Author

admin

Browsing

The following is a list of Upcoming Meeting Dates for Reporting Issuers in Canada. The data is supplied by Issuing Companies through the service of CDS Clearing and Depository Services Inc.

Company Name Record Date Meeting Date Type
 ATLANTIS SUBMARINES INTL HLDS November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 S
 Anonymous Intelligence Company* October 21, 2025 December 19, 2025 A
 Arcus Development Group Inc November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 AG
 BLUE LAGOON RESOURCES INC. November 19, 2025 December 30, 2025 A
 Big Ridge Gold Corp. November 6, 2025 December 16, 2025 AGS
 BrandPilot AI Inc. % September 29, 2025 November 13, 2025 AGS
 BrandPilot AI Inc. November 28, 2025 January 15, 2025 AGS
 CLEAN SEED CAPITAL GROUP LTD % October 2, 2025 November 20, 2025 A
 Deveron Corp. November 28, 2025 December 30, 2025 S
 EV Nickel, Inc. November 7, 2025 December 17, 2025 A
 FAB-FORM INDUSTRIES LTD November 7, 2025 December 12, 2025 AG
 Gabriel Resources Ltd November 17, 2025 December 18, 2025 AS
 Gabriel Resources Ltd % October 31, 2025 December 4, 2025 AS
 Glenstar Minerals Inc. November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 A
 Gold Strike Resources Inc. November 18, 2025 December 23, 2025 AGS
 Golden Harp Resources Inc November 4, 2025 December 9, 2025 AS
 Grafton Resources Inc. November 25, 2025 January 2, 2025 AS
 Grit Metals Corp. November 14, 2025 December 19, 2025 A
 Grosvenor Cpc I Inc. December 1, 2025 January 6, 2025 AS
 Helium Minerals Limited November 14, 2025 December 19, 2025 AG
 J2 Metals Inc. * October 8, 2025 December 3, 2025 S
 LOMIKO METALS INC * November 5, 2025 December 18, 2025 AS
 Makenita Resources Inc November 26, 2025 January 12, 2025 AG
 Margaret Lake Diamonds Inc. November 25, 2025 December 30, 2025 A
 Muzhu Mining Ltd. November 7, 2025 December 19, 2025 AS
 New Media Capital 2.0 Inc. * October 21, 2025 December 10, 2025 AGS
 New Zealand Energy Corp. November 19, 2025 December 19, 2025 AGS
 POCML 7 Inc. November 17, 2025 December 18, 2025 AS
 Pacific Geoinfo Corp. November 25, 2025 December 30, 2025 AG
 Pinnacle Silver and Gold Corp November 7, 2025 December 17, 2025 AG
 Pioneer AI Foundry Inc. November 13, 2025 December 18, 2025 A
 Pure Energy Minerals Limited * November 4, 2025 December 19, 2025 A
 QUADRO RESOURCES LTD November 28, 2025 December 30, 2025 AS
 Queen’s Road Capital Inv Ltd. November 28, 2025 January 9, 2025 AG
 Railtown AI Technologies Inc. November 10, 2025 December 17, 2025 A
 Robex Resources Inc. November 3, 2025 December 15, 2025 S
 Rev Exploration Corp. * October 27, 2025 December 19, 2025 AGS
 Route 109 Resources Inc. November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 AG
 Silver Bear Resources Plc November 25, 2025 December 30, 2025 AGS
 Sky Gold Corp November 6, 2025 December 17, 2025 AG
 Stockworks Gold Inc. * October 27, 2025 December 11, 2025 AGS
 SuperQ Quantum Computing Inc. November 24, 2025 December 29, 2025 AS
 Teryl Resources Corp. November 13, 2025 December 22, 2025 AG
 Troy Minerals Inc. November 19, 2025 December 30, 2025 A

 

Legend:

* = Change in Previously Reported Information
% = Cancelled Meeting
@ = Adjourned Meeting

Type of Meeting

A = Annual Meeting
S = Special Meeting
G = General Meeting
X = Extra Meeting
E = Extraordinary Meeting

For more information, please visit https://www.cds.ca/

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/273462

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Steve Penny, founder of SilverChartist.com, explains why he currently has a bullish outlook for gold, silver and platinum, as well as uranium.

“The reaction to the next deflationary impulse is what I believe ultimately sends silver up towards triple digits, gold up towards north of US$10,000 (per ounce),” he explained.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Here’s a quick recap of the crypto landscape for Friday (November 7) as of 9:00 p.m. UTC.

Get the latest insights on Bitcoin, Ether and altcoins, along with a round-up of key cryptocurrency market news.

Bitcoin and Ether price update

Bitcoin (BTC) was priced at US$103,760, a 3.8 percent decrease in 24 hours, and its highest valuation of the day. Its lowest was US$99,590.49.

Bitcoin price performance, November 7, 2025.

Chart via TradingView.

After a week that has seen the world’s largest cryptocurrency slip more than 20 percent from its early October record high, the crypto market began to show signs of recovery on Friday afternoon.

Speaking about Tether’s Bitcoin accumulation during the recent downturn, Bitget Wallet’s Lacie Zhang said the move underscores institutions’ view of Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset rather than a speculative trade.

“However, institutional accumulation does not necessarily signal an immediate rebound — it’s a strategic positioning move grounded in the expectation that Bitcoin will outperform once global liquidity conditions improve.’

Zhang explained that Bitcoin’s recent selloff was driven more by broader liquidity stress rather than crypto-specific issues, with exchange-traded fund redemptions causing mechanical selling, and leverage unwinding amplifying volatility — a typical liquidity-drain cycle. She also offered her outlook on what’s to come:

“Looking ahead, recovery depends on how quickly liquidity returns: if unemployment climbs above 4.4 percent or economic data softens once the US shutdown ends, the (US Federal Reserve) may be pushed toward easing. Until then, conditions remain tight, and the January to February credit cycle could still test markets. Longer term, though, institutional accumulation and resilient on-chain activity suggest the foundation for the next phase of crypto recovery is quietly being built.”

Ether (ETH) was priced at US$3,463.13, a 4.8 percent increase in 24 hours to its highest valuation of the day. Its lowest was US$3,199.47.

Altcoin price update

  • Solana (SOL) was priced at US$163.40, up by 5.2 percent over the last 24 hours to its highest valuation of the day. Its lowest was US$150.79.
  • XRP was trading for US$2.36, up by 8 percent over the last 24 hours, also at its highest valuation of the day. Its lowest was US$2.17.

Crypto derivatives and market indicators

Crypto derivatives markets displayed notable liquidation activity on Friday afternoon amid cautious trader sentiment and volatile price action. Bitcoin liquidations hit US$35.8 billion, primarily from short positions unwinding, while Ether saw US$29.8 billion in short liquidations, reflecting significant adjustments in bearish bets.

Open interest in Bitcoin futures climbed modestly by 0.65 percent to US$71.24 billion, indicating persistent market engagement despite recent price pressures just below the key US$100,000 level. Ether’s open interest rose more sharply by 3 percent to US$40.24 billion, underscoring increasing participation ahead of critical expiration events.

Funding rates for both Bitcoin (0.005) and Ether (0.006) remain marginally positive, signaling a slight long bias among traders, but a generally cautious and balanced market stance.

Crucially, Bitcoin’s relative strength index (RSI) at 48.86 sits near neutral territory, suggesting neither overbought nor oversold conditions. This RSI level aligns with the view of an equilibrium phase with potential for either consolidation or a directional move, depending on forthcoming catalysts.

Today’s crypto news to know

Senate members still gridlocked

The US government shutdown entered day 38 on Friday, with the Senate voting down a House-passed funding bill designed to temporarily restore operations. The deadlock centers on the extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies, a key sticking point for Democrats who rejected the GOP-backed measure.

In response, Senate Democrats proposed a counteroffer to reopen the government with a one year extension of healthcare subsidies. However, bipartisan agreement has yet to be reached, and negotiations continue amid growing economic and social impacts, including flight cancelations and delayed pay for federal workers.

Tempo invests in Commonware

Crypto infrastructure startup Commonware has raised US$25 million in a funding round led by Tempo, a payments-focused blockchain network launched by Stripe and crypto venture firm Paradigm.

Commonware was founded in 2024. The company develops open-source tools that empower companies to launch and manage their own blockchains. Commonware’s CEO, Patrick O’Grady, reportedly told Fortune, which first reported the story, that strategic partnerships and network growth are more important than capital alone at this stage, highlighting the long-term value of collaboration over fundraising milestones.

Japan’s financial regulator backs bank-led stablecoin pilot

Japan’s Financial Services Agency has confirmed it will support a project by the country’s three largest banks — Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (TSE:8306), Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (TSE:8316) and Mizuho Financial Group (NYSE:MFG,TSE:8411) — to jointly issue stablecoins for cross-border payments.

In a Reuters report, Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama said the agency will oversee legal and operational compliance as the initiative moves into testing. The banks intend to issue yen-pegged tokens under Japan’s revised Payment Services Act, which requires full asset backing and enhanced consumer safeguards. Startup JPYC recently launched its first fully regulated yen-denominated stablecoin backed by domestic savings and government bonds.

UNDP to launch global blockchain training program for governments

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is expanding its blockchain education initiatives to include government officials, aiming to accelerate digital infrastructure adoption in the public sector.

Robert Pasicko, who leads UNDP’s Alternative Finance Lab, said four countries will be selected for the initial rollout within weeks. The program will build on UNDP’s internal blockchain academy, and will include both training and hands-on project support. Research by UNDP has identified over 300 potential government applications for blockchain technology, from transparent fund tracking to public sector payments.

Twenty-five major blockchain organizations, including Polygon Labs, Stellar Foundation and the Ethereum Foundation, have discussed forming an advisory group under UNDP coordination.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

(TheNewswire)

Vancouver, British Columbia TheNewswire – November 10, 2025 Juggernaut Exploration Ltd (JUGR.V) (OTCPK: JUGRF) (FSE: 4JE) ( the ‘Company’ or ‘Juggernaut’) is excited to announce that detailed mapping and sampling have confirmed that the gold-rich Big Mac Zone, Whopper Zone and Gold Dome Zone all form part of the 22 Km 2 district-scale Eldorado System that remains wide open where grab samples assayed up to 263.70 gt AuEq or 8.48 ozt AuEq and channel cuts assayed up to 4.89 gt AuEq over 5.21 m from >400 mineralized veins that are up to 10 m wide hosted in shear zones up to 50 m wide, and are exposed on surface for >1 km with >1 km of vertical relief, remains open and is drill ready on the Big One property (the ‘Property’), Golden Triangle, British Columbia. In addition, based on excellent assay results, the Company has acquired additional claims and expanded the Gold Swarm discovery area of strong gold potential from 1 km 2 to 3 km 2 and 700 m of vertical relief and remains open, effectively tripling this area of strong gold potential, where grab samples assayed up to 231.81 gt AuEq or 7.45 ozt AuEq and channel cuts assayed up to 4.51 gt AuEq over 4.36 m that remains open and is drill ready. The Big One discovery is located in an area of recent glacial and snowpack abatement adjacent to the Tier 1 gold-rich porphyry systems, the likes of Galore Creek. The 100% controlled Big One property covers 39,271 hectares of geological terrane with tremendous additional discovery potential.

Link to map with samples > 1 g/t AuEq

Big One Gold Rich District Scale System Highlights:

  • The district-scale Eldorado System covers an area ~half the size of the Island of Manhattan (22 km ) that remains wide open where grab samples assayed up to 263.70 g/t AuEq or 8.48 oz/t AuEq and channel cuts assayed up to 4.89 g/t AuEq over 5.21 m from 400 mineralized veins that remain open and are up to 10 m wide, the equivalent to ~3-story building, hosted in shear zones up to 50 m wide, comparable to a 15-story building, and are exposed on surface for 500 m, or 5 football fields, with 1 km of vertical relief, the height of 2.5 Empire State Buildings.

Link to Gold Dome Figure

Link to Whopper Zone Figure

  • The Gold Swarm Area of strong gold potential has been expanded from 1 km to 3 km , equivalent to more than the downtown core of Vancouver B.C, with 700 m of vertical relief and remains wide open, with 100 veins up to 4.5 m wide, the equivalent of a 1.5-story building, and exposed on surface for 200 m equivalent to 2 football fields and remain open containing grab samples that assayed up to 231.81 g/t AuEq or 7.45 oz/t AuEq a nd channel cuts that assayed up to 4.51 g/t AuEq over 4.36 m. The Gold Swarm Area is drill ready.

Link to Goldswarm Figure

  • 41% (219 samples out of 527) collected within the Eldorado System in 2024 and 2025 assayed 1 g/t AuEq; 65% (28 samples out of 43) collected withing the Gold Swarm Zone in 2024 and 2025 assayed 1 g/t AuEq.

Grade (AuEq)

>1 g/t

>3 g/t

>5 g/t

>10 g/t

>15 g/t

>20 g/t

>30 g/t

>60 g/t

>90 g/t

Samples

219

129

95

66

51

40

23

8

5

  • Gold samples up to 256.60 g/t or 8.25 oz/t, silver samples up 2810 g/t or 90.34 oz/t, and copper samples up to 14.40 % were collected on Big One.

  • Detailed mapping has confirmed common orientations as well as similar geochemical signatures and textures of the gold-mineralized veins along the 15 km Highway of Gold corridor surrounding the snowcap of Deeker Glacier, strongly indicating that the gold-rich mineralization found throughout is all part of one huge district-scale gold system that remains wide open.

  • The polymetallic veins, alteration signature, geochemical pathfinder element signature, and geophysical anomalies strongly indicate the presence of a large common buried gold-silver-copper rich porphyry feeder source or similar magmatic source or sources at depth responsible for the extensive high-grade veining confirmed on surface over 22 km

  • The company recently received a 5-year property-wide advanced exploration drill permit.

  • Detailed geological and structural mapping has been completed on the reported drill targets in order to define the full geometry of these high-grade gold-bearing shears and veins and will be instrumental in designing the drill plan for the upcoming maiden drill program.

  • A high-resolution UAV photogrammetry survey was completed over an area of 52 km2 on the Eldorado System and Gold Swarm Zone encompassing all of the maiden drill targets. The data will be used to support modelling and define targeting the high-grade gold mineralization recently discovered.

  • A property wide LiDAR survey covering an area of 385 km has been conducted and will be used to augment information obtained from the mapping as well as plan the upcoming inaugural drill campaign.

  • Multiple drill-ready targets have been confirmed and are planned to be tested in the fully funded inaugural drill program and include but are not limited to: the 22 km Eldorado System hosting the Gold Dome Zone where grab samples assayed up to 263.70 g/t AuEq or 8.48 oz/t AuEq; the Big Mac Zone where grab samples assayed up to 113.92 g/t AuEq or 3.66 oz/t AuEq; the Whopper Zone where grab samples assayed up to 43.94 g/t AuEq or 1.41 oz/t AuEq; and the Gold Swarm Area where grab samples assayed up to 231.81 g/t AuEq or 7.45 oz/t AuEq.

  • Juggernaut is working in consultation with the Tahltan First Nation and the local community and is committed to maintaining respectful and collaborative relationships. As we advance exploration on our project, we will continue working closely with the Tahltan First Nation and all the local stakeholders and regulatory agencies to ensure our activities create long-term value and reflect community priorities.

Dan Stuart, President and CEO of Juggernaut Exploration states: ‘With a district-scale discovery of this magnitude host to so many large gold-rich veins and shears exposed on surface that rise above the valley floor for >1 km we are likely only seeing the tip of the iceberg on this mountain of gold. We look forward to the fully funded maiden drill program on this remarkable gold discovery with much anticipation. The best is yet to come!’

Manuele Lazzarotto, PhD, Chief Geologist of Juggernaut Exploration, states: ‘With the advanced exploration permit in hand, we look forward to unlocking the full potential of the Big One gold discovery in the third dimension during the inaugural drill program. Once we receive, compile, and interpret all the deliverables from the detailed and regional mapping, UAV orthophotos survey, and LiDAR survey, the same team responsible for the Tier 1 Surebet gold discovery will design and execute the maiden drill program. Obvious opportunities with the scale and grades seen on Big One are extremely rare, and we have clearly barely begun to scratch the surface. The team looks forward to testing this remarkable discovery at depth.’

Table 1: Samples from 2024-2025 with assays >1 g/t AuEq

Sample ID

Year

Sample Type

Au (g/t)

Ag (g/t)

Cu (%)

Pb (%)

Zn (%)

AuEq (g/t)

M224886

2025

Float

256.60

546.00

0.43

0.41

0.01

263.70

M217656

2025

Float

226.94

335.00

0.00

4.99

0.01

231.81

D751423

2025

Grab

138.70

29.96

0.08

0.02

0.02

139.14

M220659

2025

Grab

111.35

159.00

0.02

3.88

0.01

113.92

M224956

2025

Grab

95.04

49.60

0.02

0.02

0.01

95.67

D751282

2024

Grab

79.01

58.90

0.13

0.43

0.80

80.08

D751407

2025

Grab

68.57

115.00

0.35

1.25

6.53

72.02

D751424

2025

Grab

60.08

9.57

0.01

0.00

0.01

60.21

D751966

2024

Grab

56.54

23.30

0.03

0.02

0.03

56.84

M220561

2025

Grab

55.50

38.62

0.09

2.02

0.44

56.47

M217807

2025

Channel

47.18

156.00

0.01

9.28

0.07

50.57

D750642

2025

Grab

43.99

102.00

0.00

9.19

0.44

46.79

M217601

2025

Channel

39.84

333.00

0.02

0.07

0.06

43.94

M217579

2025

Channel

34.96

415.00

0.02

21.13

0.06

43.38

D751216

2024

Grab

37.98

75.50

0.24

5.72

3.93

41.46

D751191

2024

Channel

12.12

2810.00

0.02

8.04

0.00

37.20

D751156

2024

Grab

33.72

177.00

0.27

2.71

0.27

36.11

D751357

2025

Grab

18.06

333.00

12.05

0.00

0.14

32.65

M217613

2025

Channel

31.68

9.40

0.16

0.00

0.10

31.96

M224961

2025

Grab

31.25

13.98

0.39

0.00

0.00

31.77

D750638

2025

Grab

14.46

621.00

0.11

54.39

0.44

30.79

D751375

2025

Grab

28.47

70.39

0.15

2.43

0.40

29.94

D751402

2025

Grab

29.23

11.44

0.17

0.01

0.00

29.52

D751373

2025

Grab

21.44

172.00

0.07

15.92

6.21

27.59

D751964

2024

Talus

23.47

110.00

1.37

0.01

0.00

26.07

D750389

2024

Grab

8.10

1420.00

1.11

0.15

2.70

26.01

D751163

2024

Float

23.97

116.00

0.02

2.16

0.13

24.53

D750639

2025

Grab

18.12

174.00

3.36

2.91

0.03

23.63

M217567

2025

Channel

17.00

461.00

0.04

0.87

0.31

22.86

D750624

2025

Grab

21.62

45.06

0.00

2.33

0.16

22.58

M217705

2025

Channel

20.78

48.45

0.62

2.37

1.05

22.53

M224905

2025

Talus

9.48

646.00

5.48

0.05

0.05

22.15

M224982

2025

Chip

21.17

20.30

0.02

0.92

0.03

21.58

M217655

2025

Grab

19.64

15.34

0.00

1.37

2.93

20.74

M224983

2025

Grab

14.06

191.00

0.15

17.27

4.50

20.31

D751365

2025

Grab

9.35

566.00

0.01

25.22

0.06

20.24

M217657

2025

Grab

18.11

88.95

0.00

2.08

0.01

19.53

D750621

2025

Grab

3.76

223.00

14.45

0.00

0.11

19.09

D750644

2025

Grab

18.47

12.54

0.00

0.89

0.01

18.77

D750625

2025

Grab

18.32

6.19

0.01

0.01

0.55

18.54

D751374

2025

Talus

16.60

66.43

0.38

1.82

0.60

18.17

D750641

2025

Grab

15.52

55.65

0.63

1.85

0.08

17.06

M224959

2025

Grab

15.94

16.54

0.00

0.01

0.01

16.15

D750394

2024

Grab

13.12

163.00

0.51

1.65

0.42

16.04

M217852

2025

Channel

15.39

20.95

0.04

1.02

0.37

15.93

M217649

2025

Channel

14.96

22.24

0.41

0.64

0.95

15.92

D751285

2024

Grab

3.74

91.20

7.96

0.01

0.01

13.18

D751975

2024

Grab

10.62

198.00

0.00

0.77

0.01

13.10

D750192

2024

Grab

3.44

220.00

6.61

0.00

0.01

12.91

M224932

2025

Grab

0.00

755.00

0.63

6.07

7.28

12.43

D750852

2025

Subcrop

1.07

860.00

0.01

2.12

1.32

12.20

M220602

2025

Grab

11.92

2.04

0.01

0.00

0.04

11.96

M224883

2025

Grab

11.07

20.98

0.03

0.01

0.00

11.36

D751943

2024

Grab

4.00

128.00

0.30

15.35

8.35

11.32

D750198

2024

Float

6.01

34.10

0.14

0.04

15.30

11.21

M217784

2025

Channel

10.83

1.88

0.00

0.00

0.04

10.87

D750704

2025

Grab

2.59

325.00

0.35

22.97

1.56

10.83

D750608

2024

Grab

10.62

3.20

0.00

0.01

0.01

10.67

M217785

2025

Channel

10.17

1.97

0.00

0.00

0.01

10.20

M224957

2025

Grab

9.65

15.14

0.03

0.18

0.48

10.00

D751154

2024

Grab

5.72

218.00

0.22

1.81

1.34

9.20

D751969

2024

Float

5.59

185.00

0.40

1.91

0.98

8.82

D751284

2024

Float

6.34

47.70

0.03

6.78

0.59

8.66

D751151

2024

Float

2.79

474.00

0.01

20.00

1.22

8.59

D751192

2024

Channel

3.39

366.00

0.01

0.11

0.00

7.68

D751372

2025

Grab

7.44

16.56

0.00

0.17

0.01

7.67

D751104

2024

Float

3.79

204.00

0.30

4.60

1.12

7.54

D750395

2024

Grab

6.01

105.00

0.01

0.06

0.09

7.42

D750643

2025

Grab

7.36

2.04

0.00

0.03

0.02

7.40

M217571

2025

Channel

6.06

89.91

0.04

0.01

0.67

7.35

M220559

2025

Grab

1.55

262.00

0.01

13.83

0.08

6.94

M220601

2025

Grab

6.77

5.19

0.08

0.00

0.01

6.91

M224865

2025

Grab

0.05

213.00

4.32

0.07

0.48

6.53

M217589

2025

Channel

5.81

19.08

0.35

0.37

0.28

6.48

D751403

2025

Float

6.13

14.47

0.00

0.02

0.01

6.31

D751368

2025

Talus

6.09

6.80

0.01

0.25

0.04

6.24

D751433

2025

Grab

0.03

139.00

2.99

4.42

4.65

6.13

D751369

2025

Grab

4.97

71.63

0.02

1.44

0.07

6.10

D751939

2024

Channel

5.06

96.30

0.00

0.05

0.03

6.10

M217566

2025

Channel

4.40

118.00

0.02

0.13

0.22

5.93

D751107

2024

Float

4.09

71.80

0.22

1.20

0.95

5.71

D751112

2024

Float

4.94

59.50

0.00

0.31

0.02

5.70

M217702

2025

Channel

4.30

38.77

0.58

2.16

0.10

5.64

M224981

2025

Grab

5.31

13.36

0.01

0.69

0.04

5.60

D751435

2025

Grab

5.19

10.98

0.00

0.54

0.20

5.46

D751158

2024

Grab

4.60

30.70

0.04

1.36

0.02

5.31

M220673

2025

Grab

0.00

345.00

0.03

0.45

4.17

5.29

M217648

2025

Channel

4.69

7.08

0.26

0.44

0.43

5.17

M217788

2025

Channel

5.15

1.29

0.01

0.01

0.00

5.17

D750657

2024

Grab

3.71

40.80

0.76

0.01

0.02

4.98

M220603

2025

Grab

0.39

313.00

0.26

1.50

1.07

4.92

D751215

2024

Grab

2.96

102.00

0.04

0.04

2.15

4.84

D750094

2024

Grab

0.02

108.00

1.01

0.06

8.60

4.83

D750632

2025

Float

4.44

20.01

0.02

0.74

0.01

4.83

D750656

2024

Grab

1.56

97.60

0.06

7.88

0.25

4.53

M217573

2025

Channel

4.27

16.46

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.48

M217643

2025

Channel

4.35

3.99

0.01

0.01

0.04

4.42

M217608

2025

Channel

4.35

1.50

0.00

0.00

0.01

4.38

D751406

2025

Grab

4.07

12.47

0.00

0.02

0.05

4.24

M224868

2025

Grab

0.38

68.48

3.42

0.01

0.15

4.23

M217805

2025

Channel

4.18

2.82

0.00

0.03

0.01

4.22

D750088

2024

Grab

0.16

143.00

0.04

7.63

1.50

4.18

M224938

2025

Grab

0.00

89.59

3.15

0.01

1.15

4.11

D751417

2025

Grab

3.38

46.67

0.00

0.41

0.00

4.02

M217637

2025

Channel

3.63

10.25

0.03

0.53

0.59

4.00

D750664

2024

Float

0.46

292.00

0.02

4.51

0.08

3.99

D750854

2025

Grab

0.00

186.00

0.07

7.28

1.99

3.95

M224935

2025

Grab

0.00

271.00

0.23

1.45

0.78

3.91

M224866

2025

Grab

0.20

146.00

1.78

0.04

1.31

3.85

M224851

2025

Chip

2.61

38.00

0.13

1.99

0.85

3.70

D751697

2024

Grab

0.09

105.00

2.35

0.01

0.07

3.65

M220553

2025

Grab

0.59

200.00

0.01

3.58

0.06

3.61

D751283

2024

Float

0.26

12.60

3.02

0.00

0.00

3.57

D751946

2024

Grab

0.02

136.00

0.72

0.18

4.35

3.54

D751699

2024

Grab

2.15

68.90

0.01

2.63

0.06

3.51

D750751

2025

Grab

1.16

82.41

0.03

4.01

2.80

3.48

M224904

2025

Grab

1.04

187.00

0.00

0.43

0.17

3.43

D751195

2024

Channel

1.61

38.20

0.82

1.27

0.71

3.37

D751398

2025

Grab

0.09

65.28

2.01

2.59

1.34

3.36

D751436

2025

Grab

0.14

80.25

0.09

13.18

0.20

3.32

D751394

2025

Grab

0.24

187.00

0.16

1.40

1.42

3.22

D750554

2024

Channel

0.05

81.50

0.35

1.05

5.34

3.17

D750199

2024

Grab

0.15

108.00

0.01

7.73

0.05

3.13

D751836

2024

Chip

0.22

114.00

0.00

5.21

1.59

2.95

D751845

2024

Chip

2.63

24.80

0.00

0.01

0.00

2.95

D751972

2024

Channel

1.42

47.30

0.03

3.43

0.68

2.90

D751846

2024

Grab

2.59

24.70

0.01

0.00

0.00

2.87

D751207

2024

Grab

0.04

256.00

0.01

12.65

0.01

2.85

M224963

2025

Grab

2.63

9.40

0.09

0.08

0.01

2.84

M224855

2025

Grab

2.23

30.34

0.03

0.95

0.20

2.83

M217727

2025

Channel

2.73

2.04

0.01

0.03

0.01

2.77

D751109

2024

Grab

1.65

89.50

0.10

0.01

0.03

2.73

D751962

2024

Grab

0.55

95.20

0.26

1.17

1.98

2.65

D751404

2025

Grab

2.61

1.26

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.63

M220555

2025

Grab

0.09

83.19

0.04

8.00

0.64

2.55

D751968

2024

Grab

1.49

53.50

0.01

1.68

0.13

2.55

D751153

2024

Grab

0.83

86.60

0.38

0.08

1.16

2.52

M220674

2025

Grab

0.00

175.00

0.01

0.62

0.74

2.42

D751213

2024

Float

1.65

51.40

0.02

0.31

0.02

2.41

M224927

2025

Grab

0.70

40.80

0.13

6.73

0.02

2.37

M217782

2025

Channel

0.02

88.40

0.84

0.78

1.59

2.32

M224902

2025

Subcrop

2.02

10.72

0.01

0.90

0.02

2.31

M220677

2025

Talus

0.00

29.29

0.29

0.29

6.78

2.26

D751992

2024

Grab

0.33

102.00

0.03

3.27

0.06

2.21

D750448

2024

Grab

0.42

71.70

0.03

4.57

0.09

2.20

D751391

2025

Grab

1.89

14.34

0.10

0.24

0.01

2.19

D751947

2024

Grab

0.01

74.70

0.48

0.09

2.81

2.16

D750086

2024

Channel

0.17

17.30

0.12

1.11

4.70

2.16

D751371

2025

Grab

1.56

39.69

0.00

0.20

0.00

2.08

M224852

2025

Grab

1.08

50.66

0.16

0.93

0.29

2.05

D750555

2024

Channel

0.05

73.10

0.17

1.03

2.65

2.03

M217618

2025

Channel

1.94

6.23

0.00

0.00

0.01

2.02

D750629

2025

Grab

1.23

39.89

0.15

0.00

0.58

1.99

D751165

2024

Grab

1.95

6.80

0.00

0.01

0.01

1.99

M217592

2025

Channel

1.69

10.63

0.17

0.02

0.01

1.97

D750393

2024

Grab

1.01

41.30

0.02

1.79

0.37

1.97

D750449

2024

Grab

0.24

32.60

0.01

6.38

0.02

1.96

D751426

2025

Grab

1.91

1.49

0.00

0.00

0.01

1.94

D751352

2025

Chip

0.22

41.10

1.34

0.01

0.07

1.91

D751422

2025

Grab

0.01

41.14

1.55

0.01

0.02

1.86

M217853

2025

Channel

1.75

2.88

0.00

0.02

0.06

1.81

M217665

2025

Channel

0.80

43.76

0.53

0.00

0.01

1.80

M224912

2025

Grab

1.00

64.20

0.00

0.01

0.00

1.78

D751194

2024

Grab

0.44

130.00

0.01

0.08

0.09

1.74

D750725

2025

Grab

0.00

62.49

0.07

4.77

0.60

1.71

M224903

2025

Grab

0.47

39.05

0.86

0.01

0.01

1.70

M217721

2025

Channel

0.03

53.49

0.88

0.46

0.76

1.70

M220604

2025

Grab

0.50

29.35

0.89

0.30

0.03

1.69

D751429

2025

Grab

0.06

73.61

0.02

2.36

1.37

1.67

M224901

2025

Grab

1.46

12.66

0.02

0.22

0.01

1.66

D750197

2024

Grab

0.10

95.80

0.02

1.43

0.53

1.66

D750195

2024

Grab

0.33

15.30

0.07

2.21

1.77

1.60

D750083

2024

Channel

0.81

32.70

0.01

1.63

0.12

1.57

M217565

2025

Channel

0.47

12.27

0.61

0.04

1.67

1.56

M217724

2025

Channel

1.50

2.88

0.01

0.06

0.01

1.55

D750616

2025

Grab

0.11

64.83

0.52

0.35

0.56

1.54

D751251

2024

Grab

1.27

11.10

0.11

0.02

0.02

1.53

M217636

2025

Channel

1.33

12.99

0.01

0.07

0.01

1.52

D750552

2024

Channel

0.02

33.00

0.24

0.04

2.82

1.51

D751948

2024

Grab

0.11

53.10

0.01

3.48

0.07

1.49

D751993

2024

Grab

1.20

11.90

0.03

0.35

0.17

1.48

M224885

2025

Grab

0.48

14.86

0.90

0.00

0.01

1.45

D751116

2024

Grab

1.27

13.20

0.00

0.01

0.01

1.44

D750553

2024

Channel

0.02

25.10

0.22

0.06

2.82

1.42

D751115

2024

Grab

0.05

45.10

0.02

0.95

2.03

1.40

D751397

2025

Grab

0.01

26.13

0.65

0.05

2.10

1.40

M224914

2025

Grab

0.02

49.81

0.32

1.61

0.85

1.36

D750607

2024

Grab

0.68

43.40

0.00

0.75

0.03

1.36

D751941

2024

Grab

0.35

26.00

0.06

0.64

1.54

1.34

D750095

2024

Channel

0.06

52.40

0.07

1.56

0.93

1.32

D750093

2024

Channel

0.02

43.70

0.15

0.65

1.65

1.31

D751159

2024

Grab

0.54

29.00

0.03

1.93

0.03

1.31

M217707

2025

Channel

0.03

35.15

0.46

1.41

0.94

1.30

M217591

2025

Channel

1.17

3.78

0.06

0.04

0.03

1.28

D751599

2024

Float

0.05

67.20

0.02

1.54

0.23

1.27

M217625

2025

Channel

0.35

20.84

0.55

0.02

0.61

1.22

M217673

2025

Channel

0.07

48.23

0.03

1.41

1.35

1.22

M217626

2025

Channel

0.84

17.58

0.18

0.00

0.02

1.22

M224854

2025

Grab

0.95

20.56

0.05

0.91

0.24

1.21

D750706

2025

Float

0.03

86.21

0.09

0.10

0.05

1.18

D750091

2024

Channel

0.02

56.00

0.13

0.07

1.40

1.18

D751193

2024

Grab

0.44

20.60

0.48

0.01

0.01

1.17

D750087

2024

Channel

0.14

37.00

0.00

1.49

0.91

1.15

D751945

2024

Grab

0.02

27.30

0.08

1.53

1.17

1.13

M217704

2025

Channel

1.07

1.61

0.02

0.01

0.02

1.11

M224856

2025

Grab

0.01

18.03

0.66

0.02

1.22

1.10

D750727

2025

Grab

0.00

28.20

0.83

0.00

0.02

1.07

D751835

2024

Chip

0.12

25.20

0.05

1.76

0.75

1.05

M224919

2025

Grab

0.86

8.94

0.03

0.17

0.01

1.03

M217602

2025

Channel

0.55

25.19

0.16

0.03

0.05

1.02

The Big One property is situated in a region that is well known for hosting Tier 1 precious metal and porphyry deposits, several of which occur near the property including the multiple porphyry systems at Galore Creek (12,159 million pounds of copper, 9.438 million ounces of gold, 174.086 million ounces of silver), the world’s largest known gold reserve at KSM (47.3 million ounces of gold, 160 million ounces of silver, 7.32 billion pounds of copper) and the polymetallic copper project at Shaft Creek (5 billion pounds of copper, 3.7 million ounces of gold, 16.4 million ounces of silver), as well as the Brucejack high-grade epithermal gold deposit (14 million ounces of gold, 91.8 million ounces of silver), and the structurally controlled high-grade hydrothermal gold-silver zones at Trophy and Sphal Creek. The property geology is favorable to host these types of deposits as confirmed by the presence of extensive areas of propylitic alteration, untested geophysical anomalies, strong silt, soil and rock geochemistry including path finder elements directly related to porphyry systems, key structures and textures, porphyry-style mineralization, and high-grade polymetallic veins, that have been discovered within the Big One claims.

The Big One property can be accessed year-round via helicopter from the Glenora/Telegraph Creek Road at the Barrington Mine (33 km to the north-northeast) as well as the Galore Creek Road (15 km to the southeast). The Canadian government committed $20 M to extend/improve the Galore Creek Road to within 15 km of the Big One property. The property is 2 km west of the Scud River airstrip used in the early days of Galore Creek.

The Big One property exploration qualifies for the Critical Mineral Exploration Tax Credit (CMETC).

The Company would like to extend a special thanks to the Tahltan First Nation, the local community, and service providers for supporting our efforts and contributing to the success of this year’s program. We look forward to continuing to work with the Tahltan First Nation and all local stakeholders and businesses while we move forward to unlocking the full potential of this amazing new discovery. WORKING TOGETHER WE SUCCEED!

About Juggernaut Exploration Ltd.

Juggernaut Exploration Ltd. is an explorer and generator of precious metals projects in the prolific Golden Triangle of northwestern British Columbia. Its projects are in world-class geological settings and geopolitical safe jurisdictions amenable to Tier 1 mining in Canada. Juggernaut is a member and active supporter of CASERM, an organization representing a collaborative venture between the Colorado School of Mines and Virginia Tech. Juggernaut’s key strategic cornerstone shareholder is Crescat Capital.

For more information, please contact:

Juggernaut Exploration Ltd.

Dan Stuart

President and Chief Executive Officer

Tel: (604)-559-8028

www.juggernautexploration.com

Follow us on LinkedIn: Click Here
Follow us on Facebook:
Click Here
Follow us on X / Twitter:
Click Here
Follow us on YouTube:
Click Here

Qualified Person

Rein Turna, P. Geo, is the qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, for Juggernaut Exploration projects, and supervised the preparation of, and has reviewed and approved, the technical information in this release.

Other

The reader is cautioned that grab samples are spot samples which are typically, but not exclusively, constrained to mineralization. Grab samples are selective in nature and collected to determine the presence or absence of mineralization and are not intended to be representative of the material sampled.

Grab, channels, chip and talus samples were collected by foot with helicopter assistance. Prospective areas included, but were not limited to, proximity to MINFile locations, placer creek occurrences, regional soil anomalies, and potential gossans based on high-resolution satellite imagery. The rock grab and chip samples were extracted using a rock hammer, or hammer and chisel to expose fresh surfaces and to liberate a sample of anywhere between 0.5 to 5.0 kilograms. All sample sites were flagged with biodegradable flagging tape and marked with the sample number. All sample sites were recorded using hand-held GPS units (accuracy 3-10 meters) and sample ID, easting, northing, elevation, type of sample (outcrop, subcrop, float, talus, chip, grab, etc.) and a description of the rock were recorded on all-weather paper. Samples are then inserted in a clean plastic bag with a sample tag for transport and shipping to the geochemistry lab. QA/QC samples including blanks, certified reference materials, and duplicate samples are inserted regularly into the sample sequence at a rate of 10%.

All samples are transported in rice bags sealed with numbered security tags. The rice bags are transported from the core shacks to the MSALABS facilities in Terrace, BC. MSALABS is certified with both AC89-IAS and ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2017. The core samples undergo preparation via drying, crushing to ~70% of the material passing a 2 mm sieve and riffle splitting. The sample splits are weighed and transferred into three plastic jars, each containing between 300 g and 500 g of crushed sample material. A 250 g split is pulverized to ensure at least 85% of the material passes through a 75 µm sieve. The crushed samples are transported to the MSALABS PhotonAssayTM facility in Prince George, where gold concentrations are quantified via photon assay analysis (method CPA-Au1). Samples that result in gold concentrations ≥5 ppm are analyzed to extinction. Photon assay uses high-energy X-rays (photons) to excite atomic nuclei within the jarred samples, inducing the emission of secondary gamma rays, which are measured to quantify gold concentrations. The assays from all jars are combined on a weight-averaged basis. Multielement analyses are carried at the MSALABS facilities in Surrey, BC, where 250 g of pulverized splits are analyzed via ICF6xx and IMS-230 methods. The IMS-230 method uses 4-acid digestion (a combination of hydrochloric, nitric, perchloric and hydrofluoric acids) followed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry to quantify concentrations of 48 elements. Samples with over-limit results for Ag, Cu, Pb and Zn undergo ore-grade analysis via the ICF-6xx method (where ‘xx’ denotes the target metal). This method employs 4-acid digestion followed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT

Certain disclosures in this release may constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties relating to Juggernaut’s operations that may cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements, including its ability to complete the contemplated private placement. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements.

NOT FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES OR TO U.S. PERSONS OR FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES. THIS PRESS RELEASE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR AN INVITATION TO PURCHASE ANY SECURITIES DESCRIBED IN it.

NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.

Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Questcorp Mining Inc. (CSE: QQQ,OTC:QQCMF) (OTCQB: QQCMF) (FSE: D910) (the ‘Company’ or ‘Questcorp’) completed the first tranche of its non-brokered private placement (the ‘Offering’) on October 24, 2025. In connection with closing of the first tranche, the Company issued 14,000,334 units (each, a ‘Unit’) at a price of $0.15 per Unit for gross proceeds of $2,100,050. Each Unit consists of one common share of the Company (each, a ‘Share’) and one-half-of-one share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, an ‘Warrant’). Each Warrant entitles the holder to acquire an additional common share of the Company at a price of $0.20 until October 24, 2027, subject to accelerated expiry in the event the closing price of the Shares is $0.50 or higher for ten consecutive trading days.

A portion of the Units issued under the first tranche the Offering, representing $2,000,000 are held pursuant to a sharing agreement entered into with an institutional investor, Sorbie Bornholm LP (‘Sorbie‘) and the Company (the ‘Sharing Agreement‘). Funds deposited under the Sharing Agreement are secured in escrow with a third-party. The Sharing Agreement provides that the Company’s economic interest will be determined in twenty-four monthly settlement tranches as measured against the Benchmark Price (as defined herein). Unless subject to adjustment, each monthly settlement tranche will total $79,792.

If, at the time of settlement, the Settlement Price (determined monthly based on a volume-weighted average price for twenty trading days prior to the settlement date) (the ‘Settlement Price‘) exceeds the benchmark price of $0.1949 (the ‘Benchmark Price‘), the Company shall receive more than one-hundred percent of the monthly settlement due, on a pro-rata basis. There is no upper limit placed on the additional proceeds receivable by the Company as part of the monthly settlements. If, at the time of settlement, the Settlement Price is below the Benchmark Price of $0.1949, the Company will receive less than one-hundred percent of the monthly settlement due on a pro-rata basis. In no event will a decline in the Settlement Price of the Units result in an increase or decrease in the number of Units being issued to Sorbie, but it could result in the Company receiving less than the full amount of the subscription received from Sorbie or in the Company receiving a nominal amount for a particular month.

As an example, the following are the monthly settlement amounts the Company would receive based on varying Settlement Prices:

Settlement Price Monthly Settlement Amount
$0.2449 $100,262
$0.1949 (Benchmark Price) $79,792
$0.1449 $59,322

 

For further information concerning the Offering, readers are encouraged to review the news release issued by the Company on October 27, 2025.

About Questcorp Mining Inc.

Questcorp Mining Inc. is engaged in the business of the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in North America, with the objective of locating and developing economic precious and base metals properties of merit. The Company holds an option to acquire an undivided 100% interest in and to mineral claims totaling 1,168.09 hectares comprising the North Island Copper Property, on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, subject to a royalty obligation. The Company also holds an option to acquire an undivided 100% interest in and to mineral claims totaling 2,520.2 hectares comprising the La Union Project located in Sonora, Mexico, subject to a royalty obligation.

Contact Information

Questcorp Mining Corp.

Saf Dhillon, President & CEO

Email: saf@questcorpmining.ca
Telephone: (604) 484-3031

This news release includes certain ‘forward-looking statements’ under applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties, uncertain capital markets; and delay or failure to receive board or regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that the geophysical surveys will be completed as contemplated or at all and that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/273791

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Detroit Lions wide receiver Amon-Ra St. Brown was well aware of who was in attendance for the Lions’ Week 10 clash with the Washington Commanders in the nation’s capital.

After scoring a touchdown in the first quarter, St. Brown pointed toward the suite level at Northwest Stadium – where President Donald Trump was taking in the Week 10 game – before celebrating his score with a ‘Trump dance.’

The dance, inspired by the president’s unique dance moves, involves pumping both fists in the air while swaying the hips.

The dance’s use as a celebration first swept across the sports world last fall, shortly after Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election. Multiple athletes across a variety of professional sports leagues – and college athletics – have mimicked Trump’s dance moves to use as a celebration the 12 months since.

USA TODAY confirmed that Trump would be attending the Commanders’ Week 10 game on Nov. 7. ESPN’s Pat McAfee initially reported the president was joining Josh Harris, the Commanders’ principal owner, in a suite at Northwest Stadium.

On Nov. 8, ESPN reported that Trump and the White House had been in contact with Harris and the Commanders to express his desire for the team’s new stadium to be named after him. Washington plans to have its $3.7 billion project built on the site of the old Robert F. Kennedy Stadium – the home of the football team from 1961 to 1996 – within the city limits of the nation’s capital.

The Nov. 9 game between the Commanders and Lions is the second NFL game President Trump has attended since his inauguration in January. The first was Super Bowl 59 in February.

Trump has also attended the FIFA Club World Cup, Daytona 500, U.S. Open men’s singles final, Ryder Cup and two UFC fights during his second term in the Oval Office.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 2025 MLS Cup Playoffs are through the best-of-three Round 1 series and the journey toward the Dec. 6 championship game will continue with the conference semifinals.

In Round 1, the higher-seeded teams won seven of the eight matchups. The Philadelphia Union, the 2025 Supporters’ Shield winners, swept their first-round series; so did Los Angeles FC and the Vancouver Whitecaps. Lionel Messi and Inter Miami avoided a first-round playoff upset this time around, dispatching Nashville SC in three games.

Here is a look at the schedule for the conference semifinals for the 2025 MLS Cup Playoffs:

MLS Cup Playoffs 2025: Results and upcoming schedule

CONFERENCE SEMIFINALS

Eastern Conference

  • FC Cincinnati vs. Inter Miami — Sunday, Nov. 23, 5 p.m. ET
  • Philadelphia Union vs. New York City FC — Sunday, Nov. 23, 7:30 p.m. ET (FS1)

Western Conference

  • Vancouver Whitecaps vs. Los Angeles FC — Saturday, Nov. 22, 9:30 p.m. ET
  • San Diego FC vs. Minnesota United — Monday, Nov. 24, 10 p.m. ET

Watch the MLS playoffs on Apple TV

ROUND 1

Philadelphia Union vs. Chicago Fire

Philadelphia Union win series, 2-0

  • Game 1: Philadelphia Union 2, Chicago Fire 2 (Philadelphia won penalty shootout, 4-2)
  • Game 2: Philadelphia Union 3, Chicago Fire 0

FC Cincinnati vs. Columbus Crew

FC Cincinnati wins series, 2-1

  • Game 1: FC Cincinnati 1, Columbus Crew 0
  • Game 2: Columbus Crew 4, FC Cincinnati 0
  • Game 3: FC Cincinnati 2, Columbus Crew 1

Inter Miami vs. Nashville SC

Inter Miami wins series, 2-1

  • Game 1: Inter Miami 3, Nashville SC 1
  • Game 2: Nashville SC 2, Inter Miami 1
  • Game 3: Inter Miami 4, Nashville SC 0

Charlotte FC vs. New York City FC

NYCFC wins series, 2-1

  • Game 1: New York City FC 1, Charlotte FC 0
  • Game 2: Charlotte FC 0, New York City FC 0 (Charlotte won penalty shootout, 7-6)
  • Game 3: New York City FC 3, Charlotte FC 1

San Diego FC vs. Portland Timbers

San Diego FC wins series, 2-1

  • Game 1: San Diego FC 2, Portland Timbers 1
  • Game 2: Portland Timbers 2, San Diego FC 2 (Portland won penalty shootout, 3-2)
  • Game 3: San Diego FC 4, Portland Timbers 0

Vancouver Whitecaps vs. FC Dallas

Vancouver Whitecaps win series, 2-0

  • Game 1: Vancouver Whitecaps 3, FC Dallas 0
  • Game 2: Vancouver Whitecaps 1, FC Dallas 1 (Vancouver won penalty shootout, 4-2)

Los Angeles FC vs. Austin FC

LAFC wins series, 2-1

  • Game 1: Los Angeles FC 2, Austin FC 1
  • Game 2: Los Angeles FC 4, Austin FC 1

Minnesota United vs. Seattle Sounders

Minnesota United wins series, 2-1

  • Game 1: Minnesota United 0, Seattle Sounders 0 (Minnesota won penalty shootout, 3-2)
  • Game 2: Seattle Sounders 4, Minnesota United 2
  • Game 3: Minnesota United 3, Seattle Sounders 3 (Minnesota won penalty shootout, 7-6)

WILD-CARD ROUND

  • Chicago Fire FC 3, Orlando City SC 1
  • Portland Timbers 3, Real Salt Lake 1

2025 MLS playoff schedule

  • Oct. 22: Wild-card matches (single-elimination matches)
  • Oct. 24-Nov. 9: Round 1 (best-of-three series)
  • Nov. 22-24: Conference semifinals (single-elimination matches)
  • Nov. 29-30: Conference finals (single-elimination matches)
  • Dec. 6: MLS Cup (single winner-take-all match)

MLS Cup: Results of every championship game since 1996

  • 2024: Los Angeles Galaxy over New York Red Bulls (Dignity Health Sports Park), 2-1.
  • 2023: Columbus Crew over Los Angeles FC (Lower.com Field), 2-1
  • 2022: Los Angeles FC over Philadelphia Union (Banc of California Stadium), 3-3 (LAFC won penalty shootout, 3-0)
  • 2021: New York City FC over Portland Timbers (Providence Park), 1-1 (NYCFC won penalty shootout, 4-2)
  • 2020: Columbus Crew over Seattle Sounders FC (Mapfre Stadium), 3-0
  • 2019: Seattle Sounders FC over Toronto FC (CenturyLink Field), 3-1
  • 2018: Atlanta United over Portland Timbers (Mercedes-Benz Stadium), 2-0
  • 2017: Toronto FC over Seattle Sounders FC (BMO Field), 2-0
  • 2016: Seattle Sounders FC over Toronto FC (BMO Field), 0-0 (Sounders won penalty shootout, 5-4)
  • 2015: Portland Timbers over Columbus Crew (Mapfre Stadium), 2-1
  • 2014: Los Angeles Galaxy over New England Revolution (StubHub Center), 2-1 (extra time)
  • 2013: Sporting Kansas City over Real Salt Lake (Sporting Park), 1-1 (SKC won penalty shootout, 7-6)
  • 2012: Los Angeles Galaxy over Houston Dynamo (Home Depot Center), 3-1
  • 2011: Los Angeles Galaxy over Houston Dynamo (Home Depot Center), 1-0
  • 2010: Colorado Rapids over FC Dallas (BMO Field), 2-1 (extra time)
  • 2009: Real Salt Lake over Los Angeles Galaxy (Qwest Field), 1-1 (RSL won penalty shootout, 5-4)
  • 2008: Columbus Crew over New York Red Bulls (Home Depot Center), 3-1
  • 2007: Houston Dynamo over New England Revolution (RFK Stadium), 2-1
  • 2006: Houston Dynamo over New England Revolution (Pizza Hut Park), 1-1 (Dynamo won penalty shootout, 4-3)
  • 2005: Los Angeles Galaxy over New England Revolution (Pizza Hut Park), 1-0 (extra time)
  • 2004: D.C. United over Kansas City Wizards (Home Depot Center), 3-2
  • 2003: San Jose Earthquakes over Chicago Fire (Home Depot Center), 4-2
  • 2002: Los Angeles Galaxy over New England Revolution (Gillette Stadium), 1-0 (extra time)
  • 2001: San Jose Earthquakes over Los Angeles Galaxy (Crew Stadium), 2-1 (extra time)
  • 2000: Kansas City Wizards over Chicago Fire (RFK Stadium), 1-0
  • 1999: D.C. United over Los Angeles Galaxy (Foxboro Stadium), 2-0
  • 1998: Chicago Fire over D.C. United (Rose Bowl), 2-0
  • 1997: D.C. United over Colorado Rapids (RFK Stadium), 2-1
  • 1996: D.C. United over Los Angeles Galaxy (Foxboro Stadium), 3-2 (extra time)

USA TODAY Sports’ 48-page special edition commemorates 30 years of Major League Soccer, from its best players to key milestones and championship dynasties to what exciting steps are next with the World Cup ahead. Order your copy today!

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Every week for the duration of the 2025 NFL regular season, USA TODAY Sports will provide timely updates to the league’s ever-evolving playoff picture − typically starting after Sunday afternoon’s late games and then moving forward for the remainder of the week (through Monday’s and Thursday’s games or Saturday’s, if applicable. And, when the holidays roll around, we’ll be watching then, too.)

What just happened? What does it mean? What are the pertinent factors (and, perhaps, tiebreakers) prominently in play as each conference’s seven-team bracket begins to crystallize? All will be explained and analyzed up to the point when the postseason field is finalized on Sunday, Jan. 4.

Here’s where things stand with Week 10 of the 2025 season nearly complete:

NFC playoff picture

1. Seattle Seahawks (7-2), NFC West leaders: They reside atop the conference and division … for now. Winners of four in a row, they currently have a better record in NFC West games than the Rams, who are also 7-2. But those clubs will meet in LA in Week 11. Also, Seattle could lose the No. 1 spot Monday night. Remaining schedule: at Rams, at Titans, vs. Vikings, at Falcons, vs. Colts, vs. Rams, at Panthers, at 49ers

2. Philadelphia Eagles (6-2), NFC East leaders: Something catastrophic (not uncommon in Philly) would have to occur for the defending champs not to be the first back-to-back winners of this division since they last did it … 21 years ago. A superior record in NFC games would allow the Eagles to move ahead of the Seahawks if they can win at Green Bay on Monday. Remaining schedule: at Packers, vs. Lions, at Cowboys, vs. Bears, at Chargers, vs. Raiders, at Commanders, at Bills, vs. Commanders

3. Green Bay Packers (5-2-1), NFC North leaders: With losses to Cleveland and Carolina, it’s certainly been an uneven campaign to date for an ultra-talented team. But a loss Monday to the Eagles would drop the Pack from first place to third in their division. Remaining schedule: vs. Eagles, at Giants, vs. Vikings, at Lions, vs. Bears, at Broncos, at Bears, vs. Ravens, at Vikings

4. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (6-3), NFC South leaders: You can afford to drop two of three in a division the Bucs have ruled since 2021. Remaining schedule: at Bills, at Rams, vs. Cardinals, vs. Saints, vs. Falcons, at Panthers, at Dolphins, vs. Panthers

5. Los Angeles Rams (7-2), wild card No. 1: Winners of four straight, all in dominant fashion, they have a strong case as the league’s best team at the moment. Yet a Week 3 loss at Lincoln Financial Field could come back to haunt them when the NFC playoff field is seeded. Remaining schedule: vs. Seahawks, vs. Buccaneers, at Panthers, at Cardinals, vs. Lions, at Seahawks, at Falcons, vs. Cardinals

6. Detroit Lions (6-3), wild card No. 2: The offense responded Sunday as Dan Campbell assumed the offensive play-calling. Detroit could assume first place in the NFC North on Monday night. Remaining schedule: at Eagles, vs. Giants, vs. Packers, vs. Cowboys, at Rams, vs. Steelers, at Vikings, at Bears.

7. Chicago Bears (6-3), wild card No. 3: They’ve won six of seven since an 0-2 start but have struggled to beat seemingly weaker teams − as happened Sunday against the Giants. Remaining schedule: at Vikings, vs. Steelers, at Eagles, at Packers, vs. Browns, vs. Packers, at 49ers, vs. Lions

AFC playoff picture

1. Indianapolis Colts (8-2), AFC South leaders: The schedule’s been soft, but you can’t control whom you play − though the second-half lineup seems much less forgiving. A 6-1 record in conference games currently gives Indy the advantage over Denver and New England. Remaining schedule: BYE, at Chiefs, vs. Texans, at Jaguars, at Seahawks, vs. 49ers, vs. Jaguars, at Texans

2. Denver Broncos (8-2), AFC West leaders: They’re also winning a lot of ugly games − as they did Thursday night against Las Vegas. But wins are wins − and the Broncos have one more in AFC play than the Patriots do right now. Remaining schedule: vs. Chiefs, BYE, at Commanders, at Raiders, vs. Packers, vs. Jaguars, at Chiefs, vs. Chargers

3. New England Patriots (8-2), AFC East leaders: They’re in position to win the division for the first time since Tom Brady led them to first place in 2019 and maybe their first No. 1 seed since 2017. Not a whole lot of seemingly tough matchups from here on out. Remaining schedule: vs. Jets, at Bengals, vs. Giants, BYE, vs. Bills, at Ravens, at Jets, vs. Dolphins

4. Pittsburgh Steelers (5-4), AFC North leaders: Don’t look now, fellas, but you’re only one game up on Baltimore for the division lead. Remaining schedule: vs. Bengals, at Bears, vs. Bills, at Ravens, vs. Dolphins, at Lions, at Browns, vs. Ravens

5. Los Angeles Chargers (7-3), wild card No. 1: They manhandled Pittsburgh in prime time, offering fresh evidence that maybe they can overcome their litany of injuries. Remaining schedule: at Jaguars, BYE, vs. Raiders, vs. Eagles, at Chiefs, at Cowboys, vs. Texans, at Broncos

6. Buffalo Bills (6-3), wild card No. 2: They’re starting to lose sight of the Patriots atop the AFC East after a pathetic performance at Miami on Sunday. Remaining schedule: vs. Buccaneers, at Texans, at Steelers, vs. Bengals, at Patriots, at Browns, vs. Eagles, vs. Jets

7. Jacksonville Jaguars (5-4), wild card No. 3: Tough loss at Houston on Sunday. But their Week 5 defeat of the Chiefs, who are also 5-4, could eventually loom large for both teams. Remaining schedule: vs. Chargers, at Cardinals, at Titans, vs. Colts, vs. Jets, at Broncos, vs. Colts, at Titans

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump became the first sitting president to attend a NFL regular-season game since 1978 when he showed up to the Detroit Lions’ drubbing of the Washington Commanders in Landover, Maryland on Sunday, Nov. 9.

The crowd let the 45th president know how they felt by booing him (with a smattering of cheers) while being shown on the video board at Northwest Stadium and during a halftime military swearing-in ceremony, which Trump led.

Trump also spent a few minutes of the third quarter being interviewed by the FOX broadcast team of Kenny Albert and Jonathan Vilma.

‘It’s a microcosm of life,’ Trump answered when Albert asked him why he loved sports. ‘It’s sort of like life: the good, the bad, the ugly.

‘You have the triumph. You have the problems. You got to get through the problems to hit the triumphs. You can never quit. You can never give up.’

Standing between the two broadcasters, Trump complimented injured Commanders quarterback Jayden Daniels and praised backup Marcus Mariota – without mentioning their names and referring to them as ‘second-string’ and ‘first-string.’ He alluded to the Lions’ trade of Matthew Stafford for Jared Goff and said it worked out for both sides.

The broadcast showed a team photo from Trump’s football-playing days, uniform No. 85, at New York Military Academy. Trump admitted he never scored a touchdown.

‘I actually loved playing football … at least you realize that I never tell a lie,’ Trump said.

It seems Trump has strayed from his New York allegiances as a fan of both the Giants and Jets. There was praise of one of Vilma’s teammates with the New Orleans Saints, quarterback Drew Brees. As far as his game analysis, Trump harped on the importance of the Commanders’ drive as they trailed 32-10.

Vilma asked him about the general health of the nation. The stock market hit an all-time high, Trump said, along with his claim that ‘prices are coming down.’

‘We’re doing great,’ Trump said. ‘Just how (the Commanders) are doing right now.’

Mariota hit Deebo Samuel for a touchdown to cut the deficit to 32-16 after he said that.

‘I love ratings,’ Trump later said. ‘But you guys have the ratings.’

Trump went on to wax poetic about Washington coaches of the past and name-dropped George Allen and Joe Gibbs.

When Albert gave Trump the opening to exit stage left, Trump replied, ‘I’d love to have your job.’

Trump is no stranger to sporting events. He attended Super Bowl 59 in New Orleans in February shortly after beginning his second term. He was also on hand for the first day of play at the Ryder Cup in New York, the Major League Baseball playoffs and the men’s final of the US Open.

Trump attempted to purchase the Buffalo Bills in 2014 and his relationship with the league while in office is a complicated one, from his bashing of the protests that took place during the national anthem during his first term to standing in the Oval Office with commissioner Roger Goodell earlier this year to announce that the 2027 NFL draft will be held in Washington D.C. ESPN reported Nov. 8 that Trump wants the Commanders’ new stadium, at the former RFK Stadium site in Washington, to be named after him.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Despite Gardner’s debut, the Colts narrowly defeated the Atlanta Falcons 31-25 in overtime, relying on running back Jonathan Taylor.
  • The trade signals the Colts are betting on their current roster, which may lead to a large contract extension for quarterback Daniel Jones.
  • History suggests a lockdown cornerback alone is not enough to guarantee Super Bowl success, which typically depends on elite quarterback play.

Having a lockdown cornerback in the NFL is basically the same as having a lockdown left tackle – awfully nice but hardly predictive of Super Bowl success.

Maybe the Indianapolis Colts, who forked over two first-round draft picks to the New York Jets for corner Sauce Gardner ahead of the league’s Nov. 4 trade deadline can disprove that. But Sunday’s (very) early returns suggest otherwise.

The Colts are now 8-2 and back atop the overall AFC standings after escaping the Atlanta Falcons 31-25 in overtime in the first-ever regular-season game staged in Berlin. After a crash course into his new playbook, Gardner, who hasn’t exactly been airtight in coverage after earning All-Pro honors in 2022 and ’23, seemed to do fine in his Indy debut.

He was regularly deployed to guard Drake London, Atlanta’s top receiver and a guy coming off a three-touchdown performance at New England in Week 9. London wound up with six catches for 104 yards Sunday. However, per Next Gen Stats, he only secured two of four targets for 26 yards against Gardner, who nearly registered his first pick of 2025 while covering him. London did snare a TD on a play that Gardner was either schemed out of or made a bad decision on.

“I mean, man, I’m going to be honest; it was like a tough week for me, like mentally, just trying to learn all the plays,” said Gardner.

“I started watching tape on Cleveland, then already had to switch and watch tape on Atlanta, and that’s besides having to hurry up and fly to Indy and then hurry up and fly to Berlin.”

London also beat Gardner, who slipped, on a two-point conversion inside of two minutes to go that gave Atlanta a three-point lead before Indianapolis tied the game in the final minute of regulation.

“I was sick after that,” said Gardner, who vowed to tighten things up in overtime, when the Falcons had -8 yards on five plays.

But that’s really the rub.

Gardner couldn’t much help a team that was so often abysmal in gotta-have-it situations, the Colts 4-for-16 combined on third and fourth downs. He couldn’t bolster the blocking of an offensive line that struggled in key spots and surrendered seven sacks. He wasn’t able to limit the mistakes of quarterback Daniel Jones, who turned the ball over twice – giving him seven giveaways over the past two games (after committing three in the first eight) in a frightening reversion to the version of himself whom New York Giants fans were so familiar with. Defensively, the Colts seemed to miss injured defensive tackle DeForest Buckner much more than they needed whatever Gardner gave them Sunday.

Ultimately, running back Jonathan Taylor, a legit MVP candidate, saved the day with 244 rushing yards and three touchdowns, including an 83-yarder in the fourth quarter and the decisive score from 8 yards out in overtime.

“They go as Jonathan Taylor goes,’ said NFL Network analyst and former Pro Bowler Gerald McCoy.

‘You take away JT, you put it in Daniel Jones’ hands – we don’t know what’ll happen.”

Yup.

As pleasant a surprise as the conference-leading Colts have generally been this season – I certainly didn’t foresee this level of success unfolding – general manager Chris Ballard has now made a bed with what could be a mattress on a short shelf life. By acquiring Gardner for the hefty price he paid, Ballard has bet big on his team – and GMs should do that when they feel like their roster is Super Bowl-caliber or close to it. Gardner is a player who would need to earn his stripes in the playoffs against quarterbacks like Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen or Lamar Jackson – but he’s likely not going to make that much of a difference immediately in what’s typically an eminently winnable AFC South.

By extension, Ballard is also obligated to re-sign Jones, who’s playing on a one-year deal, to a sizable contract extension – the same mistake the Giants made after the 2022 season and ultimately regretted. Yet given Ballard’s next Round 1 selection is scheduled for the 2028 draft and 2023 first-rounder Anthony Richardson is just about relegated to bust status (at least in Indianapolis), the GM now has little recourse but to hope Jones’ marriage with head coach Shane Steichen is built to last in a way the union to Brian Daboll wasn’t.

The Colts – their losses this season have come against the division-leading Los Angeles Rams and Pittsburgh Steelers – have fattened their record this season against the likes of the Miami Dolphins, Las Vegas Raiders, Arizona Cardinals, Tennessee Titans (twice) and now the Jekyll-and-Hyde Falcons, who fell to 3-6 Sunday and have been manhandled this season by the Dolphins and the Carolina Panthers.

Moving forward, with potential future battles against Mahomes, Jackson, Allen, et al. looming, the Colts are banking that Jones can be a rarity – a largely ordinary QB1 like Nick Foles or Joe Flacco who can break through with a postseason hot streak that leads to Lombardi glory. If that happens, then Gardner will join a list that includes Stephon Gilmore, Darrelle Revis, Jalen Ramsey and even the incomparable Deion Sanders – topflight corners who couldn’t lead their original teams to success but subsequently won rings with squads largely propelled by Hall of Fame-caliber quarterbacks.

Barring that?

After betting the farm on Gardner and eventually Jones, Ballard’s years-long quarterback conundrum could ultimately be his undoing … perhaps thanks in part to his new cornerback.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY