Alice Queen (AQX:AU) has announced HORN ISLAND MINING LEASE APPLICATION REGISTERED
Download the PDF here.
This post appeared first on investingnews.com
The world’s top gold producers delivered a string of robust second-quarter results, buoyed by record prices and resilient operations as investors continue to seek refuge in the yellow metal amid growing economic uncertainty.
With spot gold trading above US$3,400 per troy ounce, just shy of its April all-time high of US$3,448.50, the world’s largest gold producers posted higher earnings and stronger cash flow in their recent Q2 results.
Below is a breakdown of how a few major players fared in Q2.
Barrick nearly doubles profit margins
Barrick Mining (TSX:ABX,NYSE:B) formerly Barrick Gold, reported a 97 percent year-on-year jump in net income to US$1.25 billion for the quarter, compared to US$634 million a year earlier.
Earnings per share rose to US$0.47 while operating cash flow in the first half reached US$2.5 billion, up 32 percent from 2024. Free cash flow more than doubled to US$770 million, supported by higher commodity prices.
Gold production climbed 5 percent from the first quarter, while copper output surged 34 percent, led by strong performance at Zambia’s Lumwana mine. Nevada Gold Mines boosted output by 11 percent, while Pueblo Viejo in the Dominican Republic posted a 28 percent increase as expansion work in the site advanced.
“From the ramp-up at Goldrush to the progress at Pueblo Viejo, Lumwana and Reko Diq, not to mention the transformational potential of Fourmile, we’re demonstrating the strength and depth of our portfolio,” president and chief executive Mark Bristow said in the recent Q2 report.
The company also recently agreed to sell its Alturas Project in Chile to a Boroo subsidiary for US$50 million upfront plus a royalty, with proceeds earmarked for funding future ventures
Kinross outpaces gold price gains
Kinross Gold Corporation (TSX:K,NYSE:KGC) posted record attributable free cash flow of US$646.6 million in the second quarter, alongside operating cash flow of US$992.4 million. Adjusted net earnings jumped to US$541 million from US$174.7 million a year earlier.
Further, the company achieved a 21 percent margin increase from the first quarter, outpacing the 15 percent rise in gold prices over the same period.
“Our portfolio of mines continued to perform well during the quarter contributing to a strong first half of the year and positioning us well to achieve our full-year guidance,” CEO J. Paul Rollinson said.
Kinross said that it expects to produce 2 million gold-equivalent ounces in 2025 at an average production cost of US$1,120 per ounce.
Paracatu in Brazil was the company’s top-producing asset, while Tasiast in Mauritania began mining the Fennec satellite deposit. US-based Bald Mountain also reported higher output at lower costs.
The company also advanced key projects, including its Great Bear exploration program in Ontario, engineering work at Round Mountain Phase X in Nevada, and drilling at the Curlew Basin project in Washington.
Agnico Eagle delivers, shares gain
Agnico Eagle’s (TSX:AEM,NYSE:AEM) operational consistency and cost control helped drive a six-day share price rally, culminating in a 10.06 percent gain over the past week.
In the second quarter, the company produced 866,029 ounces of gold, maintaining full-year guidance of 3.3 to 3.5 million ounces. Adjusted earnings per share came in at US$1.94, prompting analysts to raise 2025 profit forecasts by US$0.70 to US$6.94.
Analysts cited the company’s steady performance despite rising unit costs, noting its appeal as a defensive play in the sector. Bank of America raised its price target to US$173 due to rising optimism about the firm’s growth prospects.
Newmont rides sector momentum
Newmont (TSX:NGT,NYSE:NEM) posted higher sales and net income for the quarter while authorizing a new share repurchase program and declaring a quarterly dividend.
The miner also renewed a key lease in Ghana. Shares rose 36 percent over the last quarter, outpacing the US Metals and Mining industry’s 24.1 percent return.
The performance came despite a drop in the company’s gold production. Rather, Newmont underscored the role of shareholder returns and strategic asset moves in supporting investor sentiment. Over the past three years, Newmont has delivered a total shareholder return of 63.75 percent.
Gold outlook: Gold shines during volatility
The sector’s strong quarter unfolded against a favorable macro backdrop.
Gold, which has gained about 30 percent year-to-date, has been buoyed by safe-haven flows. The metal’s latest rally began after spot prices dipped to US$3,311.80 in early August, then climbed back above US$3,418 by the first week of August..
The Federal Reserve cut rates by a full percentage point in late 2024 but has held steady this year, citing the need for more data on how tariffs affect inflation. Lower rates generally enhance gold’s appeal by reducing the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets..
Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.
This post appeared first on investingnews.com
1911 Gold Corporation (‘ 1911 Gold ‘ or the ‘ Company ‘) (TSXV: AUMB,OTC:AUMBF; OTCQB: AUMBF; FRA: 2KY) is pleased to announce that, subject to TSX Venture Exchange (‘TSXV’) acceptance, it has engaged WIN Expertise Inc. (‘ WIN ‘), operated by Suzette Ramcharan to provide investor relations and corporate communications services (the ‘ Services ‘).
WIN (an Ontario -based company) specializes in investor relations services and will develop and implement an investor relations strategy for 1911 Gold to support the Company’s goals and objectives, targeting a broader and more diversified investor base. The engagement is for an initial period of six months and bears an aggregate fee of $48,000 , to be paid in installments of $6,000 per month for the first three months and $10,000 per month for the following three months. For the first three months, Ms. Ramcharan will spend approximately 20 hours per week providing the Services to the Company, and approximately 40 hours per week thereafter. WIN is also entitled to reimbursement by the Company for its expenses and to an additional fee of $3,000 for each in-person industry event or conference attended by Ms. Ramcharan, at the election of the Company, on behalf of the Company. The Services will commence, and the first monthly payment will be made upon receipt of TSXV acceptance of the Services.
WIN’s engagement as an investor relations and corporate communications services provider may be renewed upon completion of the initial six-month term, following which WIN will be paid a monthly fee of $10,000 for approximately 40 hours per week dedicated to providing the Services. All fees and expenses will be paid from the working capital of the Company. WIN and Ms. Ramcharan are arm’s-length parties to the Company. Neither WIN nor Ms. Ramcharan have any interest, directly or indirectly, in the Company or its securities, or any right or intent to acquire such an interest.
About 1911 Gold Corporation
1911 Gold is a junior explorer that holds a highly prospective, consolidated land package totalling more than 61,647 hectares within and adjacent to the Archean Rice Lake greenstone belt in Manitoba , and also owns the True North mine and mill complex at Bissett, Manitoba . 1911 Gold believes its land package is a prime exploration opportunity, with the potential to develop a mining district centred on the True North complex. The Company also owns the Apex project near Snow Lake, Manitoba and the Denton-Keefer project near Timmins, Ontario . It intends to focus on organic growth and accretive acquisition opportunities in North America .
1911 Gold’s True North complex and exploration land package are located within the traditional territory of the Hollow Water First Nation, signatory to Treaty No. 5 (1875-76). 1911 Gold looks forward to maintaining open, co-operative and respectful communication with the Hollow Water First Nation and all local stakeholders in order to build mutually beneficial working relationships.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Shaun Heinrichs
President and CEO
www.1911gold.com
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This news release may contain forward-looking statements. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as ‘plans’, ‘expects’ or ‘does not expect’, ‘is expected’, ‘budget’, ‘scheduled’, ‘estimates’, ‘forecasts’, ‘intends’, ‘anticipates’ or ‘does not anticipate’, or ‘believes’, or describes a ‘goal’, or variation of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results ‘may’, ‘could’, ‘would’, ‘might’ or ‘will’ be taken, occur or be achieved.
All forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s beliefs and assumptions based on information available at the time the statements were made. Actual results or events may differ from those predicted in these forward-looking statements. All of the Company’s forward-looking statements are qualified by the assumptions that are stated or inherent in such forward-looking statements, including the assumptions listed below. Although the Company believes that these assumptions are reasonable, this list is not exhaustive of factors that may affect any of the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, future events, conditions, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, prediction, projection, forecast, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. All statements that address expectations or projections about the future, including, but not limited to, the expected term of the Services to be provided, the total compensation expected to be paid for the Services, the results to the Company and its shareholders of the Services, the timing and ability of the Company to receive necessary regulatory approvals for the Services, the results of any exploration or other work on the Company’s properties, and the plans, operations and prospects of the Company, are forward-looking statements. Although 1911 Gold has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements contained in this news release are given as of the date hereof. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
SOURCE 1911 Gold Corporation
View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/August2025/15/c3783.html
News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia
This post appeared first on investingnews.com
/NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO THE UNITED STATES OR THROUGH U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES/
TSX Venture Exchange: BSK
Frankfurt Stock Exchange: MAL2
OTCQB Venture Market (OTC): BKUCF
Blue Sky Uranium Corp. (TSXV: BSK,OTC:BKUCF) (FSE: MAL2) (OTC: BKUCF) (‘Blue Sky’ or the ‘Company’) announces that it has closed final tranche of the private placement through the issuance of 1,851,000 units of the Company (each, a ‘ Unit ‘) at a price of $0.06 per Unit for aggregate gross proceeds of $111,060 (the ‘ Offering ‘). In total, the Company has issued 29,212,633 Units for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,752,758 .
Each Unit consists of one common share and one transferrable common share purchase warrant (a ‘ Warrant ‘). Each Warrant will entitle the holder thereof to purchase one additional common share in the capital of the Company at $0.075 per share for three (3) years from the date of issue, expiring August 16, 2028 for this final tranche.
The Company intends to use the proceeds of the Offering for general working capital.
Finder’s fees of $714 are payable in cash on a portion of the Offering from this tranche to parties at arm’s length to the Company. In addition, 11,900 non-transferable finder’s warrants are being issued for this tranche (the ‘ Finder’s Warrants ‘). Each Finder’s Warrant entitles a finder to purchase one common share at a price of $0.06 per share for three (3) years from the date of issue, expiring on August 16, 2028 . In total, the Company paid cash finder’s fees of $4,822.86 and issued 80,381 Finder’s Warrants for this Offering.
Certain insiders of the Company participated in this tranche of the Offering for $21,000 in Units. Such participation represents a related-party transaction under Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (‘ MI 61-101 ‘), but the transaction is exempt from the formal valuation and minority shareholder approval requirements of MI 61-101 as neither the fair market value of the subject matter of the transaction, nor the consideration paid, exceed 25% of the Company’s market capitalization. In total, insiders participated in the Offering for $117,000 in Units.
This Offering is subject to regulatory approval and all securities to be issued pursuant to the Offering in this 3 rd and final tranche are subject to a four-month hold period under applicable Canadian securities laws expiring on December 16, 2025 . The proceeds of the Offering will be used for general working capital.
The securities described herein have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘ 1933 Act ‘) or any state securities laws, and accordingly, may not be offered or sold within the United States except in compliance with the registration requirements of the 1933 Act and applicable state securities requirements or pursuant to exemptions therefrom. This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any securities in any jurisdiction.
About Blue Sky Uranium Corp.
Blue Sky Uranium Corp. is a leader in uranium discovery in Argentina . The Company’s objective is to deliver exceptional returns to shareholders by rapidly advancing a portfolio of uranium deposits into low-cost producers, while respecting the environment, the communities, and the cultures in all the areas in which we work. Blue Sky’s flagship Amarillo Grande Project was an in-house discovery of a new district that has the potential to be both a leading domestic supplier of uranium to the growing Argentine market and a new international market supplier. The Company’s recently optioned Corcovo project has potential to host an in-situ recovery (‘ ISR ‘) uranium deposit. The Company is a member of the Grosso Group, a resource management group that has pioneered exploration in Argentina since 1993.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
‘Nikolaos Cacos’
______________________________________
Nikolaos Cacos , President, CEO and Director
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
SOURCE Blue Sky Uranium Corp.
View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/August2025/15/c9631.html
News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia
This post appeared first on investingnews.com
The 2025-26 Premier League season is set to kick off, with some of the world’s biggest teams vying to win what is generally regarded as the strongest domestic soccer league on the planet.
Liverpool ended up comfortably claiming last season’s title, finishing the campaign with a 10-point edge on Arsenal. The Reds have not rested on their laurels this summer, spending big to add Florian Wirtz and Hugo Ekitiké to an offense that scored 14 more goals than any other Premier League team last season.
That said, Mohamed Salah and Co. can expect a tougher campaign this time. Arsenal let themselves down in the season’s final third, throwing away points on several occasions, while Manchester City expects much more once Rodri — their irreplaceable midfielder who missed nearly all of the last season due to a torn ACL — makes his return to full fitness.
Club World Cup champions Chelsea should also be a more consistently formidable force this season, while teams like Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur aim for better performances after some recent struggles.
Here are championship odds for the 2025-26 Premier League season:
Premier League championship odds: 2025-26 favorites
Odds via BetMGM on Thursday, Aug. 14:
- Liverpool: +175
- Arsenal: +250
- Manchester City: +350
- Chelsea: +800
- Manchester United: +2200
- Newcastle United: +5000
- Tottenham Hotspur: +5000
- Aston Villa: +8000
- Brighton & Hove Albion: +25000
- Nottingham Forest: +25000
- Bournemouth: +25000
- West Ham United: +50000
- Brentford: +50000
- Fulham: +50000
- Crystal Palace: +50000
- Wolverhampton Wanderers: +50000
- Everton: +50000
- Leeds United: +75000
- Burnley: +100000
- Sunderland: +100000
How to watch Premier League 2025-26: TV channel, streaming
The entire Premier League schedule during the 2025-26 season will be available on the NBC family of networks.
While the exact broadcast schedule for the full season has not been settled, NBC will generally broadcast at least one game per weekend, while USA Network will usually carry two or more. The majority of the action throughout the season will be streamed on Peacock.
Watch the 2025-26 Premier League season on Peacock
This post appeared first on USA TODAY
With new TV partners for the NBA, massive intrigue in the stacked Western conference and a wide-open Eastern conference, the league is cannonballing into the 2025-26 season.
Starting with opening night on NBC on Oct. 21, followed by two nights of games on ESPN and then a Friday night on Amazon Prime, marquee players, fascinating matchups and championship contenders will be featured on the NBA’s national TV schedule, which was released Thursday, Aug. 14.
NBC rejoins coverage of the league after a two-decade absence, and Amazon Prime gets its first shot at NBA games as part of the NBA’s new, 11-year, $76 billion TV deal. ESPN/ABC remains part of the league’s coverage as well.
Here are unique details of the NBA’s 2025-26 schedule:
What to know about the 2025-26 NBA schedule
This season, there are 247 national TV games, up from 172 in 2024-25.
As part of the new TV deal, in general, Monday NBA games are on Peacock; Tuesday on NBC; Wednesday on ESPN; Thursday on Prime Video; Friday on Prime Video and ESPN; Saturday on Prime Video in the afternoon and ABC at night; and Sunday on ABC in the afternoon and NBC at night.
ESPN and ABC also have the five Christmas games plus the NBA Finals.
Prime Video will feature doubleheaders on Fridays and stream the quarterfinals, semifinals and final of the NBA Cup and all six play-in games.
NBC and Peacock kick off the season with two games on Oct. 21 and will air the four Martin Luther King Jr. Day games. NBC and Peacock are also home to NBA All-Star Weekend events, including All-Star Saturday night and the All-Star Game on Feb. 15.
The NBA will play games on Election Day, Novermber 4, this season – which it did not do in 2022, 2023 and 2024.
Each team has at least two national TV games with the defending champion Oklahoma City Thunder, Los Angeles Lakers, New York Knicks and Golden State Warriors appearing on 34 national TV games.
The average number of back-to-back games for each team is 14.4, a tad down from 14.9 back-to-backs per team in 2024-25. No team has more than 16 back-to-backs, and a team will play never play the day before games during opening-week national TV games; all Emirates NBA Cup games; all Christmas games; the four-game Peacock/NBC schedule on Martin Luther King Jr. Day; the 10-game ABC Saturday schedule and eight-game ABC Sunday schedule; and the 11-game NBC Sunday schedule.
The NBA plans to launch a digital feature that will make it easier for fans to watch and stream games through NBA.com, the NBA app, team platforms and partner sites.
Making a return
Offseason moves once again altered the NBA landscape. Here are a few notable players who will visit their former team for the first time in 2025-26:
- Khris Middleton was traded from the Bucks to the Washington Wizards last season but will play at Milwaukee for the first time since that trade on Oct. 22. He was part of the Bucks’ 2021 championship.
- The Houston Rockets’ big new addition, Kevin Durant, plays at Phoenix on Nov. 24.
- Myles Turner left Indiana and signed with the Bucks in free agency and will return to play the Pacers on Nov. 3.
- Boston traded Jrue Holiday, who helped the Celtics win the title in 2024, to Portland, and Holiday and the Blazers play at Boston on Jan. 26. Two days later on Jan. 28, Kristaps Porzingis, who also won a title with the Celtics in 2024, returns to Boston as a member of the Atlanta Hawks.
- Michael Porter Jr. won a title with Denver in 2023, but the Nuggets traded him to Brooklyn in the offseason. The Nets travel to Denver for a Jan. 29 game.
- Brook Lopez, like Middleton, was a key figure on Milwaukee’s 2021 title squad, and he undoubtedly will receive a warm welcome when the Clippers play at Milwaukee on March 29.
Must-see NBA games in 2025-26
The 1,230-game schedule from Oct. 21 through April 12 is loaded with quality games. We take a look at the 25 games you can’t miss, including Houston at Oklahoma City on opening night and the Los Angeles Lakers at Golden State in the final week of the regular season. Click here to read the full analysis of must-see games.
This post appeared first on USA TODAY
The 2025-26 Premier League season kicks off this weekend and will run through matchweek 38 on May 24.
The season opens with the defending league champions Liverpool hosting AFC Bournemouth at Anfield in what should be an emotional evening after the death of Diogo Jota in July.
During the second weekend of fixtures, Everton will christen a new stadium against Brighton & Hove Albion on Sunday, Aug. 24. The team is leaving its home for more than 100 years — Goodison Park — for a new and modern stadium — Hill Dickinson Stadium.
Here is the full, 380-match fixture list for the 2025-26 Premier League season:
August 15 – Friday
- Liverpool vs. AFC Bournemouth
August 16 – Saturday
- Aston Villa vs. Newcastle United
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Fulham
- Sunderland vs. West Ham United
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Burnley
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Manchester City
August 17 – Sunday
- Chelsea vs. Crystal Palace
- Nottingham Forest vs. Brentford
- Manchester United vs. Arsenal
August 18 – Monday
- Leeds United vs. Everton (Sky Sports)
August 22
- West Ham vs. Chelsea
August 23
- Manchester City vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Brentford vs. Aston Villa
- Burnley vs. Sunderland
- Arsenal vs. Leeds United
August 24
- Crystal Palace vs. Nottingham Forest
- Everton vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Fulham vs. Manchester United
August 25
- Newcastle United vs. Liverpool
August 29
- Aston Villa vs. Crystal Palace
August 30
- Chelsea vs. Fulham
- Manchester United vs. Burnley
- Sunderland vs. Brentford
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Everton
- Leeds United vs. Newcastle United
August 31
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Manchester City
- Nottingham Forest vs. West Ham United
- Liverpool vs. Arsenal
September 13
- Arsenal vs. Nott’m Forest
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Brighton
- Crystal Palace vs. Sunderland
- Everton vs. Aston Villa
- Fulham vs. Leeds United
- Newcastle United vs. Wolves
- West Ham United vs. Spurs
- Brentford vs. Chelsea
September 14
- Burnley vs. Liverpool
- Man City vs. Man Utd
September 20
- Liverpool vs. Everton
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Newcastle United
- Brighton vs. Spurs
- Burnley vs. Nott’m Forest
- West Ham United vs. Crystal Palace
- Wolves vs. Leeds United
- Man Utd vs. Chelsea
- Fulham vs. Brentford
September 21
- Sunderland vs. Aston Villa
- Arsenal vs. Man City
September 27
- Brentford vs. Man Utd
- Aston Villa vs. Fulham
- Chelsea vs. Brighton
- Crystal Palace vs. Liverpool
- Leeds United vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Manchester City vs. Burnley
- Nott’m Forest vs. Sunderland
September 28
- Spurs vs. Wolves
- Newcastle United vs. Arsenal
September 29
- Everton vs. West Ham United
October 4 (matchweek 7)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Fulham
- Arsenal vs. West Ham United
- Aston Villa vs. Burnley
- Brentford vs. Manchester City
- Chelsea vs. Liverpool
- Everton vs. Crystal Palace
- Leeds United vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Manchester United vs. Sunderland
- Newcastle United vs. Nottingham Forest
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
October 18 (matchweek 8)
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Newcastle United
- Burnley vs. Leeds United
- Crystal Palace vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Fulham vs. Arsenal
- Liverpool vs. Manchester United
- Manchester City vs. Everton
- Nottingham Forest vs. Chelsea
- Sunderland vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Aston Villa
- West Ham United vs. Brentford
October 25 (matchweek 9)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Nottingham Forest
- Arsenal vs. Crystal Palace
- Aston Villa vs. Manchester City
- Brentford vs. Liverpool
- Chelsea vs. Sunderland
- Everton vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Leeds United vs. West Ham United
- Manchester United vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Newcastle United vs. Fulham
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Burnley
November 1 (matchweek 10)
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Leeds United
- Burnley vs. Arsenal
- Crystal Palace vs. Brentford
- Fulham vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Liverpool vs. Aston Villa
- Manchester City vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Nottingham Forest vs. Manchester United
- Sunderland vs. Everton
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Chelsea
- West Ham United vs. Newcastle United
November 8 (matchweek 11)
- Aston Villa vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Brentford vs. Newcastle United
- Chelsea vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Crystal Palace vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Everton vs. Fulham
- Manchester City vs. Liverpool
- Nottingham Forest vs. Leeds United
- Sunderland vs. Arsenal
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Manchester United
- West Ham United vs. Burnley
November 22 (matchweek 12)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. West Ham United
- Arsenal vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Brentford
- Burnley vs. Chelsea
- Fulham vs. Sunderland
- Leeds United vs. Aston Villa
- Liverpool vs. Nottingham Forest
- Manchester United vs. Everton
- Newcastle United vs. Manchester City
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Crystal Palace
November 29 (matchweek 13)
- Aston Villa vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Brentford vs. Burnley
- Chelsea vs. Arsenal
- Crystal Palace vs. Manchester United
- Everton vs. Newcastle United
- Manchester City vs. Leeds United
- Nottingham Forest vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Sunderland vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Fulham
- West Ham United vs. Liverpool
December 3 (matchweek 14)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Everton
- Arsenal vs. Brentford
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Aston Villa
- Burnley vs. Crystal Palace
- Fulham vs. Manchester City
- Leeds United vs. Chelsea
- Liverpool vs. Sunderland
- Manchester United vs. West Ham United
- Newcastle United vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Nottingham Forest
December 6 (matchweek 15)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Chelsea
- Aston Villa vs. Arsenal
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. West Ham United
- Everton vs. Nottingham Forest
- Fulham vs. Crystal Palace
- Leeds United vs. Liverpool
- Manchester City vs. Sunderland
- Newcastle United vs. Burnley
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Brentford
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Manchester United
December 13 (matchweek 16)
- Arsenal vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Brentford vs. Leeds United
- Burnley vs. Fulham
- Chelsea vs. Everton
- Crystal Palace vs. Manchester City
- Liverpool vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Manchester United vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Nottingham Forest vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Sunderland vs. Newcastle United
- West Ham United vs. Aston Villa
December 20 (matchweek 17)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Burnley
- Aston Villa vs. Manchester United
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Sunderland
- Everton vs. Arsenal
- Fulham vs. Nottingham Forest
- Leeds United vs. Crystal Palace
- Manchester City vs. West Ham United
- Newcastle United vs. Chelsea
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Liverpool
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Brentford
December 27 (matchweek 18)
- Arsenal vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Brentford vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Burnley vs. Everton
- Chelsea vs. Aston Villa
- Crystal Palace vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Liverpool vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Manchester United vs. Newcastle United
- Nottingham Forest vs. Manchester City
- Sunderland vs. Leeds United
- West Ham United vs. Fulham
December 30 (matchweek 19)
- Arsenal vs. Aston Villa
- Brentford vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Burnley vs. Newcastle United
- Chelsea vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Crystal Palace vs. Fulham
- Liverpool vs. Leeds United
- Manchester United vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Nottingham Forest vs. Everton
- Sunderland vs. Manchester City
- West Ham United vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
January 3, 2026 (matchweek 20)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Arsenal
- Aston Villa vs. Nottingham Forest
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Burnley
- Everton vs. Brentford
- Fulham vs. Liverpool
- Leeds United vs. Manchester United
- Manchester City vs. Chelsea
- Newcastle United vs. Crystal Palace
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Sunderland
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. West Ham United
January 7 (matchweek 21)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Arsenal vs. Liverpool
- Brentford vs. Sunderland
- Burnley vs. Manchester United
- 20:00 Crystal Palace vs. Aston Villa
- Everton vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Fulham vs. Chelsea
- Manchester City vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Newcastle United vs. Leeds United
- West Ham United vs. Nottingham Forest
January 17 (matchweek 22)
- Aston Villa vs. Everton
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Chelsea vs. Brentford
- Leeds United vs. Fulham
- Liverpool vs. Burnley
- Manchester United vs. Manchester City
- Nottingham Forest vs. Arsenal
- Sunderland vs. Crystal Palace
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. West Ham United
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Newcastle United
January 24 (matchweek 23)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Liverpool
- Arsenal vs. Manchester United
- Brentford vs. Nottingham Forest
- Burnley vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea
- Everton vs. Leeds United
- Fulham vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Manchester City vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Newcastle United vs. Aston Villa
- West Ham United vs. Sunderland
January 31 (matchweek 24)
- Aston Villa vs. Brentford
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Everton
- Chelsea vs. West Ham United
- Leeds United vs. Arsenal
- Liverpool vs. Newcastle United
- Manchester United vs. Fulham
- Nottingham Forest vs. Crystal Palace
- Sunderland vs. Burnley
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Manchester City
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. AFC Bournemouth
February 7 (matchweek 25)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Aston Villa
- Arsenal vs. Sunderland
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Crystal Palace
- Burnley vs. West Ham United
- Fulham vs. Everton
- Leeds United vs. Nottingham Forest
- Liverpool vs. Manchester City
- Manchester United vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Newcastle United vs. Brentford
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Chelsea
February 11 (matchweek 26)
- Aston Villa vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Brentford vs. Arsenal
- Chelsea vs. Leeds United
- 20:00 Crystal Palace vs. Burnley
- Everton vs. AFC Bournemouth
- 20:00 Manchester City vs. Fulham
- Nottingham Forest vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Sunderland vs. Liverpool
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Newcastle United
- West Ham United vs. Manchester United
February 21 (matchweek 27)
- Aston Villa vs. Leeds United
- Brentford vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Chelsea vs. Burnley
- Crystal Palace vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Everton vs. Manchester United
- Manchester City vs. Newcastle United
- Nottingham Forest vs. Liverpool
- Sunderland vs. Fulham
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Arsenal
- West Ham United vs. AFC Bournemouth
February 28 (matchweek 28)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Sunderland
- Arsenal vs. Chelsea
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Nottingham Forest
- Burnley vs. Brentford
- Fulham vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Leeds United vs. Manchester City
- Liverpool vs. West Ham United
- Manchester United vs. Crystal Palace
- Newcastle United vs. Everton
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Aston Villa
March 4 (matchweek 29)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Brentford
- Aston Villa vs. Chelsea
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Arsenal
- Everton vs. Burnley
- Fulham vs. West Ham United
- Leeds United vs. Sunderland
- Manchester City vs. Nottingham Forest
- Newcastle United vs. Manchester United
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Crystal Palace
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Liverpool
March 14 (matchweek 30)
- Arsenal vs. Everton
- Brentford vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Burnley vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Chelsea vs. Newcastle United
- Crystal Palace vs. Leeds United
- Liverpool vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Manchester United vs. Aston Villa
- Nottingham Forest vs. Fulham
- Sunderland vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- West Ham United vs. Manchester City
March 21 (matchweek 31)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester United
- Aston Villa vs. West Ham United
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Liverpool
- Everton vs. Chelsea
- Fulham vs. Burnley
- Leeds United vs. Brentford
- Manchester City vs. Crystal Palace
- Newcastle United vs. Sunderland
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Nottingham Forest
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Arsenal
April 11 (matchweek 32)
- Arsenal vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Brentford vs. Everton
- Burnley vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Chelsea vs. Manchester City
- Crystal Palace vs. Newcastle United
- Liverpool vs. Fulham
- Manchester United vs. Leeds United
- Nottingham Forest vs. Aston Villa
- Sunderland vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- West Ham United vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
April 18 (matchweek 33)
- Aston Villa vs. Sunderland
- Brentford vs. Fulham
- Chelsea vs. Manchester United
- Crystal Palace vs. West Ham United
- Everton vs. Liverpool
- Leeds United vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Manchester City vs. Arsenal
- Newcastle United vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Nottingham Forest vs. Burnley
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
April 25 (matchweek 34)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Leeds United
- Arsenal vs. Newcastle United
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Chelsea
- Burnley vs. Manchester City
- Fulham vs. Aston Villa
- Liverpool vs. Crystal Palace
- Manchester United vs. Brentford
- Sunderland vs. Nottingham Forest
- West Ham United vs. Everton
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Tottenham Hotspur
May 2 (matchweek 35)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Crystal Palace
- Arsenal vs. Fulham
- Aston Villa vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Brentford vs. West Ham United
- Chelsea vs. Nottingham Forest
- Everton vs. Manchester City
- Leeds United vs. Burnley
- Manchester United vs. Liverpool
- Newcastle United vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Sunderland
May 9 (matchweek 36)
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Burnley vs. Aston Villa
- Crystal Palace vs. Everton
- Fulham vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Liverpool vs. Chelsea
- Manchester City vs. Brentford
- Nottingham Forest vs. Newcastle United
- Sunderland vs. Manchester United
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Leeds United
- West Ham United vs. Arsenal
May 17 (matchweek 37)
- AFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City
- Arsenal vs. Burnley
- Aston Villa vs. Liverpool
- Brentford vs. Crystal Palace
- Chelsea vs. Tottenham Hotspur
- Everton vs. Sunderland
- Leeds United vs. Brighton & Hove Albion
- Manchester United vs. Nottingham Forest
- Newcastle United vs. West Ham United
- Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Fulham
May 24 (matchweek 38)
- Brighton & Hove Albion vs. Manchester United
- Burnley vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers
- Crystal Palace vs. Arsenal
- Fulham vs. Newcastle United
- Liverpool vs. Brentford
- Manchester City vs. Aston Villa
- Nottingham Forest vs. AFC Bournemouth
- Sunderland vs. Chelsea
- Tottenham Hotspur vs. Everton
- West Ham United vs. Leeds United
This post appeared first on USA TODAY
Behind every tattoo is a story – and Damar Hamlin’s is a doozy.
The Buffalo Bills safety is showing off some new ink ahead of the 2025 NFL season, which will be his second since suffering cardiac arrest on the field in Cincinnati.
His new art, created by famed tattoo artist Ganga, which covers Hamlin’s entire back, works to convey everything about the happenings on the field from that January day.
When Hamlin woke up following the near-fatal incident, he famously asked, ‘Did we win?’
Those words are featured prominently on Hamlin’s back, surrounded by a ‘Monday Night Football’ logo along with words of encouragement and a ‘Pray for Damar’ flag. Ganga also added a Paycor Stadium element to the entire display, which was famously the site of Hamlin’s cardiac arrest.
Coupled with plenty of No. 3’s, the tattoo managed to accomplish just about every element of the incident.
Hamlin’s heart stopped after making a tackle against the Cincinnati Bengals on ‘Monday Night Football’ on Jan. 2, 2023. He briefly got up and then fell to the ground, prompting a rush of medical personnel onto the field. After providing CPR, Hamlin was loaded onto a stretcher and into an ambulance.
The game was suspended and postponed.
In the meantime, Hamlin spent time on a ventilator before being able to talk to his family and breathe on his own on Jan. 6.
It was an unforgettable moment in NFL history, one that Hamlin would never forget, especially. Now he has the entire story on his back.
This post appeared first on USA TODAY
- Former University of Texas wide receiver Isaiah Bond announced he is signing with the Cleveland Browns.
- Bond went undrafted in the 2025 NFL Draft after sexual assault allegations, for which he maintains his innocence and says charges will not be pursued.
- The Browns receiving corps is currently led by Jerry Jeudy and Cedric Tillman.
We’re nearly to Week 2 of the NFL preseason and teams now have one game of film in addition to what they’re seeing in practice to assess roster strengths and weaknesses.
The Cleveland Browns may have decided to add another player to the wide receiver room.
Former Texas wide receiver Isaiah Bond announced on X that he is signing with the Browns. The Longhorns standout went undrafted in the 2025 NFL Draft and is a mid-training camp addition for Cleveland.
‘I want to express my deepest gratitude to the Cleveland Browns for believing in me and allowing me the opportunity to continue my career in the NFL,’ Bond wrote in his post. ‘Football has been my passion since I was six years old, and plying at this level is a blessing I will never take for granted.’
Bond was expected to be a Day 2 pick in the NFL Draft even after a subpar performance at the NFL scouting combine. But Bond turned himself in to the Frisco Police Department for an outstanding warrant for sexual assault in April.
Bond stated in his post that the prosecutor has decided not to pursue charges.
‘I will learn from this experience as I grow in wisdom, character, and faith,’ Bond wrote. ‘On the advice of my attorney, I will not discuss the details of this case, but I want to be clear: from the very beginning I have refuted these allegations and maintained my innocence. I stand firm by that today.’
The deal has not been finalized yet, per ESPN’s Adam Schefter.
Bond played in 13 games as a true freshman for Alabama in 2022. He led the team in receptions a year later with 48 for 668 yards and four touchdowns.
Bond transferred from Alabama to Texas for his final year of college football in 2024. As a Longhorn, he struggled to build rapport with starter Quinn Ewers and had just 34 receptions for 540 yards and five touchdowns. Fellow transfer Matthew Golden became the top receiver down the stretch for the Longhorns and ended up as a first-round pick in the 2025 NFL Draft to the Green Bay Packers.
Despite the drop in production, Bond was viewed as a probable draft pick given his game speed. The off-field allegations kept him from being selected.
Browns WR depth chart
Here’s how things look ahead of Bond’s potential arrival:
- Jerry Jeudy
- Cedric Tillman
- Jamari Thrash
- Diontae Johnson
- Kaden Davis
- DeAndre Carter
- Gage Larvadain
- Luke Floriea
- Cade McDonald
- Kisean Johnson
- Chase Cota
- David Bell
This post appeared first on USA TODAY
GMV Minerals Inc. (the ‘Company’ or ‘GMV’) (TSXV:GMV)(OTCQB:GMVMF) is pleased to announce positive results from the updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (‘PEA’) study of the Mexican Hat Gold Project (the ‘Mexican Hat Project’), located in Cochise County, southeastern Arizona.
A National Instrument 43-101 –Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (‘NI 43-101’) compliant technical report (the ‘Report’) entitled ‘Updated NI 43-101 Technical Report Preliminary Economic Assessment, Mexican Hat Project’ with an effective date of August 8, 2025 will be filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca under the Company’s profile within 45 days of this news release. All amounts are stated in second quarter 2025 US dollars (US$).
The Mexican Hat hosts a shallow oxide gold resource with excellent metallurgy and high recoveries, supported by a low strip ratio and minimal pre-stripping. Infrastructure is in place and the Mexican Hat Project demonstrates a robust NPV and IRR. With fast leach kinetics and low reagent consumption, the Company believes the Mexican Hat Project offers exceptional potential economics.
Highlights:
- Based on price sensitivity analysis at approximately the current price of US$3,350 per ounce of gold, the project returns a pre-tax IRR of 106.8% (after-tax 82.5%) and a pre-tax NPV at a 5% discount rate of US$767 million (after-tax US$538.1 million) with a payback period of 1.10 years (1.3 years after-tax).
- Base Case mine life of 10 years with total production of 597,841 ounces, averaging approximately 60,000 ounces per year.
- Crushed mineralized material will be conveyor stacked at a rate of approximately 10,000 tonnes/day on a conventional heap leach pad.
- Capex: US$89,997,000 (including US$15.4 million contingency).
- Opex: US$788 million LOM with Low LOM Strip Ratio of 2.05
- Estimated cash cost of production is US$1,354 per ounce with an all-in-sustaining cost of $1,545 per ounce inclusive of sustaining capital and additional overhead support.
- Engineering design analysis indicates the potential to increase pit size and contained ounces with increased gold prices.
FINANCIAL INDICATORS
The following table summarizes the financial indicators for the Mexican Hat Project for both before and after taxes.
|
Financial Indicators Before Taxes |
Values |
|
NPV cash flow (undiscounted) |
US$537.7M |
|
NPV @ 5% |
US$390.2M |
|
IRR % |
66.1% |
|
Payback (years) |
1.53 |
|
Financial Indicators After Taxes |
Values |
|
NPV cash flow (undiscounted) |
US$377.9M |
|
NPV @ 5% |
US$268.3M |
|
IRR % |
50.2% |
|
Payback (years) |
1.82 |
GOLD PRICE SENSITIVITY TABLE (US$ MILLIONS)
The following table summarizes the pre-tax and post-tax economic results to gold price sensitivity.
Pre-Tax and Post-Tax Sensitivity to Gold Price
|
-60% |
-45% |
-30% |
-15% |
Base |
+15% |
+34% |
+45% |
+60% |
|
|
US$/troy oz Gold |
1,000 |
1,375 |
1,750 |
2,125 |
2,500 |
2,875 |
3,350 |
3,625 |
4,000 |
|
IRR (Pre-Tax) |
18.3% |
45.0% |
66.1% |
85.0% |
106.8% |
118.7% |
134.2% |
||
|
NPV @ 5% (Pre-Tax) US$M |
-274.7 |
-108.5 |
57.7 |
224.0 |
390.2 |
556.4 |
767.0 |
888.9 |
1,055.1 |
|
IRR (Post-Tax) |
11.3% |
33.4% |
50.2% |
65.2% |
82.5% |
91.9% |
104.2% |
||
|
NPV @ 5% (Post-Tax) US$M |
-274.9 |
-117.3 |
25.8 |
149.3 |
268.3 |
387.4 |
538.1 |
625.4 |
744.4 |
INITIAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (US$ MILLIONS)
Initial capital expenditures are estimated at US$89,997,000 million as detailed below:
OPERATING COSTS
The mine operating costs were calculated to average $3.49 per tonne mined as summarized below.
|
Mine Operating Cost Center |
Unit Cost (US$/t mined) |
|
Owner Mining Personnel |
$0.11 |
|
Owner Supplies & Misc. |
0.03 |
|
Contractor Mining |
3.35 |
|
Total Cost (Rounded) |
$3.49 |
The life-of-mine operating costs were calculated to average US$20.44/tonne resource processed as summarized below.
|
Operating Cost |
Cost per Tonne of Crushed Material Processed (US$/t) |
|
Mining |
$10.60 |
|
Processing |
$8.79 |
|
G&A |
$1.05 |
|
Total Site Operating Cost |
$20.44 |
MINERAL RESOURCES
An updated Mineral Resource Estimate prepared by DRW Geological Consultants Ltd., with an effective date of August 8, 2025, was used in the PEA. Details of the Mineral Resource Estimate can be found in the Report to be filed on SEDAR+ within 45 days of this release.
|
Category |
Cut-off (g/t Au) |
Grade (Au, g/t) |
Tonnes |
Gold Oz |
Strip Ratio |
|
Inferred |
0.20 |
0.58 |
36,733,000 |
688,000 |
2.36 |
- The Mineral Resource Estimate has been constrained to a preliminary optimized pit shell, using the following parameters: SG = 2.57 gm/cc based on testwork, mining costs = $3.00/tonne, mining recovery = 98%, mining dilution = 2%, process cost = $5.00 per tonne, G&A = $1.05 per tonne, gold price = $2,500 per troy ounce, throughput at 10,000 tpd., discount rate = 5%. A cost of $0.03 was added per bench to the mining cost below the existing level surface.
- A top cut of 32 gpt gold is applied to all zones except Zone 6 which has a top cut of 50 gpt gold.
- Mineral Resources have been calculated using the Inverse Distance Squared method.
- Mineral Resources constrained to optimized pit shells are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
- Conforms to NI 43-101, Companion Policy 43-101CP, and the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. Inferred Resources have been estimated from geological evidence and limited sampling and must be treated with a lower level of confidence than Measured and Indicated Resources.
- All numbers are rounded. Overall numbers may not be exact due to rounding.
- There are no known legal, political, environmental, or other risks that could materially affect the potential development of the mineral resources.
MINE PLAN
The mine plan is conceived as a conventional open pit tuck and shovel/loader operation. There are two independent pits which are developed with five-phase or pushback designs. Pit shells were designed using 6.0-meter benches with a catch bench installed every 18 meters. A bench face angle of 66° was used, resulting in an inner-ramp angle of 45° when catch benches were included. An 88% overall gold recovery has been used in this study, which was based on bottle roll and column leach test results. Base case haulage ramps are 26 meters wide and have a design gradient of 10%. Processing rates are based on a daily crushing rate of approximately 10,000 tonnes per day utilizing two stage crushing
The mine and crushing will be operated by contractors with oversight by GMV mine management. The mine plan produces a nominal tonnage to the crushing and heap leach of 3,500 Ktonnes per year (10,000 tpd) from a total material movement of 93.8 Ktonnes for the life of mine (26,106 tpd LOM average).
The PEA is preliminary in nature; it includes inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. There is no Mineral Reserve at the Mexican Hat Project at this time. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Over the course of the mine life, 38.6 Mtonnes of Mineralized Resource is planned for processing out of a total material movement of 117.8 Mtonnes.
INFRASTRUCTURE & PROCESS PLANT
The Mexican Hat Project is located in the southeastern part of the State of Arizona, approximately 72 miles east-southeast of Tucson, and can be accessed from the Old Ghost Town Road., a gravel road extending south of the Town of Pearce or north from Gleeson Road.
Groundwater will be used as the source of water for mining operations. No permitting restrictions or quantity issues are anticipated.
A 69 kV powerline to site will be supplied by Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative from their power plant located 30 km north of the project site.
The crushing plant will be operated by a contractor to produce a crushed product for heap leaching with a 25 mm top size. Pregnant solution from the heap leach will be processed in a conventional adsorption desorption recovery (ADR) plant. The process plant will produce doré gold bars.
TECHNICAL REPORT AND QUALIFIED PERSONS
The Report entitled Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment, Mexican Hat Project’, with an effective date of August 8, 2025 and which was prepared by the following Qualified Persons (as defined under NI 43-101), all of whom are independent of the Company, will be filed by the Company within 45 days of this release on www.sedarplus.com:
- Mr. Brian Olson, Q.P., Samuel Engineering, Inc. (Metallurgical Test Work and Recovery, Process Plant and Process Operating Costs)
- Mr. Steven Pozder, P.E., Samuel Engineering, Inc. (Project Economics and Infrastructure)
- Dr. Dave Webb, Ph.D., P.Eng., P.Geo., DRW Geological Consultants Ltd. (Mineral Resource Estimate, Property Description and Location, Accessibility, Climate, Local Resource, Infrastructure and Physiography, History, Geological Setting and Mineralization, Deposit Types, Exploration, Drilling, Sample Preparation, Analysis and Security, Data Verification).
- Mr. Thomas L. Dyer, P.E., RESPEC LLC. (Mine Design, Production Schedule, Capital and Operating Costs)
- Mr. Francisco J. Barrios, P.E., BBA Consultants International LP (Pad Design and Loading)
- Ms. Dawn Garcia, CPG, PG, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Environmental)
All Qualified Persons have contributed to their corresponding sections in Interpretation, and Recommendations. The Qualified Persons have reviewed and approved the scientific, technical, and economic information obtained in this news release.
For a description of the data verification process and limitations, underlying assumptions and the results of surveys and quality assurance program regarding exploration information, please refer to the Company’s existing NI 43-101 Technical Report filed on SEDAR+ entitled ‘Preliminary Economic Assessment, Mexican Hat Project’ with an effective date of October 20, 2020.
Ian Klassen, President & CEO remarked that ‘The robust PEA confirms our contention that the project’s strong economic potential de-risks the development pathway, providing a solid foundation for advancement. The results validate the open-pit, heap-leach concept, demonstrate excellent metallurgy and recoveries, and outline a simple mining and processing strategy. With high margins, rapid payback, and straightforward engineering, the PEA positions the project well for the future, where detailed design, capital optimization, and permitting can advance with confidence.’
2025-2026 Forward Looking Plan
The Mexican Hat Project PEA economics justify continued investment in project development. The forward-looking plan for Mexican Hat includes work required to advance the project through Feasibility Study and into the permitting process.
These tasks include:
- Approx. 7000 meters of in-fill drilling to increase confidence in the current geological understanding and mineral resource estimation to sufficient level to support mineral reserve development
- Metallurgical column, hardness, and grinding tests to further optimize and improve heap leach gold recovery, and to provide information for feasibility design work
- Performing a trade-off study for self-mining and crushing versus contract mining and crushing
- Geotechnical drilling and analysis to optimize pit slope design parameters
- Conduct base-line water sampling, and update of hydrologic, cultural, and environmental studies for permitting
About GMV Minerals Inc.
GMV Minerals Inc. is a publicly traded exploration company focused on developing precious metal assets in Arizona. GMV, through its 100% owned subsidiary, has a 100% interest in a Mining Property Lease commonly referred to as the Mexican Hat Project, located in Cochise County, Arizona, USA. The project was initially explored by Placer Dome (USA) in the late 1980’s to early 1990’s. GMV is focused on developing the asset and realizing the full mineral potential of the property through near term gold production.
PEA Information and Cautionary Note Regarding Inferred Mineral Resources
The mine plan evaluated in the PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources, as defined by NI 43-101 that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be converted to Mineral Reserves. Additional drilling and technical studies will need to be completed in order to fully assess its viability. There is no certainty that a production decision will be made to develop the Mexican Hat Project or that the economic results described in the PEA will be realized. Mine design and mining schedules, metallurgical flow sheets and process plant designs will require additional detailed work and economic analysis and internal studies to ensure satisfactory operational conditions and decisions regarding future targeted production.
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce. We use certain terms in this report, such as ‘measured,’ ‘indicated,’ ‘inferred,’ and ‘resources,’ that the SEC guidelines strictly prohibit U.S. registered companies from including in their filings with the SEC.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This news release includes certain ‘forward-looking information’ under applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information include estimates and statements that describe the Company’s future plans, objectives or goals, including words to the effect that the Company or management expects a stated condition or result to occur. Forward-looking information may be identified by such terms as ‘believes’, ‘anticipates’, ‘expects’, ‘estimates’, ‘may’, ‘could’, ‘would’, ‘will’, or ‘plan’. Forward-looking information contained in this news release include, but are not limited to, statements or information with respect to: the results of the PEA, including the IRR and NPV, life of mine and production, capital and operating expenditures, cost estimates; permitting restrictions, and the mine plan, including infrastructure requirements and future plans; the filing of the PEA, including timing thereof, mineral resources; and future gold prices. Since forward-looking information are based on assumptions and address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties as described in the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulators. Assumptions upon which forward-looking information contained in this news release is based, without limitation, include: results of future exploration; gold prices; accuracy of the results of the PEA, including key assumptions and methods used to determine mineral resources and the results of the PEA; the ability to obtain required permits and approvals; the ability to execute future plans; exchange rates; ability to obtain funding; and changes in regulatory or community environment; Risks, and uncertainties include: results of further exploration; risks related to mineral tenure, permits and approvals; risks related to the execution of future plans; changes in gold price and exchange rates; risks related to obtaining financing; foreign country risks; regulatory risks and liabilities; and those risks and uncertainties as further described in the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulators which can be found on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca under the Company’s profile. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law.
Dr. D.R. Webb, Ph.D., P.Geo., P.Eng. is the Q.P. responsible for this release within the meaning of NI 43-101 and has reviewed the technical content of this release and has approved its content.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Ian Klassen, President
For further information please contact:
GMV Minerals Inc.
Ian Klassen
Tel: (604) 899-0106
Email: info@gmvminerals.com
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Source
Click here to connect with GMV Minerals Inc. (TSXV:GMV)(OTCQB:GMVMF) to receive an Investor Presentation
This post appeared first on investingnews.com