Author

admin

Browsing

  • The New York Jets lost their season opener 34-32 to the Pittsburgh Steelers in head coach Aaron Glenn’s debut.
  • Despite the loss, the Jets’ offense showed significant improvement, with quarterback Justin Fields accounting for three total touchdowns.
  • New York’s offense did not punt in the first half for the first time since 1991 and averaged 6.4 yards per play.

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. – Postseason berths aren’t earned in Week 1, and the New York Jets have waited 14 years for one. 

Maybe the missed-playoff streak will continue for another one. But the Jets, in 2025, might at least have some semblance of an identity. In the first year of head coach Aaron Glenn’s tenure, that would be a successful campaign alone after a decade and a half of wandering the wilderness. 

Indeed, there were elements of Sunday’s 34-32 loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers – the return of Aaron Rodgers – that indicated “same old Jets.” Special teams blunders. Points left on the table via missed extra points and two-point conversions in a close game. A star player (wide receiver Garrett Wilson, who had seven catches for 95 yards and a touchdown) being blown up by the opposition’s star (Steelers cornerback Jalen Ramsey) on the final play from scrimmage. 

Aaron Rodgers says ‘no hard feelings’ about Jets exit. His words indicate otherwise

“Because of the way that we play, and the way that we want to operate, there’s a chance that we’re going to be in a lot of those games,” Glenn said. “Plus, we know this league comes down to that anyway. To be able to make plays in games like this here is going to be critical for us.

“But I would say this, there’s going to be no confidence lost from these guys. These guys have been busting their butts for a long time. Again, there’s no such thing as moral victories in my eyes, but there are some things that we can definitely build on both sides of the ball. Even though there are some things we have to fix on defense, but there are some things we can build on.”

The biggest difference was the offense, obviously. Offensive coordinator Tanner Engstrand clearly has a plan for Fields’ usage and will highlight his running prowess. Fields carried 12 times for 48 yards and two touchdowns. Engstrand’s call on 4th-and-goal from the one with seven minutes left in the game – a Fields bootleg to the right for a walk-in touchdown that the quarterback amplified with some zesty steps – was one example of the creativity and emphasis on the overall run game the Jets will deploy all season. 

“(The Steelers) acquired all these guys in the offseason, future Hall of Famers on that side of the ball (defense),” Fields said. “We put up 32 and there were still plays left out there. So, like I said, all we got to do is keep building, keep getting better, and we’ll be good.”  

New York had 23 first downs, which was the second-most they had all of last season with Rodgers as quarterback (their best mark was 27 in 2024). The 6.4 yards per play the unit averaged would have been third last year. 

Fields finished 16-for-22 with 218 passing yards and a score through the air. Running back Breece Hall averaged 5.6 yards per carry against (19 carries, 107 rushing yards). 

The Jets scored on four straight possessions to start the game and didn’t punt in the first half since 1991. Chad Pennington, Brett Favre, Vinny Testaverde, Mark Sanchez and many more passed through before the combination of Fields and Engstrand (and others) helped the Jets pull it off again. 

“I thought he did an outstanding job, outstanding,” Glenn said of his quarterback’s play. 

Fields looked an awful lot better than his Steelers’ quarterback competition last season, Russell Wilson, who is now with the Giants. A couple-hundred miles down I-95 in Maryland, Wilson was 17-for-37 with 168 yards for his new team that failed to score a touchdown in a 21-6 loss to the Washington Commanders. 

Glenn, the former Detroit Lions’ defensive coordinator, has plenty to address on that side of the ball. His top players know that too. 

“We have to do the right things right and delete the wrong things out of our DNA, out of our standards, and out of our culture,” defensive lineman Quinnen Williams said. “That’s the things that we have to kind of go to the drawing board and delete – all the negative things, all the small details that we didn’t execute on. We have to get that completely deleted. 

“We did some good things today but ultimately to be the team that we want to be and the team that we’re capable of being we have to delete those small things that ultimately help (you lose) football games.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Matthew Stafford showed no issues from a previous back injury in the Rams’ 14-9 win over the Texans.
  • Stafford surpassed 60,000 career passing yards, becoming the 10th player in NFL history to do so.
  • New wide receiver duo Puka Nacua and Davante Adams combined for 14 catches and 181 yards.

INGLEWOOD, Calif. − Matthew Stafford didn’t show any ill effects from a back injury that hampered him most of the summer.

The Los Angeles Rams quarterback completed 21 of 29 passes for 245 yards and tossed one touchdown in the team’s gritty 14-9 win over the Houston Texans. Stafford was even sacked three times and hit six more.

The 37-year-old QB got back up every single time.

“It was great. I don’t take it for granted. I love being out there with those guys. I love getting to work with them,” Stafford said. “Just happy that I was able to kind of get through what was going on. A lot of support from a lot of people, teammates, coaches, trainers, everybody (and) family. A lot of appreciation goes to those people for helping me. Put a bunch of work in and was able to get back to this point. Just happy to do it. I love being out there. I love playing.”

Maybe the best cure for Stafford’s back is Puka Nacua and Davante Adams — one of the NFL’s top new wide receiver tandems. The two were the recipients of 14 of Stafford’s 21 completions and combined for 19 targets.

One of Nacua’s receptions elevated Stafford over 60,000 career passing yards, becoming one of 10 players in NFL history to reach such milestone.

“I thought Matthew Stafford was in great command all day,” Rams coach Sean McVay said. “He came up with clutch play after clutch play. I thought he was seeing the field really well. Really awesome for him to go over 60,000 yards. That’s unbelievable. Real testament to the consistency of what he’s done.”

Nacua produced a game-high 10 catches for 130 yards despite leaving the game momentarily to be evaluated for a concussion. Adams hauled in four catches for 51 yards in his Rams debut.

“A lot of the game plan is geared to get us involved. Puka had a great game,” Adams said postgame. “I think there’s a lot more we can build on, for sure.”

Houston had a problem covering Nacua most of the contest. Yet, Nacua owes Adams an assist. Adams’ presence on the field gave Nacua a matchup advantage because Adams was covered by Texans All-Pro cornerback Derek Stingley Jr. That allowed the Rams to exploit Nacua’s matchup against Kamari Lassiter and Houston’s other corners.

Bloodied Los Angeles Rams receiver Puka Nacua evaluated for concussion

“It’s huge. He has a ton of respect, and rightfully so. He’s an unbelievable player. He’s made a bunch of big plays,” Stafford said of Adams. “It’s fun to go out there and work with him, get to throw the ball to a guy that’s a future Hall of Famer. Unbelievable player. I feel lucky.”

The Rams essentially replaced Cooper Kupp with the three-time All-Pro Adams during the offseason. Adams at age 32 might be at the end of his prime, but Week 1 showed teams still have to gameplan for his mere presence on the field. He had a modest outing by his standards, but the Rams have something good brewing with their newly formed duo on the outside.

“It’s fun. These guys are just gritty and grimy dudes that’s gonna go out there and find a way to make it work,” Adams said of his Rams teammates. “A young team with a lot of energy and really everything that it takes to be a great team.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

To assist with your most difficult lineup decisions, you’ll find complete Week 1 fantasy football rankings below. Toggle between standard, half PPR (point per reception), and full PPR to see where players rank in your league’s format.

Our team at the USA TODAY Sports Network also has you covered for all your fantasy football needs. Looking for up-to-date player news? We’ve got it. Need to know who the best starts and sits of the week are for every position? We have an article for that. We also have a complete fantasy injury report.

Given the volatility of this league and fantasy football in particular, these rankings will be updated up until a half hour before the Sunday afternoon games kick off. Let’s get to it.

Week 1 fantasy football rankings: PPR and non-PPR

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Oregon defeated Oklahoma State 69-3 in a dominant performance at Autzen Stadium.
  • Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy’s comments earlier in the week about Oregon’s spending only fueled the fire for the Ducks.
  • Oregon coach Dan Lanning encouraged his team to ‘break the scoreboard’ in 66-point win.

EUGENE, OR — It was expected No. 5 Oregon would have little trouble against Oklahoma State, evident in their 69-3 drubbing of the Cowboys inside Autzen Stadium on Saturday, Sept. 6.

But if we’re being honest, this game was over way before the Ducks put the game out of reach in the first quarter. In fact, it was well decided five days prior.

When playing a team that is clearly on another level than you, a coach’s job is to bring belief that their team can pull off the unbelievable. When you’re a 27.5-point underdog, you have to inspire your squad to show up in the stadium.

So what did a renowned coach like Mike Gundy do? Try to reason why his team was no match for the Ducks.   

The longtime Cowboys coach alleged Oregon spent in one year more than five times the amount of money his team spent in three years, adding that maybe teams spending that much dough on its roster should be playing non-conference games against similarly constructed teams.

That’s as close as you can get without directly admitting you are going to lose. Is that how Gundy meant it? Maybe not, but he sealed his fate, giving Oregon coach Dan Lanning motivation like dangling a chunk of tuna in front of a great white shark. 

“I told our team right before the game that it never requires extra motivation for an opportunity to go out and kick ass,” Lanning said. “But it never hurts when somebody pours gasoline on the fire.”

If there’s one thing we’ve learned about Lanning in his four seasons in Eugene, you better not test him. Remember that infamous pregame speech against Colorado and what his team did? It was almost as if Gundy dared Lanning to see how badly he could dispose of his team. 

Not one to shy away from any shots directed at his squad, there wasn’t anything spicy said ahead of the contest. Lanning gave nothing but love to Gundy in the pregame conversation. 

But once that ball was kicked, he sure showed how invested he was in putting a straight beatdown on the Cowboys.

On the second play of the game, running back Noah Whittington sprinted right through a wide open gap for a 59-yard touchdown. On the first play of the second drive after the Ducks defense forced a three-and-out, quarterback Dante Moore rolled to his left and placed the ball perfectly into Dakorien Moore’s hands, who finished off a 65-yard touchdown score for a 13-0 lead just 96 seconds into the game. 

The torture didn’t stop there. Lanning and offensive coordinator Will Stein had their foot planted on the gas pedal for the entirety of the first half. Reverses, trick plays, going for it on fourth down. Nothing was off limits as Oregon had seven plays gain at least 25 yards en route to a 41-3 halftime lead.

You’d think Oregon would lay off the pressure in the second half? Think again. 

As if Gundy didn’t give Oregon enough bait, he served up another delicious platter by saying he wasn’t sure if his quarterback, Zane Flores, making his first college start, would be affected much by the Autzen Stadium crowd.

The crowd clearly rattled the redshirt freshman; he finished 6-of-18 with 61 yards, 35 of which came on a play where the Ducks’ coverage collapsed. When the game was well wrapped up in the third quarter, he threw back-to-back Pick-6s to add more misery. 

Oregon scored all 69 points in the first three quarters before finally pressing the brakes for the fourth quarter. The Ducks finished with 631 yards to Oklahoma State’s 211, and Oregon had more touchdowns (10) than the Cowboys had first downs (nine).

‘Obviously, some things were said, some things were brought up,’ said Oregon linebacker Bryce Boettcher. ‘Throw a little fuel on the fire. You love that.’

Moore said Gundy’s comments “hit close to home” since they were directed at Lanning and the program, likening it to attacking his dad. As a result, he took it personally and the team used it “to make sure that we push ourselves and score 69 points.”

It helps when your coach is telling you not to let up.

“Coach Lanning said, ‘We keep the foot on the neck, make sure you score as many points and try to break the scoreboard,’” Moore said. 

Coming off a horrid 3-9 season and having a team that clearly doesn’t look like it will have a rebound year, it’s worth pondering if this week is the beginning of the end of Gundy’s time in Stillwater. That fiery nature that helped make the Cowboys relevant seems like it’s fading, and he couldn’t bring it to what was by far his program’s biggest game of the season. All he did was aid the Ducks in handing Oklahoma State its worst loss since 1907 when it lost to Oklahoma 67-0.

While Gundy did his team no favors, he did prove his point. Maybe teams that spend like Oregon should play against those that do the same, because the talent discrepancy was easy to see.

But let this blowout be a warning: if you’re going to give Lanning extra motivation – especially in his home stadium where he’s now 21-1 – that raging fire is only going to get bigger.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

It took one weekend for Chase Briscoe to equal his regular season win total in the playoffs.

Briscoe dominated the NASCAR Cup Series playoffs opener at Darlington in leading 309 of 367 laps and sealing his spot in the Round of 12. The fourth win of his Cup Series career came by 0.408 seconds over Tyler Reddick and a second over Erik Jones.

Briscoe earned his playoff spot by winning in Pocono back in June. Three months later, he’s secured his best finish in the Cup Series since 2022 when he finished ninth.

This week, NASCAR heads to World Wide Technology Raceway – known as Gateway – for the Cup Series’ first playoff race at the venue. The event has only been on the calendar since 2022 with different winners in each race.

A new winner could emerge again this weekend as the playoff field marches closer to the first stage of elimination. Here’s everything you need to know to get ready for the Enjoy Illinois 300 presented by TicketSmarter on Sunday, Sept. 7:

What time does the NASCAR Cup race at Gateway start?

The Enjoy Illinois 300 presented by TicketSmarter is scheduled to start at 3 p.m. ET on Sunday, Sept. 7 at World Wide Technology Raceway in Madison, Illinois.

What TV channel is the NASCAR Cup race at Gateway on?

The Enjoy Illinois 300 presented by TicketSmarter will be broadcast on USA Network, the channel for most of the Cup Series playoffs. Pre-race coverage will start at 2:30 p.m. ET.

Will there be a live stream of the NASCAR Cup race at Gateway?

Yes, the Enjoy Illinois 300 presented by TicketSmarter will be streamed on Peacock, HBO Max, Sling TV and Fubo, which is offering a free trial to new subscribers.

Stream the NASCAR playoff race at Gateway on Fubo

How many laps is the NASCAR Cup race at Gateway?

The Enjoy Illinois 300 presented by TicketSmarter is 240 laps around the 1.25-mile track for a total of 300 miles. The race will have three segments (laps per stage) — Stage 1: 45 laps; Stage 2: 95 laps; Stage 3: 100 laps.

NASCAR Cup Series playoff standings

Here’s how things look after the playoff opener at Darlington with the gap to the leader in parentheses. The bottom four drivers will be eliminated after the first round of the playoffs.

  1. Chase Briscoe
  2. Denny Hamlin (+3)
  3. Kyle Larson (+8)
  4. Tyler Reddick (+11)
  5. Bubba Wallace (+21)
  6. William Byron (+21)
  7. Ryan Blaney (+24)
  8. Ross Chastain (+25)
  9. Austin Cindric (+34)
  10. Christopher Bell (+35)
  11. Chase Elliott (+37)
  12. Shane van Gisbergen (+43)
  13. Joey Logano (+46)
  14. Austin Dillon (+51)
  15. Alex Bowman (+62)
  16. Josh Berry (+62)

Who won the NASCAR Cup race at Gateway last year?

Last year’s race came down to the final laps in a battle between Team Penske teammates as Austin Cindric earned his first win of the season. Teammate Ryan Blaney led heading to the start/finish line for the final lap but his No. 12 Ford ran out of gas and he slowed as Cindric soared past and into the lead and his first win since the 2022 Daytona 500. Denny Hamlin, Brad Keselowski, Tyler Reddick and Joey Logano rounded out the top five.

NASCAR Cup race at Gateway starting lineup

  1. Denny Hamlin, No. 11 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota
  2. Kyle Larson, No. 5 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet
  3. Chase Briscoe, No. 19 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota
  4. Ross Chastain, No. 1 Trackhouse Racing Chevrolet
  5. Ryan Blaney, No. 12 Team Penske Ford
  6. William Byron, No. 24 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet
  7. Tyler Reddick, No. 45 23XI Racing Toyota
  8. Christopher Bell, No. 20 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota
  9. Austin Cindric, No. 2 Team Penske Ford
  10. Zane Smith, No. 38 Front Row Motorsports Ford
  11. Chris Buescher, No. 17 Roush Fenway Keselowski Racing Ford
  12. Josh Berry, No. 21 Wood Brothers Racing Ford
  13. Joey Logano, No. 22 Team Penske Ford
  14. Bubba Wallace, No. 23 23XI Racing Toyota
  15. Austin Dillon, No. 3 Richard Childress Racing Chevrolet
  16. Erik Jones, No. 43 Legacy Motor Club Toyota
  17. AJ Allmendinger, No. 16 Kaulig Racing Chevrolet
  18. Shane van Gisbergen, No. 88 Trackhouse Racing Chevrolet
  19. Chase Elliott, No. 9 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet
  20. John Hunter Nemechek, No. 42 Legacy Motor Club Toyota
  21. Ty Gibbs, No. 54 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota
  22. Kyle Busch, No. 8 Richard Childress Racing Chevrolet
  23. Brad Keselowski, No. 6 Roush Fenway Keselowski Racing Ford
  24. Noah Gragson, No. 4 Front Row Motorsports Ford
  25. Alex Bowman, No. 48 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet
  26. Daniel Suarez, No. 99 Trackhouse Racing Chevrolet
  27. Carson Hocevar, No. 77 Spire Motorsports Chevrolet
  28. Michael McDowell, No. 71 Spire Motorsports Chevrolet
  29. Cole Custer, No. 41 Haas Factory Team Ford
  30. Todd Gilliland, No. 34 Front Row Motorsports Ford
  31. Justin Haley, No. 7 Spire Motorsports Chevrolet
  32. Ryan Preece, No. 60 RFK Racing Ford
  33. Riley Herbst, No. 35 23XI Racing Toyota
  34. Ricky Stenhouse Jr., No. 47 HYAK Motorsports Chevrolet
  35. Ty Dillon, No. 10 Kaulig Racing Chevrolet
  36. Cody Ware, No. 51 Rick Ware Racing Ford
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are often overlooked as Super Bowl contenders despite winning four straight NFC South titles.
  • General Manager Jason Licht and players like Mike Evans embrace an underdog mentality, fueled by a perceived lack of respect.
  • The team returns key offensive players, including quarterback Baker Mayfield, who had a career year in 2024.

Quick. Raise your hand if you see the Tampa Bay Buccaneers as a Super Bowl contender.

I didn’t think you’d go there.

No, Tom Brady isn’t coming out of retirement again. If the Bucs are going to make a legitimate run at another championship, it’ll happen with Baker Mayfield having another career year. With Mike Evans and Lavonte David. With Vita Vea, Tristin Wirfs and Bucky Irving. With low-key coach Todd Bowles flanked by underrated GM Jason Licht.

Not convinced?

Understood. There’s a healthy, worthy discussion going on about the Eagles maybe repeating as Super Bowl champs. The Lions gagged in their last two playoff exits, so perhaps it’s Amon-Ra’s time. If, with all due respect, Micah Parsons doesn’t morph into the second coming of Reggie White and lead the Packers to the promised land.

In the NFC field, there’s noise about the Commanders and a 49ers revival, too.

But the Bucs? They’ve got 30-to-1 odds to make it to Santa Clara for Super Bowl 60.

Never mind that Tampa Bay has won four consecutive NFC South titles and with the best five-year stretch in franchise history, is the only team in the NFC to make the playoffs in each of the past five seasons. Usually, that’s a track record that leaves a team poised to take the next step. Until it’s not.

“We’re in witness protection,” Licht told USA TODAY Sports before a training camp practice. “Nobody cares. We’re down here in Tampa. Nobody realizes that we’ve quietly built – Todd, myself, our staffs – a really good team.”

In some ways, like when it’s convenient, they can roll with a Rodney Dangerfield complex and grumble about a lack of respect.

“It’s the market,” said Evans, the Hall of Fame-credentialed receiver who was Licht’s first draft pick for the Bucs in 2014, standing in a hallway at One Buc Place. ‘But it don’t matter.”

Until it can be used to make a point. Are they underdogs again?

2025 NFL season predictions: Experts pick who will win MVP, Super Bowl, more

“I hope so,” Licht replied. “Our quarterback likes a chip on his shoulder. Our GM likes a chip on his shoulder. We all like a chip on our shoulder. Seems like everybody wants the Falcons and the Panthers…”

Licht stopped himself right there. But he knows. There’s buzz about division-rival Carolina (5-12 in ’24) progressing with young quarterback Bryce Young. Atlanta, meanwhile, is loaded with weapons around its young quarterback, Michael Penix Jr., and used its two first-round picks in the NFL draft to address its weak pass rush.

Then again, there was talk about the Falcons (8-9 in ’24) overtaking the Bucs last year behind new quarterback Kirk Cousins. The Bucs won with division by two games with a 10-7 record but something was just a bit off as they were swept by Atlanta as Cousins passed for a combined 8 TDs in the two contests and threw for a career-high 509 yards in Week 5.

That sets up an intriguing subplot for the regular-season opener at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Cousins was benched last season as the Falcons faded after a 6-2 start, but he sure lit up the Bucs.

“If we played Tampa Bay every week last year, he’d be in the Hall of Fame now,” Falcons owner Arthur Blank quipped during the NFL owners meetings in March.

Ouch. As if the Bucs need any bulletin-board material.  

Typically, Bowles, prompted from defensive coordinator in succeeding the retired Bruce Arians in 2022, smiled and shrugged when presented with the chance to claim a headline with some bold statement about disrespect. Jimmy Johnson, he is not. Denny Green, hardly. And he won’t be compared with the Tuna

“We feel like we should win every ballgame and we don’t really care who we play,” Bowles told USA TODAY Sports after a camp practice.

This optimism has substance. The Bucs had the only offense in the NFL last season to rank in the top five in rushing (fourth) and passing (third) and were the first team in NFL history (est. 1920) to complete 70% of its passes while averaging 5 yards per carry. All the key contributors return, including Evans (who shares an NFL record with Jerry Rice with 11 consecutive 1,000-yard seasons) and Mayfield, who in 2024 posted career highs for passing yards (4,500) and TDs (41) and set the franchise mark with a 106.8 passer rating.

Bowles’ defense, meanwhile, has impact players at every level, including Vea, the nose tackle, David, a 14th-year linebacker, and safety Antoine Winfield, Jr. And it will be interesting to see whether Haason Reddick regains the form that allowed him to post 50 ½ sacks over a four-year span beginning in 2020, when he compiled double-digit sacks for four consecutive seasons.

After Brady retired in 2023, having led the Bucs to a Super Bowl 55 crown that capped the 2020 campaign, it seemed natural to expect a drop-off. After all, they won the division in Brady’s final season in 2022 with a losing record (8-9), then was blown out at home – by the Cowboys, of all unlikely teams – in the NFC playoff opener was Brady’s last game. There was no viable succession plan at quarterback. And after breaking the salary cap bank in chasing championships with TB12, they were cap-dry. Enter Mayfield, to go with shrewd cap management (take a bow, cap guru Jackie Davidson) and the typically deft draft stockpiles provided by Licht & Co.

“I thought we would still be a team that competed,” Evans told USA TODAY Sports, reflecting on Brady’s departure. “Obviously, we needed to figure out the quarterback situation. Luckily, Baker was available. I knew that if I played with Baker, we would get the respect that he deserves. Because quarterbacks need good skilled players and a good offensive line.”

Evans points to another factor, too. Culture.

Dallas Cowboys QB Dak Prescott facing more pressure after Micah Parsons trade

“I think it’s everything,” he said. “The front office. The coaching staff. The veteran leadership is really top tier. It’s way better than it was earlier in my career. Not trying to knock my guys back then, but…we’re all about playing for each other.”

Mayfield: “I think it starts with the two franchise guys, Mike Evans and Lavonte David, that have been criminally underrated for a long time. They just work their tails off and lead the way. I think everybody kind of follows that.”

Still, championship DNA or not, nobody’s picking the Bucs to get to the Super Bowl. I mean, according to USA TODAY Sports soothsayer Nate Davis, the ceiling for Bowles’ team is a 9-8 finish that’s good enough to win the weak NFC South again and claim the No. 4 seed in the NFC playoffs.

“We make our own projections and predictions,” Bowles said, maybe tapping his inner Nate vibe. “And our projection is to try to win the division and try to win the Super Bowl. Whatever else everybody has to say, if we listen to that, we’d be in last (place) every year. So, we don’t, and we’ve been in first every year.

“That’s how we treat it. At this point, it’s kind of a running joke, so we don’t care.”

Which leaves the Bucs flying under the radar as a team that just might emerge as a legit championship contender. In other words, Shh!

Contact Jarrett Bell at jbell@usatoday.com or follow on social media: On X: @JarrettBell

On Bluesky: jarrettbell.bsky.social

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 2025 WNBA playoff picture is coming into focus as the season enters the final stretch.

Six teams have already punched their tickets to the postseason — the Minnesota Lynx (No. 1 overall seed), Las Vegas Aces, Atlanta Dream, Phoenix Mercury, New York Liberty and Golden State Valkyries and two spots remain. The Indiana Fever is one of three teams battling for the final playoff spots, alongside the Seattle Storm and Los Angeles Sparks, with two games remaining in the regular season.

The Fever have navigated devastating injuries all season long, from season-ending injuries to Aari McDonald (broken right foot), Sydney Colson (left ACL tear) and Sophie Cunningham (right MCL tear), to Caitlin Clark (right groin) being sidelined indefinitely. Yet the team’s playoff hopes are still alive. For now.

Indiana will face the Washington Mystics on Sunday in the team’s penultimate game of the regular season. It is a must-win for the Fever and won’t be easy. Despite the Mystics being eliminated from playoff contention, Washington leads the head-to-head against the Fever this season, 2-1.

Here’s everything you need to know about the Fever-Mystics game on Sunday:

What time is Indiana Fever at Washington Mystics?

The Indiana Fever travel to Washington DC to face the Mystics at 3 p.m. ET (noon, PT) on Sunday, Sept. 7, at CFG Bank Arena. The game will be broadcast nationally on ION.

How to watch Indiana Fever at Washington Mystics: TV, stream

  • Time: 3 p.m. ET (noon PT)
  • Location: CFG Bank Arena (Baltimore)
  • TV channel:  NBA TV
  • Streaming: Fubo (free trial to new subscribers)

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Gold has long been considered a store of wealth, and the price of gold often makes its biggest gains during turbulent times as investors look for cover in this safe-haven asset.

The 21st century has so far been heavily marked by episodes of economic and sociopolitical upheaval. Uncertainty has pushed the precious metal to record highs as market participants seek its perceived security.

And each time the gold price rises, there are calls for even higher record-breaking levels.

Gold market gurus from Lynette Zang to Chris Blasi to Jordan Roy-Byrne have shared eye-popping predictions on the gold price that would intrigue any investor — gold bug or not.

Some have posited that the gold price may rise as high as US$4,000 or US$5,000 per ounce, and there are those who believe that US$10,000 gold or even US$40,000 gold could become a reality.

These impressive price predictions have investors wondering, what is gold’s all-time high (ATH)?

In the past year, gold has reached a new all-time high dozens of times. Find out what has driven it to these levels, plus how the gold price has moved historically and what has driven its performance in recent years.

In this article

    How is gold traded?

    Before discovering what the highest gold price ever was, it’s worth looking at how the precious metal is traded. Knowing the mechanics behind gold’s historical moves can help illuminate why and how its price changes.

    Gold bullion is traded in dollars and cents per ounce, with activity taking place worldwide at all hours, resulting in a live price for the metal. Investors trade gold in major commodities markets such as New York, London, Tokyo and Hong Kong. London is seen as the center of physical precious metals trading, including for silver. The COMEX division of the New York Mercantile Exchange is home to most paper trading.

    There are many popular ways to invest in gold. The first is through purchasing gold bullion products such as bullion bars, bullion coins and rounds. Physical gold is sold on the spot market, meaning that buyers pay a specific price per ounce for the metal and then have it delivered. In some parts of the world, such as India, buying gold in the form of jewelry is the largest and most traditional route to investing in gold.

    Another path to gold investment is paper trading, which is done through the gold futures market. Participants enter into gold futures contracts for the delivery of gold in the future at an agreed-upon price.

    In such contracts, two positions can be taken: a long position under which delivery of the metal is accepted or a short position to provide delivery of the metal. Paper trading as a means to invest in gold can provide investors with the flexibility to liquidate assets that aren’t available to those who possess physical gold bullion.

    One significant long-term advantage of trading in the paper market is that investors can benefit from gold’s safe-haven status without needing to store it. Furthermore, gold futures trading can offer more financial leverage in that it requires less capital than trading in the physical market.

    Interestingly, investors can also purchase physical gold via the futures market, but the process is complicated and lengthy and comes with a large investment and additional costs.

    Aside from those options, market participants can invest in gold through exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Investing in a gold ETF is similar to trading a gold stock on an exchange, and there are numerous gold ETF options to choose from. For instance, some ETFs focus solely on physical gold bullion, while others focus on gold futures contracts. Other gold ETFs center on gold-mining stocks or follow the gold spot price.

    It is important to understand that you will not own any physical gold when investing in an ETF — in general, even a gold ETF that tracks physical gold cannot be redeemed for tangible metal.

    With regards to the performance of gold versus trading stocks, gold has an interesting relationship with the stock market. The two often move in sync during “risk-on periods” when investors are bullish. On the flip side, they tend to become inversely correlated in times of volatility. There are a variety of options for investing in stocks, including gold mining stocks on the TSX and ASX, gold juniors, precious metals royalty companies and gold stocks that pay dividends.

    According to the World Gold Council, gold’s ability to decouple from the stock market during periods of stress makes it “unique amongst most hedges in the marketplace.” It is often during these times that gold outperforms the stock market. For that reason, it is often used as a portfolio diversifier to hedge against uncertainty.

    What was the highest gold price ever?

    The gold price peaked at US$3,599.61, its all-time high, during trading on September 5, 2025.

    What drove it to set this new ATH? Gold reached its new highest price following the release of unexpectedly weak US job data. Following the release, FedWatch’s odds for a 25 basis point rate cut at the upcoming US Federal Reserve meeting dropped from 99 to 90.2 percent, while odds of a 50 point drop jumped to 9.8 percent. The meeting will take place from September 16 to 17.

    Gold set new highs several times in the preceding week amid significant uncertainty in the US and global economies and surging gold ETF purchases.

    One significant driver came on August 29, when a US federal appeals court ruled that US President Donald Trump’s ‘liberation day’ tariffs, announced in April, are illegal, stating that only Congress has the power to enact widespread tariffs. The Trump administration is expected to appeal the ruling, which will go into effect on October 14.

    Stock markets fell during trading September 2, while treasury yields in the US and abroad rose significantly, providing tailwinds to the gold price. Gold was also boosted by the expectation of interest rate cuts by the US Federal Reserve at the September meeting.

    News surrounding the tariffs had previously led gold to reach multiple new highs back in April, as we dive into below.

    Gold price chart, December 31, 2024, to September 5, 2025.

    Why is the gold price setting new highs in 2025?

    This string of record-breaking highs this year are caused by several factors.

    Increased economic and geopolitical turmoil caused by the new Trump administration has been a tailwind for gold this year, as well as a weakening US dollar, sticky inflation in the country and increased safe haven gold demand.

    Since coming into office in late January, Trump has threatened or enacted tariffs on many countries, including blanket tariffs on longtime US allies Canada and Mexico and tariffs on the European Union. Trump has also implemented 25 percent tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports.

    The gold price set a string of new highs in the month of April amid high market volatility as markets reacted to tariff decisions from Trump and the escalating trade war between the US and China. By April 11, Trump had raised US tariffs on Chinese imports to 145 percent and China has raised its tariffs on US products to 125 percent.

    As for the effect of these widespread tariffs raising prices for the American populace, Trump has reiterated his sentiment that the US may need to go through a period of economic pain to enter a new ‘golden age’ of economic prosperity. Falling markets and a declining US dollar support gold, as did increased gold purchasing in China in response to US tariffs on the country. Elon Musk’s call to audit the gold holdings in Fort Knox has also brought attention to the yellow metal.

    What factors have driven the gold price in the last five years?

    Despite these recent runs, gold has seen its share of both peaks and troughs over the last decade. After remaining rangebound between US$1,100 and US$1,300 from 2014 to early 2019, gold pushed above US$1,500 in the second half of 2019 on a softer US dollar, rising geopolitical issues and a slowdown in economic growth.

    Gold’s first breach of the significant US$2,000 price level in mid-2020 was due in large part to economic uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. To break through that barrier and reach what was then a record high, the yellow metal added more than US$500, or 32 percent, to its value in the first eight months of 2020.

    Gold price chart, August 31, 2020, to September 1, 2025.

    The gold price surpassed that level again in early 2022 as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine collided with rising inflation around the world, increasing the allure of safe-haven assets and pulling the yellow metal up to a price of US$2,074.60 on March 8, 2022. However, it fell throughout the rest of 2022, dropping below US$1,650 in October.

    Although it didn’t quite reach the level of volatility as the previous year, the gold price experienced drastic price changes in 2023 on the back of banking instability, high interest rates and the breakout of war in the Middle East.

    After central bank buying pushed the gold price up to the US$1,950.17 mark by the end of January, the US Federal Reserve’s 0.25 percent rate hike on February 1 sparked a retreat as the dollar and Treasury yields saw gains. The precious metal went on to fall to its lowest price level of the year at US$1,809.87 on February 23.

    The banking crisis that hit the US in early March caused a domino effect through the global financial system and led to the mid-March collapse of Credit Suisse, Switzerland’s second-largest bank. The gold price jumped to US$1,989.13 by March 15. The continued fallout in the global banking system throughout the second quarter of the year allowed gold to break above US$2,000 on April 3, and go on to flirt with a near-record high of US$2,049.92 on May 3.

    Those gains were tempered by the Fed’s ongoing rate hikes and improvements in the banking sector, resulting in a downward trend in the gold price throughout the remainder of the second quarter and throughout Q3. By October 4, gold had fallen to a low of US$1,820.01 and analysts expected the precious metal to drop below US$1,800.

    That was before the October 7 attacks by Hamas on Israel ignited legitimate fears of a much larger conflict erupting in the Middle East. Reacting to those fears, and to rising expectations that the Fed would begin to reverse course on interest rates, gold broke through the important psychological level of US$2,000 and closed at US$2,007.08 on October 27. As the fighting intensified, gold reached a then-new high of US$2,152.30 in intraday trading on December 3.

    That robust momentum in the spot gold price continued into 2024, chasing new highs on fears of a looming US recession, the promise of Fed rate cuts on the horizon, the worsening conflict in the Middle East and the tumultuous US presidential election year. By mid-March, gold was pushing up against the US$2,200 level.

    That record-setting momentum continued into the second quarter of 2024 when gold broke through US$2,400 in mid-April on strong central bank buying, sovereign debt concerns in China and investors expecting the Fed to start cutting interest rates. The precious metal went on to hit US$2,450.05 on May 20.

    Throughout the summer, the hits kept on coming.

    The global macro environment was highly bullish for gold in the lead up to the US election. Following the failed assassination attempt on Trump and a statement about coming interest rate cuts by Fed Chair Powell, the gold spot price hit a then new all-time high on July 16 at US$2,469.30. One week later, news that then-President Joe Biden would not seek re-election and would instead pass the baton to Vice President Kamala Harris eased some of the tension in the stock markets and strengthened the US dollar. This also pushed the price of gold down to US$2,387.99 on July 22, 2024.

    However, the bullish factors supporting gold remained in play, and the spot price for gold went on to breach US$2,500 on August 2 that year on a less than stellar US jobs report; it closed just above the US$2,440 level. A few weeks later, gold pushed past US$2,500 once again on August 16, closing above that level for the first time ever after the US Department of Commerce released data showing a fifth consecutive monthly decrease in a row for homebuilding.

    The news that the Chinese government issued new gold import quotas to banks in the country following a two month pause also helped fuel the gold price rally. Central bank gold buying has been a significant tailwind for the gold price this year, and China’s central bank has been one of the strongest buyers.

    Market watchers expected the Fed to cut interest rates by a quarter point at their September 2024 meeting, but news on September 12 that the regulators were still deciding between the expected cut or a larger half-point cut led gold prices on a rally that carried through into the next day, bringing gold prices near US$2,600.

    At the September 18 Fed meeting, the committee ultimately made the decision to cut rates by half a point, news that sent gold even higher. By September 20, it moved above US$2,600 and held above US$2,620.

    In October 2024, gold first breached the US$2,700 level and continued to higher on a variety of factors, including further rate cuts and economic data anticipation, the escalating conflict in the Middle East between Israel and Hezbollah, and economic stimulus in China — not to mention the very close race between the US presidential candidates.

    While the gold price fell following Trump’s win in early November and largely held under US$2,700 through the end of the year, it began trending upwards in 2025 to the new all-time high discussed earlier in the article.

    What’s next for the gold price?

    What’s next for the gold price is never an easy call to make. There are many factors to consider, but some of the most prevalent long-term drivers include economic expansion, market risk, opportunity cost and momentum.

    Economic expansion is one of the primary gold price contributors as it facilitates demand growth in several categories, including jewelry, technology and investment. As the World Gold Council explains, “This is particularly true in developing economies where gold is often used as a luxury item and a means to preserve wealth.”

    Market risk is also a prime catalyst for gold values as investors view the precious metal as the “ultimate safe haven,” and a hedge against currency depreciation, inflation and other systemic risks.

    Going forward, in addition to the Fed, inflation and geopolitical events, experts will be looking for cues from factors like supply and demand. In terms of supply, the world’s five top gold producers are China, Australia, Russia, Canada and the US. The consensus in the gold market is that major miners have not spent enough on gold exploration in recent years. Gold mine production has fallen from around 3,200 to 3,300 metric tons (MT) each year between 2018 and 2020 to around 3,000 to 3,100 MT each year between 2021 and 2023.

    On the demand side, China and India are the biggest buyers of physical gold, and are in a perpetual fight for the title of world’s largest gold consumer. That said, it’s worth noting that the last few years have brought a big rebound in central bank gold buying, which dropped to a record low in 2020, but reached a 55 year high of 1,136 MT in 2022.

    World Gold Council data shows 2024 central bank gold purchases came to 1,044.6 MT, marking the third year in a row above 1,000 MT. In H1 2025, the organization says gold purchases from central banks reached 415.1 MT.

    In addition to central bank moves, analysts are also watching for escalating tensions in the Middle East, a weakening US dollar, declining bond yields, and further interest rate cuts as factors that could push gold higher as investors look to secure their portfolios. “When it comes to outside factors that affect the market, it’s just tailwind after tailwind after tailwind. So I don’t really see the trend changing,” Coffin said.

    Joe Cavatoni, senior market strategist, Americas, at the World Gold Council, believes that market risk and uncertainty surrounding tariffs and continued demand from central banks are the main drivers of gold.

    Should you beware of gold price manipulation?

    It’s important for investors to be aware that gold price manipulation is a hot topic in the industry.

    In 2011, when gold hit what was then a record high, it dropped swiftly in just a few short years. This decline after three years of impressive gains led many in the gold sector to cry foul and point to manipulation.

    Early in 2015, 10 banks were hit in a US probe on precious metals manipulation.

    Evidence provided by Deutsche Bank (NYSE:DB) showed “smoking gun” proof that UBS Group (NYSE:UBS), HSBC Holdings (NYSE:HSBC), the Bank of Nova Scotia (TSX:BNS,NYSE:BNS and other firms were involved in rigging gold and silver rates in the market from 2007 to 2013. Not long after, the long-running London gold fix was replaced by the LBMA gold price in a bid to increase gold price transparency. The twice-a-day process, operated by the ICE Benchmark Administration, still involves a variety of banks collaborating to set the gold price, but the system is now electronic.

    Still, manipulation has by no means been eradicated, as a 2020 fine on JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) shows. The next year, chat logs were released in a spoofing trial for two former precious metals traders from the Bank of America’s (NYSE:BAC) Merrill Lynch unit. They show a trader bragging about how easy it is to manipulate the gold price.

    Gold market participants have consistently spoken out about manipulation. In mid-2020, Chris Marcus, founder of Arcadia Economics and author of the book “The Big Silver Short,” said that when gold fell back below the US$2,000 mark after hitting close to US$2,070, he saw similarities to what happened with the gold price in 2011.

    Marcus has been following the gold and silver markets with a focus specifically on price manipulation for nearly a decade. His advice? “Trust your gut. I believe we’re witnessing the ultimate ’emperor’s really naked’ moment. This isn’t complex financial analysis. Sometimes I think of it as the greatest hypnotic thought experiment in history.”

    Investor takeaway

    While we have the answer to what the highest gold price ever is as of now, it remains to be seen how high gold can climb, and if the precious metal can reach as high as US$5,000, US$10,000 or even US$40,000.

    Even so, many market participants believe gold is a must have in any investment profile, and there is little doubt investors will continue to see gold price action making headlines this year and beyond.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Lauren Kelly, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Residents in five Western Québec municipalities of have overwhelmingly rejected a proposed open-pit graphite mine, with 95 percent voting against the La Loutre project in a referendum.

    Nearly 3,000 ballots were cast on Sunday (August 31) across Duhamel, Lac-des-Plages, Lac-Simon, Chénéville and Saint-Émile-de-Suffolk. Of those, 2,754 citizens voted against the asset, while only 115 were in favor.

    The organizers say the result leaves no room for ambiguity about local opposition.

    Located near Lac Bélanger, roughly 80 kilometers northeast of Gatineau, La Loutre is owned by Lomiko Metals (TSXV:LMR,OTCQB:LMRMF), which says it is a potential source of graphite for electric vehicle batteries.

    China is the world’s largest producer of graphite by far, and countries around the world are looking to lock down supply of the material. In 2024, Lomiko received a US$8.35 million grant from the US Department of Defense, as well as C$4.9 million from Natural Resources Canada, as the countries looked to strengthen North America’s supply chain.

    But for many locals, the referendum on La Loutre was not about global supply chains, but about protecting the lakes, forests and tourism-driven economy that sustain the Petite-Nation region.

    Duhamel Mayor David Pharand, long opposed to the mine, said the scale of the rejection will shape what comes next.

    “I can assure the population that the percentage of the results of this referendum will have a major impact on the decision of the government and the action that will be taken,” Pharand told CBC. “We will work based on those numbers with our political, federal, and provincial members of parliament to see that this project is not funded.”

    Provincial officials struck a similar tone. Papineau MRC prefect Paul-André David said in a statement that the results reflect widespread environmental concerns and will guide the region’s stance in discussions with Québec City:

    “The MRC will have to take the necessary measures to protect the interests of the community, by demanding that governments ensure that the sustainable management of water, air and landscapes is at the heart of discussions.’

    Mathieu Lacombe, the Coalition Avenir Québec member of Québec’s National Assembly for Papineau, called the outcome “unequivocal” and pledged in a Facebook post to “ensure that the will of citizens is respected.”

    Premier François Legault has repeatedly said in recent years that “if there is no social acceptability, there will be no mining activity,” a promise the Coalition du NON is now urging him to uphold.

    Coalition presses for government action

    The referendum was organized with support from the Alliance des municipalités Petite-Nation Nord and spearheaded by local business and land-use groups under the banner of the Coalition du NON.

    The coalition is demanding that both provincial and federal governments move quickly to halt the project and declare the territory incompatible with mining activity. Louis St-Hilaire, president of the Petite-Nation Lake Protection Group and co-spokesperson for the coalition, said the result represents a clear directive.

    “Through this referendum, citizens have shown that mining is clearly not what they want for their region and that they will continue to oppose it. Mr. Legault, the public is now asking you, in the public interest, to revoke Lomiko Metals’ mining rights in this area,” St-Hilaire said.

    Lomiko acknowledges challenge of social license

    Lomiko received permits from the Québec government to begin a 250 metric ton bulk sample at La Loutre on July 1, also saying in the update that it was in a permitting phase to start geotechnical site investigations.

    In a statement to CBC on Tuesday (September 2), the company acknowledged the referendum outcome, while stressing that “the many outstanding questions will become clearer as it carries out additional studies.”

    Last year, Lomiko expressed disappointment after Québec’s government declined to fund the project, saying the province appeared to be drawing “pre-emptive conclusions” before technical assessments were completed.

    Local leaders say the onus is now squarely on provincial and federal authorities to respect the verdict.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Statistics Canada released its August job numbers on Friday (September 5). The report indicated a loss of 66,000 jobs in the Canadian economy and an increase in the unemployment rate to 7.1 percent from the 6.9 percent recorded in July.

    The losses were primarily felt in the professional, scientific and technical services sector with a decrease of 26,000 jobs, followed by losses of 23,000 jobs in the transportation and warehousing sector and 19,000 jobs in manufacturing.

    One small caveat: of the 66,000 jobs lost, 60,000 were part-time workers, while full-time employment saw little change after shedding 51,000 positions the previous month.

    South of the border, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) also released its August jobs report on Friday. The report is the first jobs report since Donald Trump fired the head of the BLS after the release of July’s labor report showed weakness trickling into the economy.

    The economy added an estimated 22,000 jobs during August, well below analysts’ expectations of 75,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate also ticked up to 4.3 percent from 4.2 percent in July.

    The federal workforce saw the largest job decline, losing 15,000 jobs. The mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction sector also saw its most significant change over the last 12 months, shedding 6,000 workers.

    Additionally, the BLS revised June and July’s figures. While July’s numbers rose to 79,000 added jobs from the 73,000 first reported, the agency made a significant downward revision to June’s numbers, indicating the economy lost 13,000 jobs for the month instead of gaining 14,000.

    Jobs data from the last few months will play an important role when the Federal Reserve next meets on September 16 and 17 to discuss changes to the Federal Funds Rate, which is currently set in the 4.25 to 4.5 percent range. Most analysts are predicting the Fed to make a 25 point cut to the benchmark rate, with some now eyeing a larger 50 point cut.

    Markets and commodities react

    Canadian equity markets were mostly positive during the shortened trading week. The S&P/TSX Composite Index (INDEXTSI:OSPTX) set another new record high on Friday, closing the week up 1.7 percent to 29,050.63. The S&P/TSX Venture Composite Index (INDEXTSI:JX) did even better, climbing 3.34 percent to finish Friday at 857.25. However, the CSE Composite Index (CSE:CSECOMP) went the opposite direction, falling 5.16 percent to end the week at 158.32.

    US equity markets were volatile this week, falling sharply at the open of the trading week Tuesday (September 2) before moving back into positive territory. Although the S&P 500 (INDEXSP:INX) pulled back slightly on Friday’s weak jobs data, it ultimately ended the week up 0.33 percent at 6,481.51. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDEXDJX:.DJI) took a larger hit Friday, and closed down 0.32 percent on the week at 45,400.87. Of the three, the Nasdaq 100 (INDEXNASDAQ:NDX) was the week’s biggest winner, rising 1.01 percent to 23,652.44.

    The gold price was in focus this week as it climbed to a new record high Wednesday (September 3) on expectations of a September rate cut by the Federal Reserve and news on August 29 that a Federal Appellate court had struck down the majority of Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. Gold ended the week up 4.03 percent at US$3,586.27 per ounce after the lackluster jobs report pushed gold above Wednesday’s highs.

    Silver had a similarly explosive week, climbing past US$40 for the first time since 2011 and moving as high as US$41.38 on Wednesday. The precious metal finished Friday with a 3.32 percent weekly gain at US$41.07 per ounce.

    On the other hand, copper was off this week, shedding 0.87 percent to US$4.54 per pound. The S&P Goldman Sachs Commodities Index (INDEXSP:SPGSCI) posted a decrease of 1.17 percent by close on Friday, finishing at 543.28.

    Top Canadian mining stocks this week

    How did mining stocks perform against this backdrop?

    Take a look at this week’s five best-performing Canadian mining stocks below.

    Stocks data for this article was retrieved at 4:00 p.m. EDT on Friday using TradingView’s stock screener. Only companies trading on the TSX, TSXV and CSE with market caps greater than C$10 million are included. Mineral companies within the non-energy minerals, energy minerals, process industry and producer manufacturing sectors were considered.

    1. Carlton Precious (TSXV:CPI)

    Weekly gain: 77.78 percent
    Market cap: C$17.74 million
    Share price: C$0.24

    Carlton Precious is a mineral exploration company focused on a portfolio of precious metals projects in the Americas and Australia.

    Its flagship Esquilache silver project, located in Peru, consists of two mining concessions covering an area of 1,600 hectares. Unsubstantiated records from the property indicate historic mining produced 10 million ounces of silver between 1950 and 1962. Exposed structures on the property show mineralization of silver, lead, zinc, copper and gold.

    On March 19, Carlton reported assay results from a 2024 surface channel sampling program, with grades peaking at 13.45 grams per metric ton (g/t) gold and 1,018 g/t silver.

    The company’s most recent announcement came on July 14, when Carlton signed an agreement with the community of San Antonio de Esquilache for the project allowing for further exploration at the property. Carlton added that its staff has designed a program of up to 40 drill holes that it expects to commence in fall 2025.

    In its September 2025 investor presentation, the company stated it is submitting its drill permit applications.

    2. Quantum Critical Metals (TSXV:LEAP)

    Weekly gain: 73.68 percent
    Market cap: C$17.31 million
    Share price: C$0.165

    Formerly Durango Resources, Quantum Critical Metals is a polymetallic exploration company developing a portfolio of projects in Québec and British Columbia, Canada.

    Its flagship NMX East critical metals project is in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay region of Québec and lies adjacent to Nemaska Lithium’s Whabouchi mine. According to the project page, the company has drilled four holes at the property, producing a highlighted assay of 107.68 meters from surface containing average grades of 38.85 g/t gallium, 701.03 g/t rubidium, 24.98 g/t cesium and 3.61 g/t thallium.

    Quantum Critical Metals has also been working to advance its Victory antimony project in Haida Gwaii, British Columbia. The site was initially discovered in the 1980s and hosts mineralization of arsenic, antimony and mercury. On August 25, the company announced it submitted an application to expand the property to 1,444 hectares.

    The company’s most recent news came on Thursday (September 4), when it identified mica as a key carrier of critical minerals at its NMX project. Quantum selected samples from the 107 meter interval mentioned above, and the samples with the highest mica content returning significantly higher grades of critical metals, including gallium, rubidium, lithium and niobium.

    Quantum has now sent the samples for further testing. If the testing confirms the results, stated the discovery will allow for easier removal of these elements from the rock, as the company can first isolate the mica.

    3. Electric Metals (TSXV:EML)

    Weekly gain: 66.67 percent
    Market cap: C$79.98 million
    Share price: C$0.45

    Electric Metals is a mineral development company focused on advancing its flagship North Star manganese project in Minnesota, US. According to the company, the asset is North America’s highest-grade manganese resource. It plans to produce high-purity manganese sulphate monohydrate for lithium-ion batteries.

    On August 26, Electric Metals released its preliminary economic assessment (PEA) for North Star. The assessment demonstrated a base-case after-tax net present value of US$1.39 billion, with an internal rate of return of 43.5 percent and a payback period of 23 months.

    The report also included an updated mineral resource estimate with an indicated resource of 7.6 million metric tons of ore grading 19.07 percent manganese, 22.33 percent iron and 30.94 percent silicon, and an inferred resource of 3.73 million metric tons of ore grading 17.04 percent manganese, 19.04 percent iron and 30.03 percent silicon.

    Momentum from the PEA release landed Electric Metals on this list of top performers last week, and its shares climbed even higher this week after the company announced the results of its annual and special shareholder meeting.

    Shareholders approved all resolutions, including two related to Electric Metals’ plan to redomicile its business in Delaware, US. The first is continuance from the Canada Business Corporations Act to the Business Corporations Act of British Columbia. Shareholders also voted to authorize a continuance of the company to the Delaware General Corporation Law, with the condition of a successful corporate move to BC.

    Electric Metals CEO Brian Savage said the change is intended to align its corporate home with the company’s mission to build a fully domestic US supply of manganese.

    4. Valhalla Metals (TSXV:VMXX)

    Weekly gain: 66.67 percent
    Market cap: C$11.53 million
    Share price: C$0.15

    Valhalla Metals is a polymetallic exploration company working to advance a pair of projects in Alaska’s Ambler Mining District. Its Sun project consists of 392 claims that cover an area of 25,382 hectares.

    A May 2022 technical report states that the indicated mineral resource for the project is 1.71 million metric tons of ore containing 162.96 million pounds of zinc, 55.85 million pounds of copper, 42.04 million pounds of lead, 3.3 million ounces of silver and 12,000 ounces of gold.

    It also reported an inferred resource of 9.02 million metric tons containing 831.33 million pounds of zinc, 239.64 million pounds of copper, 290.26 million pounds of lead, 23.68 million ounces of silver and 73,000 ounces of gold.

    The project is largely dependent on the construction of the 211 mile Ambler Access Road, which Donald Trump approved in his first term as president. Joe Biden rescinded the federal permit in 2024 due to environmental concerns.

    Shares in Valhalla gained momentum this week after Congress voted 215 to 210 on Wednesday to move ahead with the project. It’s expected that the Senate will follow suit when it votes on the resolution in the next few weeks.

    5. Orosur Mining (TSXV:OMI)

    Weekly gain: 65.31 percent
    Market cap: C$108.97 million
    Share price: C$0.405

    Orosur Mining is an exploration company focused on the development of early to advanced-stage assets in South America.

    Exploration has revealed multiple gold deposits at its flagship Anzá gold project in Colombia, which is located 50 kilometers west of Medellin and sits along Colombia’s primary gold belt.

    Orosur acquired the project, previously a 49/51 joint venture between Newmont and Agnico Eagle, in November 2024.

    Since that time, the company has been working to explore the property and has made several announcements regarding its exploration efforts. The most recent came on August 26, when it reported highlights from infill drilling being carried out at the property, including one hole with 6.13 g/t gold over 71.85 meters from near surface at the Pepas gold prospect.

    Orosur also owns several early-stage projects, the El Pantano gold-silver project in Argentina, the Lithium West project in Nigeria and the Ariquemes project in Brazil, which is prospective for tin, niobium and rare earths.

    On Monday (September 1), Orosur reported that in August, it had issued 3.28 million new common shares for a total consideration of US$174,711.67 following its exercise of the same number of warrants. It also stated that 31.51 million warrants remained outstanding.

    FAQs for Canadian mining stocks

    What is the difference between the TSX and TSXV?

    The TSX, or Toronto Stock Exchange, is used by senior companies with larger market caps, and the TSXV, or TSX Venture Exchange, is used by smaller-cap companies. Companies listed on the TSXV can graduate to the senior exchange.

    How many mining companies are listed on the TSX and TSXV?

    As of May 2025, there were 1,565 companies listed on the TSXV, 910 of which were mining companies. Comparatively, the TSX was home to 1,899 companies, with 181 of those being mining companies.

    Together, the TSX and TSXV host around 40 percent of the world’s public mining companies.

    How much does it cost to list on the TSXV?

    There are a variety of different fees that companies must pay to list on the TSXV, and according to the exchange, they can vary based on the transaction’s nature and complexity. The listing fee alone will most likely cost between C$10,000 to C$70,000. Accounting and auditing fees could rack up between C$25,000 and C$100,000, while legal fees are expected to be over C$75,000 and an underwriters’ commission may hit up to 12 percent.

    The exchange lists a handful of other fees and expenses companies can expect, including but not limited to security commission and transfer agency fees, investor relations costs and director and officer liability insurance.

    These are all just for the initial listing, of course. There are ongoing expenses once companies are trading, such as sustaining fees and additional listing fees, plus the costs associated with filing regular reports.

    How do you trade on the TSXV?

    Investors can trade on the TSXV the way they would trade stocks on any exchange. This means they can use a stock broker or an individual investment account to buy and sell shares of TSXV-listed companies during the exchange’s trading hours.

    Article by Dean Belder; FAQs by Lauren Kelly.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Dean Belder, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Lauren Kelly, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com