

    For further information, please contact:

    Amandip Singh, VP Corporate Development
    Telephone: +1 (604) 428-6128
    Email: info@apollosilver.com

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    Cautionary Statement Regarding ‘Forward-Looking’ Information

    This news release includes ‘forward-looking statements’ and ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. All statements included in this news release, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements including, without limitation the expected benefits and strategic rationale of the Mule claims acquisition; the timing, scope, and success of planned exploration activities, including mapping, sampling, and drilling at the Burcham prospect; the potential for silver, gold, and copper mineralization; and the Company’s ability to advance, develop, and permit the Calico Project. Forward-looking statements include predictions, projections and forecasts and are often, but not   always,   identified   by   the   use   of   words   such   as   ‘anticipate’,   ‘believe’,   ‘plan’,   ‘estimate’,   ‘expect’,   ‘potential’,   ‘target’, ‘budget’ and ‘intend’ and statements that an event or result ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘should’, ‘could’ or ‘might’ occur or be achieved and other similar expressions and includes the negatives thereof.

    Forward-looking statements are based on   the reasonable assumptions,   estimates, analysis, and opinions of the management of the Company made in light of its experience and its perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, as well as other factors that management of the Company believes to be relevant and reasonable in the circumstances at the date that such statements are made.   Forward-looking information is based on reasonable assumptions that have been made by the Company as at the date of such information and is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may have caused actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including   but   not limited to: risks associated with mineral exploration and development; metal and mineral prices; availability of capital; accuracy of the Company’s projections and estimates; realization of mineral resource estimates, interest and exchange rates; competition; stock price fluctuations; availability of drilling equipment and access; actual results of current exploration activities; government regulation; political or economic developments; environmental risks; insurance risks; capital expenditures; operating or technical difficulties in connection with development activities; personnel relations; and changes in Project parameters   as   plans   continue   to   be   refined. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions management believes to be reasonable, including   but   not   limited   to   the   price   of   silver,   gold   and   Ba;   the   demand   for   silver,   gold   and   Ba;   the   ability to   carry on exploration and development activities; the timely receipt of any required approvals; the ability to obtain qualified personnel, equipment and services in a timely and cost-efficient manner; the ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective matter; and the regulatory framework regarding environmental matters, and such other assumptions and factors as set out herein. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results   not   to   be   as   anticipated,   estimated   or   intended.   There   can   be   no   assurance   that   forward-looking   statements   will prove to be accurate and actual results, and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward looking information contained herein, except   in   accordance   with   applicable   securities   laws.   The   forward-looking   information   contained   herein   is   presented   for the   purpose   of   assisting   investors   in   understanding   the   Company’s   expected   financial   and   operational   performance   and the   Company’s   plans   and   objectives   and   may   not   be   appropriate   for   other   purposes.   The   Company   does   not   undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws .

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at:

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/4129e12b-ae12-4e4b-9d5c-b3e1b63176a7

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1f36b2e0-2e96-449e-aa5a-8b140dcd71dc

    News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

     FPX Nickel Corp. (TSX-V: FPX) (OTCQB: FPOCF) (‘ FPX ‘ or the ‘ Company ‘) is pleased to provide an update on the activities of its affiliate company, CO2 Lock Corp. (‘ CO2 Lock ‘).

    Background

    In 2022, FPX announced the formation of CO2 Lock as a self-funding subsidiary to pursue geoscience-related carbon capture and storage (‘ CCS ‘) opportunities via permanent mineralization of carbon dioxide. FPX retains 100% of the carbon credits associated with CCS on FPX’s own properties, and can use any intellectual property developed by CO2 Lock for the benefit of FPX’s own properties.

    Since its inception, CO2 Lock has completed multiple field programs at its flagship SAM site in central British Columbia , including a successful CCS field program in 2023, which included drilling an exploration well. This achievement marked a significant milestone in the development of CO2 Lock’s innovative in-situ CO 2 mineralization technology.

    Commercial Updates

    In recent months, CO2 Lock has achieved several commercial milestones, including the signing of preliminary agreements with key counterparties in the CCS value chain as follows:

    • Letter of Intent with Cielo Carbon Solutions (‘ Cielo ‘) and Carbon Quest outlining the framework for capturing and sequestering 100,000 tonnes of CO 2 per year, scaling up to a target of 1 million tonnes per year. This strategic relationship combines Cielo and Carbon Quest’s point-source carbon capture solution with CO2 Lock’s storage solution to create an end-to-end value chain from industrial emitters to the permanent storage of carbon dioxide.
    • Memorandum of Understanding with Ionada Carbon Solutions LLC (‘ Ionada ‘) to pursue a variety of commercial arrangements relating to the capture and storage of carbon dioxide and the related sale of carbon credits into the commercial market. The collaboration will integrate Ionada’s proprietary carbon capture technology with CO2 Lock’s permanent mineralization storage solutions, creating end-to-end carbon capture storage systems that are cost-effective and scalable.
    • Letter of Intent with a leading carbon marketplace platform (the ‘ Platform ‘), under which the Platform will purchase up to 33% of the carbon credits generated annually from CO2 Lock’s flagship SAM carbon sequestration site, representing the potential for over 300,000 verified carbon credits (tonnes) per year.

    Following the successful field program in 2023, CO2 Lock has submitted an application for a carbon capture and storage exploratory reservoir license with British Columbia’s Ministry of Energy and Climate Solutions. Receipt of this license would provide CO2 Lock with the regulatory approval to advance the project towards commercial operations at the SAM project.

    CO2 Lock Financing and Restructuring

    CO2 Lock recently completed the final $600,000 tranche of its latest funding round, which raised a cumulative total of $1.7 million through a Simple Agreement for Future Equity (‘ SAFE ‘) from third-party investors. Since its inception, CO2 Lock has raised a total of approximately $3.4 million from third-party investors.

    In connection with the closing of the SAFE round, FPX and CO2 Lock have agreed to a restructuring of CO2 Lock’s capital structure such that FPX’s undiluted ownership interest in CO2 Lock has been reduced from approximately 88% (prior to the SAFE round) to 30% (on conclusion of the SAFE round). This restructuring better positions CO2 Lock to seek additional funding from third party investors going forward, while ensuring that FPX retains a meaningful ownership interest in CO2 Lock and enduring rights to utilize CO2 Lock’s intellectual property for the benefit of FPX’s own properties.

    About FPX Nickel Corp.

    FPX Nickel Corp.  is focused on the exploration and development of the Baptiste Nickel Project, located in central British Columbia , and other occurrences of the same unique style of naturally occurring nickel-iron alloy mineralization known as awaruite.  For more information, please view the Company’s website at https://fpxnickel.com/ or contact Martin Turenne , President and CEO, at (604) 681-8600 or ceo@fpxnickel.com .

    On behalf of FPX Nickel Corp.

    ‘Martin Turenne’
    Martin Turenne , President, CEO and Director

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain of the statements made and information contained herein is considered ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. These statements address future events and conditions and so involve inherent risks and uncertainties, as disclosed in the Company’s periodic filings with Canadian securities regulators. Actual results could differ from those currently projected. The Company does not assume the obligation to update any forward-looking statement.

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    SOURCE FPX Nickel Corp.

    View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/May2025/20/c0028.html

    News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    The Edmonton Oilers and Dallas Stars are facing each other in the NHL Western Conference finals for the second year in a row, starting Wednesday night in Dallas.

    In the Eastern Conference finals, the Florida Panthers and Carolina Hurricanes will meet in a rematch of the 2023 series. That series will open on Tuesday in Raleigh, North Carolina.

    That leaves four possible matchups in the Stanley Cup Final: Stars vs. Hurricanes, Stars vs. Panthers, Oilers vs. Hurricanes or Oilers vs. Panthers, last year’s championship round.

    Which matchup would be the best one to watch? All have their merits. USA TODAY ranks the four possibilities for the 2025 Stanley Cup Final:

    1. Edmonton Oilers vs. Florida Panthers

    Why not a rematch? Last year’s Stanley Cup Final certainly was entertaining, at least by the end. Florida won the first three games and appeared poised to sweep, only to be blown out 8-1 in Game 4. The Oilers forced a Game 7, but the Panthers found their game and won 2-1 at home for their first Stanley Cup title.

    Both teams are filled with stars and are deeper than they were last season. Edmonton and Florida have the top offenses of the four remaining teams. Plus, the storylines abound. Can the Panthers repeat, and would we call them a dynasty if they do after three consecutive trips to the final? Will the Oilers become the first Canadian team since the 1993 Montreal Canadiens to win the Stanley Cup? Will Edmonton’s Connor McDavid, last year’s playoff MVP, and Leon Draisaitl win their first championships? The Oilers would have home-ice advantage this time.

    2. Dallas Stars vs. Carolina Hurricanes

    Want some fresher faces? This one works. Dallas was last in the final in 2020, Carolina in 2006. Plus, there is the Mikko Rantanen factor. He already beat the Colorado Avalanche this postseason after that team surprisingly traded him to the Hurricanes earlier in the season. He would have a chance to knock off another former team because the Hurricanes dealt him to the Stars when they feared he wouldn’t sign in Carolina. He has been a force in the playoffs with a league-best nine goals and 19 points. The Hurricanes, though, have been good at neutralizing other teams’ stars. Carolina’s Andrei Svechnikov is right behind Rantanen with eight goals.

    3. Dallas Stars vs. Florida Panthers

    These teams were well-represented at the 4 Nations Face-Off, so there is top-end talent. The Finnish Olympic team certainly would be paying attention. These teams also have the best remaining power plays. Panthers coach Paul Maurice and Stars coach Peter DeBoer are friends and are highly quotable. We would want this to go to Game 7 because DeBoer is 9-0 in winner-take-all games and Maurice is 6-0.

    4. Edmonton Oilers vs. Carolina Hurricanes

    This would be the top remaining offense (Edmonton) vs. the best defense (Carolina), though the Hurricanes’ style isn’t always the most exciting to watch. This would also be a rematch of the 2006 Stanley Cup Final. The Hurricanes led that series 3-1, but the eighth-seeded Oilers fought back before Carolina won in Game 7. Rod Brind’Amour was the first player to lift the Stanley Cup as Hurricanes captain. Will he get to lift the trophy for the first time as a coach?

    This post appeared first on USA TODAY

    In reality, Rafael Devers is among the least of the Boston Red Sox’s worries.

    Devers’ reticence – or flat-out refusal – to move to first base after he agreed to a shift to designated hitter created plenty of headlines and prompted owner John Henry to fly to Kansas City and talk it out with his $313.5 million slugger.

    Unfortunately for the Red Sox, Henry didn’t pack any pitching reinforcements on the plane.

    Since that summit, Devers has been nearly unstoppable – with 15 hits in 34 at-bats, three homers and 13 RBIs in nine games. But the Red Sox are slowly slipping from shouting distance of the first-place New York Yankees, with 11 losses in their past 17 games to fall six spots in USA TODAY Sports’ power rankings.

    It might have been 12 losses in 17 games if not for Devers, who saved them with his first career walk-off homer against Atlanta on Saturday.

    A few hours later in the series finale, he erased an early deficit 3-0 with a grand slam. But the Red Sox gave up that lead and more, as they’ve done often lately. In losing five of its last six, Boston has twice given up 10 runs in a game and 14 in another. Their rotation ERA now languishes at 4.28, 22nd in the majors.

    And nowadays, that means it doesn’t much matter how many runs the Red Sox score.

    A look at our updated rankings:

    1. Los Angeles Dodgers (-)

    • Feeling the change of the guard: Stalwarts Chris Taylor, Austin Barnes cut as Dalton Rushing steps on the scene.

    2. Detroit Tigers (+2)

    • Tigers win Jackson Jobe’s first eight starts, setting franchise record.

    3. New York Mets (-1)

    • Edwin Diaz, now 10-for-10 in save chances, ramps his fastball back up to 99 mph.

    4. Philadelphia Phillies (+5)

    • At least Jose Alvarado’s PED suspension came well before the trade deadline.

    5. San Diego Padres (-2)

    • Almost mathematically eliminated in the Vedder Cup.

    6. San Francisco Giants (-)

    • Wilmer Flores, RBI machine, wins epic battle against Mason Miller for walk-off walk.

    7. Chicago Cubs (-1)

    • PCA vs. the White Sox was no match: 8-for-14, nine RBIs, four extra-base hits.

    8. New York Yankees (-1)

    • Jonathan Loaisiga’s return a nice boost for bullpen.

    9. Seattle Mariners (-)

    • There’s a new ace in town and his name is Bryan Woo.

    10. Cleveland Guardians (-)

    • Shane Bieber getting closer to a rehab assignment.

    11. Minnesota Twins (+7)

    • You win 13 in a row, you jump 14 spots in the standings. Them’s the rules.

    12. St. Louis Cardinals (-)

    • Started the year 1-10 on the road; just finished 7-2 road trip.

    13. Kansas City Royals (-2)

    • Those heavy footsteps you hear? Jac Caglianone is one step from the big leagues.

    14. Arizona Diamondbacks (+1)

    • Will be more than halfway done with Dodgers after three-game road set this week.

    15. Houston Astros (-1)

    • Thirteen come-from-behind wins.

    16. Texas Rangers (+3)

    • Evan Carter’s injury woes continue with quad strain.

    17. Cincinnati Reds (+3)

    • Is Will Benson happening? He slams five homers in four games.

    18. Atlanta Braves (+3)

    • They climb over .500, just in time to welcome back Spencer Strider and Ronald Acuña Jr.

    19. Boston Red Sox (-6)

    • Kristian Campbell sliding to first to create room for Marcelo Mayer would be a helluva fix.

    20. Toronto Blue Jays (-4)

    • Tigers show how far they have to go to be playoff team

    21. Milwaukee Brewers (-4)

    • Jackson Chourio dropped to sixth in order, promptly strikes out four times.

    22. Tampa Bay Rays (-)

    • Chandler Simpson survives unsettling slide at home plate.

    23. Athletics (-)

    • Yolo County vs. San Francisco doesn’t quite have the same ring.

    24. Washington Nationals (-)

    • Michael Soroka wins first game since July 2023.

    25. Los Angeles Angels (+1)

    • First three-game sweep over Dodgers since 2010.

    26. Baltimore Orioles (-1)

    • 15-30 record matches 2019 start, when they lost 108 games.

    27. Miami Marlins (-)

    • Sandy Alcantara drops his sixth straight decision, a career high.

    28. Pittsburgh Pirates (-)

    • Shut out in eight of their 32 losses.

    29. Chicago White Sox (-)

    • .University of Tampa product Jordan Leasure racking up 12.9 strikeouts per nine.

    30. Colorado Rockies (-)

    • 8-38, a pace that would knock the White Sox out of the record books.

    The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

    This post appeared first on USA TODAY

    Paige Bueckers and the Dallas Wings hosted the Seattle Storm on Monday night.

    Skylar Diggins and the Storm were coming off a season-opening loss to the Phoenix Mercury on the road. Meanwhile, the Wings looked to bounce back from a season-opening loss to the Minnesota Lynx on Friday.

    Bueckers, the No. 1 pick in the 2025 WNBA draft, had 10 points and seven rebounds in her pro debut against the Lynx.  She did even better Monday in Arlington, Texas, in her second game, but the Storm got the better of the Wings, with a 79-71 road victory. Bueckers looked nothing like a rookie, scoring a team-high 19 points, while adding eight assists, five rebounds and two steals.

    For a lot of this game, Dallas actually looked like the superior team, but the second and fourth quarters were not kind to the Wings. Seattle won those quarters by a combined score of 44-25.

    Nneka Ogwumike led the Storm with a monster double-double of 23 points and 18 rebounds. Diggins tallied 21 points and nine assists, and Gabby Williams added 17 points, five rebounds and five assists.

    USA TODAY Sports provided updates and highlights throughout the game. Scroll below for the full recap of Storm vs. Wings:

    Storm vs. Wings highlights

    Final: Storm 79, Wings 71

    The fourth quarter got off to a slow start. With both teams playing to prevent three-pointers, it took over two minutes for the first bucket of the quarter, when after a Bueckers missed jump shot, Kaila Charles was able to grab the rebound and shovel a quick pass to Maddie Siegrist for an easy layup.

    After that bucket though, it was all Seattle. The Storm scored eight points before the Wings could record another bucket. Arike Ogunbowale particularly struggled, shooting just 2-of-14 on the night and just 1-of-8 from three. Ogunbowale has earned a little leeway given her strong career, but her poor shooting definitely contributed to Seattle’s loss.

    End of Q3: Storm 66, Wings 61

    It’s been a back-and-forth affair. Even though the Storm have been leading for most of this game, the push-and-pull from Dallas has been unforgiving. Every time the Storm think they have figured something out, the Wings storm back to make it interesting, outscoring the Storm 20-10 in the third.

    Bueckers improved drastically with her ball control between the second and third quarters, recording three assists, a huge part of Dallas’ comeback attempt. Although Bueckers only had four points, she had two rebounds and two steals as well, creating opportunities on both ends of the floor, while Seattle has continued to rely on the Nneka Ogwumike (15 points), Gabby Williams (17), and Skylar Diggins (18) to provide almost all of the scoring. In fact, the rest of the Storm combined only have 14 points. Seattle will need someone else to step up in the final 10 minutes if they want to prevent Dallas from coming back.

    End of Q2: Storm 56, Wings 41

    Well, if you thought Dallas’ offensive outburst at the end of the first quarter would carry into the second, you’d be dead wrong. It was Seattle that stormed back (buh dum tss), almost furious at their performance at the end of the first.

    The Storm outscored their opponents 31-15. Seattle shot 9-of-11 from beyond the arc.

    Bueckers especially struggled in this quarter, tallying only five points (only three through the first 9.5 minutes) while recording some unfortunate turnovers in transition that led to points for Seattle. With about three minutes left in the quarter, there was one instance where a missed shot from the Storm led to a counterattack for Dallas. Bueckers tried threading the needle to her teammate who was out in front, but the pass was intercepted by Alysha Clark. On the ensuing defensive possession, Bueckers jumped in the air anticipating a pass, but Gabby Williams just drove past her instead and kicked the ball out to the corner, leading to a three-pointer from Skylar Diggins.

    Bueckers has taken some big steps forward in between her first game and tonight. After all, she’s already set a career-high with 11 points, but plays like the one above will make it tough for Dallas to come back in the second half.

    End of Q1: Wings 26, Storm 25

    It’s been a close game through 10 minutes, with the Storm out in front of the Wings. Dallas’ Paige Bueckers had seven points in the first quarter, including a clutch three-pointer with under a minute to go to give Dallas the lead. The Wings ended the quarter on a 15-7 run.

    Dallas’ passing also played a massive role in their comeback in the quarter. The team tallied seven assists on their first eight baskets and nine assists throughout the whole quarter. Myisha Hines-Allen had four of those assists for Dallas. However, Seattle’s Skylar Diggins leads all hoopers with five assists through the first.

    Seattle’s Nneka Ogwumike leads all scorers with eight, but Dallas’ Bueckers and McCowan are close behind with seven and six respectively.

    What time is Storm vs. Wings WNBA game?

    The Seattle Storm will play the Dallas Wings at College Park Center in Arlington, Texas, on Monday, May 19, 2025. Tip-off is scheduled for 8 p.m. ET.

    How to watch Storm vs. Wings WNBA game: TV, stream

    • Time: 8 p.m. ET
    • Location: College Park Center (Arlington, Texas)
    • TV: NBATV, KFAA (Dallas), CW (Seattle)
    • Stream: WNBA League Pass

    Predictions for Storm vs. Wings:

    Tyree writes, ‘Bueckers paced all Dallas Wings starters with 30 minutes in her debut and amassed 10 points alongside seven rebounds and a pair of assists. She wasn’t far off 22.5 despite shooting just 3-for-10 from the field against Minnesota. The WNBA is a step up from college but Bueckers shot better than 52% from the field in all four of her campaigns at UConn and only fell short of 41.0% from three in 2021-22.’

    Dewey writes, ‘Seattle’s offense was stuck in mud in its season opener, while the Wings put up a cool 84 points in a loss to the Minnesota Lynx – who were one of the best defensive teams in the WNBA last season. Trading away Loyd for draft capital signaled to me that the Storm were willing to take a step back, and they lack proven scoring options after Skylar Diggins and Nneka Ogwumike.’

    Edgington writes, ‘Paige Bueckers did score 10 points in her first WNBA game, but did so on only 30% shooting and zero made threes, along with four free throws. Hopefully, having first-game jitters out of the way, she has a more efficient shooting night against the Storm.’

    This post appeared first on USA TODAY

    While he had to wait until the fifth round of the 2025 NFL Draft to hear his name called, the 144th pick didn’t have to wait long before inking his deal to play in the league.

    The Cleveland Browns announced on Monday that they have signed Sanders to his rookie deal. The contract is a four-year deal worth $4.6 million. For reference, fellow 2025 draft pick and current teammate Dillon Gabriel will eventually receive a slotted four-year deal worth $6.2 million for being drafted two rounds earlier.

    It hasn’t been an easy road this offseason, but the ink is dried and now the work begins. Here’s what to know about Sanders’ first NFL contract.

    Shedeur Sanders contract details

    Sanders signed a four-year deal worth $4.6 million.

    The quarterback will carry an average annual value (AAV) of about $1.16 million and received a signing bonus of $446,553, according to Spotrac.

    It represents a steep drop from the contract that is slotted in the first round, which would’ve been a four-year deal worth over $40 million in total value if drafted inside the top five.

    Early in the process, Sanders was considered in the running for the No. 2 pick, which later became his college teammate, Travis Hunter. The Jacksonville Jaguars’ two-way player received a contract worth $46.5 million in total value.

    Sanders carried an NIL evaluation of $6.5 million, according to On3 Sports, but elected to pass on his final year of eligibility to enter the NFL draft.

    The move hasn’t worked out from a monetary standpoint, but he did land on a team that presents an opportunity to start. It’s a crowded room in Cleveland, but anyone’s guess who eventually ends up with the job.

    So while it’s a rocky start for Sanders in the pros, things change quickly – especially if he outplays that rookie deal.

    This post appeared first on USA TODAY

    The San Francisco 49ers continue to dole out big-money contract extensions to their best players. Their latest extension is for linebacker Fred Warner.

    Warner and the 49ers agreed to a three-year, $63 million contract extension including $56 million guaranteed, a source confirmed to USA TODAY Sports’ Tyler Dragon.

    This is the second extension Warner’s signed since the 49ers drafted him in the third round, No. 70 overall in the 2018 NFL Draft out of BYU. He’s only missed one regular season game in seven years in the league and was a starter immediately.

    Warner was a first-team All-Pro in 2020, the same year he made his first Pro Bowl. He’s made both in each of the last three seasons as one of the best linebackers in the NFL.

    Warner had two years left on the extension he’d signed prior to the 2021 season. That deal made him the highest-paid linebacker in the league and this new extension does so again.

    Warner joins tight end George Kittle and quarterback Brock Purdy among 49ers players who signed multi-year extensions this offseason. Kittle became the highest-paid tight end in the league with his deal.

    The 2025 season marks Warner’s age-29 campaign and his eighth in the NFL. San Francisco’s defense could look much different this fall after losing players in free agency and bringing in new talent via the NFL Draft. Longtime coordinator Robert Saleh is back in the building as well.

    Fred Warner stats

    Since Warner entered the league in 2018, only three players have tallied more tackles than him: Bobby Wagner, Roquan Smith and Foyesade Oluokun.

    Here’s how his stats have looked every season:

    • 2018 (16 games): 124 tackles, three tackles for loss, six passes defensed, one forced fumble, one fumble recovery
    • 2019 (16 games): 118 tackles, seven tackles for loss, 3.0 sacks, one interception, nine passes defensed, three forced fumbles
    • 2020 (16 games): 125 tackles, five tackles for loss, 1.0 sacks, two interceptions, six passes defensed, one forced fumble, two fumble recoveries
    • 2021 (16 games): 137 tackles, seven tackles for loss, 0.5 sacks, four passes defensed, one forced fumble, three fumble recoveries
    • 2022 (17 games): 130 tackles, three tackles for loss, 2.0 sacks, one interception, 10 passes defensed, one forced fumble
    • 2023 (17 games): 132 tackles, six tackles for loss, 2.5 sacks, four interceptions, 11 passes defensed, four forced fumbles
    • 2024 (17 games): 131 tackles, five tackles for loss, 1.0 sacks, two interceptions, seven passes defensed, four forced fumbles
    This post appeared first on USA TODAY

    Sector Rotation Shakeup: Industrials Take the Lead

    Another week of significant movement in the sector landscape has reshaped the playing field. The Relative Rotation Graph (RRG) paints a picture of shifting dynamics, with some surprising developments in sector leadership. Let’s dive into the details and see what’s happening under the hood.

    1. (6) Industrials – (XLI)*
    2. (4) Financials – (XLF)*
    3. (1) Utilities – (XLU)*
    4. (2) Communication Services – (XLC)*
    5. (3) Consumer Staples – (XLP)*
    6. (8) Technology – (XLK)*
    7. (5) Real-Estate – (XLRE)*
    8. (9) Materials – (XLB)*
    9. (11) Energy – (XLE)*
    10. (10) Consumer Discretionary – (XLY)
    11. (7) Healthcare – (XLV)*

    Weekly RRG

    On the weekly RRG, Utilities and Consumer Staples maintain their high positions on the RS-Ratio scale. However, there are signs of waning momentum. Staples has rolled over within the leading quadrant and is now showing a negative heading. Utilities, while still strong, are losing some of their relative momentum.

    Financials and Communication Services are hanging on in the weakening quadrant, but their tails are relatively short — indicating potential for a quick turnaround.

    The show’s star, Industrials, has made a beeline for the leading quadrant, climbing on the RS-Ratio scale while maintaining a positive RRG heading.

    Daily RRG

    Switching to the daily RRG, we get a more granular view. Utilities, Staples, and Financials are found in the lagging quadrant, but Staples and Utilities are showing signs of life, turning back up towards the improving quadrant.

    Financials, meanwhile, are hugging the benchmark.

    The daily chart confirms Industrials’ strength, mirroring its weekly performance.

    Communication Services, however, is showing some worrying signs — it’s dropped into the weakening quadrant on the daily RRG, confirming its vulnerable position on the weekly chart.

    Industrials

    XLI flexes its muscles, pushing against overhead resistance around the $144 mark.

    A break above this level could trigger a further acceleration in price.

    The relative strength line has already broken out of its consolidation pattern, propelling both RRG lines above 100 and driving the XLI tail deeper into the leading quadrant.

    Financials

    The financial sector continues its upward trajectory, trading above its previous high and closing in on the all-time high of around $53.

    Like Industrials, a break above this resistance could spark a new leg up.

    The RS line is moving sideways within its rising channel, causing the RRG lines to flatten—something to watch.

    Utilities

    XLU has finally broken through its overhead resistance, approaching its all-time high around $83.

    After months of pushing against the $80 level, this breakout is a clear sign of strength.

    The RS line is still grappling with its own resistance, but the RS-Ratio line continues its gradual ascent.

    Communication Services

    While XLC is moving higher on the price chart, its relative strength is lagging.

    The sideways movement in the RS line is causing both RRG lines to move lower, with the RS-Momentum line already below 100.

    This sector is rapidly approaching the lagging quadrant on the daily RRG—definitely one to watch for potential risks.

    Consumer Staples

    XLP is approaching the upper boundary of its trading range ($83-$85), where it is running into resistance. The inability to push higher while the market is moving up is causing relative strength to falter.

    The recent strength has pushed both RRG lines well above 100, but the current loss of relative strength is now causing the RRG-Lines to roll over.

    The tail is still comfortably within the leading quadrant, but this loss of momentum could signal a potential setback.

    Portfolio Performance

    The model portfolio’s defensive positioning has led to some underperformance relative to SPY, with the gap now just under 6%.

    However, the model is sticking to its guns, maintaining a defensive stance with Staples and Utilities firmly in the top five.

    It’s worth noting that Healthcare has now definitively dropped out of the top ranks. Nevertheless, with Staples and Utilities holding firm, and Technology and Consumer Discretionary still in the bottom half, the overall positioning remains cautious.

    These are the periods when patience is key. We need to let the model do its work and wait for new, meaningful relative trends to emerge. It’s not always comfortable to endure underperformance, but it’s often necessary to capture longer-term outperformance.

    #StayAlert, –Julius