Author

admin

Browsing

The Pittsburgh Steelers may be without their top rookie for the near future.

Defensive tackle Derrick Harmon was carted off the field during the Steelers’ preseason finale against the Carolina Panthers.

Harmon was injured while rushing from the interior. Panthers lineman Brandon Walton blocked him on the play and Harmon ended up on the ground as Carolina quarterback Jack Plummer rolled out to his right.

Harmon was later seen on the broadcast reacting to his injury on the back of the cart. He’s been ruled out of the rest of tonight’s game.

Pittsburgh drafted Harmon at No. 21 overall in the first round out of Oregon. One of the top interior defensive line prospects in the class, he is expected to start for the Steelers this season alongside Keeanu Benton and Cameron Heyward.

That may change after tonight’s injury.

This story will be updated with more information when available.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • The SEC is shifting to a nine-game conference schedule in the 2026 college football season.
  • The SEC has played a nine-game conference schedule for college football since 1992.
  • The SEC will join the Big Ten and Big 12 as Power 4 conferences with a nine-game schedule.

This story was updated with new information

One of college football’s longest-standing debates is over.

On Aug. 21, the SEC announced that beginning with the 2026 college football season, the conference will shift to a nine-game conference schedule format for college football.

‘Adding a ninth SEC game underscores our universities’ commitment to delivering the most competitive football schedule in the nation,’ SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey said in a statement. ‘This format protects rivalries, increases competitive balance, and paired with our requirement to play an additional Power opponent, ensures SEC teams are well prepared to compete and succeed in the College Football Playoff.’

The SEC currently plays an eight-game conference schedule for college football and has done so since the 1992 season. The decision also now lines the SEC up with the Big Ten and the Big 12, two Power Four conferences that have already adopted a nine-game conference schedule.

The shift to a nine-game regular season schedule for the SEC also comes less than a day after the College Football Playoff selection committee announced that it will put a greater emphasis on strength of schedule in determining the 12-team field for the CFP this season. The CFP selection committee also announced it is introducing a record strength metric that will go ‘beyond a team’s schedule strength to assess how a team performed against that schedule’ to its selection process.

Here’s what to know the SEC’s announcement that it is implementing a nine-game conference schedule:

SEC schedule format

Here’s what the full nine-game conference format would look like beginning in 2026, per the SEC’s release:

  • The SEC will continue with a single-standings, non-divisional structure
  • Each school will play three annual opponents focused on maintaining many traditional rivalries
  • Each team’s remaining six games will rotate among the remaining conference schools
  • Each team will face every other SEC program at least once every two years and every opponent home and away in four years

Additionally, SEC teams will be required to schedule at least one additional high-quality non-conference game from the ACC, Big Ten or Big 12 conferences or Notre Dame each season under this new format.

When is SEC moving to 9-game schedule?

In its announcement on Thursday, the SEC announced that it will shift to a nine-game regular season conference schedule starting in 2026. It is the first adjustment to the SEC’s conference schedule since 1992, when the conference first expanded from a 10-team membership to 12-team membership with the additions of Arkansas and South Carolina.

Power Four college football scheduling formats

With the SEC’s announcement on Thursday, the ACC is the outlier among the Power Four conferences that won’t play a nine-game conference schedule starting in 2026.

Noted by Yahoo Sports’ Ross Dellenger prior to the SEC’s official announcement on Thursday, the ACC is expected to follow suit with the SEC by adopting a nine-game conference schedule.

SEC statement on conference scheduling

Here’s an additional statement from Sankey on the conference’s shift to a nine-game conference schedule:

‘The SEC has established itself as the leader in delivering the most compelling football schedule in college athletics,’ Sankey said. ‘Fans will see traditional rivalries preserved, new matchups more frequently, and a level of competition unmatched across the nation.’

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Serena Williams is opening up about her experience with GLP-1 medications. The 43-year-old tennis star has lost 31 pounds on the drug Zepbound, a type of medication typically prescribed for diabetes and now also used for weight management. 

Williams’ struggles with body image began with postpartum changes after she gave birth to her first daughter, Alexis Olympia, in 2017, and continued after her second daughter, Adira River, was born in August 2023. She lost “a lot” of weight in the two weeks after River’s birth, she told People, but afterwards, “never lost another pound.” 

The tennis star’s candor may help to dispel the pesky health inaccuracy that weight loss is a simple matter of exercise. While an active life and healthy eating can help with the process, new research suggests that outside factors like genetics may play a bigger role than previously thought. As arguably one of the world’s greatest athletes, Williams’ decision to share her journey with GLP-1s may help to reshape the image of the drugs.

‘A misconception is that it’s a shortcut,’ she said in the interview. ‘As an athlete and as someone that has done everything, I just couldn’t get my weight to where I needed to be at a healthy place − and believe me, I don’t take shortcuts.’

Female stars struggle under the spotlight 

In a 2018 interview with Teen Vogue, Williams shared details of the body shaming she’d experienced throughout her career: “People would say I was born a guy, all because of my arms, or because I’m strong. I was different to Venus: she was thin and tall and beautiful, and I am strong and muscular − and beautiful, but, you know, it was just totally different.”

In March 2025, Meghan Trainor also opened up about struggles with body image postpartum. The Grammy winner, 31, told USA TODAY she had been looking forward to getting breast implants since she was a teenager, but pregnancy and two C-sections intensified the desire. 

“It was tough to look at my body,” she said at the time. “I’m always singing about loving myself, and it got harder and harder with all the scars and stretch marks. And then after losing weight, too, these boobs were just purely empty, just flat and just felt like skin on my body.”

Likewise, rugby champion Ilona Maher has used her platform to become a revolutionary body-positive activist and an inspiration for younger generations of women and athletes. 

Williams says it’s important to teach people to be confident at any size, like she tries to be. 

“The size I was before, there was nothing wrong with it. It’s just not what I wanted to have,” she clarified. “I just knew that I wanted to be where I personally felt comfortable.”

“Weight loss should never really change your self image,” she said. “Women often experience judgment about their bodies at any size, and I’m no stranger to that. So I feel like you should love yourself at any size and any look.” 

While the rise of GLP-1s brings a myriad of valid concerns − such as its contribution to disordered eating and promotion of thinness as the ideal body type − Williams’ outspokenness is a crucial, balanced example of healthy and transparent GLP-1 usage.

Celebrities should be transparent about their weight loss

We’re not just in a period of rapid, GLP-1 induced weight loss, we’ve also entered the “undetectable era” of plastic surgery. Cosmetic procedures and filler are no longer obvious on celebrities’ faces, rather more celebrities simply look like they haven’t aged. 

Mental health experts agree that celebrities sharing what work they’ve had done, or how they’ve gone about transformative weight loss journeys, can help fans maintain healthy, realistic beauty standards. The undetectable era may bring less transparency − making it more crucial than ever for people to stop comparing their looks to celebrities’. 

‘It may establish an unattainable ideal, and I think that the more we get comfortable with who we are, the less that becomes an issue,’ psychotherapist Stephanie Sarkis previously told USA TODAY. ‘We tend to not compare ourselves with others when we are feeling OK about ourselves.’

Williams wants to have an ‘honest conversation’ about GLP-1s

While the drugs, which have skyrocketed in popularity and ripped through Hollywood, offered Williams the extra boost she needed, she told Vogue she was aware of how much of a stigma remained.

‘I’m not saying any of this lightly, which is why it’s so important to have an honest conversation about this topic,’ she said. ‘I’m the mom of two girls, and I wanted to be very honest about what I’m doing so they can always be the same with me and we can have an open relationship.’

The medications, which work by targeting certain hormones to suppress appetite, have made Williams feel ‘sexier’ and ‘more confident,’ she said. And as for those who say if you work hard enough in the gym, you won’t need the drugs, Williams says they’re misinformed.

‘Sometimes you need help. Your story is your story, and it’s okay to make that choice to do it if you want to,’ she told Vogue. ‘I did, and I’m really happy with it.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • The NFL documented 190 concussions in 2024, the lowest since the league began tracking them in 2015.
  • The league attributes concussion decline to its new ‘dynamic kickoff’ rule and two other factors.
  • The NFL also says unsportsmanlike gestures, including sexual ones, were up 133% in 2024. Reducing them is a point of emphasis in 2025.

The NFL conducted a video call with reporters Thursday in a bid to share updates on player health and safety along with the league’s game operations. And, boy, did the information provided run the gamut.

The good: The league is thrilled with the results of its ‘dynamic kickoff’ alterations and has permanently adopted the measure with further tweaks for 2025.

The better: Player concussions dropped to their lowest level – the 2020 season impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, notwithstanding – since the league began tracking them in 2015.

The ugly: Players performing sexual gestures and other taunts during games rose 133% last season. (More on that later.)

NFL concussions are down, but why?

Jeff Miller, the league’s executive vice president in charge of player health and safety, revealed that 190 concussions were suffered by players in 2024 – that figure including preseason, regular season and postseason games along with practices. That represented a decrease from 227 in 2023. Over the previous 10 seasons, the high-water mark was 291 in 2017. (There were 178 in 2020 during the pandemic. The league canceled preseason that year, had a virtual offseason and highly modified training camp that included extensive social distancing.)

Miller attributed the decline in concussions to increasingly safer helmets, the broader use of Guardian Caps in practice – players were also permitted to start wearing them in games in 2024 – and the implementation of the dynamic kickoff set-up, which precludes players from sprinting downfield and fueling dangerous collisions at top speed.

He noted that helmet technology has improved so much that some shells are safer on their own than older helmets covered by a Guardian Cap, the padded device players often wear to reduce concussive hits. In collaboration with the NFL Players Association, the league is hoping to convince roughly 30% of its players to transition into the highest-performing helmets.

Seven older models were outlawed this season. Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Aaron Rodgers is among the players who have been forced to don a newer, safer helmet, and he hasn’t been shy about sharing his complaints.

‘Dynamic kickoff’ here to stay

After installing the new format last year, the league has moved to its new kickoff architecture permanently. Previously, the kickoff had been the game’s most dangerous play, Miller saying the injury and concussion rates spiking two- to fourfold compared to plays run from scrimmage. Injuries and concussions suffered on the dynamic kickoff, per Miller, had essentially become aligned with the risk level that occurs on plays from scrimmage.

There were other benefits from dynamic kickoff:

About one-third of kickoffs were returned last season after the figure had fallen to about one-fifth in 2023, when the league became concerned the play had basically become ceremonial. Super Bowl 58 between the Kansas City Chiefs and San Francisco 49ers included 13 kickoffs, none of them returned.

Fifty-nine returns covered at least 40 yards in 2024, the most since 2016. Seven returns resulted in touchdowns, the most since 2021.

Due to the frequently improved field position created by dynamic kickoffs, the punting rate also dropped 4.5% in 2024, which had the added benefit of reducing what had been the game’s second-most dangerous play, per Miller.

Touchbacks will be brought out to the 35-yard line this year (not the 30) in an attempt to provide further incentive for returns.

A team trailing in a game can also now declare an onside kick at any point. Last year, they could only be attempted by the trailing team in the fourth quarter.

Sportsmanship to be a point of emphasis in 2025

Back to those inappropriate gestures − the league doesn’t want to see them and plans to enforce its rules to curb their increasing occurrence.

“Sportsmanship is a point of emphasis and clarification for the players and the clubs this year,” said Walt Anderson, the league’s officiating rules analyst and formerly an NFL referee for 17 seasons.

“Our taunting was up about 55 percent last year. Unsportsmanlike gestures – whether they were either simulating or either shooting a gun or brandishing of a gun or inappropriate gestures like a throat slash or unfortunate sexual gestures that were made – those were up almost 133 percent.’

Former Seahawks star Marshawn Lynch became infamous for the commonly used sexual gesture, even performing it as an exclamation point during his legendary ‘Beast Quake’ touchdown run in Seattle during the 2010 playoffs.

“It’s just one of those areas that the league wants to work actively on. There are plenty of (other) ways for players to be able to celebrate,’ continued Anderson. ‘We want them to focus on those and not the inappropriate areas.”

Unsportsmanlike fouls result in 15-yard penalties on the field and can also result in fines, particularly for repeat offenders.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Providence Gold Mines Inc. (“Providence” or the “Company”) announces that subject to Regulatory approval it has entered an option agreement to acquire the “La Dama de Oro Gold Property”. The property is a historical gold mine 100% owned by the Optionor, (” Mohave Gold Mining”), a private Company incorporated under the laws of the state of California.

Providence recently commissioned Ethos Geological Inc. of Bozeman MT to complete an NI 43 101 technical report, authored by Zachary Black, SME-RM acting as the Qualified Person under NI 43 101. The NI 43 101 technical report has been submitted for Exchange review and approval. A cautionary note: The property is at an early exploration stage and does not have sufficient data for a mineral resource.

The La Dama de Oro Property is situated in the Silver Mountain Mining District, within the structurally complex Eastern California Shear Zone and the intersection with the San Andreas Fault Zone. Bedrock geology includes Mesozoic quartz monzonite that intrudes the Jurassic Sidewinder Volcanics. The structural history of the region implies a sequence of compressional and extensional events that reactivated favorably oriented zones of weakness for the circulation of hydrothermal fluids. The main zone of mineralization is hosted by the La Dama de Oro Fault, a shallow northeast-dipping oblique-slip fault.

The mineralization at the property is classified as a structurally controlled, low-sulfidation epithermal gold-silver vein system. Gold and silver mineralization is associated with multi-phase quartz veining, brecciation, and pervasive hydrothermal alteration along the La Dama de Oro Fault. The largest known vein is 4.5 feet at its widest point and remains open to exploration, with the potential for additional undiscovered veins along the fault system. The property has an approved exploration permit that includes a bulk sample.

The Option entitles the Company the right to purchase 100% of the La Dama de Oro Gold Property under the following terms:

YEAR 1

Within 15 days of Regulatory approval the Company shall issue 2,000,000 common shares from treasury and incur $20,000 in expenditures within 12 months of the effective date.

YEAR 2

The Company shall issue an additional 2,000,000 common shares from treasury and incur $250,000 in expenditures before the second-year anniversary of the effective date

YEAR 3

The Company shall issue an additional 500,000 common shares from treasury and incur a further $250,000 in expenditures before the third-year anniversary date of the effective date

YEAR 4

The Company shall incur an additional $250,000 expenditures before the fourth-year anniversary of the effective date

Ronald A. Coombes, President & CEO of Providence commented; “The best place to explore for gold is where gold is, with the rich historical history of past gold production at the La Dama de Oro mine there remains very good discovery potential”.

The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Zachary Black, SME-RM, a Qualified Person as defined under NI 43-101. Mr. Black is a consultant and is independent of Providence Gold Mines Inc.

For more information, please contact Ronald Coombes, President, and CEO of the Company.

Ronald A. Coombes, President & CE

Phone: 604 724 2369

roombes@providencegold.com

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Neither the OTCQB and or the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

All statements, trend analysis and other information contained in this press release relative to markets about anticipated future events or results constitute forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein, including, without limitation, statements relating to the permitting process, future production of Providence Gold Mines, budget and timing estimates, the Company’s working capital and financing opportunities and statements regarding the exploration and mineralization potential of the Company’s properties, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to business and economic risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results of operations to differ materially from those contained in the forward- looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Providence Gold Mines expectations include fluctuations in commodity prices and currency exchange rates; uncertainties relating to interpretation of drill results and the geology, continuity and grade of mineral deposits; the need for cooperation of government agencies and native groups in the exploration and development of properties and the issuance of required permits; the need to obtain additional financing to develop properties and uncertainty as to the availability and terms of future financing; the possibility of delay in exploration or development programs and uncertainty of meeting anticipated program milestones; and uncertainty as to timely availability of permits and other governmental approvals. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and opinions of management at the date the statements are made. Providence Gold Mines does not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required by applicable securities laws. Investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statement.

Source

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

ESGold (CSE:ESAU,OTCQB:ESAUF) has signed a binding memorandum of understanding with Colombian firm Planta Magdalena to form a 50/50 joint venture on a fully permitted gold- and silver-bearing tailings project.

Under the agreement, ESGold will invest C$1.5 million for its stake and will retain a first right of refusal to acquire the remaining 50 percent interest from Planta Magdalena within 12 months.

The project is designed to replicate ESGold’s Montauban model in Québec, which focuses on generating cashflow by reprocessing legacy tailings, while providing environmental remediation.

Preliminary due diligence sampling of 27 tailings collected from the project, located in Colombia’s Bolívar department, returned encouraging results, including assays of 42.7 grams per metric ton (g/t) gold and 280 g/t silver.

Several samples exceeded 5 g/t gold and 190 g/t silver, highlighting the potential for high-grade recovery.

Bulk concentrate tests are underway, with final verification to be completed at Actlabs in Québec.

Bolívar is one of Colombia’s most prolific gold regions, with artisanal miners processing an estimated 300,000 metric tons of ore annually. ESGold, a self-described scalable clean mining and exploration innovation company, plans to apply modern, mercury-free recovery methods to improve yields while addressing environmental concerns.

“The region still processes hundreds of thousands of metric tons of ore annually, yet much of it is handled using rudimentary mercury amalgamation methods that leave behind a substantial amount of gold and silver in the tailings,” said Gordon Robb, CEO of ESGold. “This creates an immense opportunity for ESGold to apply modern, environmentally responsible recovery technology that can significantly improve yields while remediating legacy mine sites.”

Pending completion of technical and legal due diligence, ESGold aims to fast track the project toward production in 2026, establishing a second high-margin operation alongside Montauban.

Green revenue stream

It is estimated that there are 8,500 tailings facilities around the globe, holding more than 217 billion cubic meters of mine ‘waste.’ In an effort to reduce the amount of stored tailings and their environmental impact, tailings reprocessing is emerging as both an economic and sustainable revenue stream.

By extracting valuable residual metals, such as gold, copper and critical minerals, from legacy waste, companies can generate revenue while reducing the environmental footprint of tailings facilities.

The approach also aligns with sustainability goals, as it mitigates risks like tailings dam failures and restores degraded sites, turning longstanding liabilities into productive assets

Globally, the growing recognition of untapped value in tailings has spurred renewed interest and investment, with major miners — like Vale (NYSE:VALE) — and governments prioritizing tailings projects as part of circular mining strategies and critical minerals security.

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Commodities giant Glencore (LSE:GLEN,OTC Pink:GLCNF) has submitted applications to place two of its flagship copper projects in Argentina under a new investment regime.

The Switzerland-based firm is seeking to include the El Pachón deposit in San Juan and the Agua Rica deposit in Catamarca under Argentina’s recently introduced Incentive Regime for Large Investments (RIGI).

Together, the two projects represent a planned capital investment of about US$13.5 billion over the next decade — US$9.5 billion for El Pachón and US$4 billion for Agua Rica.

Both sites would benefit from a long-term economic framework with enhanced investor protections under the RIGI program, which the administration of President Javier Milei launched this year to attract foreign investment.

“President Milei and his administration must be credited for introducing the RIGI. This framework has changed the investment landscape in Argentina, providing a key catalyst to attract major foreign investment to the country,” Glencore CEO Gary Nagle said in the company’s announcement on Monday (August 18).

“The RIGI provides a key platform for the development of Argentina’s significant natural resource endowment,’ added Martín Pérez de Solay, CEO of Glencore Argentina.

‘I am confident that the mining sector can be a major contributor to the Argentinian economy with the El Pachón and Agua Rica projects supporting the country’s ambition to become one of the world’s leading copper producers.”

El Pachón is a large-scale copper and molybdenum deposit with estimated resources of about 6 billion metric tons (MT) of ore averaging 0.43 percent copper, 2.2 grams per MT silver and 130 grams per MT molybdenum.

For its part, Agua Rica hosts roughly 1.2 billion MT of ore with average grades of 0.47 percent copper, 0.2 grams per MT gold, 3.4 grams per MT silver and 0.03 percent molybdenum. Ore from Agua Rica would be processed at the existing Alumbrera facilities, located 35 kilometers away, through the MARA project framework.

The scale of Glencore’s expansion comes amid a broader strategic race among western producers to secure supplies of critical minerals needed for clean energy technologies, electric vehicles and defense applications. Copper in particular is considered vital to global electrification, and analysts warn that rising demand could soon outstrip supply.

US enforcement shift on Chinese metals

On Tuesday (August 19), the US Department of Homeland Security announced that imports of Chinese steel, copper and lithium will be targeted for “high-priority enforcement” under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, a law restricting goods linked to alleged human rights abuses in China’s Xinjiang region.

“The use of slave labor is repulsive and we will hold Chinese companies accountable for abuses and eliminate threats its forced labor practices pose to our prosperity,” Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a post on X.

US officials say the Xinjiang region hosts state-run internment camps where Uyghurs and other minority groups are subject to forced labor. Beijing has consistently denied the allegations, dismissing them as politically motivated.

The announcement expands Washington’s campaign to scrutinize goods with ties to Xinjiang, which has already affected solar panels, cotton and other commodities. The new focus on copper and lithium marks a significant escalation given both metals’ central role in renewable energy and battery production.

Global supply chains in flux

Together, Glencore’s Argentine projects and Washington’s enforcement measures highlight how critical minerals are becoming increasingly entangled with geopolitics.

China processes about 70 percent of the world’s rare earths and controls a major share of global copper and lithium refining capacity. Western governments are trying to diversify away from Chinese supply chains amid rising tensions.

Argentina, with its vast mineral reserves, has emerged as a key player in this strategy. The country is already a major producer of lithium and is positioning itself as a copper hub through projects like Glencore’s expansion.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Privately owned Rare Earths Americas (REA) has formed in a bid to explore and develop high-grade rare earths assets in the US and Brazil, looking to consolidate supply chains for various domestic sectors.

The company, which raised AU$25 million in a private funding round, said it combines experienced operators and investors with “deep expertise across global mining, energy and critical materials.”

Included in the company’s portfolio is the Foothills discovery, located in Georgia, US.

The site contains grades of up to 41.3 percent total rare earth oxides, including heavy rare earths crucial for high-performance magnets. REA has highlighted its strong logistics, low-cost power and streamlined path to permitting.

In Brazil, the Alpha and Constellation projects hold more than 1 billion metric tons of high-grade ionic clay rare earths mineralization, including dysprosium and terbium, which are essential for permanent magnets.

The Homer project, also located in Brazil, targets multiple carbonatite clusters with the potential for niobium discoveries in a region known for leading niobium mines.

“The rare earths market is undergoing a generational shift as the West races to secure its rare earths future,” said CEO Donald Swartz in a Monday (August 18) press release.

REA’s timing aligns with broader US efforts to reduce reliance on China, which currently controls nearly 70 percent of global rare earths processing and accounts for most heavy rare earths production.

In April, Beijing restricted shipments of seven rare earths to the US and other countries, prompting concern among automakers and defense contractors dependent on these materials.

The US government recently proposed a pricing support mechanism for domestic rare earths ventures in order to increase production and mitigate China’s influence.

Discussions last month, led by former White House Trade Advisor Peter Navarro and National Security Council official David Copley, included rare earths producers and major tech firms reliant on these critical minerals.

China’s dominance stems from billions of dollars invested in mining and processing since 2000, often with minimal environmental or safety oversight, allowing the country to produce rare earths at lower cost than western competitors.

The US response to the Asian nation’s rare earths stranglehold has included efforts to develop domestic mine supply and build out refinement, processing and production capacity. American companies have also sought to secure alternative sources in Africa and Latin America, but investment and technology barriers remain significant.

Mountain Pass in California, the country’s only large-scale rare earths mine, produces bastnaesite carbonate, but relies heavily on foreign processing. MP Materials (NYSE:MP), the mine’s operator, posted a net loss of US$65.4 million in 2024, highlighting the challenge of competing with China’s low-cost production model.

REA’s launch positions it as a potential strategic player in this evolving landscape.

According to the company, the Foothills project offers a “streamlined permitting pathway” in the US, while the Alpha and Constellation projects in Brazil provide access to large-scale, high-grade heavy rare earths.

“With grade and strategic geography on our side, we intend to advance our rare earths projects to support the long-term supply of critical materials essential to domestic innovation,” Swartz added.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Uranium mining in Canada accounts for 13 percent of global output, making the Great White North the second largest producer of uranium in the world, behind only Kazakhstan.

Canada hosts 9 percent of the world’s uranium resources and is home to the biggest deposits of high-grade uranium. Their grades of up to 20 percent uranium are 100 times greater than the global average.

Canadian uranium deposits are found mainly in the provinces of Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Québec, as well as the territory of Nunavut. Of these, Saskatchewan leads the country in both uranium exploration and production.

In this article

    Top Canadian uranium mines

    Canada is home to three producing uranium mines, Cigar Lake, McArthur River and McClean Lake, all of which are located in Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin.

    Saskatchewan is a premier uranium mining jurisdiction as home to the Athabasca Basin, a mining-friendly region in the north of the province that’s renowned for its high-quality uranium deposits. The area’s long uranium-mining history has made Canada an international leader in the uranium sector.

    Canada’s major uranium mining companies are Cameco (TSX:CCO,NYSE:CCJ) and Orano Canada, a subsidiary of the multinational company Orano Group. Cameco is the majority owner and operator of Cigar Lake and McArthur River. Orano holds a significant stake in both mines, and is also the majority owner and operator of the recently restarted McClean Lake operation.

    Data and information on the Canadian uranium mines and advanced projects discussed below is taken from mining database MDO. The database only includes projects that have at least partial ownership by public companies.

    1. Cigar Lake Mine

    Ownership:
    54.547% — Cameco
    40.453% — Orano Canada
    5% — TEPCO Resources
    Province: Saskatchewan
    Mine type: Underground
    Deposit type: Unconformity-related

    Cigar Lake, which entered commercial production in 2015, is one of Canada’s largest uranium mines and the world’s highest grade uranium mine. The underground mining operation involves the use of innovative mining methods such as jet boring, which was purposely designed by Cameco to tackle the unique challenges of the Cigar Lake deposit.

    For 2024, production at the Cigar Lake mine was reported at 16.9 million pounds U3O8, up 2 million pounds from the previous year. Guidance for 2025 stands at approximately 18 million pounds.

    Cigar Lake’s proven and probable reserves stand at 551,400 metric tons of ore grading 15.87 percent U3O8 for 192.9 million pounds of contained U3O8. Its mine life is expected to run until 2036.

    2. McArthur River-Key Lake Mine

    Ownership:
    McArthur River mine
    69.805% — Cameco
    30.195% — Orano Canada
    Key Lake mill
    83.3% — Cameco
    16.7% — Orano Canada
    Province: Saskatchewan
    Mine type: Underground
    Deposit type: Unconformity-related

    The McArthur River-Key Lake operation is home to the McArthur River mine and Key Lake mill, respectively the largest high-grade uranium mine and largest uranium mill in the world, according to MDO.

    McArthur River was first brought into production in 2000 using raiseboring and blast hole stoping mining methods, but was put on care and maintenance temporarily in early 2018 due to low uranium prices. Cameco brought the mine and mill back into production in late 2022, progressively ramping up output over the next few years.

    Production in 2024 came in at 20.3 million pounds U3O8, up nearly 43 percent from the previous year’s output, and production guidance for 2025 has been set at 18 million pounds.

    McArthur River’s proven and probable reserves total 2.49 million metric tons grading 6.55 percent U3O8 for 359.6 million pounds of contained metal. Its mine life extends out to 2044.

    3. McClean Lake Mine and Mill

    Ownership:
    77.5% — Orano Canada
    22.5% — Denison Mines (TSX:DML)
    Province: Saskatchewan
    Mine type: Surface mine
    Deposit type: Unconformity-related

    The McClean Lake mine re-entered production in July 2025, 17 years after it was shuttered in 2008 due to low uranium prices made the operations uneconomic.

    After studies demonstrated that the joint venture partners’ patented surface access borehole resource extraction (SABRE) mining method could bring McClean back to life economically, the decision was made in January 2024 to bring the asset back into production.

    The site hosts multiple deposits, including the now-producing McClean North deposit. It also boasts the only mill in the world designed to process high-grade uranium ore without dilution, according to MDO. The mill has the capacity to produce 24 million pounds of uranium concentrate, or yellowcake, annually. Currently, the mill is processing ore from the Cigar Lake mine under a toll mining agreement.

    Proven reserves at McClean Lake are in the form of ore stockpiles, and total 90,000 metric tons at a grade of 0.37 percent for U3O8 for 700,000 pounds of contained metal. The site also hosts significant indicated and inferred resources of 25.4 million pounds across the McLean North, Sue D and Sue F deposits.

    The partners expect to produce approximately 800,000 pounds of U3O8 from McClean North in the first year of operations. In addition, mining at the McClean North and Sue F deposits has the potential to produce about 3 million pounds from 2026 to 2030.

    Upcoming Canadian uranium mines

    There are a handful of contenders for Canada’s next uranium mine: Patterson Lake South, Rook 1 and Wheeler River. None are in the construction stage yet, but most are expecting to come online in the next few years. Learn about the advanced uranium projects below.

    1. Patterson Lake South

    Ownership: Paladin Energy (TSX:PDN,ASX:PDN)
    Province: Saskatchewan
    Mine type: Underground
    Deposit type: Basement hosted vein-type or fracture-filled

    Currently in the permitting phase, the Patterson Lake South (PLS) project hosts the large, high-grade and near-surface Triple R deposit, which has the potential to produce both uranium and gold. The project has a probable mineral reserve estimate of 93.7 million pounds of contained uranium from 3 million metric tons grading 1.41 percent U3O8.

    The 2023 feasibility study for PLS highlights average production of approximately 9 million pounds U3O8 per year over a 10 year mine life.

    Paladin added the PLS uranium project to its portfolio in December 2024 via its acquisition of Fission Uranium. The company is continuing to develop the PLS’s resource potential outside of the Triple R deposit, with a significant focus on the project’s Saloon East zone. Advancing through the environmental permitting process remains ongoing.

    2. Rook 1

    Ownership: NexGen Energy (TSX:NXE)
    Province: Saskatchewan
    Mine type: Underground
    Deposit type: Basement-hosted, vein-type

    NexGen Energy’s Rook 1 project, home to the Arrow deposit, is in the permitting stage with a feasibility study completed in February 2021. Arrow hosts probable mineral reserves of 239.6 million pounds of U3O8 from 4.57 million metric tons of ore at a grade of 2.37 percent, as well as a measured and indicated resource of 256.7 million pounds from 3.75 million metric tons at 3.1 percent.

    Over its 11.7 year mine life, Rook 1 is expected to produce an average of 19.8 million pounds of U3O8 per year, including over 25 million pounds during the first five years.

    Provincial environmental assessment approval was granted in November 2023, and the federal environmental impact statement was accepted as final in January 2025. In March 2025, the company shared that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission has proposed hearing dates for the Rook I project on November 19, 2025, and February 9 to 13, 2026.

    NexGen states that a full project execution team is at the ready and the site is fully prepared for construction activities to commence following final federal approval.

    3. Wheeler River

    Ownership:
    95% — Denison Mines
    5% — Uranium Energy (TSX:UEC,NYSEAMERICAN:UEC)
    Province: Saskatchewan
    Mine type:
    Phoenix — In-situ recovery

    Gryphon — Underground
    Deposit type: Unconformity-related

    The Wheeler River uranium project, billed as the largest undeveloped uranium project in the eastern region of the Athabasca Basin, is home to the high-grade Phoenix and Gryphon deposits. Each deposit is considered a standalone asset, and the Phoenix deposit is the more advanced of the two.

    A feasibility study for the Phoenix deposit as an in-situ recovery operation was completed in mid-2023. In February 2025, Denison reported that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission is set to conduct hearings for the project’s environmental assessment and license to prepare and construct a uranium mine and mill on October 8 and December 8 to 12, 2025. If granted approval, Denison is prepared to start construction in early 2026, followed by first production by the first half of 2028.

    As for the Gryphon deposit, an update to the pre-feasibility study for a conventional underground mining operation was completed in 2023. Denison conducted a field program in the first quarter of 2025 as part of its efforts to support a feasibility study.

    Canadian uranium exploration companies

    Canada is also home to a slew of uranium exploration and development companies focused on discovering uranium in Saskatchewan, Nunavut and Newfoundland and Labrador.

      For more insight on the uranium companies operating in the Athabasca Basin discussed in this article, check out our breakdown of the 15 uranium companies exploring the basin.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      The College Football Playoff selection committee will put greater emphasis on strength of schedule in determining the field for the upcoming season.

      The change in metrics was part of a slew of modifications made to the selection process, the committee announced on Aug. 20.

      For the 2025 season, the schedule strength metric has been adjusted to apply greater weight to games against strong opponents. Also being introduced is the record strength metric, which goes ‘beyond a team’s schedule strength to assess how a team performed against that schedule.’

      PATH TO PLAYOFF: Sign up for our college football newsletter

      In the new metric, teams will be rewarded for defeating high-quality opponents and they won’t be penalized heavily for losing such games. Conversely, teams will have minimal rewards for defeating low-quality teams but will be soundly penalized for losing such games.

      Strength of schedule has been something the selection committee has considered for the entire history of the College Football Playoff, but introducing a metric allows those in power to have another data point to determine rankings.

      It has been a topic of debate among teams and conferences in the fight to get their squads in, with some believing those with tougher schedules should be rewarded. It was a central argument in whether Indiana and Southern Methodist should have been included in last year’s field given they didn’t face many ranked opponents.

      While it has mostly centered on conference schedules, it could also benefit teams that schedule marquee non-conference games now that the penalty for losing isn’t as damaging.

      ‘All of these modifications will help the selection committee as they rank the top 25 teams,” Rich Clark, executive director of the College Football Playoff, said in a statement. ‘We feel these changes will help construct a postseason bracket that recognizes the best performances and teams on the field during the regular season, and I want to thank our veteran selection committee members and data analytics groups for helping implement these changes.’

      Additional changes to College Football Playoff rankings

      The selection committee also reviewed its ranking of teams not playing during conference championship week, the final games played before the 12-team playoff is revealed. The committee decided movement in the rankings should be ‘evidence-based’ and didn’t recommend implementing a formal policy to stop any movement.

      There also have been changes to the recusals. Previously, committee members weren’t allowed to discuss or vote for teams if they were paid by the school or had a family member within the institution. Now, there will be full recusal and partial recusals.

      Members will be deemed partially recused if they have a secondary relationship, such as a family member employed by the institution but not within the football team or senior administration. In such instances, the committee member can participate in discussions related to the team, but still cannot participate in votes related to them.

      College Football Playoff rankings dates

      The selection committee will unveil its first rankings on Nov. 4, ahead of Week 11. The full schedule of rankings releases will be:

      • Tuesday, Nov. 4 (8 p.m. ET)
      • Tuesday, Nov. 11 (7 p.m. ET)
      • Tuesday, Nov. 18 (8:30 p.m. ET)
      • Tuesday, Nov. 25 (7 p.m. ET)
      • Tuesday, Dec. 2 (7 p.m. ET)
      • Sunday, Dec. 7 (playoff field unveiled, noon ET)
      This post appeared first on USA TODAY