Author

admin

Browsing

Clemson football coach Dabo Swinney called out Mississippi coach Pete Golding for recruiting tampering with a then-member of the Tigers’ transfer class during his media availability on Friday, Jan. 23.

The two-time national championship head coach specifically called out Golding and Rebels general manager Austin Thomas for contacting now-former Clemson linebacker Luke Ferrelli, who recently flipped his transfer to Ole Miss after he initially transferred to the Tigers after his freshman season at Cal.

‘I know you’re signed, what’s the buyout?’ Swinney said of the text Ferrelli told Clemson general manager Jordan Sorrells that he received from Golding during his 8 a.m. class he was taking at Clemson.

Swinney continued by stating Ferrelli also disclosed that he received a photo of a $1 million check from Golding and received calls from Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss and former Rebels quarterback Jaxson Dart. On the call with Chambliss, Swinney said that Ferrelli mentioned Golding — who was named the Rebels’ full-time coach following Lane Kiffin’s departure for LSU back on Nov. 30 — was also on the call and was trying to ‘push him to re-enter the transfer portal.’

‘If you tamper with my players, I’m going to turn you in,’ Swinney said.

Carter also mentioned that Neff said that Clemson is ‘exploring’ legal options with the situation as well.

Ferrelli flipped his transfer to the Rebels on Thursday, Jan. 22 after reentering the portal on Friday, Jan. 16, the final day it was open for players to enter unless they were playing in the College Football Playoff national championship.

‘We have a broken system, and if there are no consequences for tampering, then we have no rules and we have no governance,’ Swinney said.

In his lone season at Cal, Ferrelli recorded 91 tackles, a sack, an interception and one pass breakup in 13 games this season for Cal. He was additionally named ACC Defensive Rookie of the Year.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • College Football Playoff expansion isn’t about double the teams, it’s about double the money.

We’re going about this the wrong way, staring at the glam instead of the guts. 

College football doesn’t have a playoff problem. College football has a player movement problem.

Yet the solution from all involved is as daring as it is dumb: Throw more money at it. 

The Big Ten wants a 24-team College Football Playoff format, and the SEC, Big 12 and ACC want 16. The CFP officially stayed at 12 teams for 2026 Friday because the SEC and Big Ten, at this point, can’t agree the sun sets in the West.

The idea of CFP change didn’t quickly evolve because university presidents decided they like the new postseason, and want more teams to experience the sheer magnitude of it all. It’s because their athletic departments are desperate for money in the new player empowerment era.

These movers and shakers of higher education took nearly 150 years to agree on a four-team playoff, and 12 years later, are already debating moving to 24. Not because it works, but because of necessity.

A 12-team playoff earns an estimated $1.5 billion annually in media rights from ESPN. Double the teams, and you’ll more than likely double the price. 

Player salaries have not only taken $23 million annually in media rights money from a university’s bottom line, they’re on the verge of taking much more. Apparently, only the Big Ten sees this. 

There’s no other reason the Big Ten, which had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the original four-team CFP, is digging in on 24 teams. Who would take a playoff that already has obvious growth flaws just two years into moving to 12 teams, and want to double the entries? 

Buy IU championship books, prints

The same person who tried to sell 10% of the Big Ten’s media rights to capital investors for $2.4 billion. You may not like Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti’s business chops, but at least he’s stepping into the box and taking swings. 

At least he sees the employee train barreling down the track, and knows it’s time to do something. Because once players become employees — once the only salve to free player movement is enacted and players begin working off multi-year, unbreakable contracts — universities will be sharing much more than $23 million annually. 

Call it what you want. You say 1099 individual contractors, I say collective bargaining. No matter how you swing it, you’re still negotiating with players for a significantly larger piece of the media rights pie in exchange for multi-year deals. 

The Big Ten presidents understand this, and have given Petitti leeway to find new revenue streams. So he’s taking Ruthian swings.

Do you really think Petitti believes the sixth or seventh (or more) Big Ten or SEC team in a 24-team playoff is good for the health of the game? Of course not. 

It is, however, good for the financial bottom line of every university in the Big Ten. He’s gambling — to a larger extent than the SEC, Big 12 and ACC — that college football is bulletproof. 

No matter how you change, reformat or tweak it, fans can’t get enough. More to the point: Media companies (legacy and streaming) can’t pay enough.

Indiana and Miami just played a national championship game that drew an average of 30.1 million viewers. At one point in the game, the high-water mark was 33 million.

College football is second only to the NFL in live television viewership numbers, and is wildly undervalued. The NBA in 2024 signed an 11-year deal worth $76 billion from ESPN/ABC, NBC and Amazon Prime, and its television numbers pale in comparison to college football.

The Big Ten presidents and Petitti see the fatted calf, and want it. That doesn’t mean the SEC, Big 12 and ACC don’t also, it just means they haven’t reached that point of desperation. 

Because if the Big 12 and ACC were to agree with the Big Ten and want a move to 24 teams in the playoff, the SEC would go along. The presidents of the SEC and commissioner Greg Sankey can threaten to have their own playoff, but they won’t be the single reason college football isn’t whole.

Now, the rub: The CFP actually feels right at 12 teams. But get rid of the freebies for the Group of Six, and give them the same access as Notre Dame. If you’re ranked in the top 12, you’re in.  

Moving to 16 teams eliminates the reward of a first-round bye, further diminishing the regular season. Moving to 24 teams likely means a clunky first round of eight byes, presumably the top eight teams.

It also includes four automatic bids for each of the Power conferences. In 2025, that would’ve moved USC, Virginia, SMU, Pittsburgh, BYU, Utah and Houston to the CFP. 

Woof. 

Hey, somebody has to take big swings to fix the looming player movement problem.

Even if it’s as daring as it is dumb.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Colorado coach Deion Sanders banned players from wearing gear from their previous teams in Colorado facilities.
  • He warned players against having their parents call coaches with grievances.
  • The team welcomed several new assistant coaches for the upcoming season.

Colorado football coach Deion Sanders has so many new transfer players on his team again he’s needed to come up with a rule for how they dress.

Do not wear the gear of your previous team in Colorado facilities, he said in his first team meeting of 2026, as documented in a video posted Friday, Jan. 23, by his eldest son Deion Jr.

Sanders Sr. likened it to a player’s girlfriend wearing a shirt with her ex-boyfriend’s name on it.

“Don’t wear your old team’s gear in this facility,” Sanders told his team. “That’s disrespectful. That would be like your lady that you have currently wearing her ex (boyfriend’s) stuff. How you feel about that? She sitting up here with a shirt on that has her ex’s name… That’s how I feel about that when I see you coming to the cafeteria. You eat our food with your last teams on it? Obviously, if you wanted to stay there, you should have stayed.”

Sanders recruited 42 transfer players to his new team, replacing more than 35 who left for other schools. With so many new faces coming from other places, he’s had to lay down this and other rules for them.

Deion Sanders lays down Colorado team rules

Here’s a partial list of them as told to the team this week:

∎ No profanity outside the team meeting room.

“Profanity needs to stop,” said Sanders, who never uses it himself. “I heard it myself, especially in the dining area. It needs to stop. We’re not the only ones in the cafeteria.”

∎ No cellphones, food or drink in team meetings.

∎ Treat women with respect and address female staff members by calling them “miss” and not their first names.

∎ Sanders also warned players about parents who call Colorado coaches with any grievances.

“When you have your parents call the coaches, the coaches gonna report to me, and I’m gonna call your mom and your daddy and tell them to come and watch you practice, so they can see who you really are,” Sanders told his team. “Because you’re telling them you’re Tarzan, and most of the time, you Jane.”

Colorado football’s new assistant coaches introduced

Several new assistant coaches also introduced themselves at the meeting, including former Virginia Tech defensive coordinator Chris Marve (linebackers coach), former Abilene Christian co-defensive coordinator Aaron Fletcher (cornerbacks), former Gainesville, Georgia high school coach Josh Niblett (tight ends) and former Sacramento State head coach Brennan Marion (offensive coordinator).

Sanders also promoted Colorado staffer Johnnie Mack to running backs coach, replacing Pro Football Hall of Famer Marshall Faulk, who left to become head coach at Southern.

“There are some things that transpired in 2025 that obviously changed the faces in this room,” returning receivers coach Jason Phillips told the team.

Colorado finished 3-9 in 2025. The Buffaloes open Sanders’ fourth season as head coach on Sept. 5 at Georgia Tech.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The injury bug is swirling throughout the NBA and its latest victims are Phoenix Suns guards Devin Booker and Jalen Green.

Both players left during the Suns’ 110-103 loss against the Atlanta Hawks at State Farm Arena in Atlanta on Friday, Jan. 23.

The Hawks were led by Onyeka Okongwu, who tallied 25 points, while Jalen Johnson had a monster game with 23 points, 18 rebounds and was an assist shy of a triple-double.

Booker scored 31 for Phoenix. Collin Gillespie and Grayson Allen had 16 apiece.

Devin Booker injury

Booker went down with 5.4 seconds left in the third quarter as Phoenix led 91-84. He seemingly rolled his right ankle on Okongwu’s foot, which left Booker in serious pain.

He grabbed at his ankle and screamed in agony before the Suns medical staff left the bench to tend to Booker.

Booker needed assistance from Gillespie and the medical staff to get off of the floor and he limped back to the locker room and did not return to the game.

Booker finished with 31 points on 12-of-21 shooting, including 5-of-9 (55%) on 3-point field goals, in 28 minutes.

Jalen Green injury

Green has missed the majority of the Suns’ games this season due to a nagging right hamstring injury.

He’s only appeared in four games so far, most recently returning against the Los Angeles Clippers on Jan. 20 in a 116-110 victory where Green scored 12 points in 20 minutes. It was his first NBA action since Nov. 8.

Green played 4 minutes, scoring four points, in Friday’s loss at Atlanta. He left the game early in what was reported to be a precautionary move due to right hamstring tightness.

Green drove to the basket and scored a layup as the Suns trailed 23-22 with 2:21 remaining in the first quarter. He went back to the bench and eventually the locker room, following a Hawks timeout after Green’s basket.

Suns injury updates

Suns coach Jordan Ott spoke to reporters about the injuries after the game.

Per Duane Rankin of the Arizona Republic, part of the USA TODAY Network, Booker left the locker room on crutches.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Steve Barton, host of In It To Win It, shares price targets for silver and discusses when silver stocks may start to outperform the metal.

‘I fully expect a catch-up trade like this — I think that it’s coming, and I think it’s going to come this year and probably this first quarter,’ he said.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

After taking a bearish turn in late 2024, manganese prices started 2025 on a flat note despite a robust demand outlook supported by growth in the electric vehicle (EV) battery segment.

In the first half of 2025, the manganese market experienced mixed signals as supply dynamics shifted and demand from the steelmaking sector remained uneven. Early in the year, logistical disruptions and tight inventories in China briefly supported manganese ore prices — China’s port stocks fell to multi-year lows in March, drawing down to roughly 3.7 million metric tons due to by logistical bottlenecks and steady consumption by alloy makers and steel producers.

A rebound in sales in early spring pushed ore prices to a 2025 high of US$4.48 per metric ton.

However, by mid-year, the broader picture was one of ample supply and downward price pressure.

Manganese ore production climbed to around 10.1 million metric tons in H1, buoyed by strong export volumes from South Africa and Gabon and the resumption of Australian shipments that had been disrupted in 2024.

At the same time, global steel output weakened, particularly in China, where production declined about 3 percent year-on-year amid slowing domestic demand, while India and North America posted modest gains.

Demand for manganese alloys also softened, with sales volumes down modestly and margins compressed by rising feedstock costs, especially for alloy producers facing less favorable mixes.

Manganese prices struggle as structural demand builds

By June 20, 2025, manganese’s H1 gains had eroded and ore prices fell to US$4.21.

Eramet (EPA:ERA,OTCPL:ERMAF), a major producer, said it expected supply of manganese ore to increase in the second half of 2025, partly as key producers such as Australia returned volumes to market after earlier disruptions.

‘Ore supply should increase in H2, driven by the full return to the market of the leading Australian producer, partly offset by a potential downward revision of South African exports,’ the company notes. Demand for manganese alloys was expected to weaken in line with seasonality and softer global steel production.

Analysts cautioned that production expansions from major manganese producers could exacerbate oversupply. “Production increases … can only lead to oversupply, leading to a reduction in price,” one industry executive said.

Protectionist measures in key markets, including new EU quotas on ferroalloys, added uncertainty by potentially disrupting traditional trade flows and affecting alloy pricing dynamics.

Beyond the steel sector, structural shifts in consumption patterns emerged.

Although steelmaking still accounts for the lion’s share of manganese demand, interest in battery-related uses, particularly high-purity manganese for lithium-ion and next-generation EV chemistries, continued to gain attention.

“Our expectations of ongoing strengthening battery-grade demand and production in China in Q4 have been tempered somewhat by ongoing challenges within the nickel cobalt manganese (NCM) market,” Rob Searle, battery raw materials analyst at Fastmarkets, wrote in a November battery metals market update.

“While we expect a level of demand ramp-up in Q4, in the wider context of geopolitical challenges and a challenging Chinese market, the manganese demand uptick in the short term could be somewhat tempered,’ he added.

Changing battery chemistries

During a June Supply Chain (SC) Insights webinar, experts noted that manganese-rich cathode chemistries are increasingly drawing attention as automakers seek to cut costs and reduce exposure to cobalt and nickel.

Andy Leyland, founder of SC Insights, pointed out “manganese-rich chemistry is really offering a good solution … in terms of costs,” highlighting the commodity’s role in emerging battery designs.

While high-nickel NCM batteries remain dominant, industry players are exploring manganese as a lower-cost, high-performance alternative in Europe and North America, where supply chains remain heavily reliant on imports, particularly from China. OEMs are under pressure to secure raw materials directly, with vertical integration and direct sourcing emerging as key strategies to manage price volatility and supply security.

John Mulcahy, supply chain specialist at SC Insights, emphasized that sourcing upstream allows companies to negotiate better terms and reduce exposure to market fluctuations, even amid low pricing environments.

Manganese-rich chemistries are expected to expand steadily, complementing existing NCM and lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, rather than replacing them entirely.

As Leyland noted, these materials are “definitely very high up on the focus from the demand side,” signaling growing adoption in the global push for cost-effective, low-cobalt battery solutions.

In March, Firebird Metals (ASX:FRB,OTCPL:FRBMF) produced its first lithium manganese iron phosphate (LMFP) EV batteries, becoming the first Australian company to achieve the feat. The move could position Firebird as a low-cost manganese cathode player, and highlights growth in the LMFP battery production segment.

Rising nationalism presents trade challenges

With the demand picture for manganese showing promise, analysts warn that export restrictions in Gabon could lead to a supply crunch before the decade is over. According to the US Geological Survey, 63 percent of US manganese imports come from Gabon. In June, the African nation announced plans to implement an export ban in January 2029.

Gabon’s renewed push to ban manganese ore exports from 2029 underscores Africa’s broader shift toward value addition, but it also risks tightening an already fragile global supply picture, a Project Blue market note reads.

As the world’s second largest exporter, Gabon shipped more than 7 million metric tons of high-grade ore in 2024, material that is critical to both ferroalloy production and emerging battery supply chains.

An export ban would hit Chinese buyers and European processors reliant on Gabonese feedstock, while adding pressure to the high-grade market at a time when Australia’s GEMCO mine is expected to wind down later this decade.

Although in-country processing — through ferroalloys or batteries — offers a path to capture more value locally, it would require significant investment and could shift, rather than eliminate, environmental and logistical costs.

For global markets, Gabon’s move signals rising resource nationalism in Africa and a potential structural squeeze on manganese supply heading into the next decade.

“However, without large-scale investments from China, a key battery producer, such ambitious plans of African governments risk remaining unrealised,” the Project Blue overview states.

“China has invested in Africa’s mineral industry (e.g. Ghana), securing access to the continent’s high-quality raw materials, while keeping production of high value-added products directly in China.”

In early 2025, Euro Manganese (TSXV:EMN,OTCPL:EUMNF) scored a major boost when its Chvaletice manganese project was designated a “strategic project” under the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act.

The move underscores the EU’s push to secure local supply of critical battery materials and could tighten the manganese market by prioritizing European production in the continent’s energy transition.

Oversupply vs. new manganese demand drivers

For 2026, analysts expect the manganese market to remain broadly balanced, but with pressures and opportunities on both the supply and demand fronts. However, longer-term fundamentals point to steady growth.

Global market forecasts indicate the manganese industry could expand modestly in value and volume by 2035, driven by ongoing demand from steel and increasing uptake in battery and clean-energy applications.

Some reports project market size rising through the decades, with Asia-Pacific demand remaining dominant and new opportunities emerging in the electrification and high-purity material segments.

Steel demand will continue to be the principal driver in 2026, with India’s expanding production offering a potential buffer against slower growth in China and Europe. Battery applications may not yet move the pricing needle dramatically, but their structural importance is increasing as automakers and cathode developers look to diversify away from nickel and cobalt reliance, a trend that could support manganese demand in the medium term.

“Looking ahead to the coming weeks and months, it is likely we won’t see too much further upward pressure on prices. Asian markets are heading towards the seasonal lull in demand and manufacturing activity in February as the Lunar New Year holidays begin,” Searle said in a January Fastmarkets report.

“At the same time, there are concerns around what China’s EV demand outlook looks like in Q1 2026, with changes to subsidy schemes potentially leading to softening consumption of battery-grade manganese.”

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Aura Energy Limited (ASX: AEE, AIM: AURA) (“Aura” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce that MMCAP International Inc. SPC (‘MMCAP’) and certain other strategic investors (together the ‘Strategic Investors’) will provide funding of C$10 million for a 19.7% interest in the Company’s polymetallic Häggån project (‘the Häggån Project’) located in Sweden, establishing its value at C$50 million.

Aura has entered into a binding agreement to transfer 100% of the Häggån Project to SIU Metals Corp. (‘SIU Metals‘), an unlisted Canadian public company, in consideration for acquiring shares in SIU Metals. The agreement will result in SIU Metals being the 100% owner of the Häggån Project.

Aura will retain 78.7% ownership of SIU Metals and the Strategic Investors will own 19.7% after contributing C$10 million via a private placement. SIU Metals intends to seek a stock market listing on the TSX Venture Exchange (‘TSXV’) in connection with the transaction.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Valuation for Häggån project established at C$50 million (A$55 million)
  • Agreement with MMCAP and certain other strategic investors to provide aggregate gross proceeds of C$10 million to SIU Metals, which will be renamed following the transaction
  • Proceeds to be used for the advancement of the Häggån project, including permitting and resource expansion through continued exploration including on surrounding tenements
  • Aura will retain ownership of 78.7% of SIU Metals and consequently will retain indirect exposure to the Häggån project post-transaction
  • Aura to appoint new officers and directors to SIU Metals on closing of transaction
  • Financing is expected to complete in February 2026, with the transaction expected to complete in June 2026
  • New Canadian listed company to benefit from increased visibility and direct comparison with valuation of other public companies with similar deposits
  • On 1 January 2026, the Minerals Act in Sweden was amended to allow exploration for and extraction of uranium
Phil Mitchell, Executive Chairman Aura Energy, said:

“We are delighted to welcome investors of the calibre of MMCAP, Aura’s largest shareholder, and other high-quality investors into this new vehicle for Aura’s Häggån project, and the future support they can bring. We believe their investment is a demonstration of the quality and potential of the project, and its exciting future as, following legislation changes brought into effect on 1 January 2026, mining of uranium is now allowed again in Sweden. This transaction shines a spotlight on the under-recognized value of Häggån within Aura Energy, and creates an independent and dedicated pathway for funding, growth and management of the project.

Upon successful completion of the transaction, Aura’s existing shareholders will continue to benefit from Häggån’s upside potential, and by way of a direct comparison with the valuation of other companies with similar deposits in the region.”

Click here for the full ASX Release

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The College Football Playoff continues to dominate TV viewership ratings.

According to ESPN, Monday’s national championship game between Indiana and Miami averaged 30.1 million viewers across the network’s ‘megacast’ offerings, making it not only the most-watched game of this CFP, but also the most-watched non-NFL sporting event since the Chicago Cubs defeated Cleveland in Game 7 of the 2016 World Series.

It’s the second-most-watched national championship game since the CFP started in 2014, and peaked at 33.2 million viewers.

Buy IU championship books, newspapers, gear

The 30.1 million viewers who tuned into Indiana’s 27-21 win over Miami is a notable jump from last year’s national championship game between Ohio State and Notre Dame, which brought in an average of 22.1 million viewers.

Heisman Trophy winner and Miami native Fernando Mendoza provided a critical score for the Hoosiers on Monday with his gutsy 12-yard rushing touchdown on fourth-and-4 with 9:18 remaining in the fourth quarter. Jamari Sharpe sealed the win for the Hoosiers with an interception of Carson Beck with 44 seconds remaining.

With its win, Indiana completed one of the more remarkable turnarounds in college football history, which began two years ago with Curt Cignetti’s hiring in November 2023. The Hoosiers also joined the 1894 Yale Bulldogs as the only two teams in major college football history to go undefeated with 16-0 records in a single season.

2025-26 College Football Playoff TV ratings

ESPN also released TV viewership numbers for the entire 11-game CFP slate on Wednesday. It mentioned that the second year of the 12-team field brought in an average of 16.3 million viewers, which was a 4% increase from last season.

Surprisingly, both of the national semifinal matchups — Indiana vs. Oregon in the Peach Bowl and Miami vs. Mississippi in the Fiesta Bowl — were not included in the top four most-watched CFP games this season. The Hoosiers’ Peach Bowl win came in at No. 5 (18 million), while the Hurricanes’ Fiesta Bowl win came in at No. 7 (15.8 million), just behind Miami’s first-round win over Texas A&M.

Here’s a game-by-game breakdown of the most-watched games from the 2025-26 College Football Playoff:

  1. CFP National Championship (Miami vs. Indiana): 30.1 million
  2. CFP Rose Bowl Quarterfinal (Alabama vs. Indiana): 23.9 million
  3. CFP Cotton Bowl Quarterfinal (Miami vs. Ohio State): 19.0 million
  4. CFP Sugar Bowl Quarterfinal (Ole Miss vs. Georgia): 18.7 million
  5. CFP Peach Bowl Semifinal (Oregon vs. Indiana): 18.0 million
  6. CFP Orange Bowl Quarterfinal (Oregon vs. Texas Tech): 15.9 million
  7. CFP Fiesta Bowl Semifinal (Miami vs. Ole Miss): Ole Miss 15.8 million
  8. CFP First Round (Alabama at Oklahoma): 14.9 million
  9. CFP First Round (Miami at Texas A&M): 14.8 million
  10. CFP First Round (Tulane at Ole Miss): 6.2 million*
  11. CFP First Round (James Madison at Oregon): 4.4 million*

* Denotes games that aired on TNT

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY