Author

admin

Browsing

Man versus dog was the featured matchup when the World Series predictions contest began. But that’s unraveled thanks to the birds.

The Toronto Blue Jays, that is.

With the Blue Jays leading the Los Angeles Dodgers 3-2 heading into Game 6, man and dog might soon be commiserating rather than competing.

The men, Bob Nightengale and Gabe Lacques – esteemed baseball writers at USA TODAY Sports – both picked the Dodgers to win the World Series in six games. That’s impossible.

Luna, the 7-year-old Maltipoo, picked the Dodgers to win in seven games. That’s possible but perhaps unlikely with the final two games of the World Series set to be played in Toronto.

But Luna also has predicted the outcome of each game, and not with great accuracy. She is 2-3.

This contest could end with man and dog licking their wounds, and birds dancing atop their heads.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Week 9 results could influence whether teams become buyers or sellers ahead of the Nov. 4 NFL trade deadline.
  • The 7-1 Indianapolis Colts, led by Jonathan Taylor, boast the league’s top offense and will face the struggling Steelers defense.
  • Patrick Mahomes and the Chiefs will face Josh Allen and the Bills, with Mahomes holding a 1-4 regular-season record against Buffalo.
  • Quarterbacks J.J. McCarthy of the Vikings and Jayden Daniels of the Commanders are expected to return from injuries this week.

Week 9 is upon us, and the NFL’s Nov. 4 trade deadline is just days away.

This week’s slate of games could determine which teams are buyers and sellers with Tuesday’s trade deadline on the horizon.

Thirteen teams have earned at least five wins this season, the third-most through Week 8 since 1970, according to NFL Research. And there are no more winless clubs in the NFL after the New York Jets overcame a 15-point deficit in the fourth quarter to notch their first victory of the season.

With the trade deadline around the corner, USA TODAY Sports examines things to watch in Week 9:

Cowboys among teams to watch ahead of NFL trade deadline

It’s going to be interesting to see how teams and players navigate the NFL’s looming trade deadline.

There have already been multiple trades this week alone, and more are expected to come. Will results from Week 9 persuade teams to be buyers or sellers before Tuesday’s deadline?

Cowboys owner Jerry Jones claimed last week’s loss won’t impact his team’s decision-making process, but he went on 105.3 The Fan on Tuesday and described the type of player the Cowboys would go after if a trade were to happen.

‘One that loves football. Loves football. That seems trite. Why wouldn’t they be out there playing? Some do more than others,’ Jones said, per the Cowboys official website. ‘And so you’re looking for guys that just are from within, self-motivators, miserable when they don’t play well and they exude that around their teammates. That’s just a little thing called makeup right there. Now obviously you want to get a player that is in the top percentile of the kind of players that you’d like to go forward with. That has a price tag.’

Colts’ red-hot offense faces reeling Steelers defense

The 7-1 Colts are off to their best record since 2009. The Colts rank first in the NFL in total offense (385.3 yards per game), touchdowns (32) and points per game (33.8).

Daniel Jones is having a career renaissance in his first year in Indy. He ranks top five in the league in passing yards, but Jonathan Taylor is the engine to the Colts offense. He’s on pace for the running back triple crown. Taylor leads the NFL in scrimmage yards (1,056), rushing yards (850), scrimmage touchdowns (14) and rushing touchdowns (12).

T.J. Watt and the Steelers defense have underperformed this season. Pittsburgh ranks 30th in total defense, has the NFL’s worst pass defense and ranks 18th against the run.

If the Steelers don’t shore up their defense in a hurry, it’s going to be a long game for Mike Tomlin’s team at Acrisure Stadium.

“We make no excuses about how or why we fall short. Our job is to perform and perform at a high level and we haven’t done that. I’m excited about getting back to it,” Tomlin said this week. “Seven games or whatever doesn’t make a season. We certainly got more in front of us and more opportunities to write our story, whether it’s individuals, a component of our team, whether it’s our team in general. I think that’s our general mindset.”

Patrick Mahomes 1-4 against Bills in regular season

The regular season hasn’t been kind to Patrick Mahomes and the Chiefs against the Bills. Buffalo has won the past four regular-season meetings against Kansas City. Mahomes has a 1-4 regular season record against Josh Allen and company.

However, Mahomes is 4-0 against Buffalo in the postseason.

“Every single game comes down to like one play here or there that someone has to make, if that’s offense, defense (or) whatever it is,” Mahomes said of previous matchups against the Bills. “I think it comes down to players making plays in big moments and that’s worked out for us in the playoffs and worked out for them in other times.”

Mahomes enters Week 9 as a midseason MVP candidate. Mahomes’ 17 touchdown passes are tied for first in the league and his 2,099 passing yards rank second.

The Bills and Chiefs both enter Sunday’s marquee matchup with top-five offenses. Defensively, Buffalo and Kansas City rank second and third in pass defense, respectively.

The Chiefs have the NFL’s No. 2 scoring defense. Buffalo ranks second in the NFL in both pass block and run block win rate, per ESPN.

While Mahomes and Allen will garner most of the headlines, whichever defense has the better performance could be the deciding factor.

J.J. McCarthy returns for Minnesota

Is McCarthy the answer in Minnesota? The sample size isn’t large enough to accurately answer the question.

McCarthy has only played in two games since the Vikings drafted him in 2024 due to injuries. The second-year quarterback is expected to return this week from high right ankle sprain.

‘I’m ready to go,’ McCarthy told reporters this week. ‘I feel like myself again. I feel like I have those mobility things that I was concerned about going into last week and the prior weeks. So yeah, ready to go.’

The Vikings need McCarthy to stay healthy the remainder of the season to get a thorough evaluation of the QB, and because veteran Carson Wentz is out for the remainder of the year with a shoulder injury.

McCarthy has just a 58.5% completion percentage and averaged 150.5 passing yards per game, statistics well below the league average.

The Lions have won five consecutive games against their NFC North rival. Minnesota hasn’t defeated Detroit since Sept. 25, 2022.

Jayden Daniels slated to be back under center

The Washington Commanders have lost three straight games and desperately need Daniels to return from a hamstring injury. Daniels has missed three starts this year due to knee and hamstring injuries. Washington is 1-2 without its star quarterback.

“I’m good. If I’m out there I’m not even thinking about it,” Daniels said of his injuries this season. “If I was worried about something I wouldn’t even be playing. If I’m out there on the field, I’m gonna be confident in myself and my abilities to go out there and execute and play football.”

The Commanders won’t have Terry McLaurin (quad) on Sunday.

Washington has struggled to defend the pass this year and ranks 26th in the league in pass defense. That doesn’t bode well as the Commanders face a Seahawks team featuring wideout Jaxon Smith-Njigba who tops the NFL with 819 receiving yards. Smith-Njigba tallied at least eight receptions, 100 receiving yards and a touchdown catch in each of his past three contests.  

Since 2024, the Seahawks are 10-1 (.909 winning percentage) on the road under coach Mike Macdonald, the highest road winning percentage in the league, per NFL Research.

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Tyler Dragon on X @TheTylerDragon.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Before we embark on our Week 10 college football viewers’ guide, we must start with a public service announcement. No. 1 Ohio State is hosting Penn State (noon ET, Fox). This is also the week of the world’s largest outdoor cocktail party in Jacksonville, Fla., which is likewise accompanied by a football game between No. 5 Georgia and Florida (3:30 p.m. ET, ABC).

We provide that information on the off chance either of those contests produces unexpected happenings as rivalry games can. But is our mission in this space to identify what we think will be the best games to watch. We therefore cannot in good conscience recommend those contests unless you have a rooting interest. We’ll look instead in further detail at these seven games somewhat farther down the rankings but should feature more evenly matched opponents.

No. 11 Vanderbilt at No. 19 Texas

Time/TV: noon ET, ABC.

Why watch: The headliner in the early window is this SEC showdown that is a major role reversal for the programs involved. The Longhorns’ improbable escape at Mississippi State last week kept their slim playoff aspirations alive. Vandy, SEC doormat no more, has a couple of quality results in the bank but could use a road victory to solidify its playoff position. Commodores QB Diego Pavia continues to generate Heisman buzz, with 20 total TDs to his credit on the season thus far. He’s sure to receive added attention from Longhorns LB Anthony Hill Jr.. Texas QB Arch Manning’s frequent adventures outside the pocket have taken their toll as he is in concussion protocol and officially listed as questionable. If he’s not available, at least backup Matthew Caldwell has had some success in his limited snaps. The Vanderbilt defense, coming off a strong outing against Missouri, is led by DB C.J. Heard and LB Bryan Longwell.

Why it could disappoint: We suspect this might look a lot like Vanderbilt’s most recent outing, a tough slog against Missouri that was challenging to behold through most of it. But the dramatic finish was the payoff, and there will likely be more fourth-quarter intrigue here.

No. 16 Cincinnati at No. 24 Utah

Time/TV: 10:15 p.m. ET, ESPN.

Why watch: Nearly forgotten after an opening loss to Nebraska, Cincinnati has rattled off seven wins in a row and played itself into the thick of the Big 12 title picture. After this week the Bearcats will only have to leave home one more time, so a victory here in SLC would be huge. The Utes would need a lot of help to win the league but hope to at least stay within shouting distance. Cincinnati QB Brendan Sorsby has tossed 20 TDs with just one pick, spreading the wealth among WRs Cyrus Allen and Caleb Goodie and TE Joe Royer. They’ll give Utes LB Johnathan Hall and DB Jackson Bennee a lot of responsibilities. Utah QB Devon Dampier was fortunately not needed as he sat out last week’s victory against Colorado with an ankle injury. IF he is not ready to return, the team will have confidence in backup Byrd Ficklin after his solid outing. Either signal caller must steer clear of Bearcats’ LB Jake Golday.

Why it could disappoint: A couple scenarios come to mind. The Bearcats could struggle with the lengthy travel and unaccustomed altitude, or the Utes’ offense could bog down as it did in their blowout loss to Texas Tech. But hopefully a #Big12AfterDark shootout will unfold, and viewers will have a reason to take advantage of the extra hour on ‘fall back’ night.

No. 18 Oklahoma at No. 14 Tennessee

Time/TV: 7:30 p.m. ET, ABC.

Why watch: The SEC nightcap is in effect a playoff eliminator. A three-loss team wouldn’t be automatically disqualified from at-large consideration, but the loser here would face an uphill climb to get back to the top 12. Sooners QB John Mateer is still trying to regain his passing touch since returning from a hand injury, but the Vols’ secondary hasn’t exactly been airtight. A good push up front from DTs Joshua Josephs and Donovan Bailey would help them out. Tennessee QB Joey Aguilar, with help from RBs DeSean Bishop and Star Thomas, haven’t been easy to stop either. But the OU defense, featuring LB Kip Lewis and DE R Mason Thomas, surrenders just 12.5 points a game.

Why it could disappoint: It probably won’t – Tennessee’s games have tended to be close. But it’s possible that either the strength-against-strength confrontation when the Vols have the ball or the less accomplished pairing when the Sooners have possession will prove to be a mismatch. But a mismatch which way? That is hard to predict.

No. 23 Navy at North Texas

Time/TV: noon ET, ESPN2.

Why watch: The Midshipmen are riding a 10-game winning streak dating back to last season, but they embark on a treacherous November slate against the upper echelons of the American, with the annual Notre Dame showdown thrown in there as well. Up first are the Mean Green, who bounced back nicely from their lone loss against South Florida with a couple of 50+-point outings to stay in the championship hunt. This game features two of the nation’s most explosive offenses, both averaging in the neighborhood of seven yards per snap. Driving the ship for Navy is QB Blake Horvath, who has 12 TDs by land and another seven by air. When he doesn’t take it himself, the ball usually wins up with RB Alex Tecza or SB Eli Heidenreich. North Texas will counter with QB Drew Mestemaker, who has 21 scoring throws and just four picks. His top weapons are WR Wyatt Young and RB Caleb Hawkins. The defenses will have their hands full, but names you’ll likely hear a lot include Navy LB MarcAnthony Parker and Mean Green LB Shane Whitter.

Why it could disappoint: Hopefully it won’t and we’ll get the entertaining track meet these potent offenses promise. But neither team can afford turnovers, as getting stops to assist a multi-score comeback will be difficult.

No. 15 Virginia at California

Time/TV: 3:45 p.m. ET, ESPN2.

Why watch: The Cavaliers found overtime magic for the third time this season to maintain, barely, their place in the ACC driver’s seat. They now take their turn to visit the league’s new Bay Area outpost, where the Golden Bears have already shown they’re more than capable of causing chaos. Cal QB Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele isn’t afraid to sling it around, though protecting him has been a problem. That could mean a big day for UVa DE Daniel Rickert. Cavs QB Chandler Morris and RB J’Mari Taylor lead a balanced attack, but Morris would do well not to challenge Bears CB Hezekiah Masses, who has swiped a league-high four passes.

Why it could disappoint: How could it? Virginia games have been wild rides all season. The Golden Bears have been involved in some lopsided affairs, but most of their ACC contests have been within a score. Buckle up and enjoy.

No. 13 Texas Tech at Kansas State

Time/TV: 3:30 p.m. ET, Fox.

Why watch: The Red Raiders took a hit a couple weeks ago at Arizona State. They’re now more than a little banged up as they head to the Little Apple, where the Wildcats still have hope of salvaging their season after a disappointing start. Texas Tech QB Will Hammond sustained a season-ending knee injury in last week’s Oklahoma State win, but the good news for the Red Raiders is regular starter Behren Morton is ready to return. RB Cameron Dickey will also get opportunities to exploit K-State’s leaky ground defense. Wildcats QB Avery Johnson’s play has likewise been uneven this fall, though he has only been intercepted twice. RB Dylan Edwards remains sidelined with a foot issue, so Joe Jackson must lend as many tough ground yards as he can.

Why it could disappoint: We’ll likely know early on if it will. If the Red Raiders can take the home crowd out of it with a couple quick scores, it will probably be safe to look in on other viewing options in this window. But if the Wildcats are also able to move the ball, you’ll want to stick around.

Southern California at Nebraska

Time/TV: 7:30 p.m. ET, NBC.

Why watch: We’re stepping outside the Top 25 for this one, but it might turn out to be the most consequential matchup of the day in the Big Ten. The participants themselves are clinging to long-shot playoff hopes, but past and future opponents of both squads will also have interest in the outcome. After a rough outing at Minnesota, Cornhuskers QB Dylan Raiola and RB Emmett Johnson delivered a clutch drive to get by Northwestern. The Trojans haven’t lacked scoring punch even in their losses with QB Jayden Maiava and WR Makai Lemon able to strike at any time, but getting needed defensive stops on the road remains an issue for the program.

Why it could disappoint: Nebraska’s offensive inconsistencies could show up again, but given USC’s defensive shortcomings this is more likely to be a back-and-forth affair. Dare we say the sneaky-good game of the night? It’s possible.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

This might be the end of the line for Auburn coach Hugh Freeze.

With Sam Pittman out at Arkansas, Billy Napier finally ejected from Florida and Brian Kelly dismissed at LSU, Freeze becomes the next SEC coach facing an in-season dismissal as he winds toward the end of his third year with the Tigers.

This year has been a disaster defined by inept roster management and a punchless offense that has averaged just 4.4 yards per play in the SEC, leaving no arguments for giving Freeze a fourth season beyond his $15.4 million buyout as of Dec. 1 — and that’s chump change compared to what LSU, Penn State and others are shelling out in their coaching moves.

The only way Freeze buys more time is by taking at least three of four in November to secure the program’s first winning season since 2020. Given his flimsy job security, in fact, you can make the argument that one of those wins has to come against No. 4 Alabama in the Iron Bowl.

But this theory becomes moot if Auburn loses Saturday to Kentucky, which is unbeaten in two games against the MAC but winless in five SEC games, with three decided by 21 or more points. The Wildcats are in the conversation for the worst team in the Power Four.

With No. 11 Vanderbilt and the Crimson Tide still to come, a loss on Saturday would basically ensure that Freeze becomes the first Auburn coach since 1948-50 to oversee three losing seasons in a row. Not that he’d be around to see the year through to the finish — Auburn would likely pull the plug at some point on Sunday.

Freeze, Texas and Dabo Swinney lead the USA TODAY Sports preview of the team, game, coach and quarterback facing the most pressure in Week 10 of the regular season:

Team: No. 19 Texas

Arch Manning’s availability against Vanderbilt is in doubt after he suffered a concussion late in last week’s come-from-behind win against Mississippi State. Should he be unavailable, Texas will turn to backup Matthew Caldwell, a former Troy transfer who threw a touchdown in overtime to keep the Longhorns’ SEC and playoff hopes alive.

One-loss Vanderbilt has some wiggle room. After posting wins against LSU and Missouri, the Commodores could lose on Saturday and still earn an at-large bid by beating Auburn, Kentucky and No. 14 Tennessee.

But Texas doesn’t have that luxury. Texas will face three ranked teams this month with no room for error, needing a perfect finish to deliver on the expectations birthed from Manning’s ascension to the starting role and the first preseason No. 1 ranking in program history.

The Longhorns have not resembled that team at any point this season, starting with a 14-7 loss at No. 1 Ohio State in the opener. In the SEC, Texas lost to Florida, beat No. 18 Oklahoma and then narrowly escaped in overtime at Kentucky and Mississippi State.

There are no on-field results to suggest Texas can pull off a clean sweep against the Commodores, No. 6 Georgia, Arkansas and No. 3 Texas A&M. But there should be no questions about the team’s talent level; maybe this November gauntlet brings out the best in the Longhorns and draws a return trip to the playoff.

Game: No. 16 Cincinnati at No. 24 Utah

This is the first of several matchups that will determine the makeup of the Big 12 championship game and influence which team — or how many teams — represents the conference in the playoff.

While losses to No. 13 Texas Tech and No. 10 Brigham Young should end up blocking Utah’s path to AT&T Stadium, the Utes could upend the conference race by handing the Bearcats their first conference loss and first defeat overall since dropping the opener to Nebraska.

Cincinnati is fresh off wins against Oklahoma State and Baylor by a combined 63 points but will play on Saturday without running back Evan Pryor, a former Ohio State transfer who leads the team with 478 rushing yards on 7.2 yards per carry.

That will mean more work for quarterback Brendan Sorsby, who has thrown 20 touchdowns without an interception since the Nebraska game and joins Arkansas’ Taylen Green as the only Power Four quarterbacks with at least 1,700 passing yards and 425 rushing yards.

A loss would end Utah’s shot at the Big 12 crown but wouldn’t be fatal for the Bearcats, who could still reach the championship game with a clean finish and a Texas Tech win next weekend against BYU.

Coach: Dabo Swinney, Clemson

Clemson’s priorities shifted in the wake of September losses to LSU, Syracuse and Georgia Tech. No longer an at-large contender for the playoff, Swinney and the Tigers refocused on capturing the ACC and earning an automatic bid for the second year in a row.

But a loss to SMU has moved the goalposts once again. Now, four-loss Clemson’s goal should be to simply reach the postseason, period, against a November slate that could leave the Tigers short of at least six wins for the first time since 1998.

You can pencil in a win against Furman. Clemson should beat Florida State, which has yet to win a game in the ACC. The Tigers also play No. 17 Louisville and South Carolina on the road.

This weekend’s matchup in Death Valley against Duke feels like a make-or-break moment for a directionless program. A win would pave the way for bowl eligibility and could provide a spark that rockets Clemson through the finish line of the regular season.

But a loss would raise the odds of a losing record, which would be a shocking turn for a preseason national championship favorite while forcing Swinney to make massive changes to get the program back on track — up to and including a reshuffling of his staff and a commitment to using the transfer portal to rebuild a shaky roster.

Quarterback: Jayden Maiava, Southern California

To say that Maiava has a shot at the Heisman Trophy might sound ridiculous — he’s barely made a blip on the national radar despite some crooked numbers — but it’s not that outlandish given the opportunities that await the Trojans in November.

The numbers are worthy of Heisman consideration. Maiava leads the FBS with 10.2 yards per pass attempt, ranks third with 311.4 yards per game and ranks fifth with a 173.5 efficiency rating. He has multiple touchdowns in six of seven games and has played well in four games against Power Four teams, completing 71.3% of his throws with seven touchdowns and just two interceptions.

Another factor in Maiava’s favor is a race that hasn’t had a clear leader at any point this season. While Indiana’s Fernando Mendoza holds a slight edge over Alabama’s Ty Simpson, Ohio State’s Julian Sayin and Vanderbilt’s Diego Pavia, this is as uncertain a Heisman picture heading into November as at any point in recent history.

Five conference games this month, starting Saturday night at Nebraska, will give Maiava a puncher’s chance at leapfrogging to the front of the line. USC then hosts Northwestern and Iowa, heads to No. 6 Oregon and comes back home for UCLA. A clean sweep could land the Trojans in the playoff and earn Maiava a trip to Manhattan as a Heisman finalist.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 54th edition of the world’s biggest marathon returns to New York City, ready to test professional runners and novices alike for a 26.2-mile trek through the five boroughs of the Big Apple.

Last year, a record 55,642 runners from 137 countries participated in the TCS New York City marathon, finishing in an average time of 4:31:31.

Like last year’s race, three of the four professional winners from last year’s NYC marathon, Abdi Nageeye of the Netherlands, Kenya’s Sheila Chepkirui, and the women’s wheelchair winner Susannah Scaroni, return to defend their crown. Daniel Romanchuk, the winner of the men’s wheelchair race, has a shoulder injury suffered at the Sydney Marathon after an on-course collision with a spectator and will not compete.

Those winners will face fierce competition in what officials are calling the fastest race ever. The men’s field features Eliud Kipchoge of Kenya, a gold medalist in the marathon at the 2016 Rio de Janeiro and 2020 Tokyo Olympics, making his NYC Marathon debut. Also in the field are Evans Chebet, the 2022 champion, and Albert Korir, the winner in 2021.

The female field is also strong, with 2023 champ Hellen Obiri and Sharon Lokedi, who came in first in 2022, expected to challenge Chepkirui, in what could be a podium sweep by the trio from Kenya. But look out for Sifan Hassan of the Netherlands, making her NYC debut. Hassan won the gold medal at the Paris Olympics, beating Obiri, who took home the bronze, and Lokedi, who came in fourth.

The American losing streak is now up 16 years on the men’s professional side, and 2017 was the last time an American woman crossed the finish line first. first.

CC Sabathia, the ex-New York Yankees pitcher who was inducted into the National Baseball Hall of Fame in 2025, will serve as this year’s TCS New York City Marathon Grand Marshal.

When is New York City Marathon?

The 2025 TCS New York City Marathon starts at 8 a.m. ET on Sunday, Nov. 2.

Start times for New York City Marathon

  • 8 a.m. – Professional Men’s Wheelchair Division
  • 8:02 a.m. – Professional Women’s Wheelchair Division
  • 8:22 a.m. – Handcycle Category and Select Ambulatory Athletes with Disabilities
  • 8:35 a.m. – Professional Women’s Open Division
  • 9:05 a.m. – Professional Men’s Open Division
  • 9:10 a.m. – Wave 1
  • 9:45 a.m. – Wave 2
  • 10:20 a.m. – Wave 3
  • 10:55 a.m. – Wave 4
  • 11:30 a.m. – Wave 5 

How to watch New York City Marathon

The national broadcast of the NYC Marathon airs on ESPN2 from 8 to 11:30 a.m. ET.

The broadcast will also be available live in Spanish on ESPN3. In the New York tri-state area, WABC-TV, Channel 7, will broadcast the race from 8 to 11:30 a.m. ET (also available on the ABC 7 New York App and ESPN App) with pre-race coverage starting at 7 a.m. ET. ABC will air a live two-hour show from the finish line from 3-5 p.m. ET.

Patrons can cheer on their favorite competitors, friends, and family in person from the grandstands located at West 62nd Street and Broadway. Tickets are available for the Grandstand Seating. Most of the course from mile 3 to mile 26 is open to spectators, who can find sidewalk space and watch for free.

Fans can also follow a runner’s progress via the TCS New York City Marathon App.

Watch the 2025 NYC Marathon with Fubo (free trial for new users)

New York City Marathon route

The race starts at the Verrazzano–Narrows Bridge on Staten Island before runners work their way through Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, and the Bronx, with the finish line at Central Park, at 67th Street on West Drive.

The official closure time of the marathon is 10 p.m. ET. Runners finishing after that time will not be recorded as official finishers but will receive finisher medals.

For those who drop out during the race, officials warn you not to go through the finish line, or you will be disqualified and barred from participating in future New York City Marathons. (In other words, don’t even try it.)

New York City Marathon prize money

Prize money is equal for men and women, and the top American finishers in the men’s and women’s races will receive $25,000. The men’s and women’s wheelchair division champions will each receive $50,000. A $50,000 bonus will be paid to the Open Division and/or Wheelchair Division race winners who break the current event record.

  • 1st – $100,000
  • 2nd – $60,000
  • 3rd – $40,000
  • 4th – $25,000
  • 5th – $15,000
  • 6th -$10,000
  • 7th – $7,500
  • 8th – $5,000
  • 9th – $2,500
  • 10th – $2,000

New York City Marathon course records

  • Open Division Men: 2:04:58, Tamirat Tola, 2023
  • Open Division Women: 2:22:31, Margaret Okayo, 2003
  • Wheelchair Division Men: 1:25:26, Marcel Hug, 2022
  • Wheelchair Division Women: 1:39:32, Catherine Debrunner, 2023

New York City Marathon weather

Temperatures are expected to be in the high 40s at the beginning of the race, with a high expected of 55 by mid-afternoon. There is no rain in the forecast, but winds are expected to gust up to 15 mph.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Dr. Mark Thornton, senior fellow at the Mises Institute, discusses the factors that have taken the gold price to all-time highs. In his view, the key driver is government actions like overspending, borrowing and money printing, none of which are likely to abate soon.

He also shares his bullish outlook for silver.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Copper Quest Exploration Inc. (CSE: CQX; OTCQB: IMIMF; FRA: 3MX) (‘ Copper Quest ‘ or the ‘ Company ‘) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire a 100% interest in the Kitimat Copper-Gold Project (the ‘Project’), located approximately 10 kilometers northwest of the deep-water port community of Kitimat, British Columbia.

PROJECT OVERVIEW

The Kitimat Copper-Gold Project covers approximately 2,954 hectares within the Skeena Mining Division of northwestern British Columbia. The Project is year-round road-accessible via a network of logging and mineral exploration roads extending north from Kitimat. The property benefits from exceptional infrastructure, being within 10 km of tidewater, 1.5 km of rail, and 6 km of high-voltage hydroelectric transmission lines.

Geologically, the Project is situated within the Stikine Terrane, a prolific belt that hosts numerous porphyry copper-gold systems and is underlain by Late Triassic volcanic rocks intruded by Jurassic diorite and granodiorite bodies of the Coast Plutonic Complex. The Project’s principal target areas is the Jeannette Cu-Au Zone displaying alteration and mineralization interpreted to represent low-level intermediate to low-sulfidation epithermal expressions of a larger Cu-Au porphyry system.

HISTORICAL EXPLORATION & HIGHLIGHTS

Exploration on the Kitimat property dates back to the late 1960s, with multiple operators conducting geochemical, geophysical, and drilling campaigns. The most significant historical work was conducted by Decade Resources Ltd. (2010), which completed 16 diamond drill holes totaling 4,437.5 meters in the Jeannette Cu-Au Zone. Notable results include:

  • Hole J-7: 117.07 m grading 1.03 g/t Au, 0.54% Cu, from 1.52 m to 118.60 m.
  • Hole J-1: 103.65 m grading 1.00 g/t Au, 0.55% Cu, from 9.15 m to 112.80 m.
  • Hole J-2: 107.01 m grading 0.80 g/t Au, 0.45% Cu, from 6.10 m to 113.11 m.
  • Hole J-8: 112.20 m grading 0.41 g/t Au, 0.33% Cu, from 11.89 m to 124.09 m.

The mineralized intervals encountered in the 2010 drilling demonstrate continuous near-surface copper-gold mineralization extending over significant widths, remain open at depth within the Jeannette Zone, and occur within a broader hydrothermal system that is interpreted to extend laterally beyond the area tested.

ACQUISITION DETAILS

Under the terms of the agreement Copper Quest has until January 5, 2026 to complete a due diligence review of the Project. Upon successful review, the Company will issue 2,000,000 common shares to the vendor, Bernie Kreft, on January 6, 2026, as full consideration for the acquisition. The Project is subject to a 2.5% net smelter return (NSR) royalty, of which 40% may be repurchased by the Company for CAD $1,000,000. Copper Quest will also retain a right of first refusal on any transaction involving the sale of the remaining royalty interest. Copper Quest has until

Mr. Kreft is a well-known Canadian prospector, entrepreneur, and former star of the Discovery Channel’s Yukon Gold television series. He has a long track record of successful mineral discoveries and project generation across British Columbia and Yukon.

A finder’s fee is payable in connection with the acquisition.

MANAGEMENT COMMENTS

Brian Thurston , CEO of CopperQuest, commented:

‘The addition of the Kitimat Copper-Gold Project demonstrates Copper Quest’s continued effort to add shareholder value through the acquisition of critical mineral projects. This project is ideally located with exceptional infrastructure, in a proven geological belt known for hosting major copper-gold systems. The strong historical drill results from the Jeannette zone speak to the potential of a larger near-surface mineralized system. We look forward to advancing this asset as part of our growing copper-gold portfolio.’

NEXT STEPS

  • The Company plans to leverage artificial intelligence (AI) analysis to integrate all historical and modern exploration data to establish a comprehensive geological and geophysical model for the Kitimat Porphyry Project and improve targeting precision.
  • Additional geological mapping, sampling, and geophysical surveys may be completed to refine priority drill targets as required. Field work could include ground magnetics, induced polarization (IP), and passive seismic to better define subsurface structure and mineralization trends.
  • A follow-up drill program would test key targets within the interpreted geology and surrounding high-grade corridors.

QUALIFIED PERSON

Brian G. Thurston, P.Geo., the Company’s President and CEO and a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, has reviewed and approved the technical information in this news release.

ABOUT COPPER

Despite surging demand, global copper supply remains constrained. Ore grades are declining at major mines, permitting timelines for new projects have lengthened, and geopolitical tensions are reshaping supply chains toward stable, transparent jurisdictions. Governments in Canada, the U.S., and allied nations have increasingly identified copper as a strategic and critical metal necessary for economic and national security. Within this context, Copper Quest’s acquisition of the Kitimat Copper-Gold Project in British Columbia positions the Company to advance a discovery-stage asset in one of the world’s safest and most infrastructure-rich mining jurisdictions — precisely when new, scalable copper sources are most needed.

ABOUT Copper Quest Exploration Inc.

Copper Quest (CSE: CQX; OTCQB: IMIMF; FRA: 3MX) is focused on building shareholder value through the acquisition, exploration and development of its North American Critical Mineral portfolio of assets. The Company’s land package currently comprises five projects that span over 40,000+ hectares in great mining jurisdictions.

Copper Quest has a 100% interest in the Stars Property, a porphyry copper-molybdenum discovery, covering 9,693 hectares in central British Columbia’s Bulkley Porphyry Belt. Contiguous to the Stars Property, Copper Quest has a 100% interest in the 5,389-hectare Stellar Property. CQX also has an earn-in option up to 80% and joint-venture agreement on the 4,700-hectare porphyry copper-molybdenum Rip Project, also in the Bulkley Porphyry Belt.

Copper Quest has a 100% interest in the Nekash Copper-Gold Project, a porphyry exploration opportunity located in Lemhi County, Idaho, along the prolific Idaho-Montana porphyry copper belt that hosts world-class systems such as Butte and CUMO. The project is fully road-accessible via maintained U.S. highways and forest service roads and currently consists of 70 unpatented federal lode claims covering 585 hectares.

Copper Quest has a 100% interest in the Thane Project located in the Quesnel Terrane of Northern BC which spans over 20,658 ha with 10 high-priority targets identified demonstrating significant copper and precious metal mineralization potential.

Copper Quest’s leadership and advisory teams are senior mining industry executives who have a wealth of technical and capital markets experience and a strong track record of discovering, financing, developing, and operating mining projects on a global scale. Copper Quest is committed to sustainable and responsible business activities in line with industry best practices, supportive of all stakeholders, including the local communities in which it operates. The Company’s common shares are principally listed on the Canadian Stock Exchange under the symbol ‘CQX’. For more information on Copper Quest, please visit the Company’s website at www.copper.quest .

On behalf of the Board of Copper Quest Exploration Inc.

Brian Thurston, P.Geo.
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Tel: 778-949-1829

For further information contact:

Investor Relations
info@copper.quest

Forward Looking Information

This news release contains certain ‘forward-looking information’ and ‘forward-looking statements’ (collectively, ‘ forward-looking statements ‘) within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included herein, including without limitation, future operations and activities of Copper Quest, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are frequently, but not always, identified by words such as ‘expects’, ‘anticipates’, ‘believes’, ‘intends’, ‘estimates’, ‘potential’, ‘possible’, and similar expressions, or statements that events, conditions, or results ‘will’, ‘may’, ‘could’, or ‘should’ occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements reflect the beliefs, opinions and projections on the date the statements are made and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation, risks associated with possible accidents and other risks associated with mineral exploration operations, the risk that the Company will encounter unanticipated geological factors, risks associated with the interpretation of exploration results, the possibility that the Company may not be able to secure permitting and other governmental clearances necessary to carry out the Company’s exploration plans, the risk that the Company will not be able to raise sufficient funds to carry out its business plans, and the risk of political uncertainties and regulatory or legal changes that might interfere with the Company’s business and prospects. Readers should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements and information contained in this news release concerning these items. The Company does not assume any obligation to update the forward-looking statements of beliefs, opinions, projections, or other factors, should they change, except as required by applicable securities laws.

The Canadian Securities Exchange has not reviewed, approved or disapproved the contents of this press release, and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Here’s a quick recap of the crypto landscape for Monday (October 27) as of 9:00 a.m. UTC.

Get the latest insights on Bitcoin, Ether and altcoins, along with a round-up of key cryptocurrency market news.

Bitcoin and Ether price update

Bitcoin (BTC) was priced at US$115,014, a 0.9 percent increase in 24 hours. Its lowest valuation of the day was US$113,083, and its highest was US$116,032.

Bitcoin price performance, October 27, 2025.

Chart via TradingView.

Bitcoin (BTC) climbed to two week highs on Monday, breaking above US$115,600 as investors priced in expectations of an interest rate cut from the US Federal Reserve later this week.

The cryptocurrency has now risen for five consecutive sessions, with Sunday’s (October 26) 2.6 percent gain pushing Bitcoin past the 50 day exponential moving average at US$114,176. Technical analysts see the move as a potential prelude to a fresh rally, contingent on continued market support and Fed signals.

Trader Ted Pillows noted on X that Bitcoin has “fully reclaimed the US$114,000 support zone” and emphasized that the next key hurdle is US$118,000. He added that, if momentum holds, “a new ATH could happen in 1–2 weeks.”

Market watchers are now closely monitoring the Fed meeting for confirmation of rate cut expectations, which could provide further bullish fuel for Bitcoin and broader crypto markets.

Ether (ETH) was priced at US$4,167.45, a 1.5 percent increase in 24 hours. Its lowest valuation of the day was US$4,053.35, and its highest was US$4,246.23.

Altcoin price update

  • Solana (SOL) was priced at US$200.39, trading flat over the last 24 hours. Its lowest valuation of the day was US$197.24, and its highest was US$205.03.
  • XRP was trading for US$2.62, a decrease of 0.7 percent over the last 24 hours. Its lowest valuation of the day was US$2.60, while its highest was US$2.67.

ETF data and derivatives trends

Bitcoin derivatives metrics indicate ongoing caution and positioning for downside risk.

Liquidations for Bitcoin contracts have totaled approximately US$6.42 million in the last four hours, the majority of which were long positions, reflecting short-term selling pressure.

Ether liquidations showed a similar pattern, with long positions dominating US$15.55 million in liquidations, though long and short liquidations were more evenly split.

Futures open interest for Bitcoin fell 0.5 percent to US$75.51 billion, and Ether futures declined 0.57 percent to US$49.89 billion, suggesting modest rotation or renewed altcoin activity.

The perpetual funding rate for Bitcoin was 0.008 and 0.009 for Ether, indicating a mild long bias among remaining positions. Bitcoin’s relative strength index stood at 54.84, reflecting neutral to moderately bullish momentum and room for price growth before overextended conditions.

Today’s crypto news to know

Binance eyes US return after Trump pardon for CZ

Binance is weighing a US market re-entry following President Donald Trump’s pardon of founder Changpeng Zhao, exploring options to consolidate its American affiliate or allow direct access for US investors, Bloomberg said.

The pardon clears Zhao’s 2023 conviction for failing to maintain anti-money laundering controls, restoring his ability to lead financial ventures. Hours after the announcement, Zhao expressed ambitions to make the US “the capital of crypto” and expand Web3 globally. Binance’s BNB token jumped 8 percent in response. Zhao currently oversees a blockchain ecosystem with around US$8.7 billion in assets, ranking third behind Ether and Solana.

Japan’s first regulated yen stablecoin launches

JPYC launched Japan’s first regulated yen-pegged stablecoin on Monday.

The stablecoin aligns with Japan’s Payment Services Act, requiring full reserve backing in yen deposits and government bonds. JPYC aims to issue 10 trillion yen (US$67 billion) over three years, challenging the US-dominated stablecoin market where USDC holds roughly US$40 billion.

The framework prioritizes consumer protection and financial stability, lessons drawn from the 2022 TerraUSD collapse.

JPYC offers zero-fee issuance, redemption and transfers, earning income via interest on reserves in deposits and government bonds. Each transfer is capped at 1 million yen under the regulatory structure.

American Bitcoin boosts strategic reserve to 3,865 BTC

American Bitcoin (ABTC) expanded its strategic reserve to 3,865 BTC, acquiring 1,414 BTC through both open market purchases and in-house mining, according to a company release.

The accumulation lifts the company’s Satoshis per share metric to 418, a 52 percent increase since September 1.

Integrated mining enables ABTC to secure BTC at lower costs than external acquisitions, giving it a structural advantage over competitors.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Apex Resources (TSXV:APX,OTC:SLMLF) is a mineral exploration company with a diversified North American portfolio, combining near-term tungsten-gold opportunities in British Columbia with district-scale lithium potential in Nevada.

The company’s flagship Lithium Creek project in Churchill County, Nevada, represents a new lithium-brine discovery opportunity. Geophysical and gravity surveys have outlined extensive low-resistivity zones and complex basin structures—hallmarks of major brine systems—defining multiple drill targets. Just 70 km east of Reno and 30 minutes from Tesla’s Gigafactory, Lithium Creek is strategically positioned within the U.S. battery manufacturing corridor.

Drilling at the Jersey-Emerald project

The Jersey-Emerald project, Apex’s flagship Canadian asset, is a past-producing mine complex hosting tungsten, zinc, lead, gold, and molybdenum. Located 10 km southeast of Salmo, BC, it includes the former Emerald and Jersey mines—once among Canada’s largest producers. Apex is applying modern exploration and geophysics to expand critical mineral zones and identify new targets across the 17,500-hectare property.

Company Highlights

  • Critical-minerals focus: Apex’s portfolio is anchored by lithium, tungsten and zinc, all designated as critical by Canada and the US.
  • Precious-Metals (Gold&Silver) are important by-products at Jersey-Emerald
  • Diversified exploration pipeline: Active drill program at Jersey-Emerald (tungsten-gold-zinc) while preparing to drill Lithium Creek in Nevada.
  • Large-scale opportunity: Apex controls contiguous and nearby claim blocks around Salmo, BC, including Jersey-Emerald and Ore Hill, forming a multi-deposit critical- and precious-metal exploration district spanning more than 17,500 hectares with several historic mines, hosting Tungsten, Zinc, Lead, Silver, Gallium, Germanium, Indium, Bismuth, Tellurium and Molybdenum.
  • Strong early results in USA: Lithium Creek brine samples up to 393 mg/L lithium, with geophysics outlining multiple deep-basin anomalies.
  • Historic infrastructure advantage in Canada: More than $100 million in existing underground workings at Jersey-Emerald; year-round road, rail and power access to both BC projects.
  • Tier-1 jurisdictions: Stable, mining-friendly locations in British Columbia and Nevada with clear permitting frameworks.
  • Experienced leadership: Proven technical and capital-markets expertise led by CEO Ron Lang and a board made up of seasoned exploration and mining professionals.

This Apex Resources profile is part of a paid investor education campaign.*

Click here to connect with Apex Resources (TSXV:APX,OTC:SLMLF) to receive an Investor Presentation

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Coelacanth Energy Inc. (TSXV: CEI,OTC:CEIEF) (‘Coelacanth’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to provide the following update:

BANK CREDIT FACILITY
Coelacanth has signed an agreement to increase its bank credit facility from $52 million to $80 million with closing expected in mid-November. The Company estimates net bank debt relative to the credit facility to be $43 million as at September 30, 2025. The additional liquidity provided will be used, in part, to fund the fall drilling program noted below.

OPERATIONS UPDATE
Coelacanth is currently drilling 3 additional wells in the Lower Montney on its 5-19 Pad at Two Rivers East. Completions are anticipated for late November for an on-stream date of early February 2026. Coelacanth’s last 3 wells on the pad tested a combined 4,872 boe/d (60% light oil) and similar results are expected(1).

Coelacanth is currently producing 4 of its 9 wells on the 5-19 pad plus its legacy production at Two Rivers West. Based on field estimates, current production is approximately 4,400 boe/d (40% light oil). The remaining 5 wells are scheduled to come on production sequentially from mid-November until year-end. Test production on the 5 remaining wells was approximately 6,400 boe/d on a combined basis but net of flush production and declines, Coelacanth estimates production will be approximately 8,400 boe/d (40% light oil) at year-end and then exceed 10,000 boe/d in February 2026 when the new wells are on production (1).

Coelacanth’s business plan includes delineating and developing its large Montney resource that includes 4 potential Montney benches on its 150 section contiguous block of land at Two Rivers in northeast British Columbia.

(1) See ‘Test Results and Initial Production Rates’.

HEDGE POSITION

In conjunction with the drilling program and anticipated new wells coming on production, Coelacanth has placed the following hedges:

Product Quantity Price
($ CAD)
Reference
Point
Period
Natural Gas 10,000 gj/d 2.03 Station 2 Nov-Dec 2025
Natural Gas 5,000 gj/d 2.10 Station 2 Dec 2025
Natural Gas 10,000 gj/d 2.49 Station 2 Jan-Mar 2026
Light Oil 500 bbls/d 86.86 WTI Nov 2025-Apr 2026

 

Coelacanth is pleased with the results to date and the progression of the business plan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

Coelacanth Energy Inc.
2110, 530 – 8th Ave SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3S8
Phone: 403-705-4525
www.coelacanth.ca

Mr. Robert J. Zakresky
President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Nolan Chicoine
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.

Oil and Gas Terms
The Company uses the following frequently recurring oil and gas industry terms in the news release:

Liquids
Bbls Barrels
Bbls/d Barrels per day
NGLs Natural gas liquids (includes condensate, pentane, butane, propane, and ethane)

 

Natural Gas
Mcf Thousands of cubic feet
Mcf/d Thousands of cubic feet per day
MMcf/d Millions of cubic feet per day

 

Oil Equivalent
Boe Barrels of oil equivalent
Boe/d Barrels of oil equivalent per day

 

Disclosure provided herein in respect of a boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent has been used for the calculation of boe amounts in the news release. This boe conversion rate is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.

Product Types
The Company uses the following references to sales volumes in the news release:

Natural gas refers to shale gas
Oil refers to tight oil
NGLs refers to butane, propane and pentanes combined
Liquids refers to tight oil and NGLs combined
Oil equivalent refers to the total oil equivalent of shale gas, tight oil, and NGLs combined, using the conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of shale gas to one barrel of oil equivalent as described above.

Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words ‘expect’, ‘anticipate’, ‘continue’, ‘estimate’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘should’, ‘believe’, ‘intends’, ‘forecast’, ‘plans’, ‘guidance’ and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements or information.

More particularly and without limitation, this document contains forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company’s oil, NGLs and natural gas production and capital programs. The forward-looking statements and information are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by the Company, including expectations and assumptions relating to prevailing commodity prices and exchange rates, applicable royalty rates and tax laws, future well production rates, the performance of existing wells, the success of drilling new wells, the availability of capital to undertake planned activities and the availability and cost of labor and services.

Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements and information are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements and information address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not limited to, the risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general such as operational risks in development, exploration and production, delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures, the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production rates, costs and expenses, commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations, marketing and transportation, environmental risks, competition, the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources and changes in tax, royalty and environmental legislation. The forward-looking statements and information contained in this document are made as of the date hereof for the purpose of providing the readers with the Company’s expectations for the coming year. The forward-looking statements and information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.

Test Results and Initial Production Rates

The 5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 9.4 days and produced at an average rate of 377 bbl/d oil and 2,202 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.

The A5-19 Basal Montney well was production tested for 5.9 days and produced at an average rate of 117 bbl/d oil and 630 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.

The B5-19 Upper Montney well was production tested for 6.3 days and produced at an average rate of 92 bbl/d oil and 2,100 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.

The C5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 5.8 days and produced at an average rate of 736 bbl/d oil and 2,660 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.

The D5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 12.6 days and produced at an average rate of 170 bbl/d oil and 580 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable. The D5-19 Lower Montney well was tied into the 16-03 facility and produced an average rate of 546 bbl/d oil, 2,659 mcf/d natural gas, and 48 bbl/d NGLs, for a total average rate of 1,037 boe/d, on a sales basis, over the first 30 days of in-line production (IP30).

The E5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 11.4 days and produced at an average rate of 312 bbl/d oil and 890 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure was stable, and production was starting to decline. The E5-19 Lower Montney well was tied into the 16-03 facility, and produced an average rate of 854 bbl/d oil, 2,660 mcf/d natural gas, and 49 bbl/d NGLs, for a total average rate of 1,346 boe/d, on a sales basis, over the first 30 days of in-line production (IP30).

The F5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 4.9 days and produced at an average rate of 728 bbl/d oil and 1,607 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable. The F5-19 Lower Montney well was tied into the 16-03 facility, and produced an average rate of 745 bbl/d oil, 3,121 mcf/d natural gas, and 58 bbl/d NGLs, for a total average rate of 1,037 boe/d, on a sales basis, over the first 22 days of in-line production.

The G5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 7.1 days and produced at an average rate of 415 bbl/d oil and 1,489 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure and production rates were stable.

The H5-19 Lower Montney well was production tested for 8.1 days and produced at an average rate of 411 bbl/d oil and 1,166 mcf/d gas (net of load fluid and energizing fluid) over that period which includes the initial cleanup where only load water was being recovered. At the end of the test, flowing wellhead pressure was stable and production was starting to decline.

The reference under the ‘Operations Update’ to the last 3 wells drilled refers to the F5-19, G5-19, and H5-19 wells.

The reference under the ‘Operations Update’ to the remaining 5 wells are scheduled to come on production refers to the 5-19, A5-19, B5-19, G5-19, and H5-19 wells.

A pressure transient analysis or well-test interpretation has not been carried out on these nine wells and thus certain of the test results provided herein should be considered to be preliminary until such analysis or interpretation has been completed. Test results and initial production rates disclosed herein, particularly those short in duration, may not necessarily be indicative of long-term performance or of ultimate recovery.

Any references to peak rates, test rates, IP30, IP90, IP180 or initial production rates or declines are useful for confirming the presence of hydrocarbons, however, such rates and declines are not determinative of the rates at which such wells will continue production and decline thereafter and are not indicative of long-term performance or ultimate recovery. IP30 is defined as an average production rate over 30 consecutive days, IP90 is defined as an average production rate over 90 consecutive days and IP180 is defined as an average production rate over 180 consecutive days. Readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates in calculating aggregate production for the Company.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/272489

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com