Author

admin

Browsing
  • Defensive players rule the 2026 NFL draft midseason rankings, with Caleb Downs, Rueben Bain Jr. and Arvell Reese at the top.
  • Fernando Mendoza and Dante Moore are vying for the top QB spot, but LaNorris Sellers and Ty Simpson are in the mix, too.
  • Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson is the top-rated offensive player and receiver.

The 2026 NFL Draft is exactly six months away, leaving plenty of time for the picture to shift in the league’s much-hyped annual ‘Player Selection Meeting.’ But the first half of the college football season has already done much to reset the prevailing wisdom about the upcoming class.

New top quarterbacks have emerged while others have faded in a position group that offers little in the way of certainty. Several top prospects at other positions have entrenched themselves as likely early selections, while a handful of stars have shot to the top of draft boards amid breakout seasons. And yet there’s still bound to be more changes to come in the weeks and months ahead as the action continues and the pre-draft process ramps up.

With that said, here’s our latest look at the top 50 prospects for the 2026 NFL Draft:

2026 NFL draft rankings

1. Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State

If you had to pick a player most likely to become an All-Pro from this class, he’d be your choice. Downs’ stock might hinge on whether teams get stuck on his positional label or can envision him as more of the do-everything defender he’s demonstrated himself to be for a Buckeyes defense allowing just 5.9 points per game. He can clean up almost anything on the back end and be a legitimate force against the run.

2. Rueben Bain Jr., DE, Miami (Fla.)

At 6-3 and 275 pounds, he’s a true terror off the edge. But unlike many pass-rushing prospects his age, that’s not due to pure speed. Instead, Bain makes life miserable for opposing blockers by locking on and uprooting them. When he’s not merely driving through linemen, he’s proven adept at shedding them with active hands. Though his consistent pressure has yielded just two sacks in 2025, his forcefulness in both the pass and run game augurs well for his pro projection.

3. Arvell Reese, LB, Ohio State

The college football world has taken a shine to the Buckeyes’ breakout defender, who leads his team with 42 tackles. But his true admirers are likely waiting at the next level. At 6-4 and 243 pounds, Reese can comfortably spy quarterbacks or handle coverage assignments. His real appeal, however, might be in what he can afford a pass rush, as his impressive closing speed has helped him secure 5 ½ sacks so far this season.

4. Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State

He entered the season as the front-runner to be the first receiver taken in what seemed to be shaping up as a lackluster class at the position. But while his peers have stepped up their game, so too has Tyson. A fluid threat who can separate at all three levels, the 6-2, 200-pound target ranks fifth among Power Four players with 628 receiving yards and second with eight touchdown catches.

5. Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana

At 6-5 and 225 pounds, the Cal transfer has long looked the part of a top quarterback pick. Now he’s playing like one, too. Mendoza has been nearly flawless in orchestrating Indiana’s prolific attack, throwing 21 touchdowns with just two interceptions while averaging 9.7 yards per attempt. Precision is no problem for him, as he rhythmically picks apart defenses from the pocket with a 73.5% completion rate. But things can be a little bit for him when he’s forced off his spot, so proving he can extend plays and thrive out of structure would help answer one of the few outstanding questions about his play.

6. Dante Moore, QB, Oregon

The former five-star recruit’s rapid ascension has changed the complexion of a quarterback class that once looked short on first-round options. In his first season at the helm at Oregon after a rocky true freshman debut in 2023 at UCLA, Moore has shown poise beyond his years, tossing 19 touchdowns while exploiting defenses both from the pocket and on the move. Only a redshirt sophomore, he doesn’t have to hop into this year’s draft if things get more difficult down the stretch and his stock takes a hit. If he remains on his current trajectory, though, there might not be much reason to stick around.

7. Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame

A 228-yard rushing outing against USC drove home how much distance Love has built on the pack for the title of college football’s best back. A springy and elastic runner, the 6-0, 214-pound ball carrier can transform a backfield with his big-play ability. He’s not as complete a player as Ashton Jeanty was last year, however, and matching the former Boise State back’s draft slot looks like a stretch given how some of the teams that used top picks on running backs in April have continued to struggle in the ground game.

8. Peter Woods, DT, Clemson

The full leap into consistent dominance hasn’t yet materialized amid the Tigers’ widespread woes. Still, when Woods is on, there’s no interior presence that’s more disruptive. The high-end flashes and upper-echelon athleticism are enough to keep him squarely in the conversation for a top-five spot in the draft, but he’d help his cause significantly with a strong finish to the season.

9. Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami (Fla.)

In a deep class for offensive tackles, Mauigoa shapes up as the stoutest option. That’s certainly true from a physique standpoint, as the 6-6, 335-pounder resembles a boulder at right tackle. But he’s also been arguably the most reliable blocker of all the top prospects in this class, with his pass-protection chops catching up to his formidable work paving holes in the run game.

10. Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon

The 6-3, 245-pounder has entered full-scale offensive weapon territory, moving beyond the bounds of typical tight end usage while threatening defenses both down the seam and after the catch. Sadiq, however, is not merely a glorified receiver, as he’s also established himself as a devastating downfield blocker in the run game.

11. Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson

If Clemson had more players like Terrell, perhaps the school’s season wouldn’t have gone south so quickly. The younger brother of Atlanta Falcons cornerback A.J. Terrell plays far bigger than his 5-11, 180-pound frame, especially when it comes to run support and operating as a blitzer. NFL teams will covet him for how he balances aggression in pursuing the ball in coverage with seldom giving up big plays.

12. Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU

The term shutdown corner is thrown around too liberally, but the label certainly seems warranted in capturing the Virginia Tech transfer’s work this season. Delane has seldom been tested but surrendered essentially nothing – six catches on 23 targets – in the few instances in which teams have looked his way. Smooth and savvy in every phase of coverage, the 6-0, 190-pound corner will be especially appealing to teams that lean heavily on man-to-man matchups.

13. Keldric Faulk, DE, Auburn

At the very least, he should thrive as a run-stopping force, engulfing ball carriers at the line of scrimmage with his 6-6, 285-pound frame. What will really put him over the top, though, is additional development as a pass rusher after he collected seven sacks in 2024. There haven’t been many signs of progress so far this fall, but Faulk’s penchant for shedding blocks underscores untapped upside.

14. Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State

To some, he might just be the link between rookie sensation Emeka Egbuka and forthcoming phenom Jeremiah Smith in Ohio State’s incredible pipeline of pro receivers. But the Buckeyes’ newest go-to target has made a name for himself by averaging 17.3 yards per catch. The 6-3, 195-pounder is particularly valuable when bailing out his quarterback with his body control along the sidelines and knack for securing contested catches, though he’s also demonstrated a nuanced approach to freeing himself against both man and zone coverages.

15. Makai Lemon, WR, USC

In another era, his modest size (5-11 and 195 pounds) might have relegated him to a spot on Day 2 or beyond. With former USC standout Amon-Ra St. Brown and other undersized receivers thriving as critical weapons for their respective offenses, however, he stands to cash in on a season that has seen him sprint out to the lead in receiving yards among Power Four players with 758. Quick and sure-handed, Lemon figures to remain a high-volume target who will feast in the short-to-intermediate area.

16. T.J. Parker, DE, Clemson

At 6-3 and 260 pounds with a wealth of production (16 ½ sacks, 32 tackles for loss) in his first two seasons, Parker meets several of the standards for a first-round edge rusher. But his junior campaign has seen him take a bit of a step back, particularly in pressuring opposing quarterbacks. With a little more consistency, though, his bully-ball approach should translate well to the next level.

17. David Bailey, OLB, Texas Tech

Hotly pursued in the transfer portal, he’s gone from intriguing edge rusher at Stanford to the Football Bowl Subdivision’s sack leader with 10 ½. The 6-3, 250-pounder’s game is predicated on speed, and with good reason. Bailey is a blur off the line of scrimmage, and he can snake past blockers or beat them with an impressive array of moves. Questions about his strength might lead to his rush stalling out at times and leave him vulnerable in the run game, but defenders with this much juice don’t tend to hang around long.

18. Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama

One look at the 6-7, 366-pound blinside protector reveals that he figures to be a unique evaluation. Proctor sparked some concerns with his early struggles, but he’s since settled down. Though his size will leave some unease about his leverage and balance, he’s an outstanding athlete who has the makeup to handle NFL edge rushers.

19. LaNorris Sellers, QB, South Carolina

This is admittedly splitting the difference on a polarizing prospect. Between his superlative arm strength and rare running ability, the 6-3, 240-pound signal-caller possesses more than enough pure talent to merit a top-five selection. But his development as a passer hasn’t quite taken off at the level many had hoped to see from the redshirt sophomore. If and when it does, though, he could shoot to the top of draft boards.

20. Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama

The sample size is small, with only seven starts under his belt. But Simpson is defying all expectations, racing out to the SEC lead in touchdown passes (16) while playing virtually mistake-free football since the season-opening loss to Florida State. QB1 status isn’t out of the question if he keeps going at this pace.

21. Spencer Fano, OT, Utah

An accomplished pass protector who looks tailor-made for a zone-blocking scheme, Fano has a way of exerting a certain degree of control no matter what scenario he faces. But his lean build likely will lead to questions of whether he needs to move inside at the next level, which could drag down his stock a good deal.

22. Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee

He’s still yet to make his return this season after suffering a torn anterior cruciate ligament in January, an injury that no doubt will loom over his draft stock. Yet McCoy’s playmaking credentials are not to be questioned after he notched four interceptions and 11 passes defensed last season for the Volunteers after transferring from Oregon State. The next month will be vital in establishing his trajectory.

23. Matayo Uigalelei, DE, Oregon 

There’s not much mystery to a player who goes by ‘Young Concrete.’ The 6-5, 272-pounder wins with unmatched tenacity and a comfort in walking blockers backward. Honing his counters and becoming a more reliable presence against the run would elevate his game considerably, but both tasks seem within reach for a player who has shown impressive capacity for growth after also starring at tight end in high school.

24. CJ Allen, LB, Georgia

Wherever the ball is, Allen surely isn’t far behind, as the Bulldogs linebacker sticks to his man in coverage and tracks down opponents in the backfield. The 6-1, 235-pounder will have to continue to find ways to slip past bigger blockers in the pros, but his agility and craftiness help him avoid being engulfed.

25. Denzel Boston, WR, Washington

At 6-4 and 210 pounds, he’s what you would expect from a receiver consistently asked to haul in deep heaves and contested catches. A build not conducive to quick-twitch movements can be problematic in his efforts to beat press coverage and get going in his releases, but he has enough build-up speed to threaten defensive backs once he’s rolling.

26. Chris Brazzell II, WR, Tennessee

The Tulane transfer hasn’t kept up the torrid pace he set in the early season after burning Georgia for three touchdowns, but he’s still announced himself as one of the country’s pre-eminent deep threats. While working downfield will be his calling card early in his career, he’s also shown potential for growth – particularly as an intermediate target – beyond the basic route tree he’s asked to run in Tennessee’s offense.

27. Olaivavega Ioane, G, Penn State

The Nittany Lions’ season has been a downright disaster, but don’t place any of the blame on Ioane. The 6-3, 328-pound blocker continues to dole out punishment in the run game, but the massive progress he’s made as a pass protector has enabled him to become the leading candidate to be the first interior lineman selected next April.

28. Germie Bernard, WR, Alabama

From his previous stints at Michigan State and Washington to working alongside Ryan Williams in 2024, Bernard once seemed destined to max out with a complementary role in college. But amid Williams’ early struggles, the senior has reached a new level in 2025 by showing just how effective he can be as a go-to target. From creating separation to piling up yards after the catch, he has a strong handle on plenty of skills that will make him a central figure to any offense.

29. Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee

After learning behind Travis Hunter at Colorado last season, Hood has gotten his own turn to step into a playmaker role with an SEC-leading seven passes defensed. The 6-0, 195-pounder has the physical makeup and ball skills to hang in man coverage, though he’ll need to affirm that he can match up with the best receivers the conference has to offer.

30. Zion Young, DE, Missouri

With four sacks in his last four games – including two as part of an effort to close out a double-overtime win against Auburn – Young already has developed a strong finishing touch. Comfortable grappling with offensive tackles in the run game, the 6-5, 262-pounder is a well-rounded threat on the edge with a fairly high floor.

31. Caleb Lomu, OT, Utah

He represents the less heralded half of the Utes’ bookend blockers, but Lomu has a strong chance to join Fano as an early pick. Though the matchup against Texas Tech’s prolific pass rushers didn’t go his way, the 6-6, 308-pounder will keep teams captivated with his fleet footwork.

32. Trevor Goosby, OT, Texas

Tools, tools, tools. The 6-7, 312-pound redshirt sophomore has them in abundance despite having just a handful of starts to his name. He’s been one of the few reliable performers for the Longhorns offense, his stock is up and looking set up for a serious surge.

33. Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State

A 6-5, 243-pound son of a former NFL linebacker with the movement skills of a safety – his previous position – should be an easy sell to any front office. The full extent of Styles’ contributions is no longer a hypothetical, however, as he’s become a reliable presence at the second level in addition to an intriguing movable chess piece.

34. Anthony Hill Jr., LB, Texas

There aren’t many linebackers in this class more dynamic than Hill, a thunderous blitzer who can be deadly once he locks onto ball carriers in the backfield. He still has work to do, though, to become a more complete player when asked to drop in coverage or otherwise operate beyond chase mode.

35. A’Mauri Washington, DT, Oregon

In his first year as a starter, the 6-3, 330-pounder has made a habit of detonating plays at the line of scrimmage. A supreme jumbo-sized athlete, Washington can be a force multiplier along the front even if he never ends up posting massive sack numbers.

36. Caleb Banks, DT, Florida

The 6-6, 330-pounder has missed all but one game with a foot injury that he later reaggravated and underwent surgery on. When healthy, he’s an absolute load for opposing offenses to handle in the middle, with surprising playmaking potential for a defender of his size.

37. Cashius Howell, OLB, Texas A&M

He’s small (6-2, 248 pounds) with a sawed-off build, traits that typically might doom an edge rusher’s stock. But the Bowling Green transfer has seized the SEC lead in sacks (8 1/2) by way of quick-twitch moves and a deep well of knowhow. Howell won’t be a fit for every scheme, but teams willing to look past his atypical traits might be in for quite the reward.

38. Chris Bell, WR, Louisville

The A.J. Brown comparisons come naturally for the 6-2, 220-pound target, who’s equally comfortable hauling in catches with defenders clinging to him as he is racing away from opponents with the ball in his hands. Bell is nowhere near as complete a receiver as the Eagles star is, but his early success – he ranks fourth in the FBS with 638 receiving yards – points toward a player who’s making massive strides in handling the finer points of the position.

39. A.J. Harris, CB, Penn State

Maybe this is a bit high for a player who’s had a bit of a turbulent ride in coverage this season, especially with several other top prospects at the position faring better this fall. But the 6-1, 186-pound Harris frequently dissuades opposing quarterbacks from even looking his way thanks to his ability to stay in receivers’ hip pockets downfield.

40. Jake Golday, LB, Cincinnati

A former transfer from Central Arkansas, Golday has continued his steady ascent this season by collecting 61 tackles and proving to be a hyperactive presence on the Bearcats defense. The former defensive end adds to this class’ wealth of well-built linebackers with surprising straight-line speed.

41. Joshua Josephs, OLB, Tennessee

His 6-3, 240-pound frame might be bordering on disqualifying for some teams that would view him as a designated pass rusher rather than an every-down player. But his size hasn’t stopped him from wreaking havoc in the SEC, where he’s tallied four sacks and three forced fumbles while holding up nicely against the run.

42. Connor Lew, C, Auburn

Rugged and reliable, Lew is the picture of what teams want from a center. He’s more solid than spectacular in most phases and might have some trouble against the most powerful defensive tackles the NFL has to offer, but his combination of intelligence and athleticism should make him a fixture of any front.

43. Quincy Rhodes Jr., DE, Arkansas

There’s no missing a 6-6, 276-pound defensive end with the burst and agility of a much smaller rusher. Rhodes can run hot and cold and too often turns to his (admittedly nifty) spin move, but his arrow is pointed firmly upward.

44. Garrett Nussmeier, QB, LSU

It’s been a strange season for a player who once seemed in the mix to be the top quarterback taken in 2026, with the Tigers’ repeated lackluster outings leaving plenty of questions about Nussmeier’s pro projection. The son of New Orleans Saints offensive coordinator Doug Nussmeier has long leaned on his anticipation and aggressiveness as a passer to compensate for his pedestrian physical tools. His quick processing and savvy approach might give him a higher floor than many of his peers, but it’s unclear how NFL teams will view a signal-caller who relies so heavily on timing given his other deficiencies.

45. John Mateer, QB, Oklahoma

Even in the volatile world of quarterback evaluations, Mateer sizes up as a particularly confounding passer to assess. That stems mostly from a playing style that flies in the face of efficient play at the position, with the Washington State transfer repeatedly embracing high-risk, high-reward throws. It might be impossible to get a daring playmaker to modulate his devil-may-care approach, but teams will still be drawn toward the prospect of harnessing his penchant for threading throws into tight windows and breaking long runs.

46. Isaiah World, OT, Oregon

There’s been a distinct learning curve for the Nevada transfer as he adapts to life in the Big Ten, but things seem to be coming together for World as of late. It’s almost impossible to find 6-8, 318-pound offensive tackles with his ease of movement, so some team will take an early flier in hopes of molding him into the next great left tackle.

47. LT Overton, DE, Alabama

Whether it’s working as an edge rusher or crashing back inside, the former five-star recruit and Texas A&M transfer isn’t afraid to mix it up with opposing linemen. But the next step in his pass-rush development has yet to be unlocked, and he might not collect more than clean-up sacks until he learns to do more than bull rush.

48. Kamari Ramsey, S, USC

There’s a sizable gap between Downs and the second safety in this class, with Toledo’s Emmanuel McNeil-Warren and Oregon’s Dillon Thieneman also having a case. Ramsey, however, might have a leg up on the field thanks to coverage instincts that leave him well-equipped to handle almost any assignment.

49. R Mason Thomas, DE/OLB, Oklahoma

With Bailey, Howell, Josephs and Texas Tech’s Romello Height all making strong impressions this season, the 2026 class has a strong crop of undersized pass rushers who warrant consideration on the first two days of the draft. A rocket off the edge who’s registered 5 1/2 sacks this season, the 6-2, 249-pound Thomas has shown he can be as disruptive as any name among that group.

50. Christen Miller, DT, Georgia

Several run-stuffing defensive tackles could have contended for the final spot, including Iowa State’s Dominique Orange and Ohio State’s Kayden McDonald. Miller, however, gets the nod thanks to explosiveness and lateral agility that indicate room for growth beyond the limited returns he’s provided so far in disrupting the passing game.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Torchlight Innovations Inc. (TSXV: TLX.P) (‘Torchlight’ or ‘the Company’), doing business as RZOLV Technologies, is pleased to announce positive preliminary results from its metallurgical testing program focused on rare earth and critical mineral leaching using its proprietary RZOLV reagent system.

Modern economies are increasingly dependent on a broad suite of critical minerals and rare earth elements—including lithium, cobalt, nickel, praseodymium, tellurium, gallium, scandium, and others—that are essential to clean energy, advanced electronics, battery storage, and defense technologies.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), these minerals are ‘crucial to the performance of batteries, permanent magnets, and other clean energy technologies.’ The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) similarly notes that critical minerals ‘are vital for a wide range of industries, including clean energy and defense,’ powering systems such as solar panels, wind turbines, and electric vehicle batteries. As traditional high-grade deposits become harder to access, attention is shifting toward secondary and unconventional sources such as tailings, mine waste, low-grade ores, brines, and industrial by-products. (Sources: https://www.iea.org/topics/critical-minerals| https://www.energy.gov/fecm/articles/developing-domestic-supply-critical-minerals-and-materials)

In this emerging landscape, a reagent like RZOLV, capable of dissolving over twenty such elements, represents a potentially transformative advancement in sustainable mineral recovery.

Key Highlights

  • Multi-Element Recovery: RZOLV dissolved over 25 critical and rare earth elements under mild, non-toxic conditions, with standout recoveries of cerium (73%), manganese (64%), and cobalt (60%).
  • REE and Base Metal Versatility: Consistent recoveries (40-45%) for mid-series rare earths such as samarium, europium, and gadolinium demonstrate RZOLV’s broad leaching capability across both transition and lanthanide elements, validating its cross-commodity potential.
  • Proven Chemistry: The reagent’s redox-complex system mobilizes metals without cyanide or harsh acids, enabling clean, efficient extraction.
  • Cross-Commodity Flexibility: Consistent recoveries across both base and rare earth elements confirm broad market potential.
  • Proven Compatibility: Leach solutions integrate easily with standard ion-exchange and solvent-extraction systems for scalable downstream recovery.
  • Compatibility with Standard Hydrometallurgy: RZOLV leach solutions are compatible with ion-exchange (IX) and solvent-extraction (SX) systems, providing efficient and selective pathways for downstream metal recovery and purification.
  • Sustainable Advantage: Operates at ambient temperature and low pH-lowering environmental risk, reducing cost, and unlocking value from tailings and low-grade sources.

Multi-Element Leachability Assessment of Critical and Rare Earth Samples Using the RZOLV Reagent System

Overview

Laboratory metallurgical investigations were undertaken to evaluate the leachability of multiple metallic and rare earth elements (REEs) from mineralized feedstocks obtained from two U.S.-based mining projects. The objective of this program was to assess the broader metal-solubilization potential of the RZOLV lixiviant system and to characterize its selectivity and efficiency across a diverse elemental suite.

Testing was performed using the standard RZOLV formulation without process optimization or reagent adjustment. As such, future results may vary depending on feed composition, mineralogy, and site-specific conditions.

Methodology

Representative composite samples were subjected to a series of bottle-roll leaching tests under controlled laboratory conditions. Each test employed the proprietary RZOLV non-cyanide leach reagent under standardized parameters designed to simulate low-intensity, ambient-temperature leaching environments.

Tests were conducted in sealed 1-liter HDPE vessels agitated continuously for 72 hours to ensure uniform contact between solids and solution. Post-leach solids (tails) were separated by vacuum filtration and washed thoroughly with deionized water to remove entrained solution. Pregnant leach solutions (PLS) were analyzed by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, while head and residue samples were submitted to ALS Laboratories, an ISO-accredited analytical facility, for 61-element inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis. Elemental recoveries to solution were calculated by mass balance, comparing head and residue assays for each element to quantify percentage dissolution.

Results and Discussion

The following table summarizes the unoptimized relative solubility of key metals and rare earth elements under the test conditions. Head and residue MS-ICP assays were compared to determine recovery to solution.

ELEMENT NAME ELEMENT SYMBOL NET RECOVERY
BERYLLIUM Be (%)
CERIUM Ce 73.50%
MANGANESE Mn 64.26%
COBALT Co 60.00%
CHROMIUM Cr 47.35%
GADOLINIUM Gd 45.00%
SAMARIUM Sm 44.12%
YTTRIUM Y 43.55%
EUROPIUM Eu 43.48%
NEODYMIUM Nd 43.48%
TERBIUM Tb1 42.86%
DYSPROSIUM Dy 42.81%
PRASEODYMIUM Pr 42.25%
LANTHANUM La 40.74%
HOLMIUM Ho 40.30%
ERBIUM Er 38.10%
NICKEL Ni 36.36%
VANADIUM V 33.33%
LUTETIUM Lu 33.33%
THULIUM Tm 31.43%
URANIUM U 27.59%
TELLURIUM Te 27.34%
BERYLLIUM Be 26.24%
INDIUM In 23.53%
YTTERBIUM Yb 22.58%
SCANDIUM Sc 16.96%

Interpretation

The results confirm that the RZOLV system promotes substantial solubilization of rare-earth elements, particularly cerium (73%), manganese (64%), and cobalt (50%), validating its oxidative and complexation capacity under mild acidic conditions.

Mid-series lanthanides (Sm, Eu, Gd) achieved recoveries of 40-45 %, consistent with partial liberation from refractory oxide or phosphate phases.

Lower recoveries of niobium (18%), scandium (17%), and lithium (23%) reflect incorporation within stable mineral matrices (e.g., columbite-tantalite, zircon, or silicate lattices) that require stronger oxidative or thermal activation for efficient leaching.

Recovery of Metallic and Rare Earth Elements from RZOLV Leach Solutions

Following the successful leaching of multiple metallic and rare earth elements (REEs) using the RZOLV lixiviant system, downstream recovery methods were considered to determine viable pathways for selective metal capture, concentration, and purification. The focus of this stage of investigation was to assess the suitability of ion exchange (IX) and solvent extraction (SX) systems for recovering valuable metals and REEs from pregnant leach solutions (PLS) generated under standard RZOLV leach conditions.

The RZOLV reagent produces a low-pH, moderately oxidizing solution characterized by high solubility for transition metals and trivalent rare-earth species. This chemistry aligns well with conventional hydrometallurgical separation methods, provided resin or extractant compatibility is maintained under the mildly acidic matrix.

Preliminary evaluations indicate that ion exchange and solvent extraction could be highly effective downstream recovery methods for RZOLV-derived leach solutions. Ion exchange offers rapid, high-capacity capture of base and rare-earth metals, while solvent extraction provides refined selectivity for high-purity product separation. Both methods are compatible with RZOLV’s low-toxicity matrix, enabling environmentally responsible and economically viable metal recovery.

Environmental and Process Implications

The multi-element solubilization profile underscores the potential of RZOLV as a selective and environmentally benign lixiviant for both precious-metal and critical-mineral recovery.

The reagent’s design eliminates the need for cyanide, chloride, or nitrate oxidants—minimizing hazardous effluents—while its regenerative electrochemical cycle enables near-closed-loop operation. Because RZOLV functions under mild aqueous conditions, without extreme temperatures, concentrated acids, or high-pressure systems, it offers a flexible and energy-efficient pathway for extracting critical minerals from complex matrices.

This adaptability allows deployment in diverse applications including ores, tailings, slag, low-grade stockpiles, flotation residues, concentrates, and industrial waste streams, with minimal process re-engineering. Closed-loop regeneration further reduces reagent consumption and operating costs, improving economic viability even for dilute or low-grade sources.

Key Benefits

  • Unlocking latent value: Enables recovery of valuable elements from waste or tailings, converting liabilities into revenue streams.
  • Reduced environmental footprint: Operates at ambient conditions with non-toxic reagents, reducing chemical hazards and remediation needs.
  • Cross-commodity flexibility: Capable of dissolving over twenty critical minerals, adaptable to multiple feed types and market shifts.
  • Support for circular economy and resource security: Facilitates domestic recovery of critical minerals and aligns with global sustainability objectives.

Conclusions

Bottle-roll test results and ICP-MS analyses confirm that RZOLV promotes significant dissolution across multiple elemental groups through synergistic redox-complexation chemistry. High recoveries of Ce, Mn, and Co highlight its oxidative power, while consistent REE mobilization demonstrates its capacity for complex formation under mild conditions. The results validate RZOLV as a versatile, low toxicity lixiviant for both precious and critical mineral extraction. Ongoing research is focused on refining reagent concentration, pH, and electrochemical regeneration to further enhance recovery efficiencies for refractory elements.

This research is preliminary in nature. Assay results are based on head/tails ICP-MS performed by ALS Labs. Test materials have been subjected to the standard RZOLV formula with no reagent optimization. Results will vary based on minerology and this data provides no guarantee of future success or economic viability.

About Torchlight Innovations Inc. (doing business as RZOLV Technologies)

Torchlight Innovations is a clean-technology company with a mission to transform the global mining industry through safer, sustainable, and high-performance extraction technologies. The Company has developed RZOLV, a proprietary non-toxic, water-based hydrometallurgical formula that replaces cyanide in gold leaching.

While cyanide has been the industry standard for over a century, its toxicity has led to widespread environmental concerns, costly permitting, and outright bans in several jurisdictions. RZOLV offers equivalent recovery efficiency and cost performance with a non-toxic, reusable, and environmentally responsible profile.

The Company is currently focused on validating its technology through industrial-scale pilot programs, after which full commercialization and licensing activities will begin. The Company has safeguarded RZOLV through 2 international patent filings and a comprehensive intellectual-property framework that includes protection for its chemical formulation, regeneration processes, and specific applications in heap leaching, vat leaching, tank leaching and concentrate treatment.

Contact

Duane Nelson
President and CEO
Torchlight Innovations Inc.
Email: duane@innovationmining.com
Phone: 604-512-8118

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Forward-Looking Statements

This News Release contains ‘forward-looking information’ and ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation. Statements contained herein that are not based on historical or current fact, including without limitation statements containing the words ‘anticipates,’ ‘believes,’ ‘may,’ ‘continues,’ ‘estimates,’ ‘expects,’ and ‘will’ and words of similar import, constitute ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking information may include, but is not limited to, information with respect to our Research and Development activities Wherever possible, words such as ‘plans’, ‘expects’, ‘projects’, ‘assumes’, ‘budget’, ‘strategy’, ‘scheduled’, ‘estimates’, ‘forecasts’, ‘anticipates’, ‘believes’, ‘intends’, ‘targets’ and similar expressions or statements that certain actions, events or results ‘may’, ‘could’, ‘would’, ‘might’ or ‘will’ be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative forms of any of these terms and similar expressions, have been used to identify forward-looking statements and information. Statements concerning future revenue or earnings estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking information. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is based on the expectations and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made. The assumptions used in the preparation of such statements, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise. We do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, prospective investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Source

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The cleantech sector experienced a dynamic third quarter, with predictions of volatility coming to fruition.

While global investment in renewable energy is strong, notable pullbacks in US spending and regulatory challenges under the Trump administration have clouded the near-term cleantech outlook. Electric vehicle (EV) sales showed mixed trends, with a rush observed ahead of the phase-out of American federal tax incentives at the end of September.

The quarter was also marked by several major mergers, funding rounds and technological developments.

Regulatory currents and investment flows shape cleantech market

The third quarter began with important cleantech policy signals and shifts in industry strategy.

Although global capital flows into renewables reached a record US$386 billion in H1 2025, according to data analyzed by BloombergNEF, a steep 36 percent year-on-year drop in US renewable project spending reflects investor uncertainty in response to changing policy conditions and the expiration of tax incentives.

Regulatory headwinds took center stage as the US Environmental Protection Agency under Lee Zeldin sought to overturn the agency’s scientific findings on greenhouse gases, stirring debate on climate regulatory directions.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration’s Department of the Interior moved to halt the planned US$6 billion Maryland offshore wind project, and paused work on Orsted’s (CPH: ORSTED,OTC Pink:DNNGY) Rhode Island offshore wind farm, triggering market pushback and state-level efforts to resume construction.

A judge later allowed the continuation of construction on the Rhode Island wind farm amid legal challenges.

While offshore wind faced setbacks from regulatory halts and legal challenges, the US solar sector demonstrated resilience, experiencing a notable 25 percent increase in corporate M&A activity in H1.

That increase was highlighted by Brookfield Renewable Partners’ (NYSE:BEP) US$2.8 billion acquisition of Duke Energy’s (NYSE:DUK) solar assets, as well as FlexGen’s purchase of Powin.

During Climate Week NYC, power giant Constellation Energy (NASDAQ:CEG) CEO Joseph Dominguez noted the potential for consolidation in the renewables sector. Despite federal tax credit phase-outs, wind and solar are supported by over 30 state-level programs, creating evolving investment opportunities for well-capitalized companies.

Adding to this insight, former US Vice President Al Gore emphasized the need to reconsider nuclear power as artificial intelligence (AI) electricity demand grows. While skeptical about the high costs of small modular reactors, Gore sees fusion power as promising, but probably farther off than some optimists predict.

He acknowledged that green hydrogen sentiment is overly optimistic, noting that its “bubble has burst” due to slow cost declines, although it retains promise for heavy industry uses like low-emissions steel production.

Aside from that, Gore referred to direct air capture as “overhyped” and not a “safe bet,” while calling deep geothermal “properly hyped,” but with uncertain commercial timelines.

At the same time, US Secretary of Energy Chris Wright indicated that an overhaul of permitting processes would expedite energy infrastructure projects facing intense opposition; however, the government shutdown, now heading into its third week, has created significant uncertainty and will likely lead to further delays.

Despite perceived setbacks, Q3 brought private sector investment in scalable clean infrastructure. Investors increasingly backed cleantech initiatives focused on transformative growth and digital infrastructure aligned with the evolving energy transition. Notable financing rounds went toward low-carbon data centers and battery storage. Investments like climate fintech firm Eventual’s US$7.5 million in seed funding also hint at growing investor interest.

These cleantech sector developments highlight a complex landscape where regulatory challenges in the US coexist with ongoing innovation and investment momentum, setting the stage for a critical period of adjustment and opportunity in the renewable energy sector, both above and below the American border.

In an interview with the Globe and Mail, Jigar Shah, former director of the Loans Program Office in the US Department of Energy, said Canadian cleantech firms have an opportunity to fill the void left in the industry by the US, but that decisive action is required to prevent companies from seeking out other jurisdictions.

Twists and turns in the EV race

The third quarter marked a pivotal period for the EV market.

Cox Automotive forecast in September that EV sales would hit a record of 409,000 units in Q3, in line with previous estimates that predicted a surge as buyers rushed in before the end of the US federal EV tax credit.

Automakers Ford Motor (NASDAQ:F), General Motors (NYSE:GM) and Hyundai Motor (KRX:005380,OTC Pink:HYMTF), all of which have extended EV discounts to after the expiration of the tax credit, reported record EV sales in Q3, with Ford’s EV sales rising over 30 percent, and GM’s EV sales more than doubling thanks to a diverse product lineup under the Chevrolet and Cadillac brands. Hyundai showed a 13 percent year-on-year increase, driven by EV sales.

In September, Ford announced a multibillion-dollar investment in American EV manufacturing facilities to pioneer a novel, efficient assembly process, aiming for a 2027 launch of a competitively priced midsize electric pickup.

Tesla’s (NASDAQ:TSLA) third quarter deliveries also hit a record, with estimates showing about 149,500 units, slightly higher compared to the 143,535 units reported in the second quarter. However, Cox Automotive’s numbers show that the company’s US market share has been steadily decreasing, slipping to 38 percent in August.

CEO Elon Musk said that the company will devote more of its resources to developing AI-driven autonomy going forward. Its robotaxi program officially launched this quarter, with initial testing beginning on July 1. The company reportedly experienced three crashes on its first day, underscoring ongoing technical hurdles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has since launched another investigation into Tesla vehicles’ full self-driving technology, its second this year, after regulators received more than 50 reports of traffic violations and crashes.

Tesla also revealed its long-awaited more affordable EV models at the start of the fourth quarter. They were met with with cautious optimism by market participants. Investors will be carefully watching how these new models fare against intense price competition from domestic and foreign EV manufacturers.

Meanwhile, Tesla’s position in China continues to face pressure, with domestic manufacturer BYD Company (OTC Pink:BYDDF) surging ahead with a substantial lead. BYD delivered 582,500 pure EVs in the third quarter, nearly doubling Tesla’s China sales, which rebounded thanks to sales of the new Model Y L.

Advances in autonomous vehicle partnerships also progressed during the the third quarter, with Lyft (NASDAQ:LYFT) and Waymo collaborating on robotaxi services announced for launch next year in Nashville.

Waymo has moved to expand its user base by launching a new enterprise product, Waymo for Business, offering subsidized employee or event rides in its robotaxis in San Francisco, Los Angeles and Phoenix.

Facing rising competition, Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) said it plans to integrate autonomous vehicles alongside human drivers, partnering with Nuro and Lucid Group (NASDAQ:LCID) in a three part deal, with Uber purchasing 20,000 Lucid electric robotaxis over six years alongside licensing fees for Nuro’s self-driving technology.

Under the terms of the agreement, Uber will acquire minority stakes in both companies. The first robotaxis are expected to launch in a major US city next year.

Cleantech forecast for 2025

Q4 will be pivotal as the cleantech sector adjusts to the withdrawal of key federal incentives in the US, such as the rooftop solar tax credit, set to expire on December 31, and grapples with regulatory uncertainties.

Offshore wind projects face legal and administrative hurdles that may reshape regional renewable energy development.

Meanwhile, emerging areas of the cleantech market — such as advanced nuclear and climate fintech — offer promising growth paths, but require coordinated policy and investment frameworks. Reflecting this challenge, 11 states are collaborating to accelerate the development of advanced nuclear energy within their borders, seeking to create a strong and credible demand signal by coordinating commitments and dividing financial risks.

In autonomous vehicle innovation, Amazon’s (NASDAQ:AMZN) self-driving car subsidiary Zoox is seeking broader regulatory approval to operate up to 2,500 cars without traditional human controls.

If approved, Zoox would be able to conduct a first-of-its-kind paid commercial robotaxi service.

The US Department of Transportation plans to propose rules in spring 2026 to modernize vehicle safety standards for automated driving systems, including relaxing requirements tied to manual controls.

Forward-looking industry voices suggest cautious optimism, emphasizing the critical role of innovation, policy clarity and market adaptation in sustaining cleantech momentum into 2026.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Donald Trump signed a rare earths deal during their meeting at the White House on Monday (October 20).

The meeting was set to focus on critical minerals and rare earths, with Albanese telling Bloomberg on Sunday (October 19) that it would also be an opportunity to “consolidate and strengthen” the Australia-US relationship.

According to insiders, the deal had been in the works for five months.

During the meeting, Trump said he “never had any doubts” about the countries’ bond, adding that “there’s never been anybody better.” For his part, Albanese described the deal as an US$8.5 billion pipeline ‘that we have ready to go.’

The signing happened after opening remarks from Trump, during which the US president called the deal a “key objective” in reducing reliance on China. “Within a year, we’ll have critical minerals and rare earths that you won’t know what to do with them,” Trump said, adding, ‘They’ll be worth about two dollars.’

China currently holds the world’s largest rare earths reserves and is the top producer by far, but Australia has been highlighted as a key player as trade tensions between the US and China ramp up.

The country is home to some of the most significant rare earths operations globally, such as Lynas Rare Earths’ (ASX:LYC,OTC Pink:LYSDY) Mount Weld mine, and Arafura Rare Earths’ (ASX:ARU,OTC Pink:ARAFF) Nolans project.

Last week, several companies, such as Nova Minerals (ASX:NVA,NASDAQ:NVA), were invited to brief the Australian government on key projects prior to the country’s meeting with the US.

Nova was instructed to include an overview of its flagship Estelle gold project, including the key minerals identified, planned expansion activities and the company’s engagement with US government agencies.

The same goes for Resolution Minerals (ASX:RML,OTCQB:RLMLF), which was invited for a briefer on its Idaho-based Horse Heaven gold-antimony-tungsten project.

Both Nova and Resolution were among the top-gaining mining stocks on the ASX last week.

Trump supports Biden-era AUKUS deal

Albanese and Trump also discussed the AUKUS submarine deal, a multibillion-dollar agreement between Australia, the UK and the US, which is geared at boosting security in the Indo-Pacific region.

When asked whether AUKUS is meant to be a “deterrent” for China, Trump answered yes. However, he also said he doesn’t think that will be needed as the US military is the best in the world.

‘We’re going to get along great with China,’ he said.

AUKUS is worth around US$239 billion, or AU$368 billion, over 30 years.

Starting in 2032, Australia plans to buy three Virginia-class submarines from the US, with the option to get two more. These will fill the gap while the UK and Australia develop a new submarine model. Trump also said the US is working on building more submarines for Australia and is going to expedite submarine exports to the country.

Australia is expected to receive the first of the new submarines in the early 2040s.

Securities Disclosure: I, Gabrielle de la Cruz, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

TORONTO – More than three decades after Joe Carter touched them all, George Springer gave the Toronto Blue Jays another home run for the ages, vaulting them into the World Series for the first time since they won their second consecutive championship in 1993.

Springer’s momentous, go-ahead three-run home run flipped Game 7 of this American League Championship Series in the Blue Jays’ favor, and they held on to defeat the Seattle Mariners 4-3 in front of a Rogers Centre crowd that erupted like it hasn’t in years with one swing of the bat.

Game 1 of the World Series is Friday, Oct. 24, the defending champion Los Angeles Dodgers invading Toronto in a first-ever Fall Classic matchup. The Dodgers would’ve opened at home, were it not for a stunning pivot point in a winner-take-all game.

It came in the bottom of the seventh inning, the Mariners leading 3-1 thanks to home runs from their superstar sluggers, Julio Rodriguez and Cal Raleigh, and just eight outs away from the first World Series trip in franchise history.

Yet thanks in part to a decision that may follow manager Dan Wilson around for the remainder of his career, the Blue Jays salvaged their season just in time.

Wilson lifted ace Bryan Woo, who’d pitched two scoreless innings of relief but let the first two runners on in the seventh, in favor of right-hander Eduard Bazardo, who pitched two innings the night before in a losing Game 6 effort.

The move immediately backfired.

Thanks to a sacrifice bunt, Bazardo inherited a one-out situation with the tying runs in scoring position. Yet he’d be facing a diminished Springer, playing in the fifth Game 7 of his storied October career yet hobbled by a bum knee after Woo drilled him with a pitch there three nights earlier.

Bazardo had thrown 15 pitches the night before. Know who was fully rested?

Andres Muñoz, the Mariners’ two-time All-Star closer, who struck out 12 batters per nine innings this season and had two days’ rest.

And the Mariners really needed a strikeout.

Instead, Bazardo left a sinker in the middle of the plate, right in Springer’s happy zone. Springer swung, and his eyes got big. The crowd did not erupt, skeptical of the ball’s flight.

Yet as left fielder Randy Arozarena’s pursuit of the ball faded, a roar reached a crescendo, and the crowd of 44,770 erupted when the ball settled in the first row of the outfield seats.

Springer nearly stopped in his tracks in disbelief rounding first. The building shook. The Blue Jays led 4-3.

Meanwhile, Wilson’s counterpart John Schneider managed his own all-hands pitching meeting deftly. Ace Kevin Gausman pitched a scoreless sixth inning to record the win.

Chris Bassitt, a starter idled for bullpen work in these playoffs, pitched a perfect eighth, doubled over in emotion as he exulted inducing a J.P. Crawford ground ball for the last out.

Finally, closer Jeff Hoffman, who also worked two innings in Game 6, struck out the side in the ninth, setting off bedlam in this hockey town that goes crazy for its lads on the diamond when they’re going well.

The Mariners? They remain the franchise of legends, of Edgar and the Big Unit and Junior and Ichiro. This seemed the night their superstars finally converted their talent into October gold.

Instead, one false move did them in – and the World Series will be returning to Canada for the first time since Carter’s Series-ending shot against Philadelphia’s Mitch Williams in 1993.

Move over, Joe. Springer’s 23rd career postseason homer deserves your company. 

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. is ALCS MVP

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. was named ALVS MVP after going 10-for-26 (.385) with three home runs and a 1.330 OPS in the seven-game series.

Toronto’s first baseman signed a 14-year, $500 million extension to stay with the Blue Jays earlier this year.

Here’s how ALCS Game 7 unfolded:

George Springer home run flips Game 7, puts Blue Jays in front

George Springer’s three-run homer off Eduard Bazardo sent Toronto into a frenzy, giving the Blue Jays a 4-3 lead in the seventh inning of Game 7.

Springer’s 23rd career postseason home run ties him with Kyle Schwarber for third-most in MLB history.

Bryan Woo began the inning for Seattle but walked Addison Barger to lead off and gave up a single to Isiah Kiner-Falefa. A bunt got the runners to second and third with Bazardo coming on to replace Woo. With out out, Springer launched the go-ahead homer to left.

Bryan Woo in for Seattle, Mariners lead 3-1 through six

TORONTO – Bryan Woo won the finest mano-a-mano battle of the night, and the Mariners are nine outs away from their first World Series. 

In his second inning of relief, Woo engaged Blue Jays superstar Vladimir Guerrero Jr. in a nine-pitch match, Guerrero fouling off three two-strike pitches, Woo never giving in. 

Finally, Guerrero blinked. 

He flailed at a 2-2 sweeper well outside the strike zone for the first out of the sixth inning, deflating Rogers Centre and rendering the Alejandro Kirk single that followed harmless. 

It is 3-1 Mariners heading to the seventh – and ace Kevin Gausman is on in relief for the Blue Jays. 

Cal Raleigh home run puts Mariners up 3-1

TORONTO – The superstars are showing out for the Mariners, who are starting to take command of this ALCS Game 7 as they seek the first World Series trip in franchise history. 

Cal Raleigh rocketed a home run into his team’s bullpen in right field and the Mariners took a 3-1 lead into the bottom of the fifth. 

So far, they’ve already won one moral victory: George Kirby pitched four virtually incident-free innings, keeping the Mariners bullpen idled until Bryan Woo relieved him in the fifth. 

Meanwhile, Raleigh’s homer came off top Blue Jays set-up man Louis Varland, and Toronto will have to play uphill the rest of the way.

Shane Bieber removed: Mariners 2, Blue Jays 1

TORONTO – Shane Bieber committed the cardinal sin of walking the No. 9 batter, producing the first pitching change of ALCS Game 7. 

Blue Jays manager John Schneider lifted Bieber with two outs in the top of the fourth, two men on and Mariners slugger Julio Rodriguez – who doubled and homered in his first two at-bats – coming to the plate. 

Wise move. Top set-up man Louis Varland induced a grounder to third and the Mariners stranded a pair of runners and cling to a 2-1 lead entering the bottom of the fourth. 

Bieber pitched 3 2/3 innings, giving up seven hits and two runs, striking out five and walking one. 

Julio Rodriguez home runs puts Mariners back in front

TORONTO — Julio Rodriguez grimaced in pain after fouling a ball off his left leg. Then, he put a hurting on a Shane Bieber slider, driving it 109 mph into the left field seats for a home run to give the Mariners a 2-1 lead over the Blue Jays heading to the bottom of the third in ALCS Game 7. 

Rodriguez limped around the batter’s box and was visited by Mariners manager Dan Wilson and a trainer before staying in the game. Six pitches later, he found a Shane Bieber slider to his liking and drove it 423 feet into the left field seats. 

Mariners starter George Kirby has given up three hits through two innings, and neither club has had action in its bullpen in this winner-take-all game. 

Crazy inning has ALCS Game 7 tied 1-1

TORONTO – If the first inning is any indication, it will be a loud, long and loony night for ALCS Game 7 at Rogers Centre. 

Josh Naylor and Daulton Varsho exchanged RBI singles as the Mariners and Blue Jays were tied 1-1 after the first frame. 

But that’s hardly the half of it. 

The top of the first ended when Naylor leapt, turned and was struck by a throw from Blue Jays third baseman Ernie Clement, who was on the verge of completing a very routine double play – until it wasn’t. Naylor was originally ruled safe until umpires huddled and called interference – calling out Naylor and batter Jorge Polanco both. 

Pitchers Shane Bieber and George Kirby both struggled, throwing 20 and 25 pitches, but avoided more trouble as Kirby left runners at the corners by getting Ernie Clement to fly to center. 

Josh Naylor called for interference

TORONTO — On a potential double-play ground ball off the bat of Jorge Polanco in the top of the first, Josh Naylor left his feet and turned his head as Toronto Blue Jays third baseman Ernie Clement – who cut off shortstop Andrés Giménez to field the ball –  threw to first to complete a 5-3 double play. 

The ball ricocheted into foul ground and Polanco was originally called safe. 

But after a conference among the six umpires, they umpires ruled interference and both runners were out. 

Mariners take first-inning lead in Game 7

Julio Rodriguez hit a leadoff double against Shane Bieber and came around to score on Josh Naylor’s RBI single with one out, staking the Mariners to an early lead in Toronto.

Mariners lineup today: ALCS Game 7

  1. Julio Rodríguez (R) CF
  2. Cal Raleigh (S) C
  3. Josh Naylor (L) 1B
  4. Jorge Polanco (S) DH
  5. Randy Arozarena (R) LF
  6. Eugenio Suárez (R) 3B
  7. J.P. Crawford (L) SS
  8. Leo Rivas (S) 2B
  9. Victor Robles (R) RF

Blue Jays Game 7 lineup

  1. George Springer (R) DH
  2. Nathan Lukes (L) LF
  3. Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (R) 1B
  4. Alejandro Kirk (R) C
  5. Daulton Varsho (L) CF
  6. Ernie Clement (R) 3B
  7. Addison Barger (L) RF
  8. Isiah Kiner-Falefa (R) 2B
  9. Andrés Giménez (L) SS

George Springer injury update for ALCS Game 7

TORONTO – With a pair of home runs and a .960 OPS through six games, George Springer has stood tall in this American League Championship Series.

Except when he was down in the dirt, a 95-mph pitch from Seattle Mariners right-hander Bryan Woo drilling him directly in the right knee. Or, two nights later, when he came back for a game the Toronto Blue Jays had to win, took four plate appearances without incident, but then winced and hopped and grimaced through the searing pain in his fifth.

And now here he is, in a place so foreign to nearly every major leaguer but almost a second home for him: Game 7, the fifth in his career as he chases a second World Series title.

Said Springer: “This is what you want. I don’t think here’s anybody across the league that if you said in spring training, ‘Hey, you’re going to be in Game 7 of the ALCS,’ that you’re going to say, ‘Oh, man, no.’”

Mariners vs Blue Jays Game 7 predictions

  • Bob Nightengale: Blue Jays 4, Mariners 3
  • Gabe Lacques: Blue Jays 6, Mariners 4
  • Jesse Yomtov: Blue Jays 5, Mariners 1

Blue Jays championships: Toronto World Series wins

The Toronto Blue Jays won back-to-back World Series championships in 1992 and 1993.

They defeated the Atlanta Braves in six games in 1992 for their first title and then beat the Philadelphia Phillies in six to repeat, clinching on Joe Carter’s walk-off home run.

When does the World Series start?

  • Game 1: Friday, Oct. 24
  • Game 2: Saturday, Oct. 25
  • Game 3: Monday, Oct. 27
  • Game 4: Tuesday, Oct. 28
  • *Game 5: Wednesday, Oct. 29
  • *Game 6: Friday, Oct. 31
  • *Game 7: Saturday, Nov. 1

Mariners’ Julio Rodriguez embraces Game 7 pressure

Mariners outfielder Julio Rodriguez has two homers, five RBIs and five walks so far in the ALCS.

‘Tis is my first time being part of a Game 7, and they say in sports that there’s no better two words than that,’ Rodriguez said before Game 7.

‘We’ve got here by being who we are, by playing our baseball. I feel like that is something that you have to double down. There is no need to do more,’ Rodriguez told reporters.

‘I feel like everybody have been doing it the whole year, we’ve been playing baseball the whole year, preparing the whole year. And it came down to one game you just do one more of the same thing.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Oklahoma City Thunder can be seen as the current gold standard for building a championship team. This new era began when Billy Donovan left to coach the Chicago Bulls, and Mark Daigneault took over. The Thunder won 22 games in Daigneault’s first season in 2020 and have increased their win total over the past four years, culminating in an NBA-high 68 wins and the team’s first championship. 

This was achieved by stockpiling draft picks, using those picks to select role players, and executing a franchise-changing trade to acquire Shai Gilgeous-Alexander from the Los Angeles Clippers.

General manager Sam Presti, who won his first long-overdue Executive of the Year award last season, is making sure the championship core remains intact by signing league and Finals MVP Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, and Chet Holmgren to long, big-money contract extensions, and barring injury and complacency, could sit atop the perch for the rest of the decade.

Oklahoma City is again the odds-on favorite to bring home another championship. Here are five teams that could throw a wrench in that coronation:

Cleveland Cavaliers

Cleveland seems best equipped to stop the Thunder from becoming the first team to repeat since the 2018 Golden State Warriors. Last year, the Cavaliers started with a 15-game winning streak and had the best record in the East, but their postseason run ended with a disappointing five-game drubbing to the Indiana Pacers in the Conference Semifinals. Although they had the defensive player of the year, Evan Mobley, their defense let them down in the playoffs, and they finished 9th in defensive rating during the regular season. First-team All-NBA selection Donovan Mitchell provides consistent scoring and stability, while the additions of Lonzo Ball and Larry Nance Jr. are expected to strengthen their bench, so Cleveland will likely remain one of the league’s top teams. 

Denver Nuggets

Any team with the league’s dominant force is a contender every season. Nikola Jokic, a three-time MVP, averaged a triple-double last year, and with new head coach David Adelman, don’t expect that production to decline. What has changed is that Michael Porter, Jr. is now in Brooklyn, and to compensate for his absence, Aaron Gordon, Jamal Murray, along with new additions Cameron Johnson, Tim Hardaway Jr., Jonas Valančiūnas, and Bruce Brown, should provide enough support for Jokic so Denver can improve on its No. 4 seed and the seven-game conference semifinals loss to the Thunder. Keep an eye on guard Christian Braun, a 15-point-a-game scorer and recipient of a new five-year, $125 million extension, who may be in the running for Most Improved Player.

New York Knicks

Is it now or never for the five-decade championship-starved Knicks after making their first conference finals appearance in 25 years? That loss to the Pacers led to Tom Thibodeau being fired and replaced by Mike Brown, who has promised a different style of basketball with a more up-tempo pace and almost a reliance on the three-point shot. That could lead to a heavy burden being lifted off Clutch Player of the Year Jalen Brunson. Brunson could be planted out on the perimeter instead of being ball-dominant and distributing, even though he had a career-high in assists last season. With the Pacers and Boston Celtics having superstars nursing Achilles injuries, New York’s path to the Finals figures to be less complicated.

Houston Rockets

The conversation with the Rockets begins and ends with 37-year-old Kevin Durant, who is on his third team this decade. Durant, with his new two-year, $90 million extension, is expected to lift the Rockets into immediate championship contention, even without guard Fred VanVleet, who was lost for the year with a knee injury. Durant is expected to be scoring option 1, 2, and 3, something Houston lacked last year. The Rockets’ young core, especially All-Defensive First Team selection Amen Thompson, will be crucial in advancing past the first round, where their season ended. But this team’s identity should be on the defensive end, with four starters listed at 6-foot-10 or taller. And despite Durant being expected to wear a cape on most nights, any realistic title aspirations have to start with lockdown defense.

Minnesota Timberwolves

There is no other way to put it: the Timberwolves are loaded, and anything less than another appearance at least to the Western Conference finals would be a massive disappointment. Anthony Edwards is a bona fide superstar and should be in the MVP conversation. His teammates, Jaden McDaniels, Naz Reid, and Julius Randle, provide more than enough punch to where they should waltz deep into the playoffs. One concern may be at the point guard position. Mike Conley is 38 years old, so if second-year player Rob Dillingham can take over those reins, the Timberwolves, who were rated in the top 10 in offensive and defensive efficiency, can turn their balanced roster into champions.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

TORONTO — George Springer has heard almost everything from opposing fan bases throughout his career, the price every clutch postseason performer pays as their career goes on. It has been laid on even thicker in road games since the 2019 revelation of the Houston Astros’ sign-stealing scheme.

So when he was asked before Game 7 of the ALCS how he felt when Seattle Mariners fans booed him when he crumbled to the ground when a 95-mph pitch struck him on the right knee in Game 5, he demurred. Just concerned about his health, he said.

Yet that hit a little different for Springer’s father, George Jr., who had to watch his son berated by a sellout crowd at T-Mobile Park, with fans cursing the slugger as he writhed in pain.

Even when Springer and the Toronto Blue Jays got a significant measure of revenge when he hit a go-ahead three-run home run that sent the Blue Jays to the World Series and eliminated the Mariners, father was still stinging about son getting booed while he was suffering.

“I’ll be completely honest about that: That was the most despicable fan behavior I have ever witnessed. Anywhere,” Springer’s father told USA TODAY Sports. “I’ve been to soccer games and football games and obviously Major League Baseball games the past 12 years, in playoff environments, in tough places to play.

“I have never seen a fan base boo a player who was injured. Rejoice in their injury. Those fans will now have a very long offseason to reflect on their behavior.”

Springer’s 23rd career postseason home run came off Mariners reliever Eduard Bazardo and flipped a two-run Blue Jays deficit into a 4-3 victory. The Mariners are still seeking their first trip to the World Series, left to wonder about next year, which came far sooner than they would have imagined.

The elder Springer hopes it allows ample time for soul-searching for the fans cursing his son right behind him at T-Mobile Park.

“I hope when they come back in the spring, and cheer on their team,” he says, “they’ll be better fans and better people.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

With more than 40% of the season behind us, there are only two ways to improve your rosters — waiver wire and trades.

Evaluating a fantasy trade can be a daunting task. Most managers value their players more than they’re actually worth. That’s where the Week 8 fantasy football trade value charts come in. You can also check out our Week 8 fantasy rankings to help with lineup and waiver decisions this week.

The charts can be used as your very own fantasy football trade analyzer in standard, half-PPR (point per reception) and full PPR leagues. Someone sends you an offer? Simply pull out a calculator (on your phone, you don’t need an actual calculator) and plug in the values for each player. Don’t worry, six-points-per-passing-touchdown and superflex leagues are covered as well.

Important note: If you’re offered an uneven trade (i.e., a 2-for-1 or 3-for-1), include the values for the players you’d be moving to the bench or dropping within your calculation. Example: If someone in your league offers you Breece Hall, Stefon Diggs, and Jakobi Meyers (combined value of 91) for Ja’Marr Chase (71), it might look like you’re getting the better end of it. However, if you’re bumping down, say, Kyle Monangai and Tez Johnson (combined value of 42) in the process, it’s a net negative deal for you.

The rankings are based on how players should be valued in 12-team leagues. Players are sorted in order of their half-PPR values.

Quarterback trade value chart

(Note: ‘6/TD’ is for leagues that award six points for passing touchdowns and ‘SFLEX’ stands for superflex.)

Running back trade value chart

Wide receiver trade value chart

Tight end trade value chart

Overall Week 8 fantasy football rest-of-season rankings

Note: These values are for 12-team, one-QB leagues with half-PPR scoring.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Los Angeles Lakers begin the 2025-26 season, hosting the Golden State Warriors on Tuesday, Oct. 21, with the expectation of being a true contender in a tough Western Conference.

Luka Dončić and LeBron James headline the Lakers’ roster, but it will be the depth the organization has put around the two superstars that will determine how deep the Lakers can make a run in the playoffs.

The Lakers managed to finish third in the Western Conference and made the playoffs last season after acquiring Dončić on Feb. 2, but finished out the postseason with three straight losses to the Minnesota Timberwolves in the first round.

While guard Austin Reaves, forward Rui Hachimura and center Deandre Ayton round out the starting lineup, here are some underrated players on the roster this season that could help make a difference this season.

Marcus Smart, Guard

Smart could prove to be a key contributor for the Lakers. He could give the Lakers a physical point-of-attack defender.

The guard is a three-time all-defensive player and won the Defensive Player of the Year award for the 2021-22 season. In the seasons that followed, he has struggled to stay healthy.

He’s dealt with a finger issue dating back to December of 2024 that carried over throughout the early part of 2025.

Smart spent the last season with both the Memphis Grizzlies and the Washington Wizards, starting in just seven of the 34 games he played together. With the small sample size, he averaged nine points, 3.2 assists and 2.1 rebounds per game in 20 minutes played.

Gabe Vincent, Guard

Vincent adds a level of versatility for the Lakers, showing the ability to play as a point guard and a shooting guard.

He will be in the starting lineup, replacing James, for the season opener when the Lakers host the Warriors on Tuesday.

The veteran guard showed why he’s a valuable asset for the Lakers’ depth, scoring 14 points in the preseason finale on 5-of-6 shooting from the field in 23 minutes of play. He was 4-of-5 from the three-point line. He also produced another double-digit scoring output, with 18 points in the first four minutes of play against the Dallas Mavericks after going 5-for-5 from three.

The UC Santa Barbara product scored 6.4 points, 1.4 assists and 1.3 rebounds in 72 games played last season for the Lakers.

Maxi Kleber, Center

Kleber arrived in Los Angeles as part of the Dončić trade with the Mavericks. Kleber was dealing with a foot fracture that sidelined him, and he didn’t see time on the court for the Lakers until the playoffs, where he played just one game.

Kleber is already questionable for the season opener against the Warriors because of an abdominal injury.

If he can stay healthy, he could serve as another backup big man who can stretch the floor for the Lakers.

Jaxson Hayes, Center/Forward

Hayes is no stranger to the fan base, having taken over as the starting center after Anthony Davis was traded to the Mavericks. 

Hayes can play as a forward and a center, but appeared to fall out of favor with coach JJ Redick during the postseason and saw limited action. He started four of the team’s five playoff games but averaged just 7.8 minutes.

Hayes could potentially thrive with the second unit, where he isn’t dealing with the expectation of filling Davis’ shoes.

He averaged 6.8 points and 4.8 rebounds in 19.5 minutes per game. Hayes started 35 of the 56 games he played last season.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY