Author

admin

Browsing

Syntholene Energy (TSXV:ESAF,FSE:3DD0) is a next-generation clean energy company developing high-performance, carbon-negative synthetic liquid fuels, with aviation as its initial target market. The company is commercializing its proprietary Hybrid Thermal Production System, a breakthrough technology designed to enable low-cost, large-scale production of ultrapure synthetic jet fuel (eSAF).

Syntholene targets production costs up to 70 percent lower than the nearest competing technologies, positioning its fuel to be cost-competitive with — and ultimately cheaper than — conventional fossil fuels. With a mission to deliver the world’s first truly high-performance, low-cost, and carbon-neutral eFuel at industrial scale, Syntholene aims to unlock a new era of affordable, sustainable aviation and clean energy solutions

Syntholene is progressing its Hybrid Thermal Production System from laboratory-scale validation toward a real-world demonstration facility in Iceland, leveraging abundant geothermal resources and long-term expansion potential.

Company Highlights

  • Proprietary Production Technology – Synthetic fuel (eFuel) produced through a fully integrated, proprietary pathway designed for superior performance and materially lower cost than conventional power-to-liquid methods
  • Low-Cost, High-Performance Fuel – Engineered to deliver high energy efficiency while significantly reducing production costs
  • Sustainable Feedstocks – Manufactured using renewable electricity, green hydrogen, and captured carbon
  • Ultra-Low Emissions – Delivers up to 90 percent lower lifecycle emissions compared to conventional jet fuel
  • Drop-In Compatibility – Fully compatible with existing aircraft engines and global fueling infrastructure
  • Scalable Clean Energy Solution – Designed for industrial-scale deployment to accelerate the transition to sustainable aviation fuel

This Syntholene Energy profile is part of a paid investor education campaign.*

Click here to connect with Syntholene Energy (TSXV:ESAF) to receive an Investor Presentation

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Dalaroo Metals Ltd (ASX: DAL, “Dalaroo” or “Company”) is pleased to announce the results of its 2025 exploration program completed at the Company’s 100%-owned Blue Lagoon Project in Greenland (Figure 1).

Highlights

  • Maiden sampling program at the Blue Lagoon Project (Blue Lagoon) unlocks new Zirconium (Zr) and Rare Earth Elements (REE) potential district in Greenland.
  • First sampling program at Blue Lagoon since 1979 has successfully returned elevated Zr + REE mineralisation. All 113 samples returned anomalous values, across a ~2.7km strike – indicating a highly prospective new critical metals district in Greenland.

Zirconium & Hafnium

  • Exceptional high-grade Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2) and Hafnium Oxide (HfO2) surface samples include:
    • 4.42% ZrO2 & 98ppm HfO2 (Sediment Sample 26818D)
    • 4.09% ZrO2 & 99ppm HfO2 (Sediment Sample 26817D)
    • 3.82% ZrO2 & 82ppm HfO2 (Sediment Sample 26808D)
    • 3.58% ZrO2 & 61ppm HfO2 (Sediment Sample 26820D)
    • 3.13% ZrO2 & 62ppm HfO2 (Sediment Sample 26803D)
    • 2.85% ZrO2 & 73ppm HfO2 (Sediment Sample 26806D)
  • >2% ZrO2 and >40ppm HfO2 encountered in auger holes and sediment samples across the entire ~2.7km strike, indicating a large-scale, broad and well mineralised target area.
  • Hafnium is a critical semiconductor metal, which has become vital for supercharging the next-generation microchips and semiconductors, due to its high-K constant (dielectric constant) allowing Hafnium to store significantly more electrical charge than traditional SiO2 based semiconductors.
  • HfO2 has a K-constant approximately ~6x higher than SiO2, with one of the highest melting points of any compound, resulting in >1000x reduction in electron leakage through transistors versus SiO2 – underpinning the next generation of high-performing semiconductors1.
  • HfO2 (High Purity) indicative sale price currently at AU $16,297/kg, reflecting its advanced chemical properties, increasing demand in high‑tech applications, and the scarcity of hafnium‑bearing minerals2.
    • Blue Lagoon sampling has confirmed a ~2.7km strike with >2% ZrO2 and >40ppm HfO2 at surface, with potential for Hafnium grades to concentrate further at depth, subject to drilling confirmation.

Rare Earths

  • The Blue Lagoon Project has returned high-grade REE results with consistent elevated Magnet Rare Earth Oxides (MREO)13 encountered at surface, with Total Rare Earth Oxide (TREO)13,16 grades highlighted by:
    • 8,079 ppm TREO with 29% MREO (Sediment Sample 26824D)
    • 6,491 ppm TREO with 27% MREO (Sediment Sample 26801D)
    • 5,668 ppm TREO with 27% MREO (Sediment Sample 26824C)
    • 5,654 ppm TREO with 27% MREO (Sediment Sample 26823D)
    • 5,519 ppm TREO with 25% MREO (Sediment Sample 26818D)
  • Blue Lagoon has shown exceptional Heavy Rare Earth Oxides (HREO)14,15 enriched in Dysprosium (Dy2O3) and Terbium (Tb4O7) grades encountered at surface, unlocking a new completely untapped district in Greenland:
    • 886ppm HREO (Sediment Sample 26824D)
    • 752ppm HREO (Sediment Sample 26801D)
    • 742ppm HREO (Sediment Sample 26823D)
    • 682ppm HREO (Sediment Sample 26807D)
    • 654ppm HREO (Sediment Sample 26806D)
    • 628ppm HREO (Sediment Sample 26818D)
    • 615ppm HREO (Sediment Sample 26808D)
    • 597ppm HREO (Sediment Sample 26824C)
    • 596ppm HREO (Sediment Sample 26817D)
    • 589ppm HREO (Sediment Sample 26822D)
    • 559ppm HREO (Sediment Sample 26820D)
  • TREO grades and HREO grades have the strong potential to improve as Dalaroo continues to assess full district potential of the Blue Lagoon Project and drill test immediate targets to determine the scale of the mineralised system.
  • Importantly, sampling at Blue Lagoon has returned low Uranium levels, with a maximum reading of 25ppm U3O8 which has the potential to simplify processing complexities and encouragingly falls below the 100ppm uranium threshold levels for permitting in Greenland
  • Placer & Liberated REE Potential: These exceptional REE grades were encountered at surface, consistently over the entire ~2.7km strike. With the natural weathering having enriched the REE into beach-like alluvial sediments – indicating potential for a proximal placer style REE deposit, where REE grains have been freely-liberated and has the potential to produce a REE concentrate through low CAPEX, simple physical separation methods.

Click here for the full ASX Release

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Will Rhind, CEO of GraniteShares, outlines his thoughts on gold and silver heading into 2026, noting that historical precedents point to higher prices.

‘Clearly when you look back on some of those other periods for gold — and silver particularly — where they went to all-time highs, then we could be talking about a lot higher prices,’ he said.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The solar industry is turning to base metals and innovation to bypass the soaring silver price.

Silver’s exceptional electrical and thermal conductivity make it a critical material in the production of photovoltaics (PV). However, record-high prices are forcing key solar industry players to find more cost-effective alternatives.

In a September 2025 report, BNEF analysts note that silver represents about 14 percent of the total cost of production for solar panels, up from 5 percent in 2023. At the time, silver was trading in the US$42 to US$46 per ounce range.

Since then, the white metal’s price has exploded, hitting an all-time high of US$93.77 on Wednesday (January 14). That’s double the level it was in September, and a nearly 200 percent increase from the year before.

In an industry already fraught with intense competition, such a large leap in the price for a major component is unsustainable. In response, top manufacturers in China such as LONGi Green Energy Technology (SHA:601012) are turning to base metals and technological innovations to help manage solar panel input costs.

Solar panel makers bypassing silver

China dominates the global solar PV industry, representing more than 80 percent of worldwide manufacturing capacity across the supply chain, including polysilicon, wafers, cells and modules.

In early January, Bloomberg reported that starting in Q2, LONGi Green Energy is planning to start mass producing solar cells using base metals instead of silver in an effort to reduce costs.

Di Giacomo believes that because LONGi Green Energy is one of the solar industry’s technological leaders, its move away from silver marks a significant turning point for the sector.

Bloomberg notes that the company has joined the ranks of other Chinese solar manufacturers looking to sidestep silver’s price volatility. In December, JinkoSolar Holding (NYSE:JKS), which is headquartered in China, but listed in the US, said it was looking to roll out large-scale production of solar panels using base metals. Additionally, smaller firm Shanghai Aiko Solar Energy (SHA:600732) is producing 6.5 gigawatt solar cells without silver.

“Other major manufacturers, such as JinkoSolar and AIKO Solar, are also exploring silver-free technologies or solutions that minimize the use of this metal,” said Di Giacomo. “The convergence of efforts among leading players suggests this is not an isolated trend, but rather a structural shift in how solar panels are designed and manufactured.”

Is copper a viable alternative to silver?

Copper is the prized favorite among the base metals for swapping out silver.

While both metals have seen unprecedented price rallies on the back rising industrial demand from clean technologies and artificial intelligence, silver maintains an enormous premium over copper. Currency, the price of a troy ounce of silver is trading at about 22,000 percent higher than a troy ounce of copper.

“Although its conductivity is slightly lower, copper is far more abundant, cheaper and supported by a more diversified supply chain,” stated Di Giacomo. “These characteristics make it an attractive option for an industry seeking to scale production without exposure to bottlenecks in critical raw materials.”

The red metal may be a great electrical conductor, but it doesn’t match silver’s capabilities. There’s also the tendency for copper to oxidize and degrade, testing the long-term viability and reliability of copper-based solar components. For those reasons, subbing in copper presents technical challenges for PV makers.

One area of concern for replacing silver with copper is the high temperatures needed in the fabricating process for tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) cells, the technology currently dominating the solar panel industry.

This might not be as big an issue for LONGi Green Energy, which manufactures back-contact (BC) cells. The technical processes for adapting copper to this new type of solar cell architecture is much simpler compared to TOPCon cells.

“New generations of copper-metallized cells are achieving efficiency levels increasingly close to those of traditional silver-based models,” said Di Giacomo. “In some cases, improvements are even being observed in mechanical strength and module durability, key factors for long-term solar installations and operation under demanding environmental conditions.”

BC cells have also been shown to generate more power from the same amount of sunlight compared to TOPCon cells. A white paper from renewable energy advisory company Rinnovabili states that field data indicates that BC modules are capable of producing up to 11 percent more energy over their lifetime compared to TOPCon technology.

How will substitution impact silver?

In a November 2025 report, the Silver Institute reported that industrial silver demand is projected to drop by 2 percent in 2025 to 665 million ounces. One of the contributing factors in the decline is an approximate 5 percent decrease in silver demand from the solar industry, even though the number of global PV installations set a new record high for the year. This is “due to a sharp drop in the amount of silver used in each module,” according to the firm.

“A sustained reduction in solar sector silver demand could alter market dynamics,” warned Di Giacomo.

However, at this point it’s too early to tell. For one, TOPCon technology is expected to account for 70 percent of the market in 2026. The cost of manufacturing BC cells is not expected to reach parity with TOPCon cells until the end of the decade, said Molly Morgan, senior research analyst at CRU Group, as reported by pv magazine.

“That’s why we believe we might see a coexistence of the two technologies in the 2028 to 2030 timeframe,” she said.

Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

(TheNewswire)

 

Prismo’s Interest Currently Stands at 95% With Option for Full Control

Vancouver, British Columbia, January 16th, 2025 TheNewswire – Prismo Metals Inc. (‘Prismo’ or the ‘Company’) (CSE: PRIZ,OTC:PMOMF) (OTCQB: PMOMF) is pleased to announce that it has completed its previously announced transaction with Infinitum Copper Corp. (TSXV: INFI) (‘Infinitum’) whereby Prismo has increased its interest in the Hot Breccia copper project, located in the heart of Arizona’s prolific copper belt, from 75% to 95%. In addition, Prismo has obtained an irrevocable option to acquire Infinitum’s remaining 5% interest, providing a clear path to 100% interest in the project.

Alain Lambert, CEO of Prismo commented: ‘This transaction marks a significant milestone for Prismo and provides a clear mechanism to securing full ownership of Hot Breccia. It materially improves the strategic flexibility of the project.’

He added: ‘Prismo remains firmly committed to advancing Hot Breccia. The recent extension of certain milestone obligations under the option agreement with Walnut Mines LLC, the owner of the Hot Breccia claims, together with the completion of the transaction with Infinitum, provides the Company with additional flexibility as we evaluate a range of strategic alternatives. Each of these pathways’ goal is to drill what we consider to be one of the most compelling copper exploration opportunities in Arizona and the broader United States.

Dr. Linus Keating, manager of Walnut Mines LLC, enthusiastically commented: ‘Walnut Mines is solidly in favor of any action that moves Hot Breccia closer to a serious drill program. We are hopeful that this transaction will accomplish that goal in 2026. In our opinion, this property remains one of the best copper exploration opportunities in North America.’

Under the terms of the transaction, Prismo paid Infinitum CA $185,000 to acquire a 20% additional interest in the Hot Breccia project and assumed all of Infinitum’s remaining obligations under the existing option agreement with Walnut to issue shares to Walnut, which has been satisfied by the issuance to Walnut of 450,630 common shares at a deemed issue price of $0.11 per share. Prismo has also agreed to pay Infinitum 5% of any consideration received in connection with a transaction in which Prismo assigns its interest in Hot Breccia to a third party to acquire the 5% interest held by Infinitum.

Prismos Hot Breccia project lies at the heart of the Arizona Copper Belt, which hosts several globally significant porphyry copper deposits.  Examples of these significant deposits are Freeport McMoRan’s Miami-Inspiration mining complex, BHP’s San Manuel mine, Rio Tinto and BHP’s Resolution deposit and others (see Figure 1).  

 

Figure 1. Location of the Hot Breccia Project in the Arizona Copper Belt.

The Company wishes to update its January 12th, 2026 news release to confirm that the Company issued 2,250,000 units for gross proceeds of $225,000 and issued 140,000 Finder’s Warrants and paid finder’s commissions of $14,000 to a certain qualified finder. Each Unit consisted of one common share in the capital of the Company (a ‘Share‘) and one common share purchase warrant of the Company (a ‘Warrant‘). Each Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one Share for a period of thirty-six (36) months from the date of issue at an exercise price of $0.175. Prismo intends to proceed next week a final closing of 1,500,000 Units for gross proceeds of $150,000.

About Prismo Metals Inc.

Prismo (CSE: PRIZ,OTC:PMOMF) is a mining exploration company focused on advancing its Hot Breccia copper project in Arizona and its Palos Verdes silver project in Mexico.

Please follow @PrismoMetals on , , , Instagram, and

Prismo Metals Inc.

1100 – 1111 Melville St., Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 3V6  Phone: (416) 361-0737

Contact:

Alain Lambert, Chief Executive Officer alain.lambert@prismometals.com

Gordon Aldcorn, President gordon.aldcorn@prismometals.com

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This release includes certain statements and information that may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect the expectations or beliefs of management of the Company regarding future events. Generally, forward-looking statements and information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as intends‘ or anticipates, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results may’, could‘, should‘, would‘ or occur. This information and these statements, referred to herein as ‘forwardlooking statements’, are not historical facts, are made as of the date of this news release and include without limitation, statements regarding discussions of future plans, estimates and forecasts and statements as to management’s expectations and intentions with respect to, among other things: the timing, costs and anticipated results of drilling at Hot Breccia; the ability of Prismo to fund drilling and pursue potential third-party partnerships; the Company’s strategic flexibility with respect to the Hot Breccia project going forward; the number of shares issuable by Prismo to Walnut pursuant to the transaction described in this news release; and the Company’s expectations regarding mineralization and other qualities of the Hot Breccia project.

These forwardlooking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things: delays in obtaining or failure to obtain appropriate funding to finance the exploration program at Hot Breccia; the risk that the Company will not enter into a third-party partnership with respect to the Hot Breccia project; the risk that mineralization will not be as anticipated at the project; the risk that the Company will not be able to take advantage of geological information to refine drill targeting; metal prices; market uncertainty; and other risks and uncertainties application to exploration activities and the Company’s business as set forth in the Company’s disclosure documents available for viewing under the Company’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Company has applied several material assumptions, including without limitation, that: the ability to raise capital to fund the drilling campaign at Hot Breccia and the timing of such drilling campaign; the ability of the Company to enter into a third-party partnership on the project; that the project will have the anticipated mineralization and other qualities; and the  Company will be able to take advantage of geological information to refine drill targeting.

Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements or forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and forward-looking information. Readers are cautioned that reliance on such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, forward-looking information or financial out-look that are incorporated by reference herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. We seek safe harbor.

Copyright (c) 2026 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

More than two months into Major League Baseball’s free agency period, plenty of elite talent remains ‒ though the overall depth available has been significantly hollowed out.

A run on relievers ‒ often the last class of players to come off the board ‒ finally gave way to elite sluggers finding homes, with Kyle Tucker’s stunning deal with the Los Angeles Dodgers leaving infielder Bo Bichette the best player available.

Who’s left on the free agency market? USA TODAY Sports ranks the top remaining free agents and breaks down who’s already signed:

Ages on April 1, 2026:

1. Bo Bichette (28, SS, Blue Jays)

Bichette’s sterling World Series performance on, essentially, one leg spoke to both his grit and significant skill set. Posted a .311/.357/.483 line before getting hurt. And if he’s better suited to second base in the future, consider that he’s hitting the market two years earlier than Marcus Semien, and that worked out OK for Texas.

2. Framber Valdez (32, LHP, Astros)

Not sure if he’ll sniff the Max Fried rent district for lefty starters but it never hurts when you’re literally one of two on the market. Valdez is consistently right around 200 innings, has a championship pedigree and suppresses the home run ball. Not an ideal conclusion to his Houston era, but it’s also easy enough to hand him the ball and set your alarm clock for September.

3. Cody Bellinger (30, OF/1B, Yankees)

Bellinger topped the 150-game mark for the first time since 2019 and had an excellent season his one year in the Bronx – producing 5.1 WAR, hitting 29 homers and playing typically sound defense. Given his health history, there will be some risk wagering on a hale Bellinger for the next five-plus years – but his overall skill set will be difficult to ignore.

4. Zac Gallen (30, RHP, Diamondbacks)

He led the NL in WHIP (0.91) and the majors in fewest hits per nine innings (5.9) in 2022, but regressed to 1.26 and 8.3/8.1 the past two seasons. He was much better once the trade deadline passed, posting a 3.32 ERA in his last 11 starts.

5. Lucas Giolito (31, RHP, Red Sox)

Giolito finally turned the page on a pair of injury-ravaged seasons to make 26 starts and post a 3.41 ERA, enough to comfortably decline his $19 million player option. Giolito completed at least six innings in 15 of his 26 starts, though he missed a playoff outing with elbow soreness.

6. Eugenio Suárez (34, 3B, Mariners)

Forty-nine home runs at age 34: What kind of a price do you put on that? Suarez, a free agent for the first time in his career, is about to find out. Suitors know what they’re getting: Punishing power, a ton of strikeouts, suboptimal defense at third but off the charts on the clubhouse affability index.

7. Chris Bassitt (37, RHP, Blue Jays)

A little high for the reliable righty? Well, consider that there are so few Chris Bassitts out there and this one just completed a three-year, $63 million deal with numbing consistency: 32 starts a year, a 3.89 ERA, nearly six innings per start. He topped that off with a selfless stint in the playoff bullpen, where he gave up one earned run in seven appearances.

8. Max Scherzer (41, RHP, Blue Jays)

He indicated after World Series Game 7 that he hadn’t thrown his final pitch, and he posted often enough in 2025 that the standard one year, $15.5 million deal should still be waiting for him.

9. Justin Verlander (43, RHP, Giants)

Those videos of Verlander and Scherzer playing bridge in the nursing home are gonna be wild 40 or so years from now. For now, though, they’ve got innings in their arms and for Verlander’s sake, hopefully he can find a home that’s both pitcher-friendly but also not totally lacking in run support: His 3.85 ERA resulted in a 4-11 record as he sits on 266 wins.

10. J.T. Realmuto (35, C, Phillies)

What’s the going rate for a highly skilled glue guy these days? Realmuto has been integral to the Phillies’ success in recent years, but he’s now a decade into a career as a big league catcher. His OPS and adjusted OPS sagged to career-worst marks of .700 and 91 last season, even as he caught a major-league high 132 games. Seems likely player and team will find a price agreeable to both.

11. Luis Arráez (28, INF/DH, Padres)

Let the Arráez Rorshach tests begin. Do you see a singles hitter with a league average OPS? Or a magician with elite bat-to-ball skills? A three-time batting champion with three teams? Or a guy who can never justify his lack of slug despite all those one-baggers. Be interesting to see what the market thinks.

12. Nick Martinez (35, RHP, Reds)

More invaluable than his peripherals indicate, Martinez took the ball 82 times over two years in Cincy, including 42 starts, and amassed 6.3 WAR and a steady 3.83 ERA.

13. Jose Quintana (37, LHP, Brewers)

Can we at least spare this man the indignity of nosing around for a job in March?

14. Paul Goldschmidt (38, 1B, Yankees)

Until further notice, he remains a decent right-handed platoon option at first, the Yankees eminently pleased at the 1.2 WAR and clubhouse gravitas he provided.

15. Harrison Bader (31, OF, Phillies)

The man simply seems to get better and more valuable with age. He received $6.25 million from Minnesota last winter, and after a July trade to Philadelphia was perhaps their most valuable player down the stretch.

16. Rhys Hoskins (33, 1B/DH, Brewers)

A bumpy couple of years in Milwaukee, where injuries and the emergence of Andrew Vaughn cut Hoskins out of the fun this past season. He struck out more than once per game as a Brewer but did salvage league-average OPS thanks to his power.

17. Zack Littell (30, RHP, Reds)

Littell completed the transition from swingman to full-fledged starter the past two seasons and this year reached 186 ⅔ innings with Tampa Bay and Cincinnati. Just 130 strikeouts might give suitors pause to believe he can repeat it, but Littell has proven himself as a reliable innings-eater.

18. Seranthony Dominguez (31, RHP, Blue Jays)

Durable and relatively dependable, Dominguez cut his home runs per nine in half this year (1.5 to .7) and landed a high-leverage spot in a playoff bullpen after a trade to Toronto.

19. Tomoyuki Sugano (36, RHP, Orioles)

A tale of three seasons for Sugano, who started strongly, faded badly and then made a mini-comeback to land almost exactly on the definition of ‘quality start’: A 10-10 record and 4.64 ERA. Probably did enough to land another job stateside in 2026.

20. Michael Conforto (33, OF, Dodgers)

Will that beautiful left-handed swing again prove irresistible to a suitor? The Dodgers gambled $17 million that they could turn him into a weapon and he batted .199 and did not make the playoff rosters.

21. Marcell Ozuna (35, DH, Braves)

Last call for the full-time DH? The Braves couldn’t get rid of Ozuna at the trade deadline and now he’ll take his 21 homers to the market. Hit 40 and 39 homers in 2023-24, finishing fourth in NL MVP voting in ’24.

22. Isiah Kiner-Falefa (31, INF, Blue Jays)

Simple though his role may be, there’s simply not many IKFs out there, tasked with catching the ball, running the bases well and possessing the ability to fill in anywhere on the infield.

23. Austin Hays (30, OF, Reds)

Cincy was a solid fit for Hays, who smacked 15 homers in 380 at-bats. Still adept in a right-handed platoon role.

24. Patrick Corbin (36, LHP, Rangers)

Can still eat innings – 155 of ‘em in 2025 – and now with a little less pain, as he shaved his ERA from 5.62 his final year in Washington to 4.40 in Texas.

25. David Robertson (40, RHP, Phillies)

Used to be only Roger Clemens could get away with chilling out for a few months and then hopping aboard a playoff train. Robertson did so to some success in Philly; will he be up for the long haul next spring?

26. Tommy Kahnle (36, RHP, Tigers)

Leaving New York – where he’d posted a 2.38 ERA his past two seasons – was tricky for Kahnle, whose 4.43 ERA was his worst since 2018.

27. Daniel Coulombe (36, LHP, Rangers)

Was better before he got caught up in the Twins fire sale (1.16 ERA in Minnesota, 5.25 in 15 appearances in Texas) but on balance remains one of the most reliable and versatile lefty relief options available.

28. Jakob Junis (33, RHP, Guardians)

All he does is get outs, though the itinerant swingman did see some WHIP inflation (1.230) this past season.

29. Walker Buehler (31, RHP, Phillies)

The arm is too good to give up on, even if the Red Sox had little choice but to do so after posting a 5.45 ERA and 5.89 FIP in 22 starts there. He fared a little better in a two-start look-see with Philadelphia, but he’ll clearly be in a short-term incentive-laden situation in 2025.

30. Jon Gray (34, RHP, Rangers)

His 2025 was a wash, as a fractured wrist in spring training and shoulder neuritis limited him to six appearances.

31. Tyler Anderson (36, LHP, Angels)

Seemed like a quick three years in Anaheim, mercifully, where Anderson posted a good year, not-so-good and a so-so season. He’s coming off the last of those, the biggest bugaboo a career worst 1.8 homers per nine.

32. Miles Mikolas (37, RHP, Cardinals)

A bit of will-he or won’t-he involved with Mikolas, who may retire, though he’s never one to leave any innings on the table. Last year, he ate up 156 ⅓ of them, with a 4.84 ERA.

33. Victor Caratini (32, C, Astros)

A fairly deluxe backup catcher, with a league-average OPS, 12 homers and well-regarded behind the plate.

34. Miguel Andujar (30, INF, Reds)

A nifty revival for the 2018 Rookie of the Year runner-up, as he posted an .822 OPS with the A’s and Reds and positioned himself as a versatile righty platoon bat going forward.

35. Justin Wilson (38, LHP, Red Sox)

About as close to a LOOGY as one can get in this three-batter minimum era, as Wilson tossed 48 1/3 innings in 61 appearances, holding lefties to a .212 average.

36. Mitch Garver (35, C/DH, Mariners)

The bat continues to fade, but Garver did catch 43 games backing up the Big Dumper in Seattle.

37. Scott Barlow (33, RHP, Reds)

A throw-till-you-blow guy and well, Barlow hasn’t blown yet, his 75 appearances always a value to a team needing innings.

38. Martin Perez (34, LHP, White Sox)

Declined the player portion of his mutual option after a flexor strain limited him to 10 starts in 2025.

39. Starling Marte (37, OF, Mets)

His four years of meritorious, if injury-plagued, service in Flushing are over. But Marte should still retain some value as an extra outfielder.

40. Andrew McCutchen (39, OF, Pirates)

He’s not so sure about that open invitation to return to Pittsburgh, but has indicated he’ll run it back one more time, somewhere, in 2026.

41. Brent Suter (36, LHP, Reds)

If only for the post-clinch dance moves. For real, though, Suter never pitched more than 3 ⅔ innings last season but appeared in 1 through 9 at some point. Anytime, anywhere.

Free agent signings, with pre-winter rankings:

1. Kyle Tucker (29, OF, Cubs)

SIGNED: Four years, $240 million with Dodgers, Jan. 15.

3. Alex Bregman (31, 3B, Red Sox)

SIGNED: Five years, $175 million with Cubs, Jan. 10.

5. Pete Alonso (31, 1B/DH, Mets)

SIGNED: Five years, $155 million with Orioles, Dec. 10.

7. Kyle Schwarber (33, DH, Phillies)

SIGNED: Five years, $150 million with Phillies, Dec. 9.

8. Dylan Cease (30, RHP, Padres)

SIGNED: Seven years, $210 million with Blue Jays, Nov. 26.

10. Edwin Diaz (32, RHP, Mets)

SIGNED: Three years, $69 million with Dodgers, Dec. 9.

11. Ranger Suárez (30, LHP, Phillies)

SIGNED: Five years, $130 million with Red Sox, Jan. 14.

12. Josh Naylor (28, 1B, Mariners)

SIGNED: Five years, $92.5 million with Mariners, Nov. 16.

13. Shota Imanaga (30, LHP, Cubs)

SIGNED: Accepted $22.025 million qualifying offer from Cubs, Nov. 18.

15. Trent Grisham (29, OF, Yankees)

SIGNED: Accepted $22.025 million qualifying offer from Yankees, Nov. 18.

18. Merrill Kelly (37, RHP, Rangers)

SIGNED: Two years, $40 million, with Diamondbacks.

19. Ha-Seong Kim (30, SS, Braves)

SIGNED: One year, $20 million with Braves, Dec. 15.

20. Robert Suarez (34, RHP, Padres)

SIGNED: Three years, $45 million with Braves, Dec. 11.

24. Michael King (30, RHP, Padres)

SIGNED: Three years, $75 million with Padres, Dec. 18.

25. Gleyber Torres (29, INF, Tigers)

SIGNED: Accepted $22.025 million qualifying offer from Tigers, Nov. 18.

26. Raisel Iglesias (35, RHP, Braves)

SIGNED: One year, $16 million with Atlanta, Nov. 19.

32. Mike Yastrzemski (35, OF, Royals)

SIGNED: Two years, $23 million with Atlanta, Dec. 10.

33. Devin Williams (31, RHP, Yankees)

SIGNED: Three years, $51 million with Mets, Dec. 1.

34. Emilio Pagán (34, RHP, Reds)

SIGNED: Two years, $20 million with Reds, Dec. 3.

35. Tyler Mahle (31, RHP, Rangers)

SIGNED: One year, $10 million with Giants, Dec. 31.

38. Tyler Rogers (34, RHP, Mets)

SIGNED: Three years, $37 million with Blue Jays, Dec. 12.

39. Jorge Polanco (32, INF, Mariners)

SIGNED: Two years, $40 million with Mets, Dec. 13.

40. Ryan O’Hearn (32, 1B/OF, Padres)

SIGNED: Two years, $29 million with Pirates, Dec. 23.

42. Kyle Finnegan (34, RHP, Tigers)

SIGNED: Two years, $19 million with Tigers, Dec. 9.

45. Brad Keller (30, RHP, Cubs)

SIGNED: Two years, $22 million with Phillies, Dec. 17.

47. Steven Matz (34, LHP, Red Sox)

SIGNED: Two years, $15 million with Rays, Dec. 8.

48. Ryan Helsley (31, RHP, Mets)

SIGNED: Two years, $28 million with Orioles, Nov. 30.

49. Drew Pomeranz (37, LHP, Cubs)

SIGNED: One year, $4 million with Angels, Dec. 16.

50. Michael Lorenzen (34, RHP, Royals)

SIGNED: One year, $8 million with Rockies, Jan. 7.

52. Danny Jansen (30, C, Brewers)

SIGNED: Two years, $14.5 million with Rangers, Dec. 13.

53. Phil Maton (33, RHP, Rangers)

SIGNED: Two years, $14.5 million with Cubs, Nov. 25.

54. Josh Bell (33, 1B/DH, Nationals)

SIGNED: One year, $7 million with Twins, Dec. 15.

56. Caleb Thielbar (39, LHP, Cubs)

SIGNED: One year, $4.5 million with Cubs, Dec. 16.

58. Shawn Armstrong (35, RHP, Rangers)

SIGNED: One year, $5.5 million with Guardians, Dec. 18.

60. Luke Weaver (32, RHP, Yankees)

SIGNED: Two years, $22 million with Mets, Dec. 17.

67. Mike Soroka (28, RHP, Cubs)

SIGNED: One year, $7.5 million with Diamondbacks, Dec. 8.

69. Sean Newcomb (32, LHP, Athletics)

SIGNED: One year, $4.5 million with White Sox, Dec. 23.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • The Texans’ defense ranked among the league’s best during the regular season in yards allowed, points allowed, and takeaways.
  • Players credit their success to a close-knit, ‘college-esque’ camaraderie and the ‘swarm culture’ instilled by head coach DeMeco Ryans.

PITTSBURGH – Will Anderson Jr. had a dream. 

“I said ‘Look, I’m not Martin Luther King,’” Anderson said about his interaction with teammate Sheldon Rankins before the Houston Texans departed for Pittsburgh to face the Steelers in the wild-card round. “But, ‘I had a dream that you had a scoop. But I don’t know what’s going to happen.’ The dream went blank after that.”

Lost to Anderson’s REM cycle was something that played out perfectly for the Texans. In the fourth quarter of their eventual 30-6 thrashing of the Steelers, Anderson Jr. and Rankins combined to sack Aaron Rodgers, who lost the ball (Anderson received credit for the forced fumble). Rankins picked up the pigskin and scampered 33 yards for a touchdown that took a 10-6 game to a 17-6 difference with 11:23 remaining. Houston’s defense wasn’t done scoring – Calen Bullock iced the game, and potentially Rodgers’ career, by picking off a pass and returning it 50 yards for the game’s final score. 

The Texans’ defense, led by head coach DeMeco Ryans and defensive coordinator Matt Burke, has been dominant for an entire season. The Seattle Seahawks are the lone Super Bowl contender with a claim as legitimate as the Texans’ for best defense in the league. Houston finished the regular season first in yards allowed per game (277.2) and then surrendered 175 net yards to the Steelers. They allowed the second-fewest points per game (17.4, while the Seahawks were 17.2). The Texans were third in total takeaways (29) and finished tied for seventh in sacks. No team allowed fewer first downs per game than them (16.2). 

“The biggest thing that we were talking about – like, OK what we did in the regular season, it ain’t going to matter when we get into the playoffs” Anderson said. 

He wanted his teammates to keep the same energy while raising the bar and got just that. According to Next Gen Stats, he and Danielle Hunter combined for 15 pressures. The Texans, as a team, generated a 45.9% pressure rate (17 total times). Rodgers had been pressured a league-low 21.5% of his dropbacks during the regular season. The minus-33.4 expected points added (EPA) is the lowest mark by any playoff defense in the last decade. They haven’t allowed a positive EPA-per-dropback since a Week 2 loss to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

“I thought everybody was dialed in,” Anderson, the former Alabama standout, said. “You talking about popping it off, big plays, taking the ball – doing whatever it takes to win the game.” 

With a divisional-round matchup on the road against the New England Patriots on deck, the Texans’ defense has designs on something more than recognition.

“We’re here for it all,” Rankins said. “I won’t sugarcoat or dance around that topic. We’re here for the whole thing. This is just a stepping stone for where we want to go.” 

Texans’ defense being the best ‘for each other’

A 10-year veteran, Rankins would like to think he’s been a part of defenses in which he’s been able to trust the other 10 guys on the field as he has done with the 2025 Texans. But this group takes the cake, he said.

“I also think we have a special, close group,” he said. “I think I’ve been a part of some special groups, but the closeness hasn’t always been to this level. It almost, to a degree – especially with how many younger playmakers we have, it almost has a college-esque feel.” 

The inside jokes and light-hearded ribbing. That not only breeds camaraderie in the locker room, Rankins said, but spills over onto the field. 

“How we play for each other,” he said, “not just with each other.”   

Coaches can use that to their advantage. Because guys know one another so well, communication is easier. 

“Instead of a guy having to shout something, it can be a look, it can be a hand signal, a wink here, a wink there, or just even if it’s getting a guy’s attention, a guy can know exactly what that means and go out there and execute it fast,” Rankins explained. “I think that camaraderie, that togetherness that we have throughout the building, throughout the locker room, definitely spills over. It allows us to just go out there and play for each other, but play fast while doing it.” 

Houston safety Jalen Pitre said having guys who think of themselves as offensive players has made the Texans’ other unit lethal. 

“These are offensive players that play defense,” he said. 

Pitre said they’ll let those outside the locker room determine whether they are the best unit in the NFL. 

“I never really think about that,” he said. “I know we have a talented group. But I never really think about ‘Who is the best?’ and all that stuff. Like, we just show up ready to execute and let the numbers speak for themselves.”

“We take pride in that,” said Rankins, who gave the offense props for controlling the clock and converting third downs to stay on the field against Pittsburgh. 

Any defense would sign up for that type of performance from the other side of the ball, Rankins said. 

“That allows us to really pin our ears back and put pressure on teams,” he said. “Because if our offense is doing that, the pressure is on their offense to match it.”  

Ryans tells his team they can shut any offense down. The confidence flows from the coaching staff to the players, who keep a chip on their shoulder every time they show up for work. 

“That’s our mindset: we’re the best defense,” Bullock said. “So we got to show it and work throughout the week to prove that we’re a great defense. So when we go out there, we got that confidence, nothing can hold us back.” 

Texans surge from 0-3 to earn opponents’ respect

Texans cornerback Kamari Lassiter knew the unit had the potential to dominate based on offseason workouts. 

“Seeing guys doing what they’re doing now,” he said. “Seeing the d-line go hunt. Seeing the (linebackers) do what they do. Communicate, lead, seeing the back end play sticky, play physical, play fast. We knew we had something special.” 

A lot of people counted out the Texans after their 0-3 start, Bullock said. 

“We set a goal. We knew we had the guys,” he said. “We worked every single day to be the best defense.

“We just kept our head down, and we kept pushing.”

When they were 0-3, and Andreson saw how the team kept responding, “everybody rallying together, that’s when I knew what our foundation was.” He tipped his hat to Ryans and “what he’s instilled.” The coach wanted a ‘swarm culture. “

“That’s what’s been built here,” Anderson said.  

It’s something Patriots head coach Mike Vrabel noticed. 

“They’re not only talented,” Vrabel said Wednesday, “but they have a play demeanor that I can appreciate.”

What does that mean? Houston chases the football, Vrabel said. Having two demons on the edge in Anderson and Hunter – both of whom also are effective against the run – also helps.  

“If they get blocked,” Vrabel said, “they don’t stay blocked long.” 

“All the hype is deserving from what I’ve seen,” he said. “We’ve got to be able to stay ahead of the chains. We’ve got a tough task. We’ll have our hands full.”

Patriots center Garrett Bradbury said he sees the San Francisco 49ers and Robert Saleh’s influence on Ryans’ scheme. Houston will dare New England to run the ball. So the Patriots must do so efficiently. That’s a challenge every offensive lineman wants, Bradbury said. 

“I think what you see is who they are,” Bradbury told USA TODAY Sports. “It’s what DeMeco prides that team on. They’re a really good defense.

“They want to rush the passer every single play, and they’re gonna rush the passer on the way to stopping the run.” 

“It’ll be a great matchup,” Bradbury added. “I’m excited for the game.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Indiana, LSU, and Texas Tech are highlighted for having some of the best transfer classes this cycle.
  • New coaches, like Eric Morris at Oklahoma State, often use the portal to bring in a large number of new players.
  • Key player acquisitions include quarterbacks Josh Hoover to Indiana and Brendan Sorsby to Texas Tech.

Smart teams approach the transfer portal with specific needs and goals, identifying plug-and-play additions who can lift a program from eight wins to the quarterfinals of the College Football Playoff — as was the case with Texas Tech this season.

Or, in the case of Indiana, from the cellar of the Big Ten nearly to the top of the Football Bowl Subdivision.

But there are also cases where new coaches need to use the big-tent approach of grabbing as many new players as they can to rapidly rebuild a roster. The best example of that in this year’s cycle is Oklahoma State and new coach Eric Morris.

Transfers by conference: SEC | Big Ten | ACC | Big 12

The portal is closing Friday night but the fun isn’t quite over yet, as players who entered before the deadline can still sign with a new program and be eligible this season.

While there will be more additions in the coming weeks, here are the best transfer classes to date, starting with the Hoosiers, LSU and Red Raiders:

Indiana

Best transfers: QB Josh Hoover, WR Nick Marsh, OG Joe Brunner

The unbeaten Hoosiers found their next starting quarterback in Hoover (TCU). They found a new top-level receiver in Marsh (Michigan State) and a productive Power Four back in Turbo Richard (Boston College). They’ll rebuild up front behind Brunner (Wisconsin), maybe the best offensive lineman on the market. And to top things off, Indiana added immediate help on the defensive line and an all-conference defensive back in A.J. Harris (Penn State).

LSU

Best transfers: QB Sam Leavitt, S Ty Benefield, WR Jayce Brown

Leavitt (Arizona State) is one of three transfer quarterbacks in this class, along with Husan Longstreet (Southern California) and Landen Clark (Elon). Lane Kiffin also added maybe the portal’s most impactful defensive back in Benefield (Boise State) while rebuilding the Tigers’ receiver corps with Brown (Kansas State), Eugene Wilson (Florida), Winston Watkins (Ole Miss) and Tre’ Brown III (Old Dominion).

Texas Tech

Best transfers: QB Brendan Sorsby, DT Mateen Ibirogba, LB Austin Romaine

One of the top overall players in the portal, Sorsby (Cincinnati) brings Big 12 experience and an NFL-ready skill set to the starting job. Tech added another experienced Big 12 contributor in Romaine (Kansas State), a starter since midway through his freshman year. Ibirogba (Wake Forest) was an all-conference pick in the ACC and one of six linemen set to join the roster, including edge Adam Trick (Maryland) and defensive tackle Bryce Butler (Washington).

Virginia Tech

Best transfers: EDGE Javion Hilson, WR Que’Sean Brown, EDGE Kamauryn Morgan

James Franklin pulled over several players from Penn State, including tight end Luke Reynolds and quarterback Ethan Grunkemeyer. The Hokies were especially productive in adding edge rushers, with Morgan (Baylor) and Hilson (Missouri) joined by a run of ex-Nittany Lions in Cortez Harris, Mylachi Williams and Daniel Jennings.

Texas

Best transfers: WR Cam Coleman, DT Ian Geffrard, RB Hollywood Smothers

This is a smaller transfer class headlined by the type of players who can lift the Longhorns back into the playoff. That includes high-profile newcomers who can support Arch Manning’s development in Coleman (Auburn) and Smothers (North Carolina State). Defensively, Texas added two huge pieces to the front seven in Geffrard (Arkansas) and former All-ACC linebacker Rasheem Biles (Pittsburgh).

Ole Miss

Best transfers: OT Carius Curne, WR Darrell Gill Jr., CB Jay Crawford

Along with Curne (LSU) and Gill (Syracuse), the Rebels’ offense adds quarterback Deuce Knight (Auburn) as the potential new starter. While young, Curne has the frame and athleticism to develop into one of the best in the SEC. Crawford (Auburn) is a proven starter on the outside with room for growth. Running back Kewan Lacy doesn’t count in this group, but retaining him for another year might’ve been the biggest off-field win of the newly minted Pete Golding era.

Penn State

Best transfers: QB Rocco Becht, S Marcus Neal Jr., WR Chase Sowell

Penn State’s 36-player class includes a bunch of big pieces from last year’s offense under Matt Campbell at Iowa State, including Becht, Sowell, running back Carson Hansen, tight end Ben Brahmer and interior lineman Trevor Buhr. Likewise with the defense: Neal, fellow safeties Jeremiah Cooper and Jamison Patton, tackle Ikenna Ezeogu and linebackers Caleb Bacon and Kooper Ebel will help ease the transition to a new staff and make the Nittany Lions a Big Ten contender.

Louisville

Best transfers: S Koen Entringer, TE Brody Foley, WR Tre Richardson

Louisville and coach Jeff Brohm continue to do excellent work in the portal. Entringer (Iowa) is a huge get for a defense that really needs his experience and proven production; he considered the NFL draft before joining the Cardinals. The offense added quarterback Lincoln Kienholz (Ohio State) and one of the cycle’s strongest collections of pass-catchers, including Foley (Tulsa), Richardson (Vanderbilt) and Lawayne McCoy (Florida State).

Kentucky

Best transfers: QB Kenny Minchey, OT Lance Heard, S Jordan Castell

Kentucky and new coach Will Stein have made some noise. Minchey (Notre Dame) was briefly committed to Nebraska before being flipped to the Wildcats. Castell (Florida) is a veteran SEC starter who can help with the development of a young but talented transfer haul at linebacker. Where the Wildcats have excelled is in overhauling the offensive line with Heard (Tennessee) and guards Tegra Tshabola (Ohio State) and Coleton Price (Baylor). Stein also remade the backfield by bringing in CJ Baxter (Texas) and Jovantae Barnes (Oklahoma).

Oklahoma State

Best transfers: QB Drew Mestemaker, LB Isaiah Chisom, RB Caleb Hawkins

Like Campbell at Penn State, Morris brought in a huge chunk of his key players from North Texas, led by Mestemaker, Hawkins and wide receiver Wyatt Young. These pieces will lead to a huge improvement from this season’s putrid offense. The defense will feature an influx of Power Four transfers such as Chisom (UCLA), Louisville lineman Jerry Lawson, linebacker Tate Romney (Arizona State) and cornerback Trudell Berry (Vanderbilt).

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The divisional round of the NFL playoffs is regarded as the best weekend of the season by some fans. Four games over two days, two of them including the regular season’s best teams − insomuch as one might regard the No. 1 postseason seeds as the best squads.

Saturday, the Denver Broncos, the top seed in the AFC, will host the Buffalo Bills in a rematch from the 2024 wild-card round − Josh Allen and Co. cruising best then-rookie Bo Nix and the Broncos 31-7. In the NFC, the San Francisco 49ers and Seattle Seahawks will meet for the third time (and second in three weeks) − the ‘Hawks returning to action at Lumen Field following their bye.

Sunday afternoon, the New England Patriots will try to advance to their first AFC championship game in seven years − by beating a red-hot Houston Texans squad hoping to get that for for the first time. Ever. The final matchup of the weekend quartet will pair the Los Angeles Rams and Chicago Bears, who will square off in the postseason for the first time in 40 years − since the legendary ’85 Bears shut out the Rams at Soldier Field.

Which teams will qualify for the NFL’s version of the Final Four? Our experts make their selections:

(Odds provided by BetMGM)

Divisional round picks, predictions, odds

  • Bills at Broncos
  • 49ers at Seahawks
  • Texans at Patriots
  • Rams at Bears
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

With the conclusion of the world juniors and the NHL season beyond its halfway point, the 2026 draft is quickly entering the forefront of discussions across the hockey world. 

NHL commissioner Gary Bettman announced this week the draft will be hosted at Buffalo’s KeyBank Center in June, becoming the first arena to host the event in its decentralized format since it was introduced at The Peacock Theater in Los Angeles last year.

The NHL’s Central Scouting department also released its mid-term rankings, headlined by Gavin McKenna, Ivar Stenberg and Keaton Verhoeff, sparking debate among scouts and prospect enthusiasts. Player evaluation for this class is becoming more intriguing with each passing day.

Considering the current NHL standings and the organizational needs of the teams positioned to select in the lottery, let’s look at one of many ways the top 16 picks in the draft could fall next summer.

(Draft order determined by standings, sorted by points percentage, before games on Jan. 15, 2026)

NHL mock draft: Top 16 picks

1. Vancouver Canucks: Frolunda (Sweden) left wing Ivar Stenberg

Stenberg took his game to new heights in the biggest moments of the world juniors. He was just as dangerous as a distributor as he was a finisher, and his ability to break down defenses and make high-end plays under pressure made him one of the tournament’s best players. He scored a game-winning goal in his return to Frolunda, and his historic scoring pace in the Swedish League will make him a top-three pick this summer.

2. Winnipeg Jets: Penn State (NCAA) left wing Gavin McKenna

McKenna’s showing at the world juniors was cause for debate. He finished second in tournament scoring while being a catalyst on the best power play at the event. His play off the puck and his overall compete level still left a lot to be desired, however. He has the tools to be a generational offensive talent, but his spot as the No. 1 pick in this draft is no longer a lock. Winnipeg needs another top-end winger anyway.

3. Calgary Flames: North Dakota (NCAA) defenseman Keaton Verhoeff

With Rasmus Andersson trade rumors intensifying, the Flames could land a long-term replacement in Verhoeff as a right-shot defenseman who can log big minutes and play in all on-ice situations. There wasn’t a ton of opportunity for him at the world juniors to showcase his skills with Team Canada, but a big second half at North Dakota should reinforce his status as the top blueliner in this class.

4. St. Louis Blues: Boston University (NCAA) center Tynan Lawrence

Lawrence suited up for his first three games of college hockey after leaving the USHL’s Muskegon Lumberjacks to join Boston University. He centered the team’s top line alongside two top prospects in the NCAA, Cole Eiserman and Ryder Ritchie. While there’s clearly going to be an adjustment period, his motor, defensive contributions and ability to elevate teammates will translate well and should make for an intriguing push to become the top pick in this draft.

5. New York Rangers: Jukurit (Finland) defenseman Alberts Smits

Smits’ draft stock skyrocketed after his showing at the world juniors. He averaged the second-most ice time in the tournament at 23:40, was responsible for handling every tough matchup Latvia faced, and was the driving force of the team’s offense. The 18-year-old was named to Latvia’s Olympic team, and with another impressive showing, he could be the first defender off the board this summer.

6. Chicago Blackhawks: Windsor (OHL) left wing Ethan Belchetz

At 6-foot-5 and 228 pounds, Belchetz has the frame of an enforcer with the vision and IQ of a playmaker, making him a one-of-a-kind prospect in this class. His biggest concern this season has been his skating and overall pace, but he still feels like a solid top-six forward with a set of tools that teams don’t typically let slide beyond the top five. The Blackhawks could eventually play him with Connor Bedard or Frank Nazar.

7. Anaheim Ducks: Sault Ste. Marie (OHL) defenseman Chase Reid

Reid is a talented athlete who processes offense at a very high level while defending with purpose. There are few players with his tools in this class. There were times when his aggressiveness in driving play at the world juniors worked against him, but he never let mistakes discourage him. His willingness to be a difference-maker with each shift is admirable, and he could help an aging right side of the Ducks’ defense.

8. Columbus Blue Jackets: Djurgarden (Sweden) center Viggo Bjorck

Despite being Sweden’s youngest player at the world juniors, Bjorck was right there with Stenberg as one of the most effective forwards of the tournament. He stood out on the power play and penalty kill, was an aggressive forechecker who won more battles than he lost despite being 5-foot-9 and displayed his crafty playmaking ability with a pace of play that few could match. He proved he has a skill set that can’t be overlooked.

9. Nashville Predators: Tappara (Finland) center Oliver Suvanto

Suvanto feels like a center the Predators wouldn’t pass on at this point in the draft, regardless of where his talents rank among the top forwards in this class. His skating issues were the biggest factor preventing him from creating offense at the world juniors, but there’s still a ton to like about what he could bring to the NHL level with his defensive details, proficiency as a net-front presence and tenacious forechecking.

10. Utah Mammoth: Blainville-Boisbriand (QMJHL) defenseman Xavier Villeneuve

Villeneuve would bring an element of offense to the Mammoth’s defensive core that the team doesn’t have. He’s earned comparisons to Montreal Canadiens defenseman Lane Hutson with his dynamic skating ability, offensive deception and willingness to drive play from the back end. He projects as a high-end power-play quarterback at the NHL level and could put up strong production in a high-octane offensive system like Utah’s.

11. New Jersey Devils: Vancouver (WHL) defenseman Ryan Lin

The Devils could go in a few directions with this selection, considering their issues with preventing and generating offense this season. That said, Lin’s defensive maturity makes it hard to believe he’ll be on the board beyond this point in the draft. As trade rumors involving Dougie Hamilton continue to circulate, there could be some runway for Lin to develop and show off his offensive capabilities in this Devils’ system as well.

12. Ottawa Senators: Forfeited draft pick

The Ottawa Senators must forfeit this year’s draft pick after failing to disclose Evgenii Dadonov’s limited no-trade clause when they moved him to Vegas in 2021, leading to an invalidated trade between the Golden Knights and Anaheim Ducks in 2022. They had to forfeit one first-round pick in either 2024, 2025 or 2026, and they already drafted Carter Yakemchuk and Logan Hensler. If they trade for another first-rounder, they could use a winger.

13. Los Angeles Kings: Prince Albert (WHL) defenseman Daxon Rudolph

It’s no secret that the Kings’ defensive core is aging aside from Brandt Clarke and Mikey Anderson, so taking Rudolph here makes sense. Rudolph has been on an offensive tear as of late, going on a 13-game point streak in which he put up 11 goals and 24 points with the Prince Albert Raiders. That layer of offense could easily make him a top-10 pick on top of what he provides with his smooth skating, size and defensive ability.

14. San Jose Sharks: Peterborough (OHL) left wing Adam Novotny

Novotny had a much better world juniors with Czechia than his three assists would indicate. He led the tournament in total shots and showed some playmaking flashes despite primarily making an impact in his forechecking and penalty-killing. The Sharks already have high-end offensive skill within their system and could use a player of Novotny’s defensive stature to round out what is already one of the top prospect pools in the NHL.

15. Chicago Blackhawks (via Florida): Prince George (WHL) defenseman Carson Carels

Much like Verhoeff, Carels was sheltered in his role with Team Canada, but he’s proven to be trusted in all on-ice situations at the WHL level. He’s great at defending on the rush and can problem-solve effectively when facing oncoming pressure. Offensively, he doesn’t shy away from jumping in the rush and creates chances for himself and others in a way that’s projectable in the NHL.

16. Seattle Kraken: Vancouver Giants (WHL) right wing Mathis Preston

Preston was recently traded to the Vancouver Giants and has fit seamlessly, putting up three points in his first two games. He provides a combination of speed, skill and compete that could have him be a top-six forward in the NHL. With some older players on the wing in Seattle, Preston could fit well within the Kraken’s organizational timeline and would be a great selection in this range.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY