Author

admin

Browsing

Numerous news media outlets reported that Heisman Trophy winner Travis Hunter had graduated from the University of Colorado on May 8, citing social media posts from CU that showed him attending the graduation ceremony and saying he “GOT THAT DEGREE!”

Another CU football post showed Hunter in a video saying he “graduated in three years.”

What actually happened is a little more complicated. He is not scheduled to graduate until December after applying to graduate in fall 2025, according to an athletics department spokesman.

He attended the May 8 graduation ceremony in Boulder anyway to be able to experience it now, before he begins his pro football career as the No. 2 overall draft pick for the Jacksonville Jaguars, according to the school.

“Travis walked in (the May 8) commencement ceremony and will graduate with a degree in anthropology in December 2025,” said Steve Hurlbert, the athletics department spokesman. “He’s likely to be a little busy that time of year and he really wanted to experience all the pomp and circumstance.”

Hurlbert also noted Hunter has a 3.9 grade-point average.

How common is ‘walking early’ before graduation?

It is not that unusual. It’s allowed at other schools, too, for different reasons, such as wanting to participate in the graduation ceremony with your friends even if you need to complete a few more classes to get your degree.

Actually graduating is still different than attending the commencement ceremony because it requires students to meet all their degree requirements. At CU, students are required to apply to graduate for the semester in which they’ll “officially and successfully” complete all requirements for the degrees and majors they’re pursuing, according to the university website.

In Hunter’s case, Hurlbert said he applied to graduate in the fall of 2025, which ends in December. It’s not clear what requirements Hunter has left to complete. Hurlbert declined to say, citing privacy law covering academic records. A message seeking comment from Hunter through his agent was not returned.

This explains why Hunter was not listed among the thousands of degree candidates in the CU commencement program for May 8 even though he attended the ceremony.

“CU had 67 student-athletes graduate last week and 103 student-athletes walked in the ceremony, so it’s not unusual at all for student-athletes who have graduated last winter or will graduate in August or next December to participate in spring commencement because it’s such a great experience,” Hurlbert said.

Why did CU’s social media indicate he got his degree?

The posts from CU football’s social accounts led to widespread reports that Hunter had in fact graduated, including the post that said he “GOT THAT DEGREE!” It showed Hunter in graduation attire with friends saying, “Boys out here graduating man.”

“It was just a social media staffer who didn’t know that (Hunter) was just walking” in the ceremony, Hurlbert said.

Hunter himself seemed to confirm it in another CU post when he said he had “graduated in three years.”

That would be approximate if he only has a small amount of degree requirements to complete. He enrolled at Jackson State in January 2022 after graduating high school, according to The Clarion Ledger in Jackson, Mississippi. He transferred to Colorado in January 2023 after head coach Deion Sanders made the same move.

After previously being listed as a psychology major at CU, he chose to major in anthropology, the study of humanity. In January, he was named the Division I Academic All-American Team Member of the Year.

“I’m an anthropology major, and I really enjoy learning about different cultures and how they interact with one another,” Hunter said in an email interview with USA TODAY Sports last year. “Being able to learn about these cultures and skills is incredibly beneficial to me even when playing football. I have the opportunity to learn the importance of accepting and interacting with other people and playing with other people despite their cultural or ethnic makeup.”

Shilo Sanders earns master’s degree from Colorado

Among the 67 student-athletes who graduated in May, the university said Deion Sanders’ safety son, Shilo Sanders, earned a master’s degree in organizational leadership after previously earning an undergraduate degree at Jackson State. He is now with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers as an undrafted free agent.

Sanders’ youngest son, Shedeur Sanders, the former Colorado quarterback, said on his YouTube show in January that he hoped to graduate at the end of the past semester in May. He was selected in the fifth round by the Cleveland Browns in the NFL draft in April. The university said he is on track to graduate later this year but has not applied for graduation yet.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Monday was not the best day to be a Washington, D.C. sports fan.

The city got bad news after bad news Monday night as three of its professional teams got dealt a bad hand and suffered major losses.

It started just after 7 p.m. ET in the NBA draft lottery. It was another painful season for Wizards fans after they went 18-64 during the 2024-25 season, just a slight improvement from the 15-win season before. With the second-worst record in the NBA, it was with the Utah Jazz and Charlotte Hornets for the best odds to get the top pick in the draft. Get the first overall pick, and the Wizards could select Cooper Flagg and change the course of its franchise.

That didn’t happen. The Wizards were guaranteed a top six pick, and they ended up with the sixth selection in the 2025 draft. The worst possible outcome coming to fruition as the Dallas Mavericks won the Flagg sweepstakes.

A few hours later, the Nationals pulled off a ninth inning comeback on the road against the Atlanta Braves to tie it 3-3. But in the bottom of the ninth, Alex Verdugo hit a RBI single to bring in Eli White and walk it off for the Braves. Now the Nationals are 17-25 and on a six-game losing streak.

The Nationals’ loss came as the Carolina Hurricanes were putting the finished touches on a 5-2 win over the Capitals in Game 4 of the Eastern Conference semifinals. Carolina now has a commanding 3-1 lead over the top seed in the conference, putting the Capitals’ stellar season on the brink of ending.

A day to forget in the nation’s capital.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news fast. Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Carolina Hurricanes are one win away from advancing to the Eastern Conference final thanks to a 5-2 victory Monday over the Washington Capitals in Game 4 of their second-round series.

The Edmonton Oilers also took a 3-1 lead in their series with a 3-0 victory against the Vegas Golden Knights.

Sean Walker had a goal and an assist, the first two postseason points for the veteran defenseman, as did forward Taylor Hall. Shayne Gostisbehere, Seth Jarvis and Andrei Svechnikov also scored for the Hurricanes, who can punch their ticket by winning Game 5 Thursday in Washington. Frederik Andersen stopped 19 shots in the win.

Jakob Chychrun had a goal and an assist and Alex Ovechkin scored as the comeback attempt by the Capitals fell short. Logan Thompson made 32 saves.

Washington had pulled to within 3-2, but Carolina went back up by two goals when Capitals defenseman Rasmus Sandin’s stick got stuck in the boards.

Carolina took the early lead with Gostisbehere netting the first first-period goal of the series. Jesperi Kotkaniemi, who assisted on the goal with Eric Robinson, screened Thompson on the shot with 9:36 left.

The Capitals had chances in the first period to tie the game as Carolina racked up six penalty minutes. That included a high-sticking double minor on Jordan Martinook with 3:36 left. However, Carolina’s league-best penalty killing unit in the postseason allowed the Capitals just one shot on goal while they had the advantage.

Moments after Martinook left the penalty box, Jarvis upped the Hurricanes’ lead by being in the right place at the right time just 65 seconds into the second period, pouncing on a rebound off Sebastian Aho’s shot that glanced off Thompson and the crossbar.

Washington finally found a way past Andersen when Chychrun scored on a one-timer from Matt Roy with 14:42 left in regulation. However, the Hurricanes recovered their two-goal advantage three minutes later when Jack Roslovicsprung Hall for a breakaway.

Ovechkin broke his three-game goalless streak by scoring on a 5-on-3 power play with 7:36 left. The Capitals had 1:43 remaining on the power play but could not tie the game.

Walker made it 4-2 with 3:15 left. Svechnikov’s empty-netter 54 seconds later sealed the victory.

Oilers shut out Golden Knights for 3-1 series lead

Adam Henrique scored twice to put the Oilers one win away from advancing to the conference final for the third time in four seasons. Edmonton, up will try to wrap up the series on Wednesday in Las Vegas.

Oilers goaltender Stuart Skinner made 23 saves to pick up his first win of this year’s playoffs. Skinner, who began the playoffs as the starter but struggled and lost the job, returned to the net for the past two games with Calvin Pickard injured. He posted his second career playoff shutout.

Goalie Adin Hill stopped 29 shots for the Golden Knights, who failed to build on their last-second Game 3 victory.

Henrique opened the scoring 87 seconds into the game by burying an open chance from the slot after Connor Brown won a board battle behind the Vegas net and sent a puck to him.

The Oilers controlled the bulk of the play in the opening period and went up 2-0 at 13:03 of the period when Henrique slipped home a loose puck during a scramble. Hill went after Evander Kane, who collided with him after the goal.

Kane extended Edmonton’s lead at 7:38 of the second period when he slid a shot through Hill’s legs as he drove down the wing on an odd-man rush.

Connor McDavid earned an assist on the goal, running his point-scoring streak to eight games.

During the first period, the first fight of the playoffs took place between Edmonton’s Trent Frederic and Vegas’ Nicolas Hague.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

triumph gold Corp. (TSXV: TIG) (OTC Pink: TIGCF) (FSE: 8N6) (‘triumph gold’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce the discovery of a new Silver-Gold vein system, now named the Proton Zone, at its 100%-owned Freegold Mountain Project in Yukon, Canada. The discovery lies 1.3 km northeast of the Nucleus Deposit and 2.75 km northwest of the Revenue Deposit.

The Proton Zone was uncovered in fresh bedrock exposed by placer mining at Mechanic Creek in a previously unexplored area. The mineralized zone spans approximately 15 x 15 metres and lies over 300 metres from the nearest historic sampling or drill hole (Figures 1-3). The shear-hosted quartz-sulfide veins share a similar geochemical signature to the nearby Nucleus deposit but are hosted in granodiorite, similar to the Revenue deposit.

Highlights from Proton Zone Sampling (see Table 1):

  • Grab sample C959830: 1.68 g/t Au, 8.99 g/t Ag, >10,000 ppm As
  • Chip sample C959831 (30 cm): 5.95 g/t Au, 7.17 g/t Ag, >10,000 ppm As

Table 1: Assay Results from the Proton Zone

Sample
Number
Easting
(NAD83-8N)
Northing
(NAD83-8N)
Sample
Type
Au
g/t
Ag
g/t
Cu
ppm
As
ppm
Sb
ppm
Bi
ppm
C959829 380510 6714755 Grab 0.50 1.26 153 9,030 94.4 8.57
C959830 380508 6914767 Grab 1.68 8.99 212 >10,000 153 68.3
C959831 380515 6914772 30cm Chip 5.95 7.17 161 >10,000 38.8 49.6

 

Other high-grade vein zones have been sampled along Mechanic Creek. The Drone Zone, located 1.3 kilometres south of the Proton Zone, returned up to 450 g/t gold and 19 g/t silver (March 2019). An additional zone 600 meters south of the Proton Zone returned values up to 6.58 g/t gold and 13.6 g/t silver.

These zones all feature gold-silver-copper-arsenic-antimony-bismuth geochemistry and have not been followed up with drilling. Their proximity to the Nucleus and Revenue deposits suggests a potential link to the Revenue porphyry mineralizing event. The Revenue system is similar in style to the Casino deposit, part of the Tintina Gold Belt.

Sample Descriptions:

  • C959829: Silicified vein-breccia with up to 10% arsenopyrite
  • C959830: Similar to above, about 10 meters away along the same structure
  • C959831: Clay-altered, gossanous zone with no visible sulphides, east-trending

triumph gold’s VP of Exploration Jesse Halle comments: ‘Mechanic Creek continues to generate highly prospective exploration targets, demonstrating the significant growth potential of the Revenue and Nucleus deposits. This new zone shows gold-and-silver-dominant geochemistry like the Vest Pocket and Granger zones, the latter being added to the 2020 resource estimate. A new mineralized trend is emerging, and we are excited to see where it leads.’

Figure 1: Nucleus and Revenue deposits as well as additional zones of mineralization (Map scale 1:30,000)

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/5125/251686_fc7500020495ba1d_001full.jpg

Figure 2: Proton Zone Map (1:5,000 scale)

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/5125/251686_fc7500020495ba1d_002full.jpg

Figure 3: Proton Zone Sampling

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/5125/251686_fc7500020495ba1d_003full.jpg

Nucleus Deposit Overview

The Nucleus deposit hosts epithermal gold-silver-copper mineralization within Paleozoic schists and gneisses, crosscut by quartz-feldspar porphyry dykes and a leucogranite stock. Structural control is related to the Big Creek fault system.

2020 Resource Estimate (at 0.30 g/t AuEq cutoff):

  • Indicated: 31 million tonnes grading 0.65 g/t gold, 0.07% copper, and 0.7 g/t silver
  • Inferred: 9.4 million tonnes grading 0.56 g/t gold, 0.04% copper, and 0.7 g/t silver

triumph gold’s Principal Geologist, Marty Henning, comments: ‘With rising gold and silver prices, the Nucleus resource is showing strong potential for growth. Mineralization extends below the current $1,500 per ounce gold pit resource, and further drilling along key structural trends could significantly expand the resource.’

Figure 4: Distribution of anomalous Gold within surface rock, soil and silt samples

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/5125/251686_fc7500020495ba1d_004full.jpg

The last major exploration program at the Nucleus deposit was conducted in 2021. Figure 1, Table 2 and Table 3 provide details of the program and demonstrate the growth potential of the Nucleus deposit. Drilling completed in 2021 was designed to test mineralization continuity along the four corners of the main and northern satellite pit resource, the Big Creek South Fault, and the newly defined Orbit Zone (New Release May 4, 2022). Drill hole attributes are summarized in Table 1, and gold equivalent (AuEq) composite grades are highlighted in Table 2.

Table 2: Nucleus 2021 Drillhole Summary

Hole-ID Easting
(NAD83-8N)
Northing
(NAD83-8N)
Elevation
m
Depth
m
Azimuth Dip
N21-01 379458 6913364 852 306.32 35 -60
N21-02 379120 6913528 951 449.58 30 -60
N21-03 379162 6913073 895 320.43 210 -60
N21-04 379162 6913073 895 295.66 30 -60
N21-05 378859 6913336 974 288.04 220 -60
N21-06 378859 6913336 974 316.99 40 -60
N21-07 379111 6914021 1003 312.42 70 -70
N21-08 379566 6914430 902 327.5 60 -60
N21-09 379666 6914527 860 215.49 45 -70
N21-10 379525 6914090 906 257.86 210 -70
N21-11 379620 6914482 880 232.56 340 -60
O21-01 380343 6912498 812 242.32 220 -50

 

Table 3. Significant Intercepts >0.50AuEq with sub-intervals >1.0 g/t AuEq.

Hole-ID From
m
To
m
Interval
m
AuEq
1750
Au
g/t
Ag
g/t
Cu
%
N21-01 21 38.5 17.5 0.45 0.33 1.39 0.07
N21-01 57 84.25 27.25 0.75 0.60 1.65 0.08
Including 67 84.25 17.25 1.02 0.85 1.72 0.09
N21-01 218 224.7 6.73 0.29 0.11 1.20 0.11
N21-01 268 272.5 4.5 0.52 0.24 1.72 0.16
N21-02 15.24 46.5 31.26 0.76 0.71 0.67 0.02
Including 28.5 33 4.5 2.10 2.00 1.57 0.05
N21-02 61.5 65.45 3.95 1.30 1.08 2.20 0.12
Including 61.5 65.45 3.95 1.30 1.08 2.20 0.12
N21-02 114.08 119.5 5.37 0.79 0.74 0.39 0.03
N21-02 223.41 236.7 13.29 1.17 0.90 2.24 0.16
Including 228.8 236.7 7.9 1.58 1.25 3.15 0.19
N21-03 90.1 109 18.9 0.55 0.48 0.54 0.04
Including 90.1 95.5 5.4 1.00 0.93 0.57 0.04
N21-04 135.5 138.5 3 1.24 1.18 0.25 0.03
N21-06 276.38 280.1 3.73 1.22 0.87 1.85 0.21
N21-07 75 82 7 0.46 0.43 0.59 0.01
N21-08 70 86.5 16.5 0.66 0.66 0.25 0.00
Including 70 82 12 0.71 0.70 0.25 0.00
N21-09 85.5 88.5 3 0.89 0.87 0.25 0.01
N21-09 153 163 10 0.46 0.33 0.25 0.08
N21-10 4 13 9 0.41 0.36 0.87 0.02
N21-10 54 63 9 0.71 0.65 0.69 0.03
N21-11 31.6 51.6 20 0.96 0.92 1.46 0.01
Including 31.6 41 9.4 1.41 1.36 2.25 0.01
N21-11 194 198 4 0.55 0.42 1.05 0.07
O21-01 94.5 98.3 3.8 0.68 0.47 1.22 0.12
O21-01 141 146.4 5.43 0.69 0.56 0.69 0.08

 

References and Disclosures

The AuEq composite was calculated using a >0.50 g/t AuEq and >1.0 g/t AuEq cutoff and

Gold equivalent [AuEq] is used for illustrative purposes to express the combined value of gold, silver, and copper as a percentage of gold. No allowances have been made for recovery losses in a mining scenario.

AuEq is calculated using US$1,750.00 per troy ounce of gold, US$24.00 per troy ounce of silver, and US$4.00 per pound of copper.

AuEq = Au g/t + (Ag g/t X $24.00 / $1750.00) + (Cu% X $4.00 X 22.0462) / ($1750.00 / 31.10)

Sample Preparation and QAQC

Rock samples from the Freegold Mountain Project Proton Zone were submitted to the ALS Geochemistry laboratory in Whitehorse for sample preparation. Sample pulps were shipped directly to ALS Vancouver for analyses.

Rock samples were weighed, dried and crushed to 70% passing 2 millimetres, then riffle-split to obtain a 250-gram sub-sample pulverized to greater than 85% passing 75 microns (PREP-31). A 0.25-gram sample from each pulp was analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using 4-acid (near-total) digestion and induced coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS), giving 48 elements (ME-MS61). A 30-gram sample from each pulp was analyzed for Au using fire assay and atomic absorption spectroscopy (Au-AA23).

Diamond drill holes at the Freegold Mountain Project are drilled using HTW and NTW core sizes (70.92 millimetres and 56.00 millimetres diameter, respectively). Sample preparation is completed at ALS Whitehorse, and sample pulps are shipped to ALS Vancouver for analysis. Samples are dried and crushed to 70% less than 2 millimetres with a 250-gram riffle-split and pulverized to better than 85% passing 75 microns (PREP-31).

A 50-gram sample from the pulp is analyzed for gold using fire assay techniques and atomic absorption spectroscopy with detection limits of 0.005-10 parts per million (‘ppm’) (Au-AA24). Gold over-limit values are re-analyzed using a gravimetric finish with an upper detection limit of 10,000 ppm (Au-GRA22). A 0.25-gram sample from the pulp is analyzed with multi-element geochemistry (ME-ICP61) using a 4-acid near total digestion and induced coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) providing 33 elements.

Sample Quality Assurance/Quality Control (‘QAQC’) measures include unmarked certified reference materials (CRMs), rock blanks, and field duplicates inserted into the sample sequence. These make up 5% of the samples submitted to the lab for holes reported in this release. Additional QAQC checks are ongoing in accordance with 43-101 standards.

National Instrument 43-101 Disclosure

The technical content of this news release has been reviewed and approved by triumph gold’s Principal Geologist Marty Henning, P.Geo., a ‘Qualified Person’ as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators (‘NI 43-101’). He has also verified the data disclosed, including sampling, analytical and test data, and the underlying technical information in this news release.

About triumph gold Corp.

triumph gold is a Canadian-based, growth-oriented exploration and development company with a district-scale land package in the mining-friendly Yukon. Led by an experienced management and technical team, The Company is focused on actively advancing its flagship Freegold Mountain Project using multidiscipline exploration and evaluation techniques.

The road-accessible Freegold Mountain Project in the Dawson Range Au-Cu Belt hosts three NI 43-101 Mineral Deposits (Nucleus, Revenue, and Tinta Hill). The Project is 200 square kilometres and covers an extensive section of the Big Creek Fault Zone, a structure directly related to epithermal gold and silver mineralization and gold-rich porphyry copper mineralization.

The Company owns 100% of the Big Creek and Tad/Toro gold, silver, and copper properties along the Freegold Mountain Project strike within the Dawson Range.

The Company also owns 100% of the Andalusite Peak copper-gold property, 36 km southeast of Dease Lake within the Stikine Range in British Columbia.

triumph gold acknowledges the traditional territories of the Little Salmon Carmacks First Nation and Selkirk First Nation, on which the Company’s Yukon mineral exploration projects are located. triumph gold has a longstanding, ongoing engagement with these First Nations through communication, environmental stewardship, and local employment.

For more information, please visit triumphgoldcorp.com.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

Signed ‘John Anderson’

John Anderson, Executive Chairman

For further information about triumph gold, please contact:

John Anderson, Executive Chairman
triumph gold Corp.
(604) 218-7400
janderson@triumphgoldcorp.com

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

This news release contains forward-looking information, which involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual events to differ materially from current expectations. Important factors – including the availability of funds, the results of financing efforts, the completion of due diligence and the results of exploration activities – that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s expectations are disclosed in the Company’s documents filed from time to time on SEDAR (see www.sedarplus.ca). Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release. The company disclaims any intention or obligation, except to the extent required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/251686

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Falco Resources Ltd. (TSX.V: FPC) (‘ Falco ‘ or the ‘ Corporation ‘) is pleased to announce that it has responded to all questions and comments requested by the Direction de l’évaluation environnementale (‘ DEE ‘) des projets industriels et miniers on February 27, 2025 (the ‘ Correspondence ‘), as more fully described in Falco’s press release dated March 3, 2025.

The responses, commitments, and explanatory letter submitted (the ‘ Responses ‘) follow the meetings and clarifications obtained from representatives of the Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs (the ‘ Ministry ‘) and other ministries, regarding the principal issues raised by the Horne 5 project (the ‘ Project ‘), in the Correspondence. The Responses will allow the Ministry to complete its analysis in accordance with the standard evaluation process.

Advancement of Certain Issues
Regarding the Ministry’s interpretation of section 197 of the Clean Air Regulations (‘ CAR ‘), the Ministry representatives are continuing their analysis, and Falco is confident that the Ministry’s position on this issue will be known in the coming weeks. For more information, refer to the Corporation’s press release dated March 3, 2025, by clicking on the following link .

Regarding the potential impacts of the Project on the Centre de radio-oncologie régional de Rouyn-Noranda (Rouyn-Noranda Regional Radiation Oncology Centre), la Direction de santé publique de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue (the Abitibi-Témiscamingue Public Health Department) confirmed that it has selected its seismologist expert to form part of its technical committee of experts who will work to assess the risks posed by the Project on the equipment, structures, and activities of the Centre intégré de la santé et de services sociaux de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue (the Abitibi-Témiscamingue Integrated Health and Social Services Centre) and to identify mitigation measures to ensure the safety and proper operation of the facilities and activities. A first meeting of the technical committee will be held in the coming weeks.

Luc Lessard, President and CEO of Falco, commented: ‘ I would like to thank our employees and experts for the work they have done to enable the submission of responses to the Ministry, which brings us closer to a conclusion regarding the environmental authorization process for our Horne 5 Project. Falco believes that the Ministry has all the relevant information to complete its analysis and make its recommendation to the Members of Cabinet.

As previously disclosed, the results of the independent survey recently conducted by Léger demonstrate strong majority support for the Project in Rouyn-Noranda and Abitibi-Témiscamingue.

About Falco
Falco Resources is one of the largest holders of mining titles in the province of Québec, with a large portfolio of properties in the Abitibi greenstone belt. Falco holds rights to approximately 67,000 hectares of land in the Noranda Mining Camp, representing 67% of the entire camp and including 13 former gold and base metals mining sites. Falco’s principal asset is the Horne 5 project located beneath the former Horne mine, which was operated by Noranda from 1927 to 1976 and produced 11.6 million ounces of gold and 2.5 billion pounds of copper. Osisko Development Corp. is Falco’s largest shareholder with a 16.0% interest in the Corporation.

For further information, please contact:
Luc Lessard
President and Chief Executive Officer
514 261-3336
info@falcores.com

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively, ‘ forward-looking statements ‘) within the meaning of applicable securities laws. These statements include references to the social acceptability of the Project, the Ministry’s interpretation of section 197 of the CAR, the issues identified in the course of the BAPE process and noted by the Ministry, the development of the Horne 5 Project and the granting of environmental authorizations. These statements are based on information currently available to the Corporation and the Corporation provides no assurance that actual results will meet management’s expectations. The occurrence of such events or the realization of such statements is subject to a number of risk factors, including, without limitation, the risk factors identified in Falco’s annual management’s discussion and analysis and in other continuous disclosure documents available at www.sedarplus.com .

Although Falco believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking statements are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on these statements, which only apply as of the date of this press release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. As mentioned by Falco in its public disclosure and in its previous press releases, certain major issues have been raised by the Ministry in the context of the development of the project and in the BAPE process, including the compliance of the Project with section 197 of the CAR. There is no certainty or guarantee that the Ministry will change its position regarding the application of section 197 of the CAR to the Project, that Falco will be able to respond to the numerous additional requests from the Ministry in a timely manner or that Falco will be able to raise the necessary funds to continue the additional studies requested by the Ministry, which could significantly delay or prevent the granting of the required authorizations and therefore have an adverse impact on the development of the Project and on Falco’s financial situation. Except as required by applicable law, Falco disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information.

News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Coverage area includes recently announced gold till anomaly plus two more historic gold occurrences on Matagami property largely subject to base metals exploration

Nuvau Minerals Inc. (TSXV: NMC) has just completed a key step on its journey to unlocking the gold potential of the Matagami Property in the Abitibi region of Québec. It has flown a detailed high resolution drone magnetic (‘MAG’) survey over an area north of where a 2023 sonic drilling program discovered a significant gold grain anomaly. Hole PD-23-030s had more than 2,000 gold grains per 10 kg of material, supported by a near-contiguous sample with 295 gold grains.

The MAG survey included areas where two other gold anomalies have been previously identified in Québec’s SIGEOM/EXAMINE database (see Figure 1):

  • Daniel-1, which includes a gold value of 6.18 grams per tonne over 1 metre associated with massive sulphide from a diamond drill hole.
  • McIvor-SE, which is sourced from a grab sample in a volcanic shear zone, grading at 37.71 grams per tonne.

‘These showings add to our thesis that the Matagami camp has the potential to produce gold,’ said Peter Van Alphen, Nuvau’s President and CEO. ‘The data from this MAG survey will help us develop our eventual diamond drill program related to the gold grain anomaly we recently identified, which is scheduled to start in the second half of 2025. We have just begun to uncover the gold potential of this 1,300 square kilometre land package, where exploration to date has been limited to base metals even though it is in a region known for hosting gold mineralization, including the Detour Gold and Casa Berardi gold mines.’

The detailed high resolution drone MAG survey was flown over the area surrounding PD-23-030s, extending north and northeast of the anomaly (see Figure 1). The western limit of the survey is approximately 3 kilometres away from the Caber Complex and the Renaissance discovery, the undeveloped massive sulfide cluster with near-term production potential. This high resolution MAG survey will provide valuable geophysical data to support Nuvau’s continuing base metal exploration of the underexplored northern part of the property.

The MAG survey was flown along 25-metre spaced lines oriented at N020° for total line kilometers of 5,066 kilometres. The data was captured at low altitude, approximately 20 metres above ground and will provide a global image of the extended area. Overall, a total area of 128 square kilometres was covered.

The quality and resolution of the survey will enable interpretation of the contrasting geological units as well as structural interpretation, which is key to both the future exploration of region for both gold and base metals. Although this area was previously covered by a mosaic of lower resolution surveys, the data was of much lower definition than what current technology can deliver.

Figure 1 High resolution Drone Mag survey outline on Matagami Camp property with detail MAG data (Source SIGEOM) and gold showing (Source EXAMINE, GM 60332 and GM 44892).

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11236/251673_bc53b819740fd8c6_001full.jpg

Figure 2 Matagami Property Location relative to the gold producers and explorers in the region. Results from adjacent property(ies) are not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on Nuvau’s property.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11236/251673_bc53b819740fd8c6_002full.jpg

Qualified Person and Quality Assurance
Gilles Roy, P. Geo. (Qc), Director of Exploration of Nuvau and a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, has verified the scientific and technical data disclosed in this news release, and otherwise reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information in this news release.

For further information, please contact:
Peter van Alphen
President and CEO
Telephone: 416-525-6063
Email: pvanalphen@nuvauminerals.com

About Nuvau Minerals Inc.
Nuvau is a Canadian mining company focused on the Abitibi Region of mine-friendly Québec. Nuvau’s principal asset is the Matagami Property, which is host to existing processing infrastructure and multiple mineral deposits and is being acquired from Glencore.

Cautionary Statements
Readers are cautioned that geophysical surveys are not definitive; the results contained in this news release are still at an early stage of interpretation, with no guarantee of a mineral discovery.

This news release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively, ‘forward-looking statements’) within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Any statements that are contained in this news release that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are often identified by terms such as ‘may’, ‘should’, ‘anticipate’, ‘will’, ‘estimates’, ‘believes’, ‘intends’ ‘expects’ and similar expressions which are intended to identify forward-looking statements. More particularly and without limitation, this news release contains forward-looking statements concerning drill results relating to the Matagami Property, the results of the PEA, the potential of the Matagami Property, the timing and commencement of any production, the restart of the Bracemac-McLeod Mine, the completion of the earn-in of the Matagami Property and the timing and completion of any technical studies, feasibility studies or economic analyses.

Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and the actual performance may be affected by a number of material factors, assumptions and expectations, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, including expectations and assumptions concerning the Company and the Matagami Property. Readers are cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of any forward-looking statements may prove to be incorrect. Events or circumstances may cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted as a result of numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Readers are further cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, as such information, although considered reasonable by the management of the Company at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated.

The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the date of this news release, and are expressly qualified by the foregoing cautionary statement. Except as expressly required by securities law, neither the Company nor Nuvau undertakes any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/251673

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

finlay minerals ltd. (TSXV: FYL) (OTCQB: FYMNF) (‘Finlay’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce that it has appointed Robert F. Brown as Executive Chairman of the Board, and Ilona Barakso Lindsay as President & Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Brown and Ms. Lindsay formerly held the positions of President & CEO, and Vice President Corporate Relations, respectively. Both Mr. Brown and Ms. Lindsay also continue to be directors of Finlay.

The Company is further pleased to announce the appointment and to welcome Susan Flasha as Vice President, Corporate Development. Ms. Flasha has held positions with Brixton Metals in Corporate Development and as Senior Geologist where she established partnerships with BHP Group Ltd. and Eldorado Gold Corp., and Pretium Resources as Senior Project Geologist for the Brucejack Mine and Bowser Regional Exploration program. Ms. Flasha holds a Master of Science degree in Geological Sciences from Queen’s University.

Gord Steblin continues as Chief Financial Officer and Wade Barnes as Vice President, Exploration of the Company. The Company recognizes and thanks them both for their continued efforts and support as we advance Finlay.

About finlay minerals ltd.

Finlay is a TSXV company focused on exploration for base and precious metal deposits through the advancement of its ATTY, PIL, JJB, SAY and Silver Hope Properties; these properties host copper-gold porphyry and gold-silver epithermal targets within different porphyry districts of northern and central BC. Each property is located in areas of recent development and porphyry discoveries with the advantage of hosting the potential for new discoveries.

Finlay trades under the symbol ‘FYL’ on the TSXV and under the symbol ‘FYMNF’ on the OTCQB. For further information and details, please visit the Company’s website at www.finlayminerals.com

On behalf of the Board of Directors,

Robert F. Brown ,
Executive Chairman of the Board & Director

Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Forward-Looking Information: This news release includes certain ‘forward-looking information’ and ‘forward-looking statements’ (collectively, ‘forward-looking statements’) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements in this news release that address events or developments that we expect to occur in the future are forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, although not always, identified by words such as ‘expect’, ‘plan’, ‘anticipate’, ‘project’, ‘target’, ‘potential’, ‘schedule’, ‘forecast’, ‘budget’, ‘estimate’, ‘intend’ or ‘believe’ and similar expressions or their negative connotations, or that events or conditions ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘may’, ‘could’, ‘should’ or ‘might’ occur. All such forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made. Forward-looking statements in this news release include statements regarding, among others, the exploration plans for the Properties. Although Finlay believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include market prices, exploration successes, and continued availability of capital and financing and general economic, market or business conditions. These forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions including, among other things, assumptions regarding general business and economic conditions, the timing and receipt of regulatory and governmental approvals, the ability of Finlay and other parties to satisfy stock exchange and other regulatory requirements in a timely manner, the availability of financing for Finlay’s proposed transactions and programs on reasonable terms, and the ability of third-party service providers to deliver services in a timely manner. Investors are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements,   and accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein. Finlay does not assume any obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

SOURCE finlay minerals ltd.

View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/May2025/12/c3343.html

News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The NCAA selection committee has spoken, and the 2025 NCAA Softball Tournament field is set.

Sixty-four teams will begin their road to a potential appearance in the Women’s College World Series at the end of May and beginning of June in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The teams included in the field are the 31 automatic qualifiers for conference champions and 33 at-large teams.

Starting on May 16, these teams will play in 16 regionals across the country, hosted by the 16 national seeds. The winner of each region will advance to play in a best-of-three super regional round, with the eight remaining teams advancing to Oklahoma City for the WCWS. The last two teams standing will play in a best-of-three series to determine the national champion.

However, just like every year, there will be a handful of teams shaking their heads following the NCAA softball selection show. Some teams will feel they should have been a regional host, while some will feel they were poorly ranked and got a bad shake of which regional they have to travel for. Of course, several teams felt like they were unfairly left out of the tournament.

Here’s a look at the winners, losers and snubs from the 2025 NCAA women’s college softball field:

Winners

The Southeastern Conference

The SEC had an NCAA Tournament record-14 teams, including seven of the top eight national seeds and nine of the top 15, capping off a great season. That means if chalk holds through the regional round, only one non-SEC team will host a super regional: No. 5 seed Florida State.

Texas A&M

The Aggies are the No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA softball tournament for the first time in program history. The Aggies edged out the four-time defending champion Oklahoma due to their No. 1 ranking in the RPI at the end of the season. Texas A&M did not have a chance to defeat the Sooners in the SEC softball tournament championship game, but could face the Sooners in Oklahoma City.

NCAA softball tournament first-timers

Belmont, Mercer, North Florida, Saint Louis and Santa Clara are first-timers reaching the NCAA softball tournament this season. The Bruins defeated Southern Illinois in the MVC Championship game to earn their first-ever berth, while Mercer was crowned the Southern Conference champions.

The Ospreys earned their first ASUN Tournament title in program history, while the Billikens secured the 2025 Atlantic 10 Softball Championship title with a walk-off win. The Broncos earned their first West Coast Conference championship to automatically qualify.

South Carolina

Seeding matters when it comes to the NCAA softball tournament, and a single seed line can make a huge difference. The Gamecocks edged out No. 9 UCLA for the final top-eight seed. That means they’ll be set to host the Bruins at home in the super regional, if both teams advance.

Losers

UCLA

The Bruins ended the season with an RPI of No. 4 and were the runners-up to Michigan in the Big Ten tournament. However, none of that was enough for UCLA to clinch the last top-eight seed to earn a hosting bid. Instead, if the No. 9 seed Bruins advance to the super regional, they’ll have to travel to Columbia to take on South Carolina on the road.

Virginia Tech

The Hokies had an impressive season but fell apart during the sixth inning of the ACC tournament championship game against eventual champion Clemson. For its trouble, Virginia Tech has to travel to No. 15 seed Alabama in the Tuscaloosa Regional, where the Hokies and Crimson Tide split two games during the Easton Bama Bash in February.

Oregon

The Ducks won the regular season Big Ten championship in their first year in the conference. They also took two out of three games against UCLA during the regular season, but are ranked as the last nationally seeded team at No. 16. The Ducks also had wins over No. 5 seed Florida State (2-0) and No. 7 seed Tennessee (1-0) in nonconference play.

Snubs

Nevada

The Wolf Pack posted a 41-14 record playing against a top-70 strength of schedule. It also finished with an RPI of 36 but, after losing in the Mountain West Tournament, was excluded from the tournament.

Oklahoma

It’s hard to say the No. 2 overall seed was snubbed in any way — but as the four-time defending champs, the Sooners had a real argument as the No. 1 seed after winning the regular season SEC championship in the toughest conference in the country.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The field has been set for the 2025 NCAA softball tournament, which means the road to the Women’s College World Series is set, too.

As was expected going into the selection show, the SEC dominated: Fourteen of the conference’s 16 teams are heading to the postseason, led by SEC tournament co-champions Texas A&M and Oklahoma, the top two seeds of the tournament, respectively. The SEC claimed seven of the top eight seeds and nine of the top 16 overall.

The Sooners are aiming for a dynastic fifth straight national championship, which would place them in rarefied air in all sports. But the field looks more perilous than it has in years past this year, with Patty Gasso’s team lacking its usual pitching depth.

Here’s a look at our predictions for the 2025 softball NCAA Tournament and Women’s College World Series:

Bryan-College Station Regional

  • No. 1 Texas A&M (45-9)
  • Marist (47-7-1)
  • Liberty (47-12)
  • Saint Francis (26-24)

The Aggies should breeze through their regional with two wins and reach the championship game. Texas A&M will advance to the super regional.

Norman Regional

  • No. 2 Oklahoma (45-7)
  • Boston University (39-17)
  • Omaha (39-11)
  • Cal (35-19)

The Sooners are going to be motivated after not getting the No. 1 overall seed. Fully expect Gasso and Oklahoma to turn up the heat in their regional.

Gainesville Regional

  • No. 3 Florida (43-14)
  • Mercer (38-24)
  • Georgia Tech (27-22)
  • Florida Atlantic (44-10)

Florida was the No. 2-ranked team in RPI at the end of the season. The Gators finished sixth in the SEC, but played one of the toughest schedules in the nation.

Fayetteville Regional

  • No. 4 Arkansas (40-12)
  • Saint Louis (34-22)
  • Oklahoma State (33-18)
  • Indiana (33-18)

The Razorbacks have arguably the best player in the nation in Bri Ellis. That alone should carry them through the regional.

Tallahassee Regional

  • No. 5 Florida State (46-9)
  • Robert Morris (30-16)
  • USF (43-14-1)
  • Auburn (32-22)

Florida State is playing as well as any team in the country, with a deep pitching staff and the best hitting lineup in the ACC. The Seminoles should breeze through their regional.

Austin Regional

  • No. 6 Texas (46-10)
  • Eastern Illinois (34-20)
  • Michigan (38-19)
  • UCF (33-22-1)

Big Ten tournament champion Michigan could prove to be a tough test for the Longhorns, but Texas is as battle-tested as any program in the country and should ultimately prevail.

Knoxville Regional

  • No. 7 Tennessee (40-14)
  • Miami (Ohio) (35-24)
  • North Carolina (40-15)
  • Ohio State (43-12-1)

The Lady Vols have one of the best pitchers in college softball in Karlyn Pickens and no one else in the regional can match her arm talent. Tennessee advances.

Columbia Regional

  • No. 8 South Carolina (40-15)
  • Elon (33-19)
  • North Florida (45-13)
  • Virginia (37-17)

South Carolina snuck in for the final super regional host site. The Gamecocks will take full advantage and have the opportunity to host UCLA in the next round.

Los Angeles Regional

  • No. 9 UCLA (49-10)
  • UC Santa Barbara (34-24)
  • San Diego State (37-17)
  • Arizona State (35-19)

The Bruins, like Oklahoma, are going to be motivated after being ‘snubbed’ for the final super regional host spot.

Baton Rouge Regional

  • No. 10 LSU (41-14)
  • SE Louisiana (48-14)
  • UConn (35-17)
  • Nebraska (39-13)

Jordy Bahl transferred to Nebraska to bring home a national championship. Bahl delivers for the Cornhuskers as they upset host LSU to advance to the super regionals.

Clemson Regional

  • No. 11 Clemson (44-12)
  • SC Upstate (39-14)
  • Northwestern (29-18-1)
  • Kentucky (29-26)

The Tigers should feel confident entering their regional after winning the ACC softball tournament championship. Clemson has the ‘it’ factor when it comes to making comebacks and should be good enough to carry on to the super regional.

Lubbock Regional

  • No. 12 Texas Tech (45-12)
  • Brown (33-15)
  • Washington (34-17)
  • Mississippi State (37-17)

The Red Raiders outscored their opponents 26-0 over three games in the Big 12 Tournament and appear to be playing their best softball. It also helps to have NiJaree Canady on your side.

Tucson Regional

  • No. 13 Arizona (45-11)
  • Santa Clara (32-20)
  • Grand Canyon (46-6)
  • Ole Miss (37-17)

The Wildcats are ready for the regional round following wins over Alabama, Stanford and UCLA in nonconference play. But don’t sleep on Ole Miss and Grand Canyon giving them a run for their money.

Durham Regional

  • No. 14 Duke (38-16)
  • Howard (31-18)
  • Coastal Carolina (41-17)
  • Georgia (31-20)

How about the Bulldogs showing off the strength of the SEC with a major upset over Duke in the Durham Regional? Georgia has the talent to pull off the upset.

Tuscaloosa Regional

  • No. 15 Alabama (37-21)
  • Jackson State (28-23)
  • Belmont (40-14)
  • Virginia Tech (41-11)

Virginia Tech had a strong season in the ACC and has a talented pitcher in Emma Lemley. She could carry the Hokies past host Alabama into the super regional round.

Eugene Regional

  • No. 16 Oregon (47-7)
  • Weber State (28-30)
  • Binghamton (36-12)
  • Stanford (40-11)

Oregon is another program that could feel ‘disrespected’ after barely clinging on for the last national seed. The Ducks had nonconference wins over Florida State and Tennessee and won the Big Ten regular season championship.

Super Regionals

Bryan-College Station Super Regional

  • No. 1 Texas A&M vs. No. 16 Oregon: Aggies win in three games

The Aggies are ranked No. 1 in RPI for a reason. Texas A&M is talented in all three phases of the game and, despite having a strong roster, Oregon is not a match. But the Ducks do force the ‘if necessary’ game.

Norman Super Regional

  • No. 2 Oklahoma vs. Virginia Tech: Oklahoma sweeps

The magical run for the Hokies ends here with a motivated Oklahoma squad looking to make history. The Sooners just prove too much for Virginia Tech and earn the sweep.

Gainesville Super Regional

  • No. 3 Florida vs. Georgia: Florida sweeps

Who doesn’t want to see the Gators and Bulldogs battle in the postseason, regardless of the sport? Florida will earn a sweep over their rivals and reach the WCWS once again.

Fayetteville Super Regional

  • No. 4 Arkansas vs. No. 13 Arizona: Arizona wins in three games

This could be a fun back-and-forth super regional with both teams ranking inside the top 12 in RPI. However, in the end, the Wildcats pull off the upset and advance to the WCWS.

Tallahassee Super Regional

  • No. 5 Florida State vs. No. 12 Texas Tech: Florida State wins in three games

Texas Tech has a strong batting lineup and Canady. However, the Seminoles are deeper in pitching and batting.

Austin Super Regional

  • No. 6 Texas vs. No. 11 Clemson: Texas wins in three games

The Longhorns and Tigers present another strong super regional matchup. However, the home field advantage for Texas proves to push the team over the top to advance to the WCWS again.

Knoxville Super Regional

  • No. 7 Tennessee vs. Nebraska: Nebraska wins in three games

Bahl vs. Pickens will be a treat for all college softball fans on a national stage. However, Bahl is going to continue to carry the Cornhuskers over the Lady Vols into the WCWS.

Columbia Super Regional

  • No. 8 South Carolina vs. No. 9 UCLA: UCLA wins in three games

The Bruins are motivated following the snub behind the Gamecocks. Expect UCLA to flex its offensive power against South Carolina and get back to the WCWS following a short stint away.

Women’s College World Series

  • No. 1 Texas A&M
  • No. 2 Oklahoma
  • No. 3 Florida
  • No. 5 Florida State
  • No. 6 Texas
  • No. 9 UCLA
  • No. 13 Arizona
  • Nebraska

WCWS championship series

Prediction: No. 1 Texas A&M over No. 3 Florida in three games

The Aggies have been the most impressive team in college softball this season. Texas A&M will go 3-0 in the WCWS to get to the championship series. The Gators will dispose of the Sooners during their run but ultimately fall to Texas A&M in three games in the championship series.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY