Author

admin

Browsing

The Trump administration is considering a direct equity stake in a Louisiana-based refinery to establish what officials say would become the only large-scale producer of gallium in the US.

The Department of Defense is set to invest US$150 million in preferred equity in Atlantic Alumina, known as ATALCO, as part of a strategic partnership with an affiliate of Pinnacle Asset Management, according to Bloomberg.

The unannounced deal will fund an expansion of ATALCO’s alumina output and the construction of a new circuit to recover gallium, a critical metal used in military systems and advanced semiconductors.

Under the agreement, ATALCO will pair the Pentagon’s investment with an additional US$300 million from Pinnacle. The US government is also expected to provide additional funding within 30 days of the transaction’s closing.

“This strategic partnership is an essential step in reducing reliance on foreign nations for critical minerals,” ATALCO said.

Once fully built out, the facility is expected to produce more than 1 million metric tons of alumina annually and up to 50 metric tons of gallium per year. Gallium is typically recovered as a by-product of alumina refining, and China currently dominates both global alumina processing and gallium supply.

ATALCO has operated continuously since the late 1950s at its refinery in Gramercy, Louisiana, where it processes Jamaican bauxite into alumina, a fine white powder used in aluminum production.

After the closure of a neighboring refinery in 2020, the facility became the last alumina refinery of its kind in the country. The company says it currently supplies roughly 40 percent of domestic alumina demand.

The investment is a continuation of the Trump administration’s shift toward taking direct financial stakes in companies it views as strategically important in its effort to rebuild a domestic supply chain for rare earths and critical minerals.

Last November, the government backed a US$1.4 billion public-private partnership involving Vulcan Elements and ReElement Technologies, a subsidiary of American Resources (NASDAQ:AREC), to expand domestic rare earth magnet production.

In October, officials explored taking an equity stake in Critical Metals (NASDAQ:CRML), a US-listed company developing Greenland’s Tanbreez rare earths deposit.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Doug Casey of InternationalMan.com and the podcast Doug Casey’s Take shares his thoughts on gold, silver and more heading into the new year.

Casey, who is also a best-selling author, sees higher prices for both precious metals ahead.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • Production guidance of 50,000-55,000 oz gold
  • Cash Costs of $1,850-$1,950/oz gold and All In Sustaining Costs of $2,025-$2,125/oz gold
  • Pre-stripping of Veta Madre open pit expansion at La Colorada
  • $27M exploration program funded from operating cash flow

Heliostar Metals Ltd. (TSXV: HSTR,OTC:HSTXF) (OTCQX: HSTXF) (FSE: RGG1) (‘Heliostar’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to provide production and cost guidance for 2026 as well as details of growth plans across the portfolio. The Company plans to produce 50,000-55,000 ounces of gold at by-product cash costs of $1,850-$1,950oz gold and a consolidated All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) of $2,025-$2,125oz gold. Heliostar will utilize the cash generated from ongoing operations to continue to invest in exploration and growth initiatives across the Company’s portfolio, including advancement of the flagship Ana Paula development project towards production.

Project Category 2026 Guidance
La Colorada Mine
Gold Production (Ounces) 20,000-22,300
Silver Production (Ounces) 130,000-145,000
Cash Costs (per gold ounce)1,2 $1,650-$1,750
All-In Sustaining Cost (per gold ounce)1,2,3,4 $1,775-$1,875
San Agustin Mine
Gold Production (Ounces) 30,000-32,700
Silver Production (Ounces) 160,000-175,000
Cash Costs (per gold ounce)1,2 $2,000-$2,100
All-In Sustaining Costs (per gold ounce)1,2,3,4 $2,150-$2,250
Heliostar Consolidated
Gold Production (Ounces) 50,000-55,000
Silver sold (Ounces) 290,000-320,000
Cash Cost (per gold ounce)1,2 $1,850-$1,950
All-In Sustaining Costs (per gold ounce)1,2,3,4 $2,025-$2,125

 

  1. Cash costs and AISC are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to the ‘Non-GAAP Financial Measures’ section of this news release for further information on this measure.
  2. AISC is based on the World Gold Council definition.
  3. Mine site AISC includes only the portion of corporate G&A allocated to the operating mines. Consolidated G&A includes the aforementioned corporate G&A allocated to the operating mines plus all corporate stock-based compensation.
  4. Annual average exchange rate from all costs based on Mexican peso to US dollar (18 pesos per one dollar).

The La Colorada mine (‘La Colorada’) will continue to produce metals from processing Junkyard and other stockpiles with a focus on additional re-leaching opportunities at the operation. The San Agustin mine (‘San Agustin’) successfully resumed mining operations in December 2025 (see the press release dated December 17, 2025) and will continue mining, crushing, stacking and leaching activities to produce gold and silver through 2026 and beyond.

La Colorada

In 2026, the Company expects to produce 20,000-22,300 ounces of gold at an AISC of $1,775-$1,875 per ounce of gold. This will come from crushing and stacking stockpiles, including the Junkyard Stockpile ore, a portion of the Truckshop Stockpile and re-leaching opportunities.

Development of the Veta Madre open pit expansion project is planned to commence in early Q3. The Company plans to conduct pre-stripping of 11 million tonnes of waste in 2026 to access the 43,000 ounces of in-situ gold in reserves at Veta Madre starting in the first half of 2027. This is a key growth initiative that will drive increased production at the mine in 2027.

De-risking drilling of Veta Madre and Veta Madre Plus (a planned cutback and possible expansion, respectively) is ongoing. The results of this program will provide technical information for a refined pit design and may lead to additional mineral reserves. Heliostar has also budgeted for regional exploration beyond the main mine trend at La Colorada with the aim of unlocking the full geologic potential of the larger, under-explored land package. In addition, the Company has planned for a dedicated drill program in the second half of 2026 to investigate the underground potential below the existing open pits at La Colorada. Heliostar intends to invest up to $5.8M in resource development and exploration activities at La Colorada in 2026.

San Agustin

After successfully restarting open pit production in December 2025, the operation will produce at steady state through 2026 and beyond. The Company expects the mine to produce 30,000-32,700 ounces of gold at a site-level, by-product AISC of $2,150-$2,250 per ounce of gold. The increase in cost compared to that shown in the January 2025 Feasibility Study is driven by general inflation, higher contractor mining costs and allocation of corporate general and administrative costs.

Drilling focused on expanding the oxide reserves at the Corner Area and around the existing open pit is ongoing, with 13,000 metres budgeted in 2026. In addition, Heliostar has planned up to 5,000 metres of drilling to investigate the high-grade portions of the large, polymetallic sulphide deposit that sits both adjacent to and beneath the oxides currently being mined. Further, $2.0M has been earmarked for exploration of Heliostar’s claims across the district, including early-stage exploration of the silver-rich Consejo veins mapped at surface. The Company plans to invest up to $9.7M through this year to unlock the full geologic potential of the property.

Ana Paula

The ongoing 20,000 metre infill and expansion drill program at Ana Paula will continue through Q1 2026. Given the success to date, an additional 6,500 metres have been approved to continue to upgrade inferred material currently in the Preliminary Economic Assessment mine plan. Heliostar has commenced work to complete a Feasibility Study for Ana Paula, scheduled to be completed in the first half of 2027. This important milestone will fully define the construction and operating plans to develop a 100k ounce per year gold mine.

Heliostar plans to continue to advance the existing 412 metre production-scale decline into the Ana Paula deposit in 2026. This work is planned to start in Q3 and is part of a broader de-risking and early works program to support production at the mine in the second half of 2028. The completion of the decline will also provide a platform for underground drilling to continue to expand the Ana Paula deposit at depth and explore for the causative intrusion and potential mineralized contact skarn deposit.

In addition, $1.5M has been budgeted for early-stage, regional exploration at Ana Paula. This includes a drone magnetics survey, ground-based gravity survey, property-wide soil sampling and geologic mapping. The Ana Paula project sits on a largely unexplored 56,334ha land package – one of the largest in the prolific and highly prospective Guererro Gold Belt. In total, Heliostar plans to invest $6.6M in resource development and regional exploration at Ana Paula in 2026, in addition to the $15.0M required to extend the decline.

Other Properties

At Cerro del Gallo, Heliostar is advancing permitting discussions alongside active engagement with the local communities and social benchmarking surveys. The Company’s workplan includes an update of the geologic model to allow flotation trade-off testing, further metallurgical test work of the sulphide portion of the deposit and hydrological data collection.

Unga and San Antonio will see modest exploration and metallurgical programs, respectively.

The total planned exploration, development and study expenditure for these properties is $4.9M.

Statement of Qualified Persons

Gregg Bush, P.Eng., Qualified Person, as such term is defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, has reviewed the scientific and technical information that forms the basis for this news release and has approved the disclosure herein. Mr. Bush is employed as Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Management believes that the reported non-GAAP financial measures will enable certain investors to better evaluate the Company’s performance, liquidity, and ability to generate cash flow. These measures do not have any standardized definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. Additional details of the Company’s calculation of Cash Costs and All-In Sustaining Costs can be found in the most recent MD&A.

About Heliostar Metals Ltd.

Heliostar is a gold producer with production from operating mines in Mexico. This includes the La Colorada Mine in Sonora and San Agustin Mine in Durango. The Company also has a strong portfolio of development projects in Mexico and the USA. These include the Ana Paula project in Guerrero, the Cerro del Gallo project in Guanajuato, the San Antonio project in Baja Sur and the Unga project in Alaska.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

Charles Funk
President and Chief Executive Officer
Heliostar Metals Limited
Email: charles.funk@heliostarmetals.com
Phone: +1 844-753-0045
Rob Grey
Investor Relations Manager
Heliostar Metals Limited
Email: rob.grey@heliostarmetals.com
Phone: +1 844-753-0045

 

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release includes certain ‘Forward-Looking Statements’ within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and ‘forward-looking information’ under applicable Canadian securities laws. When used in this news release, the words ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘target’, ‘plan’, ‘forecast’, ‘may’, ‘would’, ‘could’, ‘schedule’ and similar words or expressions, identify forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking statements or information relate to, among other things, the Company’s plans, prospects and business strategies; the Company’s guidance on the timing and amount of future production and its expectations regarding the results of operations; the completion of additional studies, including and the Feasibility Study for Ana Paula; exploration and metallurgical programs; and expectations for other economic, business, and/or competitive factors.

Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information relating to the terms and completion of the Facility, any future mineral production, liquidity, and future exploration plans are based on management’s reasonable assumptions, estimates, expectations, analyses and opinions, which are based on management’s experience and perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, and other factors that management believes are relevant and reasonable in the circumstances, but which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, the receipt of necessary approvals, price of metals; no escalation in the severity of public health crises or ongoing military conflicts; costs of exploration and development; the estimated costs of development of exploration projects; and the Company’s ability to operate in a safe and effective manner and its ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms.

These statements reflect the Company’s respective current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of other assumptions and estimates that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political, and social uncertainties and contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information and the Company has made assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation: precious metals price volatility; risks associated with the conduct of the Company’s mining activities in foreign jurisdictions; regulatory, consent or permitting delays; risks relating to reliance on the Company’s management team and outside contractors; risks regarding exploration and mining activities; the Company’s inability to obtain insurance to cover all risks, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all; currency fluctuations; risks regarding the failure to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; risks relating to project financing and equity issuances; risks and unknowns inherent in all mining projects, including the inaccuracy of reserves and resources, metallurgical recoveries and capital and operating costs of such projects; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties; laws and regulations governing the environment, health and safety; the ability of the communities in which the Company operates to manage and cope with the implications of public health crises; the economic and financial implications of public health crises, ongoing military conflicts and general economic factors to the Company; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; employee relations, labour unrest or unavailability; the Company’s interactions with surrounding communities; the Company’s ability to successfully integrate acquired assets; the speculative nature of exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; stock market volatility; conflicts of interest among certain directors and officers; lack of liquidity for shareholders of the Company; litigation risk; and the factors identified under the caption ‘Risk Factors’ in the Company’s public disclosure documents. Readers are cautioned against attributing undue certainty to forward-looking statements or forward-looking information. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements or forward-looking information to reflect changes in assumptions or changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such statements or information, other than as required by applicable law.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/280186

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

PITTSBURGH – Wired headphones inserted into his ears and the hood of his gray sweatshirt flipped up – not long after he ended his news conference with a f-bomb – one of the best to ever step foot on a football field was on his way toward the exits of Acrisure Stadium following the Pittsburgh Steelers’ loss to the Houston Texans, 30-6, in the final game of the NFL wild-card round. 

Whether it was the final time Aaron Rodgers departed a locker room as a NFL player figures to be an offseason-long question. For the second straight year, Rodgers will take his time contemplating his next steps. There’s the possibility of retirement after 21 NFL seasons, four MVPs, a Super Bowl MVP and more lines than necessary to collate a Hall of Fame resume. He could sign with a different, expected contender. Returning for another go-round with the Steelers and head coach Mike Tomlin is certainly on the table. 

In his postgame news conference, Rodgers lamented not doing much with the amount of opportunities provided to the Steelers’ offense by the defense, which forced three turnovers, on Monday. He also warned that he’d be avoiding any emotional decisions. 

“I’m disappointed. Obviously, it was such a fun year. A lot of adversity, but a lot of fun.” 

Rodgers said that the 2025 season marked an “overall” great year in his life. He got married. He made the postseason for the first time since the 2021 season.  

“This is a really good part of that, coming here and being part of this team, so it’s disappointing to be sitting here with the season over.”

Asked point-blank if he’d want to continue playing in Pittsburgh should he decide another season in the NFL was what he wanted, Rodgers replied: “I’m not going to talk about that.” 

Rodgers said he’ll “get away” – coming to a darkness retreat near you – have the “right conversations” before making any grand plans. 

“I’ve answered this before,” Rodgers said. “Every game could be my final game.”

Backup Mason Rudolph replaced Rodgers for the Steelers’ final offensive drive of the game, which became a blowout thanks to two fourth-quarter touchdowns by the Texans’ defense. Rodgers was sacked four times. Potentially, Rodgers’ last pass in the NFL was a pick-six returned 50 yards by Calen Bullock. Rodgers was 17 of 33 passing for 146 yards and the pick, with one fumble lost that was returned for a touchdown in the fourth quarter by Sheldon Rankins, the dam breaking on the Steelers’ season. 

Did loss to Texans mark end of Tomlin era in Pittsburgh?

Tomlin, the Steelers coach, now finds himself at a career crossroads, it seems. 

“I’m not even in that mindset as I sit here tonight,” Tomlin said from the podium. “I’m more in the mindset of what transpired in this stadium and certainly what we did and didn’t do – not a big-picture mentality as I sit here tonight.” 

Tomlin, 53, won a Super Bowl in his second season with the Steelers and was back in the big game two years later. He’s now lost seven straight playoff games and owns an 8-12 postseason record. The last win came after the 2016 season. 

“I don’t necessarily compare it to any other moment,” Tomlin said. “It’s the here and now, and certainly it’s difficult. But that’s what we sign up for. That’s the life we live.”

Tomlin said he always feels optimistic in terms of building a roster that can win in both the regular season and playoffs. 

“When you don’t get it done, words are cheap. It’s about what you do or you don’t do … people talk too much in our business,” Tomlin said. “You either do or you don’t.” 

Steelers’ defensive end Cam Heyward said the outside noise doesn’t affect him because nobody outside of the Steelers’ building can comprehend the effort Tomlin puts into his team and the entire operation. 

“Coaches can only do so much,” he said. “Players have to play better. In those critical moments, players have to step up.”

Once again, the class of the conference existed tiers above what the Steelers were capable of reaching. Even with a future Hall of Famer at quarterback, the Steelers needed until the final game of the regular season to wrap up the division against an opponent that fired their head coach, as John Harbaugh had been employed by the rival Baltimore Ravens for 18 years before his dismissal. Harbaugh was the only coach who rivaled Tomlin’s longevity of 19 seasons in the same place. Never has he turned in a losing campaign, including a 10-7 mark this year.  

Will Year 20 – if there is one to be had for Tomlin in Pittsburgh – bring more of that same standard? Or can they take the next step? The fans at Acrisure Stadium who didn’t wait for the final horn – at least half of the black-and-yellow-clad crowd – might not want to answer that question.

In fact, noticeable “Fire Tomlin!” chants permeated the brisk air as the final minutes ticked away. The boos were louder. 

The classic Twitter “Mike Tomlin/Steelers voodoo dark magic” jokes don’t even hit the same anymore, especially if the result is, at best, a first-round exit.

C.J. Stroud and the Texans tried to give the game away by consistently fumbling the football, but neither Steelers’ unit took advantage. Pittsburgh’s defense is the most expensive one in football. Neither the stats nor the tape made that make sense throughout the season. 

Offseason of Aaron Rodgers speculation begins

Rodgers himself dropped to 11-11 as a starter in the postseason. He has stated throughout the year that he’s enjoyed his time with Tomlin and the Steelers. NFL Media reported that the team would be open to bringing him back next season. He looks rejuvenated compared to the version of the future Hall of Famer that played last season on the New York Jets, one season after he tore his ACL on the fourth play of the season during his “Gang Green” debut. 

The arm strength remains. He had no problem overthrowing Calvin Austin III on a go route in the third quarter, with the ball traveling about 60 yards through the air with ease. Or an intermediate threading of the needle to Adam Thielen to start a drive later that quarter. 

But tailoring the offense to Rodgers’ wants and needs reaches a point of diminishing returns. Early in the game, offensive coordinator Arthur Smith moved the pocket for Rodgers, who rolled left, flipped hips, found a wide-open DK Metcalf on an intermediate crossing route for a pickup of 25 yards. Rodgers went back to him on the next play and drew a defensive pass interference call. 

The Steelers did their best to bring in components that helped in the effort to distribute the ball quickly. Kenneth Gainwell earned Rodgers’ trust through an ability to seemingly always make the first tackler miss. Metcalf, when available, put his YAC-prowess to use. Tomlin and the front office placated Rodgers by signing veterans Adam Thielen and Marquez Valdes-Scantling. 

Tomlin’s patience last offseason netted him Rodgers under the presumption that the Steelers were simply competent quarterback play away from being contenders. 

Rodgers said the Steelers have the pieces in place to remain in the playoff race. Metcalf is under contract for the next handful of seasons. The team will have to keep Gainwell in the building, Rodgers advised. 

Coming together as a team during training camp in Latrobe, Pennsylvania is one of the many fun moments of the 2025 season Rodgers will return to with fondness, he said. 

“We faced a lot of adversity. But there’s a lot of special moments that I’ll think back on,” Rodgers said. “Right now, it’s just disappointment. But thankful to put the colors on and run out of the tunnel and be a part of this organization.”

Fueled by frustration from having to constantly answer the same question – what did he learn about Tomlin this year? – Rodgers said as much, dropped an expletive, and got up from his seat at the microphone to end his press conference. 

Rodgers then strolled toward the exit, hood up and headphones in, stopped to talk with right guard Mason McCormick and a few Texans players outside of the visitor’s locker room, and then was on his way. 

To where is a question that has an answer nearly as complicated as the guy it is about.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The NCAA’s top programs were all in action this week as all 15 nationally ranked women’s college hockey teams played. 

For Northeastern, Boston University, Harvard and Boston College, it was also a final chance to tune up ahead of the 2026 Beanpot tournament that begins Tuesday, with the finals next week at Boston’s TD Garden.

For the first time, programs like Yale, Clarkson and Colgate showed they might soon move into these national power rankings as well.

While familiar squads lead the top three, Penn State and Minnesota-Duluth swapped places in the top 10 from last week.

Here’s a look at the top 10 NCAA women’s hockey programs this week:

Women’s college hockey power rankings

1. University of Wisconsin (WCHA)

After returning a week later than other programs in 2026, Wisconsin stumbled out of the gate, tying Minnesota-Duluth 1-1 and losing in the shootout. They looked more like themselves in Game 2 of the weekend series as stars Laila Edwards, Caroline Harvey, Kirsten Simms, Kelly Gorbatenko and Adela Sapovalivova found the back of the net in a balanced 5-1 win. Wisconsin has been so consistent this season that it was bound for a blip.

2. Ohio State University (WCHA)

Kaia Malachino has added another threat to Ohio State’s forward group. Coach Nadine Muzerall seemingly gets a contribution from someone new each game as they had nine different goal-scorers across their 4-0 and 5-1 sweep of WCHA conference rival St. Cloud State. Rookie Hilda Svensson continues to lead the Buckeyes in scoring and sits third nationally behind only American Olympians Abbey Murphy (Minnesota) and Caroline Harvey (Wisconsin).

3. University of Minnesota (WCHA)

Can anybody stop Minnesota captain Abbey Murphy? She pushed her nation-leading goal and point totals to 28 goals and 50 points in 22 games after scoring four goals and seven points in a sweep over conference rival Minnesota State this weekend. While she recorded a hat trick, it was her highlight-reel, lacrosse-style assist that drew attention.

4. University of Minnesota-Duluth (WCHA)

After a troublesome trip to Northern Ireland for the Bulldogs, they answered in a big way, beating Wisconsin in a shootout to open their weekend before falling 5-1 on Saturday. Eve Gascon made 38 saves and stopped all shootout attempts on Friday’s shootout win, and she did it only hours after finding out she had been cut from Canada’s Olympic team. The response from their team, and one of the top goalies in the nation, was strong. 

5. Quinnipiac (ECAC)

The Quinnipiac Bobcats continued to roll this past weekend, beating RPI and Union by identical 5-1 margins after returning from a positive showing at the Friendship Series in Belfast. Forwards Kahlen Lamarche and Emerson Jarvis continued to power Quinnipiac’s offense. No goaltender in NCAA hockey has played more than Felicia Frank, and few have played as well as she sits third in the nation in goals-against average (1.38) and save percentage (.943).

6. Penn State (Atlantic Hockey America)

Mercyhurst has been a thorn in Penn State’s side recently. That continued last weekend as Penn State shut out the Lakers 3-0 before falling 4-3 in overtime. It’s just not an outcome the Nittany Lions can accept if they want to prove they can compete with the best programs from ECAC and the WCHA. The program is set to lose Tessa Janecke, Kendall Butze, Maddy Christian, Katie DeSa, Katelyn Roberts and Leah Stecker after this season.

7. Cornell (ECAC)

Cornell tied Clarkson but won the shootout and beat St. Lawrence. What was promising about the results was that the typically offensively starved Big Red scored 10 goals in two games. Their tie against Clarkson coincided with an uncharacteristic off-night from netminder Annelies Bergmann, who has been one of college hockey’s most consistent goaltenders for three seasons.

8. Princeton (ECAC)

Issy Wunder had five goals in two games as Princeton beat Union and RPI. They’ve got another tune-up week against a pair of Ivy League schools this week before they return to matchups against nationally ranked programs.

9. Northeastern (Hockey East)

After being shut out by Yale in a mid-week game, Northeastern bounced back, beating Providence 5-2. Rookie Stryker Zablocki led the way with her second hat trick of the season. Providence, however, outshot Northeastern. They won’t dip far in the national rankings, but they powered down this week, not up.

10. Connecticut (Hockey East)

UConn swept Maine, but it wasn’t convincing. Maine outshot them on the weekend, and UConn narrowly held on for 2-1 and 4-3 wins. After Yale posted back-to-back shutouts over Northeastern and Dartmouth, UConn will need a stronger showing this week against Merrimack to stay in the top 10.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

On Jan. 12, the future Hall of Fame QB’s final pass against the Houston Texans ended in a touchdown – for the opposing team.

Texans defensive back Calen Bullock returned Rodgers’ final pass of the wild-card matchup in Pittsburgh for a pick-six, sealing Houston’s eventual 30-6 win.

Rodgers didn’t return for the Steelers’ final drive, begging the question, is this the last pass of his storied career?

While that question, along with many more surrounding the future of the Steelers, will be answered in the offseason, Rodgers’ final game of the 2025 season was a disappointment by any standard. The Steelers’ most recent playoff loss of the Mike Tomlin era saw Rodgers finish 17-of-33 passing for 146 yards, one interception and zero touchdowns.

Rodgers was sacked four times, fumbled twice, and posted a passer rating of 50.8.

The image of Rodgers walking off the field in defeat is a far cry from the highs of his years with the Green Bay Packers. Will it be the last fans see of him on an NFL field? Only time will tell.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Aaron Rodgers believes the idea of firing coaches like Mike Tomlin or Matt LaFleur would have been unthinkable earlier in his career.
  • Rodgers criticized the influence of social media and TV experts on NFL coaching decisions, calling it a ‘joke.’
  • He stated that when a team has the right coach and culture, changes should not be considered despite outside pressure.

PITTSBURGH – Back in Aaron Rodgers’ day, aka the 2000s, the idea of firing either the head coach of the Pittsburgh Steelers, Mike Tomlin, or the Green Bay Packers’ Matt LaFleur would be considered asinine, the 42-year-old quarterback believes. 

Rodgers acknowledged that bias, since he played for both of the coaches, played a part in his stance. But he knows how he’d run things if it were his call to make. 

“This league has changed a lot in my 21 years,” Rodgers said following the Steelers’ wild-card loss to the Houston Texans, 30-6, on Jan. 12. “You know, when you hear conversation about the Mike Tomlins of the world, Matt LaFleurs of the world – those are just two that I’ve played for – when I first got in the league, there wouldn’t be (a) conversation about whether those guys were on the hot seat.”

The way in which the NFL is covered now, Rodgers said, and the “snap decisions” that are made in accordance with the larger discourse is an issue. 

“The validity given to the Twitter experts and all the experts on TV now who make it seem like they know what the hell they’re talking about, to me, that’s an absolute joke,” Rodgers said. “For either of those two guys to be on the hot seat is really apropos of where we’re at as a society and as a league.” 

LaFleur’s season ended Saturday when his Packers collapsed in the second half against the Chicago Bears and lost. Despite a NFL Media report from the end of the regular season saying a contract extension could be in the works, which was mirrored by an ESPN report Monday that LaFleur’s job was safe, speculation spread that Green Bay could be looking to move on from the seventh-year head coach. 

Tomlin, meanwhile, lost his seventh straight playoff game June 12 with Rodgers as his quarterback to wrap up the duo’s first – and perhaps only – season as a coach-QB duo. 

“Obviously, Matt has done a lot of great things in Green Bay, and we had a lot of success,” said Rodgers, who won his third and fourth MVPs while being coached by LaFleur. “‘Mike T.’ has had more success than damn near anybody in the league for the last 19, 20 years. 

“More than that, though, when you have the right guy and the culture is right, you don’t think about making a change. But there’s a lot of pressure that comes from the outside, and obviously that sways decisions from time to time. But that’s not how I would do things and not how the league used to be.” 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Aaron Rodgers is taking a beating.

The four-time NFL MVP is playing in what might be the final game of his career on ‘Monday Night Football’ in the wild-card round against the Houston Texans. It’s safe to the say the visitors are trying to crash the Pittsburgh Steelers’ party at Acrisure Stadium.

Rodgers has been under pressure all night long and in the fourth quarter, the Texans finally got the turnover they were looking for.

Facing a third-and-12 with over 11 minutes left down by four, Rodgers dropped back to pass. He was promptly met by multiple Texans, mainly Will Anderson Jr., who led the charge.

The 42-year-old quarterback was devoured by the pass rush and coughed up the ball, which Sheldon Rankins returned for a Houston touchdown.

It extended the Texans’ lead to 11 with 11 minutes to go, a seemingly insurmountable deficit for the offensively-challenged Steelers against arguably the league’s best defense.

The four-seeded Steelers backed into the playoffs thanks to a missed field goal by the Baltimore Ravens’ Tyler Loop in the final game of the regular season.

If it wasn’t for that, Rodgers and co. would’ve been home watching their rivals in this contest.

Instead, it’s the Steelers that are getting clobbered by a lethal pass rush.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY