Author

admin

Browsing

Updated 10 October 2026. Brent crude’s December contract closed the week at $104.72 a barrel on Friday 9 October, up 0.42 percent on the day and about 2.4 percent above the previous Friday’s $102.25 settle (Investing.com historical data). Markets are shut for the weekend and Brent reopens on Sunday evening. Verdict: the week ahead is a range trade with a political floor. President Trump has ruled out new strikes on Iran before the 3 November midterms while keeping the naval blockade in place, and prediction markets believe him for now. That caps the upside unless a tanker incident changes the picture, while the blockade and a storm-hit Gulf of Mexico keep a floor under the price. Reference levels for the week are $97 below and $110 above.

Key facts

  • Friday close: $104.72 for the December Brent contract, after a session range of $102.33 to $105.09. Thursday’s close was $104.28 (Investing.com historical data).
  • The week’s range was $97.06 to $105.92: the low came on Tuesday 6 October, the high on Thursday 8 October, when reports of possible new US strikes on Iran lifted prices more than 4 percent before Trump’s statement pulled them back (Investing.com; Al-Monitor; OilPrice.com).
  • Trump’s pledge: on 8 October he said on Truth Social that the US “will not be attacking Iran at any time prior to the Midterm Elections”, that the blockade “will remain in full force and effect”, and that Washington is having productive discussions with Tehran (Axios; Al-Monitor; AP via the Boston Globe).
  • Polymarket odds (fetched Saturday morning, 10 October): 95.6 percent that the US-Iran ceasefire holds through 12 October, 91.5 percent through 15 October, 75.5 percent through 31 October, 72.5 percent through the midterms and 39.5 percent through 30 November.
  • Storm Isaias shut in about 511,000 barrels a day of offshore crude, roughly a quarter of Gulf of Mexico output, according to figures reported on 8 October.
  • The EIA raised its fourth-quarter Brent forecast to about $105 in its October Short-Term Energy Outlook, $14 above September’s outlook, and put September’s Brent spot average at $114 (EIA, via Ship & Bunker and Trend).
  • Next data point: US September CPI is due on Wednesday 14 October at 8:30am ET (BLS release calendar). August CPI ran at 3.4 percent year on year.

Where Brent finished the week

Brent spent the first half of the week drifting lower. The December contract closed at $100.32 on Monday 5 October, touched $97.06 intraday on Tuesday and closed at $100.20 on Wednesday, according to Investing.com’s historical data. The selling came from the supply side: G7 reserve barrels, Gulf exports running above pre-war levels on several days in late September, and Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline, which its energy minister said had reached 5.8 million barrels a day of operating capacity.

Thursday changed the tone. Brent jumped 4.07 percent to close at $104.28 after media reports that the White House had asked the Pentagon for strike options that could be used before the midterms. Trump’s Truth Social post later that day ruled such strikes out, and OilPrice.com reported that oil dropped on the statement while still finishing the day higher. Friday was quieter: Brent traded between $102.33 and $105.09 and closed at $104.72.

The result is a week that ended about $2.47 higher than it began, with the market holding most of Thursday’s gain even after the reason for it was withdrawn. That tells you the floor is not only about Iran.

What the Iran pledge does and does not change

Trump’s statement removes the most obvious upside catalyst for the next three weeks: a resumption of US strikes on Iranian territory, which Axios reported would likely target energy facilities, infrastructure and nuclear sites if major combat resumed. It does not remove the blockade, which keeps Iran’s own exports off the market, and it does not cover what happens after 3 November.

Polymarket’s ceasefire contracts show that time structure clearly. Traders put the ceasefire holding through 12 October at 95.6 percent and through 31 October at 75.5 percent, but only 39.5 percent through 30 November. The market is pricing the pledge as a deadline, not a peace deal. The contracts resolve on US kinetic action on Iranian soil, so they do not capture attacks on shipping, which have continued: the UKMTO maritime agency reported a tanker off Qatar struck by multiple projectiles this week.

For Brent in the coming week, the practical reading is that a war-driven spike is less likely than it was on Thursday morning, while a shipping-driven one is no less likely than it was before.

The Gulf of Mexico and the inventory picture

Storm Isaias added a domestic supply shock. About 511,000 barrels a day of offshore output, around 25 percent of Gulf of Mexico production, was shut in as operators evacuated platforms, according to figures reported on 8 October and covered in our note on Gulf storm outages and Hormuz tensions. How fast those barrels return depends on whether platforms come through without damage. A quick restart would remove part of the support that held Brent above $104 on Friday.

The EIA’s weekly data showed US crude inventories down 3.2 million barrels, the largest draw in five weeks, while gasoline stocks rose. In its October outlook the agency estimated that global inventories fell by about 1.9 million barrels a day in the third quarter and will fall by a further 700,000 barrels a day in the fourth, which is the basis for its roughly $105 fourth-quarter forecast. We covered that revision in EIA’s $105 Q4 Brent forecast.

The 14 October CPI print

September CPI lands on Wednesday 14 October. It matters to Brent in two directions. Energy is a direct input: with Brent spot averaging $114 in September by the EIA’s count, $23 above August, the energy component is likely to be large. A hot headline number would push yields and the dollar up, which tends to weigh on dollar-priced crude. A soft core number would do the opposite and would also ease pressure on the White House over fuel prices before the midterms. August’s CPI rose 3.4 percent year on year and 0.4 percent month on month.

Brent week ahead: bull, base and bear

Scenario Brent (December) What has to happen Anchor
Bear ~$97 Gulf of Mexico platforms restart quickly with no damage, Gulf exports stay strong, the ceasefire holds and a hot CPI print lifts the dollar. $97.06 was the December contract’s intraday low on Tuesday 6 October (Investing.com), before the strike reports. Roughly 7 percent below Friday’s close.
Base $102 – $106 No US strikes, as pledged; the blockade stays; shipping incidents continue at this week’s pace; storm output returns gradually. Friday’s session range was $102.33 to $105.09 and Thursday’s high was $105.92 (Investing.com). The EIA’s fourth-quarter average forecast of about $105 sits inside it.
Bull ~$110 A serious tanker attack or a disruption at Hormuz or the East-West pipeline, or storm damage that keeps Gulf of Mexico barrels offline for weeks. About 5 percent above Friday’s close and still below September’s $114 spot average (EIA). The bull case needs supply news, not Washington.

These are near-term reference levels built from prices traded in the past week and the EIA’s published averages, not forecasts. Brent can move several dollars in a session on a single shipping headline, as Thursday showed.

What to watch this week

  • Sunday evening’s open. Any weekend shipping incident in the Gulf or the Red Sea will show up in the first trades.
  • Gulf of Mexico restart reports. Daily shut-in figures will show how much of the 511,000 barrels a day is back.
  • Wednesday 14 October, 8:30am ET. US September CPI.
  • The EIA weekly inventory report, which will be the first to capture the storm shut-ins in full.
  • Polymarket’s 15 October and 31 October ceasefire contracts. A drop in either is an early sign that traders are doubting the pledge. Our earlier look at how Polymarket prices the Iran blockade explains how those contracts are built.
  • 1 November. The next OPEC+ review of the seven producers’ targets, covered in our OPEC+ November hold analysis.

Quick take: Brent closed the week at $104.72 with Washington’s strike option parked until 3 November and the blockade still in force. That points to a $102-$106 week. The route to $97 is a fast storm recovery plus a strong dollar after CPI; the route to $110 runs through the shipping lanes, not the White House.

FAQ

What was the Brent crude price on Friday?

Brent’s December contract closed at $104.72 a barrel on Friday 9 October 2026, up 0.42 percent on the day, according to Investing.com historical data. Thursday’s close was $104.28.

Is the oil market open on the weekend?

No. ICE Brent futures stop trading on Friday evening and reopen on Sunday evening, so the Friday close is the reference price over the weekend.

What did Trump say about Iran and the midterms?

On 8 October Trump said on Truth Social that the US would not attack Iran at any time before the 3 November midterm elections, that the naval blockade remains in full force, and that talks with Iran are productive.

What are the odds the US-Iran ceasefire holds?

On Saturday 10 October Polymarket priced the ceasefire holding through 12 October at 95.6 percent, through 31 October at 75.5 percent and through 30 November at 39.5 percent. The contracts resolve on US military action on Iranian soil, not on attacks against shipping.

How does CPI affect oil prices?

A higher-than-expected inflation print tends to lift bond yields and the dollar, which weighs on dollar-priced crude. US September CPI is due on 14 October at 8:30am ET.

What is the EIA’s Brent forecast?

The EIA’s October Short-Term Energy Outlook expects Brent to average about $105 a barrel in the fourth quarter of 2026, about $96 for the full year and about $84 in 2027.

How much Gulf of Mexico oil did Storm Isaias shut in?

About 511,000 barrels a day, roughly 25 percent of Gulf of Mexico crude output, according to figures reported on 8 October. The impact on prices depends on how quickly platforms restart.

Sources: Investing.com (Brent December futures historical closes and session ranges, 5-9 October 2026); Axios, Al-Monitor, AP via the Boston Globe and OilPrice.com (Trump’s 8 October statement and market reaction); Polymarket (US-Iran ceasefire contracts, prices fetched 10 October 2026); EIA October 2026 Short-Term Energy Outlook as reported by Ship & Bunker and Trend (fourth-quarter and annual Brent forecasts, inventory estimates, September average); EIA weekly petroleum status report (US crude draw); US Bureau of Labor Statistics release calendar (CPI date); UKMTO (tanker incident off Qatar); Bloomberg as cited in FinanceFeeds’ 8 October report (Storm Isaias shut-ins, East-West pipeline capacity).

This article is for information only and is not investment advice. Commodity prices move continuously and the figures above were accurate at the time of writing. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any instrument. Do your own research and consider your own circumstances before trading.

Crumbl faces two massive problems.

First, the chain sells a pricey indulgence customers don’t actually need. Second, millions of Americans are taking GLP-1 drugs that curb their appetites.

“People just don’t feel great about the economy,” Zions Bank Senior Economist Robert Spendlove told KSL. “And a big reason for that is they’re facing constant pressure of rising prices and higher inflation.”

For consumers watching their grocery bills and other household expenses climb, a $5 cookie is an easy purchase to skip. Unlike a meal or a grocery staple, Crumbl’s oversized treats are an indulgence, making them vulnerable when shoppers start cutting discretionary spending.

And, as someone taking a GLP-1 drug, I can clearly say that I’m snacking less often, and a survey from PwC shows I’m not alone.

“Sixty-one percent of current users say they’re buying fewer sweet treats, and 56% say the same about salty snacks,” the data showed.

It’s a perfect storm of bad news that has led to store closures, franchisee bankruptcy filings, and a staggering drop in sales.

Crumbl’s sales have crumbled

An internal Crumbl document obtained by Restaurant Business shows August sales were 70% lower than two years earlier.

Foot traffic at Crumbl’s more than 1,000 locations fell 32% year over year, according to data from Placer.ai.

That situation has led to numerous store closures and a franchisee Chapter 7 filing.

  • A Crumbl cookie retail chain franchisee in St. Matthews, Ky., closed its business, and its owners filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, seeking to liquidate their assets, facing more than $352,000 in liabilities, according to Louisville Business First.
  • Franchisee Red Sheep St. Matthews LLC, which was owned by Richard and Emily Diamond, filed its petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Kentucky on Oct. 1, according to PacerMonitor.

Crumbl has closed at least 57 stores in 2026, following additional closures in 2025, based on a comparison of data from its current store locator page and archival versions of that page.

The challenge facing the chain is that history is littered with once-popular dessert chains that experienced success and then eventually shut down.

Crumbl faces a number of challenges based on its menu and the state of the consumer.

Shutterstock

Dessert-only businesses have historically struggled

RTM Nexus CEO Dominick Miserandino isn’t surprised that Crumbl has faced significant sales problems.

“The cookie business has enough problems with fading novelty. Now you’ve got people on GLP-1 drugs who don’t even want the cookie. That’s a tough combination when your entire business depends on someone deciding they deserve a treat,” he told TheStreet.

A number of dessert-only chains that were once popular have closed down. The list includes:

  • Sprinkles Cupcakes (2025): The well-known cupcake chain closed all its remaining U.S. locations on Dec. 31, 2025, including its cupcake vending machines. The company had roughly 20 locations and more than 30 ATMs. No official reason for the shutdown was given, according to the Associated Press.
  • Chip City Cookies (2026): The New York-founded gourmet cookie chain closed all its remaining locations in October 2026. The company cited declining sales, changing consumer preferences, and insufficient funding, QSR Magazine reported.
  • Crumbs Bake Shop (2014): Once the largest specialty cupcake chain in the U.S., Crumbs closed its remaining 58 stores after a steep sales slump and financial problems, reported the Los Angeles Times.
  • Gigi’s Cupcakes (2025): The cupcake chain’s franchisor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in January 2025, citing financial difficulties. The filing followed years of store closures and financial problems. Some independently operated franchises remained open, according to Restaurant Business.

Craveworthy Brands CEO Gregg Majewski, whose company owns Dirty Dough, a cookie dough snack chain, shared his recipe for keeping customers coming back.

“Look at the trends in frozen yogurt, cupcakes, and all these other ones,” he told Restaurant Dive. “We want to maintain sales so we don’t see those drops by having an assortment of items for guests.”

GLP-1 use isn’t hurting all snack brands

While it’s easy to say that people on GLP-1s eat fewer snacks, that’s only a piece of the puzzle.

“We have seen no obvious impact from GLP-1s in our data,” Krispy Kreme CEO Joshua Charlesworth told Restaurant Dive. “I think that’s because it’s such an infrequent purchase that the vast majority of our doughnuts are purchased in dozens for sharing occasions — 40% of them are for gifts for somebody else.”

Data from Circana shows that GLP-1 users have not stopped visiting restaurants.

“Circana has tracked foodservice data for 50 years, and consumers have been following various diet plans for the entirety of that time. Restaurants continue to adapt and grow with those trends,” the research firm shared.

Key findings include:

  • Circana’s research, which combines consumer survey data and receipt tracking, found that GLP-1 users decrease the average number of items ordered per trip by 1%.
  • This aligns with a broader trend, as 35% of all restaurant consumers reported ordering smaller portion sizes in October for health-related reasons.
  • The analysis reveals a notable change in menu item selection among GLP-1 users, who now tend to order more main dishes and fewer sides, snacks, and breads.
  • This group shows a strong preference for healthier choices, with 63% actively seeking more vegetables and 55% seeking more fruit.

“With GLP-1 usage, the biggest change to restaurants won’t be that consumers stop going out to eat, it will be how they go out to eat and what they order,” it shared.

Related: Is Kroger open on Columbus Day?

SoundHound stock has plunged to its lowest level since November 2024 as investors continue betting against the voice AI company. It slumped to a low of $5.38 on Friday, down by nearly 80% from its all-time high, a sign that Nvidia’s investment has flopped. 

Investors are aggressively betting against SoundHound stock

SOUN stock has plunged since October last year, when it peaked at $22 after Nvidia took a stake in the company. Despite its strong revenue growth, investors have continued to bet against the company, with the short interest rising to 40%. This makes it one of the most heavily shorted companies in the US. 

Short interest is a figure that looks at the number of shares of a stock that investors have sold short but have not yet covered or closed out. It is usually a measure of how many traders are betting that a stock will fall. A high figure is a sign that many people expect it to drop over time. 

It can also be a sign that a stock will experience a short squeeze, a situation where it rebounds, forcing short sellers to buy shares to close their positions. A good example of a short squeeze was GameStop, which surged in early 2021. OpenDoor also experienced a short squeeze last year.

SoundHound’s crash and the rising short interest is happening even as its revenue continue growing. Its last earnings report showed that revenue jumped by 45% to $61.9 million as more companies continued to embrace its technology. It signed a 7-figure deal with a healthcare system with over 30,000 employees. It also renewed its contracts with top companies like Rakuten Securities and Hyundai.

SoundHound also continued to narrow its losses during the quarter. Its net loss came in at $42.8 million from $74 million a year earlier. The management decided to hike its targets for the year. It now expects that its annual revenue will be between $230 million and $260 million. 

Analysts expect that its revenue will be $251 million, followed by $390 million next year. The real figures will be higher than these because of its recent LivePerson acquisition in a $43 million deal.

SOUN stock price technical analysis

SoundHound stock chart | Source: TradingView

The weekly chart shows that the SoundHound stock has been in a strong sell-off since last year. It has now dropped below the important support level of $5.80, its lowest level in March and August, invalidating the double-bottom pattern. The double-bottom is one of the most common bullish reversal patterns in technical analysis. 

The stock continues falling below the 50-week Exponential Moving Average and the descending trendline that connects the highest swing since January. Its double-bottom pattern was part of the descending triangle pattern. 

Therefore, the path of the least resistance is downwards, with the next key target to watch being at $4. The risk, however, is that it may experience a short squeeze, especially as its earnings nears.

The post SoundHound stock breaks key support as short interest surges: Is a squeeze coming? appeared first on Invezz

The myth is that Block just took a new $15 million Cash App settlement hit. It did not. Payments to approved claims are scheduled for October 2026, and new claims closed on 18 November 2024. The $15,000,000 cash cap is in the agreement filed on 3 March 2024. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granted final approval on 27 March 2025. Block’s Class A shares, ticker XYZ, closed Thursday 8 October 2026 at $75.23. A Nasdaq quote saved Friday at 8:11 a.m. Eastern still showed that close, a premarket sale of $75.50, and a market cap of $45,360,022,500. Those last two prints imply 600,795,000 shares, so the fund is $0.025 a share.

The check headlines skip the waterfall. Kim awarded $5,000,000 in fees, $1,515,687 to Angeion Group, and $7,500 in service awards. Residual cash is $8,476,813. Against 667,985 nonduplicate claims, an even split is $12.69. The $2,500 figure is a documentation cap, not the payment.

Key facts

  • Administrator alert, updated 28 September 2026: deficiency review is finished, and distribution “will be issued to approved claims in October 2026.” Final approval was 27 March 2025. Claims closed 18 November 2024. Source: cashappsecuritysettlement.com.
  • Agreement, Document 76-2, filed 3 March 2024: defendants deposit $15,000,000, and total liability under the agreement does not exceed that sum. Notice costs already paid are subtracted, not added. Source: the settlement agreement.
  • Order of 27 March 2025: 667,985 nonduplicate claims out of 158,011,266 potential class members, and 191 opt-outs. Fees $5,000,000, with $500,000 held back. Angeion $1,515,687. Service awards $2,500 each to Michelle Salinas, Raymel Washington, and Amanda Gordon. Source: Judge Kim’s order.
  • Arithmetic from that order: fees, administration, and service awards are $6,523,187. Residual cash is $8,476,813, or $12.69 across 667,985 claims. That even split is not the formula. Documented claims are paid first and cut pro rata if the net fund is short.
  • Nasdaq, saved 9 October 2026: Thursday 8 October close $75.23, down 1.10 percent from Wednesday’s $76.07, on 8,400,865 shares. Friday 8:11 a.m. Eastern premarket last sale $75.50. Market cap on that snapshot $45,360,022,500. 52-week range $48.21 to $86.92. Source: Nasdaq.
  • Form 10-Q filed 5 August 2026, figures in thousands: quarterly net revenue $6,617,687, up 9.30 percent. Net income $87,069. First-half net loss $221,526. Ex-bitcoin Cash App revenue rose $533.9 million, or 32 percent. The filing does not name Salinas. Source: the 10-Q.
  • Complaint filed 9 February 2024: a December 2021 incident “resulted in the unauthorized public release of PII of 8.2 million current and former Cash App Investing customers,” including names, brokerage account numbers, holdings, and trading activity. Plaintiffs allege a former employee downloaded the reports. Source: the complaint.

What just happened, and why the obvious reading is wrong

The obvious reading is that Cash App is mailing a new $15 million settlement and that $2,500 is the check. The month is real. The novelty is not. The administrator’s 28 September alert says distribution to approved claims will be issued in October 2026. It does not say a payment file has cleared, and it does not reopen the desk.

Beverly Kidd wrote on 8 October, “i haven’t received my cash app settlement yet.” October still had most of the month left, and the site never named a morning. Link: her post. The same search included pitches of a flat $2,500 for every user, with no documents required. That is not this case.

The case is Salinas, et al. v. Block, Inc. and Cash App Investing, LLC, No. 22-cv-04823, Northern District of California. The notice covers an April 2022 disclosure, an October 2023 disclosure, and unauthorized transfers. The defendants deny wrongdoing. The 8.2 million figure is the December 2021 allegation. The 158,011,266 figure is a notice population. The check count is 667,985 claims, 0.42 percent of that population.

Who gets paid, and who is shut out

The class covers current or former customers with unauthorized access, fraudulent transfers, or an alleged error on Cash App, Cash App Investing, or a linked account. The window is four years before the 23 August 2022 Salinas complaint, which is 23 August 2018, through the notice date. The FAQ dates that notice at 20 August 2024. One FAQ line starts the unauthorized-account definition on 23 September 2018. The agreement does not. The agreement controls.

A timely claim can seek three things, only for losses not already repaid. Out-of-pocket losses are capped at $2,500 with third-party documents, from credit monitoring to unrefunded overdrafts and late fees. Handwritten receipts alone do not qualify. Lost time is three hours at $25, which is $75. Transaction losses need a notice to the defendants, a police report, or other proof the administrator accepts.

If approved claims exceed the net fund, payments are cut pro rata. Leftover cash goes to claimants or to charity. It does not revert to Block. Checks expire if not cashed within 90 days, and a reissue is good for 60 days. People who never filed, and did not opt out, release their claims and get nothing. The 191 opt-outs can still sue.

What Block agreed to, in cash and in controls

Within 30 days of the effective date, the defendants deposit $15,000,000, less notice costs already paid. The administrator pays notice and admin, taxes, the fee award, service awards, then approved claims. Class counsel called the fund non-reversionary. The waterfall matches that label.

The security section is a representation, not a construction budget. The defendants “represent that they have implemented” what they say they maintain: vulnerability management, annual secure-coding training, a Cash App security team, daily internal scans, weekly PCI scans, annual penetration testing, a public bug bounty, a threat-intelligence team, and a yearly SOC 2 Type II exam.

Counsel told the court those changes were worth $5 million, citing cybersecurity expert Mary Frantz, and used that to argue a $20 million value. The fee motion says Cash App “agreed to implement” them. The agreement says the defendants “have implemented” controls they “maintain.” The cash cap is $15 million.

What the court order does to the $15 million

Kim granted final approval and the fee in part, and denied a separate cost bill of $76,696.58. Counsel had asked for $5,000,000, called 25 percent of a $20 million value, and had said that 25 percent included costs. The court awarded the $5,000,000 and denied the extra bill. Ten percent of the fee, $500,000, is held back until a post-distribution accounting says whether the net cash reached valid claims, whether payments were scaled, and whether Angeion spent $1,515,687.

The holdback is not extra money for claimants unless a later order says so. No fee-reduction order was on the site’s document list. The subtraction is $15,000,000 minus $5,000,000 minus $1,515,687 minus $7,500, which is $8,476,813, or $12.69 across 667,985 claims. That is a ceiling on the average. If documented claims exceed $8.48 million, the $2,500 cap is theoretical and the cut is pro rata.

Who is exposed

XYZ holders are exposed to a closed cash item. At 600,795,000 implied shares, $15 million is $0.025, or 0.033 percent of Thursday’s $45,197,807,850 equity value. The June 10-Q’s basic share count was 597,829 thousand. On either count the fund is about two and a half cents.

June-quarter net income was $87.069 million. The cash fund is 17.23 percent of that quarter and 0.227 percent of $6.618 billion of net revenue. The first half was a net loss of $221.526 million, about $0.37 a share, roughly 15 times the settlement. Ex-bitcoin Cash App revenue rose 32 percent. Bitcoin was 3 percent of Cash App gross profit. The equity story is the app, not the envelopes.

Banks that already repaid a customer keep that loss, because reimbursed claims are excluded. The class still reaches linked bank, card, and investment accounts, which is why Cash App Investing is a defendant. The Square card reader is the other segment and is not the class. Revolut is covering ID-replacement costs after a data incident, and Wise is covering UK tax shortfalls after a software error. Sumsub can supply an identity layer, and the bank still owns the KYC call. None of that caps a regulator.

What the tape shows

The closes here are Thursday’s official prints. Friday’s session had not closed when the history was saved, so the 8:11 a.m. Eastern sale at $75.50 is premarket and is not a bar. From the 2 January 2026 close of $65.15, Thursday is up 15.47 percent. Thursday is 0.63 percent under the 126-session average of $75.71, 5.10 percent under the 50-session average of $79.27, and 6.91 percent above the 200-session average of $70.37. The high close is $84.85 on 27 August 2026. The low close is $49.09 on 12 February 2026. Nasdaq’s $100.00 one-year field would be 32.93 percent above the spot, and it is not a case below.

Session XYZ close Note
2 Jan 2026 $65.15 First 2026 close in the file
12 Feb 2026 $49.09 Low close, intraday low $48.21
27 Aug 2026 $84.85 High close, intraday high $86.92
25 Sep 2026 $76.42 Last close before the site update
28 Sep 2026 $73.31 Down 4.07 percent from 25 September
7 Oct 2026 $76.07 Volume 3,010,475
8 Oct 2026 $75.23 Down 1.10 percent, volume 8,400,865

The 28 September drop is not a settlement print. No release that day tied the shares to the calendar, and the close was $76.54 by 6 October. Thursday’s volume was 2.79 times Wednesday’s and the price gave back $0.84. A $0.025 item does not explain that volume. The cause is not in a filing.

Source: Nasdaq daily closes for Block Class A (XYZ), 1 October 2025 through the Thursday 8 October 2026 close of $75.23. Lines are this piece’s 31 March 2027 cases: bull $84.85, the 27 August 2026 close; base $75.71, the 126-session average; bear $70.37, the 200-session average. The $15 million settlement is not a price on this chart. Chart: FinanceFeeds.

What they said, and what the release does

Block has not admitted the breaches. The notice says the defendants deny wrongdoing, and the FAQ says the deal is not a finding that they broke the law. Posts from @CashApp from 4 October to 9 October 2026 were promotional. The highest-engagement one begins “we really don’t care what apps you put us next to on your phone” and does not mention the fund. Link: the 7 October post. The June 10-Q calls Jack Dorsey a controlling shareholder. He is not quoted here. A January 2022 Form 8-K lists SQ. Friday’s Nasdaq quote lists XYZ.

“After reviewing all of the required factors and considering the evidence, the Court finds the Settlement Agreement is fair, adequate, and reasonable.”

Sallie Kim, United States Magistrate Judge, Northern District of California, order of 27 March 2025, Document 157.

“After nearly two years of hard-fought litigation, including three (3) full-day mediation sessions over the span of several months with additional telephone calls and exchanges of data with mediator Robert A. Meyer, Esq. of JAMS, the parties reached an exceptional Settlement that compensates Class Members for their losses and protects them against future risks.”

Nicholas A. Migliaccio, co-lead counsel, Migliaccio & Rathod LLP, fee motion signed 15 August 2024, Document 100.

USA TODAY posted on 9 October: “Payments from a $15 million settlement agreed to by Cash App and parent company Block for a 2021 breach are expected to start going out soon.” That line is on the USA TODAY account. It is not a disbursement receipt. The complaint’s first incident is December 2021, and the notice also covers 2023 access through recycled phone numbers. “Soon” means October.

Class members who stay in release claims about system security, access, and transfers of information or funds, including the 9 February 2024 complaint. The FAQ’s statute list runs from the California privacy statutes through the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and the FTC Act, inside the four-year window. That is a wide private release against $8.48 million of residual cash.

The $15 million cap binds the defendants under this agreement. It does not bind a regulator. An attorney general is not a class member, and the 191 opt-outs are not bound. Three days with mediator Robert A. Meyer of JAMS produced $15 million of cash, a representation that existing controls continue, and a release. The June 10-Q still warns that a security incident can force remediation spend and regulatory investigations. That sentence is the open liability. Salinas is the closed one.

About 0.42 percent of the notice population filed, and opt-outs were 0.00012 percent. The thin objection count helped Kim approve the deal. It also means most people in that population never see a check, while the release still binds them if they fit the class and stayed in.

Bull, base, bear, and what happens next

The horizon is 31 March 2027. The spot is Thursday’s $75.23. The bull reuses a close the stock already printed. The base and the bear are averages of the saved Nasdaq closes. Nasdaq’s $100.00 field stays out.

Case 31 Mar 2027 Versus $75.23 What has to be true
Bull $84.85 +12.79 percent Price revisits the 27 August 2026 close. October checks stay inside the $15 million cap. The next 10-Q adds no new material Cash App security contingency. Ex-bitcoin Cash App growth does not reverse the June quarter’s 32 percent.
Base $75.71 +0.64 percent The 126-session average. The settlement stays a 2025 item. Distribution is a mailing, not a new loss.
Bear $70.37 -6.46 percent Price returns to the 200-session average because a new contingency, larger than this fund, is disclosed, or the first-half loss of $221.5 million is read as a margin break.

The bull is ($84.85 minus $75.23) divided by $75.23, or 12.79 percent. The base rounds 126 closes from $75.7107 to $75.71, up 0.64 percent. The bear rounds 200 closes from $70.3653 to $70.37, down 6.46 percent. Ten times this fund is still only about $0.25 a share. The bear is a franchise rerating, not the arithmetic of Salinas.

This is not financial advice.

By 31 October 2026 the administrator issues payments to approved claims. The chain is the 28 September update: deficiency work is done, and distribution is set for this month. That does not admit a claimant who missed 18 November 2024.

By 29 January 2027 a check dated 31 October 2026 hits the 90-day stale legend. The administrator then tries the contact on the form and reissues, and the reissue is good for 60 days. The order does not date the post-distribution accounting. The prediction is a filing by 31 January 2027, because the $500,000 fee holdback waits on it. That filing has to say whether $8,476,813 covered the claims or the cuts were pro rata.

By 31 March 2027 the base path is $75.71 if later reports add no material Cash App security contingency above the $15 million cap. The bull is $84.85 if the August close is revisited. The bear is $70.37 if a new contingency, or the first-half loss, is treated as the risk this settlement did not retire.

Frequently asked questions

cash app settlement

The Cash App settlement is a $15 million cash fund in Salinas v. Block, and payments to approved claims are scheduled for October 2026. The case is Salinas, et al. v. Block, Inc. and Cash App Investing, LLC, No. 22-cv-04823, in the Northern District of California. The administrator’s site, updated 28 September 2026, says the deficiency review is finished and distribution will be issued this month. New claims are closed. The deadline was 18 November 2024.

Are Cash App settlement payments starting?

Yes. The payment window is October 2026, and October has started. The administrator’s 28 September notice says distribution will be issued to approved claims this month. It does not say the first deposit has already posted. A claimant who wrote on 8 October that nothing had arrived is consistent with that calendar. Checks that do go out expire if they are not cashed within 90 days. The claim form itself is no longer open.

Who gets money from the Cash App settlement?

Approved claimants who filed by 18 November 2024. The class is current or former Cash App or Cash App Investing customers with unauthorized access, or with unauthorized or fraudulent transfers, or an alleged account error, from four years before 23 August 2022 through the 20 August 2024 notice date. Losses a bank or Block already repaid are out. People who did not file get nothing. The 191 opt-outs are not paid and are not bound.

Is the Cash App settlement payment $2,500?

No. $2,500 is the cap on documented out-of-pocket losses, not a flat check. Lost time is capped at three hours at $25, which is $75. Transaction losses need a report to the company, a police report, or other proof. After $5,000,000 in fees, $1,515,687 for Angeion, and $7,500 in service awards, $8,476,813 remains. Across 667,985 claims that is $12.69 if split evenly, before any pro rata cut.

Did Block admit the Cash App breach?

No. The settlement agreement and the court notice say Block and Cash App Investing deny wrongdoing and that the deal is not a finding they violated the law. The complaint alleges a December 2021 download affecting 8.2 million Cash App Investing customers and a 2023 incident that used recycled phone numbers. Those are allegations. Judge Kim found the agreement fair, adequate, and reasonable. She did not try the breach.

Will the $15 million move Block stock XYZ?

Not as a new charge. XYZ closed at $75.23 on 8 October 2026. On the shares implied by Friday’s premarket market cap, $15 million is $0.025, or 0.033 percent of equity value. June-quarter net income was $87.1 million. The first half was a $221.5 million loss. Those figures dwarf the fund. A future regulator is not capped by this private settlement. That open risk is not in the October checks.

At a time when so many retailers are closing their doors due to financial difficulties, consumers are getting more accustomed to saying goodbye to their favorite stores. 

But one department store closure is hitting hard. 

Neiman Marcus’ historic Dallas flagship has officially closed its doors, marking the end of an era for the luxury retailer and the city where it began.

Despite efforts to save it, the iconic department store closed up shop on Sept. 30, ending more than a century at its downtown Dallas location. The closure drew longtime customers who wanted one final look at a store that had become much more than a place to shop.

“My grandparents started bringing me in the 1970’s,” customer Jay Johnson told CBS News Texas. “It’s sad for such an iconic store.”

Neiman Marcus leaves behind a legacy of luxury

The emotional response underscores the significance of the closure. 

Neiman Marcus helped define Dallas’s luxury shopping identity for generations, building a reputation that extended beyond designer merchandise to dining, holiday traditions, and personalized service.

Neiman Marcus opened its downtown Main Street location in 1914. The flagship store subsequently became a landmark associated with the city’s cultural and commercial history.

“It is Dallas,” Johnson told CBS News Texas. “When you read the history of the Marcus family, it’s been in Downtown all these years. It’s part of the fabric of Dallas.”

The store’s significance went beyond its merchandise. Its Zodiac Room restaurant, elaborate holiday displays, and architectural details helped make shopping there an experience in its own right.

Fashion filmmaker and historian Hayley Chow compared the landmark’s place in Dallas to a famous New York institution.

“To me, this Neiman’s is our Tiffany’s to New York City,” Chow said, according to CBS News Texas.

The store also attracted prominent visitors over the decades, including Elizabeth Taylor, James Dean, and Grace Kelly, further cementing its association with glamour and high fashion.

For many Dallas residents, however, its most important legacy involved everyday family traditions.

The closure also raises questions about the future of downtown retail, as businesses reconsider where customers prefer to shop and how urban shopping districts can remain competitive.

Charlotte Jenkins, another visitor interviewed by CBS News Texas, acknowledged the challenges facing the city’s center.

“Downtown has to move faster, be more competitive, so we can attract the next wave of growth,” she said.

Neiman Marcus helped define Dallas’s luxury shopping identity for generations.

Bloomberg / Getty Images

The luxury retailer plans to preserve parts of its history

Neiman Marcus is not abandoning Dallas completely. Instead, its parent company, Saks Global, is concentrating its efforts on the retailer’s NorthPark Center location, which is undergoing a major renovation.

When the company announced the closure, it said it had decided to “concentrate our resources where our customers prefer to shop,” according to CBS News Texas.

More Retail:

The company has also committed to preserving selected elements of the downtown flagship at NorthPark. 

That approach reflects a broader challenge facing established retailers: maintaining the heritage that makes their brands distinctive while adapting their physical stores to changing customer preferences.

Luxury retailers face their own challenges in persuading shoppers to visit physical stores when competing shopping destinations and online options are readily available.

For Neiman Marcus, the downtown closure does not erase its history, but it does change how customers will experience it.

The future of the historic building also remains an open question. As Dallas continues to reimagine its urban core, the fate of the former flagship will be another test of whether the city can preserve its past while attracting new investment.

For longtime customers, though, the loss is already tangible.

Related: Dollar General makes surprisingly affordable change

US stocks ended mixed on Thursday, with the Nasdaq Composite posting its steepest decline among the major indexes as artificial intelligence stocks came under pressure and rising oil prices added to inflation concerns.

The Nasdaq fell 1.24% to 27,197.10 points, while the S&P 500 lost 0.46% to 7,765.70. The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 0.09% to 51,225.48.

AI stocks fall after OpenAI revenue report

Technology and semiconductor stocks declined after a Financial Times report said OpenAI’s annualised revenue was about $20 billion below the figure the company had previously signalled.

Oracle shares fell more than 5%, while Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices declined about 2% and 3%, respectively.

Semiconductor stocks were among the weakest performers after having gained more than 80% so far this year.

The report added to concerns around the large capital requirements of the AI industry.

Broadcom and Oracle also faced pressure after reports that Broadcom was arranging $50 billion in financing for OpenAI, while Oracle was seeking additional funding.

Investors are also looking ahead to the third-quarter earnings season, which begins next week.

Palantir was among the few technology stocks to gain, rising 2% after Goldman Sachs upgraded the company to Buy from Neutral.

The firm said the company could benefit from increasing demand for sovereign AI and customised applications.

Oil prices rise as Middle East tensions persist

Oil prices climbed as concerns over supply disruptions in the Middle East continued to weigh on markets.

Brent crude settled 3.6% higher, while West Texas Intermediate gained 3.19%.

Oil prices were supported by attacks on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and a reduction in US oil production linked to hurricane activity.

US crude prices have risen more than 60% this year as the conflict involving Iran has tightened global supplies. Higher energy prices have also increased concerns that inflation could remain elevated.

President Donald Trump later said the US would not attack Iran before the midterm elections, helping oil prices retreat from their session highs.

Treasury yields remain elevated

Treasury yields remained close to multi-year highs as investors assessed the impact of higher oil prices on inflation and the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate outlook.

The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield was last down more than 7 basis points at 5.22%, while the 30-year yield fell 13 basis points to 5.60%.

The moves followed a strong auction of 30-year Treasury bonds.

The rise in yields has added to volatility in equities, particularly as investors assess whether higher energy prices could keep inflation elevated and lead to further interest-rate increases.

Markets currently expect the Federal Reserve to leave rates unchanged this month, while the probability of a December rate hike is nearly 70%, according to CME’s FedWatch tool.

Fed Governor Christopher Waller has said further rate increases will probably be necessary, although the timing remains flexible.

Other stocks move on company news

Outside the technology sector, PepsiCo shares gained after the company said it would pursue additional spending cuts while lowering its annual core profit forecast.

Starbucks shares edged lower following reports that the coffee chain was exploring a potential acquisition of Chipotle Mexican Grill. Chipotle shares jumped on the report.

The post Dow holds steady as Nasdaq falls 1.24% on AI stocks, oil surge appeared first on Invezz

Ethereum cryptocurrency can be expected to fall further toward the next support level 2355.00 (which reversed the price multiple times in September).

  • Ethereum broke support zone
  • Likely to fall to support level 2355.00

Ethereum cryptocurrency continues to fall after the earlier breakout of the support zone between the support level 2500.00 (former strong resistance from the end of August, as can be seen from the daily Ethereum chart below) and the support trendline of the daily up channel from August. The breakout of this support zone accelerated the active minor impulse wave c of the ABC correction 4 – which started earlier with the daily Japanese candlesticks reversal pattern Shooting Star from the resistance level 2780.00.

Given the increasingly bearish sentiment seen across the crypto markets today, with persistent outflows from the US spot Ethereum ETFs, Ethereum cryptocurrency can be expected to fall further toward the next support level 2355.00 (which reversed the price multiple times in September and the target price for the completion of the active correction 4).

The subject matter and the content of this article are solely the views of the author. FinanceFeeds does not bear any legal responsibility for the content of this article and they do not reflect the viewpoint of FinanceFeeds or its editorial staff.

The information does not constitute advice or a recommendation on any course of action and does not take into account your personal circumstances, financial situation, or individual needs. We strongly recommend you seek independent professional advice or conduct your own independent research before acting upon any information contained in this article.

Consumers today are feeling squeezed from multiple directions. 

Food prices continue to rise, gasoline is getting more expensive, and even shoppers who have avoided making major changes to their spending are being forced to pay closer attention to where every dollar goes.

The latest Consumer Price Index data underscores the pressure. Overall consumer prices increased 3.4% over the 12 months through August, while food prices rose 2.7%.

Gasoline prices were an even bigger problem, jumping 3.9% in August alone and 27.4% from a year earlier. 

That environment makes a seemingly small change from Dollar General particularly interesting.

Dollar General is expanding same-day delivery through Instacart while allowing customers to pay the same product prices online that they would pay in its stores. 

The partnership initially covers about 7,000 Dollar General locations, with plans to reach roughly 20,000 stores this fall. 

Read more: Dollar General makes changes to cut shoplifting, shrink

Dollar General sees delivery as more than convenience

Delivery models commonly include a per-item markup. That’s the cost of that convenience. 

Dollar General clearly sees things differently.

The retailer has spent years building a footprint in rural and underserved communities, with more than 21,000 stores and roughly 75% of the U.S. population living within five miles of a location, as the company reported on its most recent earnings call. 

That physical presence gives Dollar General an unusual advantage when it comes to fulfilling local delivery orders. 

But the company isn’t treating delivery simply as a service for existing shoppers. Rather, it’s using it to attract new customers. 

And the company is opting to avoid markups to maintain the value proposition that’s likely to win more people over. 

During Dollar General’s most recent earnings call, CEO Todd Vasos said, “We estimate we have already seen more than 1 million new customers first engaged through our delivery and then become an in-store shopper at Dollar General.”

If that momentum continues, Dollar General could benefit financially even if it’s not charging extra for home delivery.

Dollar General is expanding its partnership with Instacart while keeping prices low for shoppers.

Image source: Shutterstock

The real value is keeping customers loyal

Offering delivery is a great way for Dollar General to keep up with competitors like Target and Walmart. 

But the company’s delivery expansion also protects its position as a convenient, low-cost neighborhood retailer.

The company said its delivery offerings are generating about 80% sales incrementality, meaning much of that business represents sales it might not otherwise capture. 

Vasos put the opportunity even more clearly on the earnings call. “Our delivery platforms are also becoming a more meaningful sales driver as digitally engaged and delivery customers are more than twice as productive as our non-digitally engaged customer,” he said.

More Retail:

For Dollar General, removing product markups could mean giving up some revenue per delivery order. But the potential payoff is greater customer acquisition, larger basket sizes, and stronger loyalty.

For shoppers facing higher grocery and gasoline bills, meanwhile, the benefit is simpler.

Getting Dollar General prices without having to make the trip could be one of the few conveniences that doesn’t make an already strained household budget even tighter.

Related: Albertsons, Dollar General can’t match Walmart’s grocery prices